lip course outline 2013

7/22/2019 Lip Course Outline 2013

1/9

I COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS

Session 1

A. IP in General: WHAT IS IP

Article 712, Articles 721-724, New Civil Code (Approved June 18,

1949)

Understanding Copyright and Related Rights (WIPO) http://

www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdf

Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO) http://www.wipo.int/

freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdf

Section 4, IP Code

ELIDAD C. KHO, doing business under the name and style of KEC

COSMETICS LABORATORY, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,

SUMMERVILLE GENERAL MERCHANDISING and COMPANY, and ANG

TIAM CRAY, [G.R. No. 115758. March 19, 2002.]

JESSIE G. CHING, petitioner, vs. WILLIAM M. SALINAS, SR., ET AL,

respondents. [G.R. No. 161295.June 29, 2005]

Section 14, Article XII, Sections 10, 13, 15 and 16, Article XIV,

Philippine Constitution

Section 2, IP Code

Rodriguez N F, TODAYS CHALLENGE: PROTECTING COPYRIGHT IN THE

INTERNET, 57 Ateneo L J 1117 (2013)

B. Copyright: WHAT WORKS ARE PROTECTED; WHAT WORKS ARE NOT

Section 172-176, IP Code

FRANCISCO G. JOAQUIN, JR., and BJ PRODUCTIONS, INC. vs.

HONORABLE FRANKLIN DRILON, GABRIEL ZOSA, WILLIAM ESPOSO,

FELIPE MEDINA, JR., and CASEY FRANCISCO, [G.R. No. 108946. January28, 1999.]

FILIPINO SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, INC.,

vs. BENJAMIN TAN [G.R. No. L-36402. March 16, 1987.]

COURSE OUTLINE

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 2013

Atty. N. F. Rodriguez, Jr.

Page 1 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/895/wipo_pub_895.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.pdf


2/9

Session 2

A. Copyright: Economic Rights and Moral Rights

Berne Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne )

WIPO Copyright Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/

index.html )

Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement

(TRIPS) (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm ) Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) Section 177, IP Code

Sections 200-201, IP Code


B. Related or Neighboring Rights

Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) Sections 202-212, IP Code

Rome Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/rome )

WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/

treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.html )

C. Ownership and Transfer of Copyright



RA 9239

Session 3

A. Limitations on Copyright: Periods of Protection


B. Limitations on Copyright: Free and Fair Use


COURSE OUTLINE



Page 2 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/bernehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne


3/9

Session 4

Infringement

Sections 216-220, IP Code Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013) A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES Rep Act No. 9239 Rep Act No. 10088 PEARL & DEAN (PHIL.), INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs. SHOEMART,

INCORPORATED, and NORTH EDSA MARKETING, INCORPORATED, [G.R.

No. 148222. August 15, 2003.] PACITA I. HABANA, ALICIA L. CINCO and JOVITA N. FERNANDO vs.

FELICIDAD C. ROBLES and GOODWILL TRADING CO., INC., [G.R. No.

131522. July 19, 1999.] 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. COURT OF

APPEALS, EDUARDO M. BARRETO, RAUL SAGULLO and FORTUNE

LEDESMA, [G.R. Nos. L-76649-51. August 19, 1988.] COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC. vs. COURT OF APPEALS, SUNSHINE HOME

VIDEO, INC. and DANILO A. PELINDARIO, [G.R. No. 110318. August

28, 1996.] SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (PHILS.), INC. and IFPI (SOUTHEAST

ASIA), LTD., vs. HON. JUDGE DOLORES L. ESPANOL, AND SOLID

LAGUNA CORPORATION [G.R. No. 156804, March 14, 2005]

Session 5

A. Scope of Application and Institution of Actions



B. The Digital Environment: WIPO Treaties

Rep Act No. 10372 (February 28, 2013)

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 3 of 9 pages

_________________________________


4/9

Rodriguez N F, TODAYS CHALLENGE: PROTECTING COPYRIGHT IN THE

INTERNET, 57 Ateneo L J 1117 (2013) SONY CORP. OF AMER. v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., 464 U.S. 417

(1984) (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?

court=us&vol=464&invol=417 )

Electronic Frontier Foundation: The Betamax Case (http://w2.ef.org/

legal/cases/betamax/ )

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. ET AL. v. GROKSTER, LTD., ET

AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 04.480. Argued March 29, 2005.Decided June 27,

2005 (http://www.copyright.gov/docs/mgm/opinion.pdf)

Electronic Frontier Foundation: MGM versus Grokster (http://

w2.ef.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/ )

Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement

(TRIPS) (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm )

Berne Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne )

Rome Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/rome )

WIPO Copyright Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/

index.html )

WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (http://www.wipo.int/

treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.html )

Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1988 (http://www.copyright.gov/

legislation/dmca.pdf)

!! TRADEMARKS

Session 6

A. What are Trademarks?

Sections 121-122, IP Code Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO) ELIDAD C. KHO, doing business under the name and style of KEC

COSMETICS LABORATORY, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,

SUMMERVILLE GENERAL MERCHANDISING and COMPANY, and ANG TIAM

CRAY, [G.R. No. 115758. March 19, 2002.]

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 4 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/bernehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/bernehttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdfhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wppt/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/index.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/romehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/bernehttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/bernehttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htmhttp://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/http://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/http://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/http://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/http://www.copyright.gov/docs/mgm/opinion.pdfhttp://www.copyright.gov/docs/mgm/opinion.pdfhttp://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417


5/9

PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI vs. COURT OF APPEALS, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and

the BARBIZON CORPORATION [G.R. No. 114508. November 19, 1999.] Paris Convention (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris )

B. Registrability

Section 123, IP Code

Strength of Trademarks (http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/

degrees.html)

Abercrombie and Fitch v Hunting World (http://bulk.resource.org/

courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.html )

ANA L. ANG, petitioner, vs. TORIBIO TEODORO, respondent. [G.R. No.

48226. December 14, 1942.]

MASSO HERMANOS, S. A., petitioner, vs. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS,

respondent. [G.R. No. L-3952. December 29, 1953.]

THE EAST PACIFIC MERCHANDISING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs.

THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and LUIS P. PELLICER, respondents. G.R.

No. L-14377. December 29, 1960.]

PHILIPPINE REFINING CO., INC., petitioner, vs. NG SAM and THE

DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, respondents. [G.R. No. L-26676. July 30,

1982.]

CONVERSE RUBBER CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. UNIVERSAL RUBBER

PRODUCTS, INC. and TIBURCIO S. EVALLE, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS,

[G.R. No. L-27906. January 8, 1987.]

EMERALD GARMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs.

HON. COURT OF APPEALS, BUREAU OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER and H.D. LEE COMPANY, INC., respondents.

[G.R. No. 100098. December 29, 1995.]

SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A. and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC.,

petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and CFC CORPORATION,

respondents. [G.R. No. 112012. April 4, 2001.]

ARCE SONS AND COMPANY, petitioner, vs. SELECTA BISCUIT

COMPANY, INC, ET AL., respondents. [G.R. No. L-14761. January 28,1961.]; [G.R. No. 17981. January 28, 1961.]

ANDRES ROMERO, petitioner, vs. MAIDEN FORM BRASSIERE CO., INC.

and THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, respondents. [G.R. No. L-18289.

March 31, 1964.]

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 5 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/parishttp://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/537/537.F2d.4.21.74-2540.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/degrees.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/parishttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris


6/9

CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and NSR

RUBBER CORPORATION, respondents. [G.R. No. 120900. July 20,2000.]

Session 7

A. Trademark Rights Conferred


B. Registration Procedure; Application; Nice Classification; Declaration of Actual

Use; Disclaimers; Priority Right Examination and Publication; Opposition;

Registration; Cancellation

Section 124-144

Post-Registration Procedure


Session 8

A. Infringement, Unfair Competition, etc.


A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES

LA CHEMISE LACOSTE, S. A., petitioner, vs. HON. OSCAR C.

FERNANDEZ, Presiding Judge of Branch XLIX, Regional Trial Court,

National Capital Judicial Region, Manila and GOBINDRAM HEMANDAS,

respondents. [G.R. Nos. 63796-97. May 21, 1984.]

DEL MONTE CORPORATION and PHILIPPINE PACKING CORPORATION,petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and SUNSHINE SAUCE

MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, respondents. [G.R. No. 78325. January

25, 1990.

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 6 of 9 pages

_________________________________


7/9

ASIA BREWERY, INC. petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS and

SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, respondents. [G.R. No. 103543. July 5,1993.]

MCDONALDS CORPORATION v. L.C. BIG MAK BURGER, INC., [G.R. No.

143993, August 18, 2004]

COCA-COLA BOTTLERS, PHILS., INC. (CCBPI), Naga Plant, petitioner, vs.

QUINTIN J. GOMEZ, a.k.a. "KIT" GOMEZ and DANILO E. GALICIA, a.k.a.

"DANNY GALICIA", respondents. [G.R. No. 154491. November 14,

2008.]

B. Domain Names

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/faq/domains.html

PATENTS

Session 9

A. What are Patents?

Section 21, 71, IP Code;

Rep Act No. 9168;

Rep Act No. 9150

B. Understanding Industrial Property (WIPO)

Session 10

A. Patentability

Section 23, 24, 25 26, 27, 28;

B. Rights Conferred

Section 28, 29, 30, 71, IP Code

C. Registration Procedure

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 7 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/faq/domains.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/faq/domains.htmlhttp://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/faq/domains.html


8/9


D. Cancellation

Section 61-65

Session 12

A. Infringement of Patent; Rights and Remedies

Sections 67-84

A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY RIGHTS CASES

SMITH KLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. THE

HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and TRYCO PHARMA CORPORATION,

respondents.

LOTHAR SCHUARTZ, et al., petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF

APPEALS (SPECIAL FIFTH DIVISION) and THE BUREAU OF PATENTS,

TRADEMARKS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, respondents.

KENNETH ROY SAVAGE/K ANGELIN EXPORT TRADING, owned andmanaged by GEMMA DEMORAL-SAVAGE, petitioners, vs. JUDGE

APRONIANO B. TAYPIN, Presiding Judge, RTC-BR. 12, Cebu City, CEBU

PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, NATIONAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION, Region VII, Cebu City, JUANITA NG MENDOZA,

MENDCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ALFREDO SABJON and DANTE

SOSMENA, respondents.

CRESER PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS

AND FLORO INTERNATIONAL CORP., respondents.

ANGELITA MANZANO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, and MELECIA

MADOLARIA, as Assignor to NEW UNITED FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING

CORPORATION, respondents.

Session 13

COURSE OUTLINE



Page 8 of 9 pages

_________________________________


9/9

A. Industrial Designs and Utility Models



B. Trade Secrets

What is a Trade Secret? (http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/

trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm )

C. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSMISSION OF RIGHTS


COURSE OUTLINE



Page 9 of 9 pages

_________________________________
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htmhttp://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htmhttp://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htmhttp://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm

lip course outline 2013

Documents