live animal evaluation beef nick nelson blue mt. community college ans 231 originated by kenneth...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Live Animal EvaluationLive Animal EvaluationBeef Beef
Nick NelsonNick NelsonBlue Mt. Community CollegeBlue Mt. Community College
ANS 231ANS 231Originated by Originated by Kenneth GeunsKenneth Geuns
Michigan State UniversityMichigan State UniversityRevised 2009Revised 2009
![Page 2: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Fat IndicatorsFat Indicators
Tailhead & Pins
LastRibs
Brisket
Foreflank
Rear flank& Cod
![Page 3: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Steer 1Steer 1
![Page 4: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Steer 2Steer 2
![Page 5: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ComparisonComparison
Steer 1 - Choice Steer 2 - Standard
![Page 6: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Market Beef Muscle IndicatorsMarket Beef Muscle Indicators
Loin
Quarter/Rump
Forearm
Stifle
![Page 7: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Live Cattle EvaluationLive Cattle Evaluation
• Live Weight• Dressing Percentage• 12th rib fat• Rib Eye Area• Kidney, Pelvic, Heart fat (KPH)• Breed Influence • Quality Grade• Yield Grade
![Page 8: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WeightWeight
• Live or Carcass
• Live Weight range– 900 lb to 1500 lb– Avg: 1250 lb
• Carcass Weight range– 550 lb to 950 lb – 775 lb
![Page 9: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Dressing PercentageDressing Percentage
• Proportion of live weight that ends up as carcass
• Example: 1250 lb steer with a 775 lb carcass has a dressing percent of 62%
• Range: 55 - 67%
• Avg: 62%
![Page 10: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Factors Affecting Dressing %Factors Affecting Dressing %
• Gut Fill– Gut fill = Body Weight = Dressing %
• Hide weight and/or mud– Hide wt = Dressing %
• Muscle– Muscle = Dressing %
• Fat– Fat = Dressing %
• Dairy influence
![Page 11: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1212thth Rib Fat Rib Fat
• Highly correlated to retail yield
• Predictor of total carcass fatness
• Range: .15 in. to .80 in.
• Avg: .40
• .25 in. considered minimum
![Page 12: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Rib Eye AreaRib Eye Area
• Highly correlated with lean yield
• Predictor of total carcass muscle
• Dependant of carcass weight
• Range: 9.0 - 18.0 sq. in.
• Avg: 12.5 sq. in. for 1150 lb steer
• Rule of thumb: 1.1 sq. in. for 100 lb live wt
![Page 13: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
KPHKPH
• Internal fat as a percentage of carcass weight
• Continental cattle will tend to have less than British cattle
• Range: 1.0 - 4.5%
• Avg: 2.5%
![Page 14: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Breed InfluenceBreed Influence
The use of genetic data has helped increase the animals ability to grade, however not all breeds grade equally.
• English Breeds: most consistent• Continental: tend to lack marbling, bad
attitudes stress out marbling• Brahman: thicker hide; tend to be low
marbling, decreased dressing %• Dairy: tend to be lean, but marble well
![Page 15: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Quality GradeQuality Grade
• Assigned according to amount of marbling and bone maturity
• Most influential component of pricing
• Range: Standard to Prime
• Avg: Low Choice
![Page 16: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
USDA Quality GradesUSDA Quality Grades
![Page 17: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Factors Affecting Quality GradeFactors Affecting Quality Grade
• Genetics
• Age of cattle
• Time on feed
• Energy content of diet
• Fat cover
• Continental/ Brahman influence
![Page 18: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Yield GradeYield Grade
• Calculated to predict yield of boneless, closely trimmed, retail cuts from the round, loin, rib and chuck (BCTRC)
• Based on 4 estimations– 12th rib fat– Hot carcass weight (HCW) – Rib eye area (REA)– Kidney, pelvic, heart fat (KPH)
![Page 19: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a9ee755034643688b633c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Yield GradeYield Grade
• Range: 1 through 5– 1 = Lean and/or Muscular; High cutability– 5 = Fat and/or Light Muscled; Low cutability
• Avg: 3.0