linguistic and geographical co-occurrence constraints on /r/ and /g/ in dutch dialects ton goeman...
TRANSCRIPT
Linguistic and geographical Linguistic and geographical co-occurrence constraints on co-occurrence constraints on /r/ and /g/ in Dutch dialects /r/ and /g/ in Dutch dialects
Ton Goeman
(Meertens Institute Amsterdam)
Hans Van de Velde
(Université Libre de Bruxelles)
Based on a new dialect surveyBased on a new dialect survey
A. Dutch-Flemish Dialect Conference 1975
B. Lacuna’s in phonological and morphological dialect knowledge
C. Structure of changing dialects at the end of the 20th century
D. Fieldwork
–
HOW?HOW? A. Questionnaire & transcriptions in narrow
IPA
B. Localities– 410 localities in the Netherlands– 210 localities in Belgium– 52 localities in the province of Friesland
C. Collaboration– Meertens Instituut / Ghent / Leuven / Groningen /
Fryske Akademy / Free University Amsterdam
Results fieldwork 1982-1992Results fieldwork 1982-1992
Transcriptions entered in databank:
• Netherlands: 365 localities; 25 by Groningen: Drente• Belgium: 189 localities• Total: 554
– Friesland: 23 localities only fragmentarily
Distribution
of the 554 localities
Phonology: what?Phonology: what?
Vocalism:– Long (also historically long)– Short (id.)– Diphthongs (id.)
With & without front mutation factor
Open & closed syllables
Vocalism (cont.)Vocalism (cont.)Before all rhyme positions (voiced &
voiceless ):– -t/d, s/z, p/b, f/v, k, ch/g, l, r, n, m, w, j,
morpheme final, st/sp/sk, ts/ps/ks, ft/cht,– r+t/d, r+s/z, r+labial, l+velar, r+l, r+n, r+m– n+t/d, n+s/z, m+p, ng(+velar)– l+alveolar, l+labial, l+velar, l+m– l+CC, r+CC, n+CC
Consonants wordinitially (before Consonants wordinitially (before different vowels)different vowels)New with respect to past projects:
– Completeness– Unknown state of affairs: e.g.:
pronunciation of / g /: ‘soft’ g en ‘harsh’ g
• Not transcribed in the past• Not retraceable by postal questionnaire
• Example as making part of future volume of FAND: ‘g’ in geven ‘give’: __[-back]
/ƒ/ in ‘geven’
Fieldwork Amsterdam Leuven
Gent Groningen
Total: 1878 wordforms, Total: 1878 wordforms, wordgroups or sentenceswordgroups or sentences
286 wordforms with / g /76 wordinitial wordforms with / r /62 wordfinal wordforms with / r /
Items chosen for /r/Items chosen for /r/Initial / r /
– riem ‘belt’ / i / regen ‘rain’ / e. /, rest ‘rest’ / E /, rood ‘red’ / o. /
Initial / r / cluster– vroeg ‘early’ / u /, groen ‘green’, droog ‘dry’ /o./,
groot ‘great’ /o./Final / r /
– bier ‘beer / i. /’, weer ‘anew’ / e. /, meer ‘more’, zwaar ‘heavy’ / a, /, zuur ‘sour’ / y /, duur ‘expensive’ / y /
Items chosen for /g/Items chosen for /g/
Initial (/ I , e. , E , a , A, ç , o. , u /)– gisteren ‘yesterday’, geel ‘yellow’, geven ‘give,
geld ‘money’, gapen ‘yawn’, gaan ‘go’, gal ‘bile’, god ‘god’, goot ‘gutter, goed ‘good’
Final (/ e. , E, u /)– deeg ‘pastry’, weg ‘way, vroeg ‘early’
Overall frequency of variants and Overall frequency of variants and geographical distributiongeographical distribution
Frequencies of variants may be more or less the same when the whole linguistic area is taken into account
• tables
However, the distribution of variants may differ when we look at their geographical spread
• maps
riem ‘belt’ regen ‘rain’ rest ‘id.’ rood ‘red’
alv. tap (tap) 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.10
apical trill (atr) 0.61 0.62 0.56 0.67
uv. trill (uvt) 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.14
uv. fric. (uvf) 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06
Table 1 NetherlandsPercent of r-variants > 4 wordinitially
Before high front vowel
Before front vowels
Before back vowel
bier‘beer’
weer‘anew’
meer ‘more zwaar‘heavy
zuur‘sour’
duur‘expensive’
alv. tap (tap) 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.10 0.10
apical trill (atr) 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.21 0.24 0.48
velar fric. (vef) 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
velar appr.(vap) 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.02
uv. trill (uvt) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10
uv. fric. (uvf) 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.09
sjwa 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.08
r-color (voc) 0.05 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.06
Table 2 NetherlandsPercent of r-variants > 4 wordfinally
After high front vowel
After front vowels
After low front vowel
After front rounded vowels
vroeg ‘early’ droog ‘dry’ groen ‘green’ groot ‘great’
alv. tap (tap) 0.15 0.13 0.16 0.16
apical trill (atr) 0.62 0.62 0.58 0.59
uv. trill (uvt) 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.13
uv. fric. (uvf) 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08
Table 3 NetherlandsPercent of r-variants > 5 initial clusters
After back vowels
gisteren‘yesterday’
geel‘yellow’
geven‘give’
geld‘money’N
goot ‘gutter’N
palatal (pal) 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.32 0.25
velar (vel) 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.54 0.64
uvular (uv) 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06
faryng. (far) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
h 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.04
gapen ‘yawn’ gaan ‘go’ gal ‘bile’ god ‘god’ goed ‘goed’
palatal (pal) 0.16 0.15 0.19 0.15 0.17
velar (vel) 0.68 0.69 0.64 0.67 0.67
uvular (uv) 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05
faryng. (far) 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
h 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12
Table 4 Netherlands and Belgium (N=Netherlands only)Percent of g-variants > 4 wordinitially
Different realisations of ‘palatal’ /g /
Goeman (1999)
Before front vowel
Before front vowels
Before / E / and / o. /
(back variants of / a / e.g. in the east)
Back vowels
deeg ‘pastry’ weg ‘way’ vroeg ‘early’
pal 0.41 0.32 0.29
vel 0.50 0.60 0.57
uv 0.05 0.07 0.06
zero 0.02
Table 5 NetherlandsPercent of g-variants > 4 wordfinally
Front ~back vowels
/ r / versus / g / word initially/ r / versus / g / word initially
Front vowels
/ r / versus / g / word finally/ r / versus / g / word finally
Front vowels
Conclusions for / r / and / g /Conclusions for / r / and / g /– Regions with velar g show also apical r– Regions with palatal g show uvular R
• But not in the North East• Not word finally in North Holland
– Regions with extremely fronted /g/ are kernel regions with uvular R
– Initially• Region with faryngeal~h g show apical r
– Finally• Region with velar g show apical r
– In Zealand
Conclusions specific for / g /Conclusions specific for / g /
Word finally, allophonic distribution is more clear than word initially
Sometimes word specificContrary to the Standard Language,
uvular / g / is in the minority in the dialects
Conclusions specific for / r / Conclusions specific for / r / compared to / g /compared to / g /Initially, no allophonic vowel
distribution effects for / r /• Cfr. Van Reenen
– While light allophonic vowel distribution effects for for / g /
South and East /R/ from Germany– Cfr. Van Reenen (Cologne?)
– While palatal / g / autochtonous (or from Cologne?)
– Cfr. for Cologne Weijnen
geel geld goed groen groot vroeg weg deeg droog echtbilabial 0.6 0.6pharyngal 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.6 3.1h 3.7 4.3 2.8 0.3labiodental 0.3nul 2.6palatal 33.0 32.7 31.5 28.7 25.6 30.4 33.5 42.6 31.8 34.1schwa 0.3uvular 6.3 5.1 6.5 6.5 6.3 6.5 7.4 5.1 4.8 6.8velar 55.4 56.5 57.4 61.9 64.8 59.1 58.8 52.0 35.8 58.8missing 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 27.0 0.3
Realization of (g)
bier duur meer weer zuur zwaar regen rest riem rood vroeg droog groen groot
aap 0.3 0.6 3.1atr 51.4 49.4 46.9 48.9 25.3 21.9 64.2 59.1 63.1 66.5 63.9 64.2 60.5 61.6
nul 0.6 1.4 0.9 0.3
paf 0.3ret 0.9 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.3
rtr 1.1 1.1 0.9
sjw 10.2 8.2 10.2 6.3 37.8 38.1sui 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3
tap 10.8 10.2 11.4 11.9 10.2 8.2 11.1 12.5 11.6 10.5 15.3 13.6 16.8 16.8
uvf 7.7 9.4 6.0 8.8 7.7 8.5 8.2 7.1 8.0 6.5 8.5 8.0 7.4 8.0uvt 10.2 9.9 8.8 9.4 9.9 9.7 12.8 13.9 14.2 14.2 12.2 13.6 14.5 13.1
vap 0.9 2.0 4.3 6.8 1.4 2.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.3
vef 2.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 2.6 1.1voc 5.7 6.5 8.0 4.0 5.1 6.0
gg 0.9 2.7 2.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 4.8 0.3
Realization of (r)
(r)CrV (r)final (g)initial (g)final(r)initial .96 .88 -.40 -.32(r)CrV .89 -.42 -.34(r)final -.41 -.34(g)initial .86
Correlation Coefficientsall correlations are significant, p<.001
Fieldwork, IPA transcriptions or Fieldwork, IPA transcriptions or data entry/correction Amsterdamdata entry/correction Amsterdam
– J. Aben, B. van den Berg, J. Buitenhuis, D. Coppes, J. Daan, M. Engelen, M. Fransen, L. Gijsbers, T. Goeman, R. Hofstee, E. van Houten, T. de Jong, I. Kemperman-van Driel, A. Klaassen, M. Klamer, G. Kocks, J. Kruijssen, Lutz, E. Matthijs, M. van Mulken, A. Ottow-Kolman, B. Pijn, S. van der Ree, P. van Reenen, K. van Reenen-Stein, A. de Reus, J. de Rooij, M. Schellevis, M. Stols, H. Veenhof-Haan, P. Veerman, P. van Vliet, A. de Vries, C. van Zaanen