limited hazardous materials survey report

Limited Hazardous Materials SurveyReport

Contra Costa Community College – Applied Arts BuildingChiller Replacement Project2600 Mission BellSan Pablo, California

RGA Project No: R1167404

June 29, 2016

Prepared for:

Contra Costa Community College District500 Court StreetMartinez, California 94553

Prepared by:

RGA Environmental, Inc.1466 66th StreetEmeryville, CA 94608

Report prepared by: Brad WallenbergIndustrial Hygienist, CSST 13-5068

Report reviewed by: Kenneth PilgrimDepartment Manager, CAC 03-3503

Table of Contents1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1

2. Scope of Work .................................................................................................................... 3

3. Methods and Sampling Strategy ...................................................................................... 3

4. Asbestos Results ................................................................................................................. 5

5. Lead Results ....................................................................................................................... 5

7. Regulatory Requirements ................................................................................................. 6

8. Recommendations to Implement Regulatory Requirements ........................................ 8

9. Limitations.......................................................................................................................... 9

Appendices

1. Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody - Asbestos

2. Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody – Lead

3. Sample Location Figure

4. Inspector Certificates

Limited Hazardous MaterialsSurvey ReportContra Costa CollegeApplied Arts Building2600 Mission Bell DriveSan Pablo, California1. Executive Summary

The following is a report of the limited hazardous materials survey conducted byRemington Caldwell, California Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) and CaliforniaDepartment of Public Health (CDPH) Inspector Assessor with RGA Environmental, ATerracon Company, (RGA). The survey was performed on June 13, 2016 in the AppliedArts Building of the Contra Costa College Campus located at 2600 Mission Bell Drive inSan Pablo, California.

The scope of the survey was to identify hazardous materials including asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs) and lead containing paint with the potential to be impactedby the Chiller Replacement Project as depicted in drawing set dated June 13, 2016 andprovided by the District. The survey area was limited to building areas and materials withthe potential to be disturbed by the planned project.

During the survey, eight (8) homogenous suspect ACMs were identified. Three (3) of thehomogeneous suspect ACMs tested positive for asbestos content.

Nine (9) painted finishes were sampled for potential lead content. Two (2) of the paintedmaterials sampled were reported above the laboratory detection limit for lead.

Table I summarizes the materials identified as ACMs. Table II summarizes the materialsthat were determined to be negative for asbestos content. Table III summarizes the leadconcentrations of the materials sampled.

Limited Hazardous Materials SurveyApplied Arts Building – C1067 – Chiller ReplacementContra Costa CollegeSan Pablo, California

Page 3

2. Scope of Work

The scope of the survey was as follows:

· Inspect the survey area for the presence of suspect ACMs and lead-containing paintwith the potential to be impacted by the planned Chiller Replacement project.

· Collect a representative number of samples of suspect ACMs following the NationalEmissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) protocol for samplecollection for a renovation survey. Analyze asbestos bulk samples using polarizedlight microscopy (PLM) in accordance with EPA’s July 1993 method for thedetermination of asbestos in bulk building materials - EPA 600/R-93/116.

· Collect paint chip samples of the primary painted surfaces within the survey areasuspected to be lead containing for purposes of compliance with CaliforniaDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) Lead in ConstructionStandard. Bulk samples and paint chips were analyzed at an accredited laboratory byFlame Atomic Absorption (AA) for Total Lead reported in parts per million (ppm).

· Submit written report including analytical results, regulatory requirements,conclusions and recommendations.

3. Methods and Sampling Strategy

Visual InspectionAccessible materials were visually inspected in the survey area using the methodspresented in the federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations(40 CFR, Part 763) as a guideline. AHERA was originally only applicable to schools,however state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) andAsbestos School Hazard Abatement and Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) have adoptedthe AHERA sampling methodology for all buildings subject to demolition or renovation.

Bulk Sampling of AsbestosBulk samples of all suspect ACM homogeneous materials were collected. Ahomogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, ormiscellaneous material that is uniform in color, texture and age of construction. Examplesof homogeneous materials include:

· Pipe-insulation produced by the same manufacturer and installed during the sametime period;

· Resilient flooring of identical color and pattern;

· Troweled on surfacing materials located in contiguous areas.

Limited Hazardous Materials SurveyChiller ReplacementContra Costa CollegeSan Pablo, California

Page 4

The survey area was visually inspected for the presence of suspect materials. Asmaterials were identified, bulk samples were obtained with the aid of a coring device orother hand tool and placed into individual sampling bags. Each sample was given adiscrete identification number and recorded on field notes as well as chain-of-custodyforms. Refer to accompanying tables and appendices for details on material samplelocations and results. Bulk samples were transported to EMLab P&K (EML) in SouthSan Francisco, California.

Bulk Sampling of Suspect Lead Containing MaterialsPaint chip and/or suspected lead containing materials were collected using a hand scraperand were placed into individual plastic sampling containers. Each sample was provided adiscreet sample number, which was recorded on a chain-of-custody form. Samples weretransported to QuanTEM Laboratories (QuanTEM) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma foranalysis.

Bulk Sample Analysis - AsbestosEML is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology's NationalVoluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for determination of asbestosfibers in bulk materials.

All samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) techniques inaccordance with methodology approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). As set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A toSubpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4, the lower limit of reliability detection for asbestosusing the PLM method is approximately one percent (1%) by volume. Cal-OSHA definesasbestos containing construction materials (ACCM) as those materials having asbestoscontent of greater than one tenth of one percent (>0.1%).

When None Detected (ND) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning noasbestos was observed in the sample material above the reliable limit of detection for thePLM method.

Note: under EPA assessment criteria, if a single sample of a homogeneous material testspositive for asbestos, all homogeneous materials within that building are considered to beasbestos containing.

Bulk Sample Analysis – LeadAll paint samples were analyzed for lead content using the Flame Atomic Absorptionspectroscopy in accordance to EPA Method SW846-3050B-7000B. When “<” appears inthe lead sample report, it should be interpreted as meaning below analytical detectionlimit.


Page 5

4. Asbestos Results

During the survey, eight (8) homogenous suspect ACMs were identified. Three (3) of thehomogeneous suspect ACMs tested positive for asbestos content. One (1) material wasassumed to be asbestos containing. All identified ACMs are listed below in Table Ibelow.

TABLE IASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Material Description Material Location WasteCategory Asbestos Type

EstimatedQuantity

Sealant, White Cooling Tower – Flange sealant Cat. II 2% CH 20 sf

Flange Gaskets Cooling Tower, Chiller andMechanical Room Cat. I 30 - 70% CH 15 gaskets

Off-WhiteMastic/Sealant

Chiller and Mechanical Rooms –Applied on Fiberglass PipeInsulation – Ends and at ValveBodies

Cat. II 2% CH 25 sf

NA = Not Applicable, CH = Chrysotile, RACM = Regulated asbestos containing material (friable), Cat. I = Non-friable (note ACMmust be reclassified as a RACM if rendered friable during removal), Cat. II = Category II Non-friable (note ACM must be reclassifiedas a RACM if rendered friable during removal), sf = square feet

The materials that were reported as negative for asbestos content are listed in Table IIbelow.

TABLE IINON-ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Material Description Material Location(s)

Silver Paint Chiller Tower

Stucco Wall Chiller Room

Concrete Pad Chiller and Mechanical Rooms

Wallboard with Joint Compound Chiller and Mechanical Rooms

Green Neoprene Glue Chiller Room

5. Lead Results

Nine (9) painted finishes were sampled for potential lead content. Two (2) of the paintedmaterials sampled were reported above the laboratory detection limit for lead. Table IIIbelow summarizes the sampling locations and results for the materials.


Page 6

TABLE IIILEAD SAMPLE RESULTS

Sample Number Description/Location of Sample Results (ppm)

Pb-01 Silver Paint on Metal on Chiller Tower <49.4

Pb-02 Tan Paint on Stucco Wall in Chiller Room <48.8

Pb-03 Tan Paint on Metal on Door of ChillerRoom 825

Pb-04 Green Paint on Metal on Equipment of ChillerRoom <49.8

Pb-05 Blue Paint on Metal Pipe in Chiller Room <49.8

Pb-06 Grey Paint on Drywall in Chiller Room <49.6

Pb-07 Grey Paint on Concrete Floor of Mechanicaland Chiller Room <49.5

Pb-08 White Caulk on Metal on Flange of ChillerTower <49.1

Pb-09 Green Paint on Neoprene in Chiller Room 522ppm = parts per million

7. Regulatory Requirements

Asbestos

Building materials within the survey area contain asbestos in concentrations greater thanone tenth of one percent (0.1%). Impacting materials containing greater than 0.1%asbestos either through repair, maintenance, renovation or demolition activities triggersnumerous regulations enforced by such agencies as OSHA (worker protection) and EPA(environmental exposure, transportation and disposal).

Listed below are the regulations that apply if the materials are removed:

· Any individual who contracts to provide health and safety services relating to ACMsmust be certified by Cal-OSHA as either a Certified Asbestos Consultant or a SiteSurveillance Technician. The activities they are certified to provide include:conducting asbestos surveys; writing work plans or specifications for abatement;monitoring the work of abatement contractors; collecting air samples; anddetermining if the work area is safe for re-occupancy by non-asbestos workers.Regulation: Cal-OSHA 8 CCR 1529 (q)(1).

· If more than 100 square feet of materials that contain greater than 0.1% asbestos willbe abated, they must be abated by a Cal-OSHA registered asbestos abatementcontractor. Regulation: Cal-OSHA 8 CCR 1529 (R).


Page 7

· ACMs that are classified by OSHA as other/miscellaneous materials are present.Removal of these materials is considered a Class II activity according to Cal-OSHAregulations. Work practices and engineering controls for Class II work are specifiedin Cal-OSHA 8 CCR 1529 (g) (7-8).

· If more than 100 square feet or 100 linear feet of friable ACM will likely be removed,the abatement contractor must notify the Bay Area Air Quality Management Districtten (10) days prior to removing the material. Regulation: BAAQMD Regulation 11,Rule 2.

· Friable ACMs greater than 1% asbestos must be manifested, transported, anddisposed of as hazardous waste in accordance with the Department of Toxic andSubstances Control (DTSC), a division of Cal-EPA. DTSC regulates disposal ofasbestos waste. DTSC issues U.S. EPA hazardous waste generator identificationnumbers.

Lead-Containing Materials

Lead-containing paint was identified during the survey. Impacting lead-containingmaterials either through renovation or demolition activities triggers numerous regulationsenforced by such agencies as OSHA (worker protection), EPA (environmental exposure,transportation and disposal), and Department of Public Health (DPH).

Listed below are the regulations that apply if the lead containing materials are impactedduring renovation activities:

· Federal OSHA as well as California OSHA regulates all worker exposure duringconstruction activities that impact lead-containing materials. California OSHAenforces the Lead in Construction Standard in Title 8 CCR 1532.1. The scope coversconstruction work where employees may be exposed to lead during such activities asdemolition, removal, surface preparation for re-painting, renovation, clean-up androutine maintenance. The OSHA specified method of compliance includes respiratoryprotection, protective clothing and equipment, housekeeping, hygiene facilities,medical surveillance, and training, among other requirements.

· California OSHA requires Department of Public Health Lead-Related Constructiontraining if any lead related construction work in public buildings will exceed OSHA’spermissible exposure limit (PEL) for lead.

· Disposal of all lead-containing paint and bulk materials is regulated at concentrationsat or exceeding 1,000 ppm as stated in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part263 - Land Disposal Regulations and Title 22, Division 4 Environmental Health ofthe California Administrative Code. Lead containing materials that exceed 50 ppmmust be additionally analyzed to determine possible waste disposal restrictions withrespect to lead. However, lead related work at any lead concentration is regulatedunder the OSHA statutes.


Page 8

8. Recommendations to Implement Regulatory Requirements

Asbestos

· Develop a performance abatement specification or work plan for the removal orimpact of the ACMs identified in the survey that will likely be disturbed by theplanned seismic improvement project. The purpose of an abatement specification isto clearly define the scope of work for more competitive and accurate bidding as wellas to reduce the number of costly delays and change orders during the project.

· Conduct a pre-bid job-walk for abatement contractors in order to obtain the mostcompetitive pricing.

· Retain a Certified Asbestos Consultant or Site Surveillance Technician to provide on-site construction supervision of the asbestos abatement contractor to ensure utilizationof proper work practices as stated in the work plan or specification. The Consultantalso ensures that all local, state and federal regulations are followed and that theproject remains on schedule. The on-site Consultant generates documentation ofcontractor work practices and training, and asbestos air sampling results. The on-siteConsultant also ensures that all asbestos materials are removed by the abatementcontractor and properly manifested.

· Request the Asbestos Consultant to collect a sufficient number of air samples on adaily basis to validate that the abatement contractor is not causing any releases ofairborne asbestos fibers outside their work area.

· Request the Asbestos Consultant to visually review the work of the abatementcontractor to verify that all the ACMs are abated. If the work areas pass the visualclearance, then final air clearance samples are collected to ensure that the area is safefor re-occupancy, or unregulated work.

· Request a final written report outlining all activities that transpired throughout thecourse of the abatement project.

Lead-Containing PaintLead containing debris that will be landfilled should be classified as hazardous waste iflead waste concentrations exceed either the total lead concentration or soluble leadconcentration regulatory limits.

We recommend the following actions prior to the start of renovation:

· Use only trained workers for disturbance of building components containing lead.All demolition work should be performed in accordance with the OSHA Lead inConstruction Standard, Title 8 CCR 1532.1. Removal of lead-based paint should beperformed by Department of Public Health Lead Related Construction trainedworkers.


Page 9

· Worker exposure, environmental monitoring, and proper engineering controls shouldbe implemented throughout the lead related work.

· Contractor should adhere to OSHA and other applicable state and local regulationsfor worker protection, hazard communications, work practices, engineering controlsand proper waste disposal.

· Proper waste stream categorization is required for the disposal of lead-containingmaterials such as paint debris, ceramic tile, and painted building components (intact)in accordance with the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC). Thedisposal of lead-containing materials shall be coordinated with the landfill.

9. Limitations

RGA warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in generalaccordance with accepted professional practices as applied by similar professionals in thecommunity at the time of its preparation. Changes in the state of the art or in applicableregulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report.

The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail andscope to determine the presence of ACMs and lead-containing paint identified in thisreport. The testing results represent a limited survey. The survey was limited to areas andmaterials in the building that will likely be impacted by the planned project. Othersuspect asbestos and lead containing materials exist in the building that were not includedin the scope of this survey. Also, note that this is a survey report and not an abatementspecification. This document is not appropriate for competitive bidding or for use as anabatement specification.

Appendix 1

Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody - Asbestos

Approved by:

Approved SignatoryDr. Kamashwaran Ramanathan

Report for:

Ms. Karin SchroeterRGA Environmental, Inc.1466 66th StreetEmeryville, CA 94608

Regarding: Project: R1167404; Contre Costa College - C1067; 2600 Mission Bell, San Pablo, CAEML ID: 1554478

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:Asbestos PLM: 06-14-2016 and 06-15-2016

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA Methods 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020, SOP EM-AS-S-1267)

EMLab ID: 1554478, Page 1 of 7EMLab P&K, LLC

EMLab P&K6000 Shoreline Ct, Ste 205, So. San Francisco, CA 94080

(866) 888-6653 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.comClient: RGA Environmental, Inc.C/O: Ms. Karin SchroeterRe: R1167404; Contre Costa College - C1067; 2600 Mission Bell, San Pablo, CA

Date of Sampling: 06-13-2016Date of Receipt: 06-14-2016Date of Report: 06-15-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Total Samples Submitted: 24Total Samples Analyzed: 24

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 9

Location: 1A, Silver Paint - Chiller Tower - Metal Exterior Lab ID-Version‡: 7205427-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentSilver Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 1B, Silver Paint - Chiller Tower - Metal Fan Cover Lab ID-Version‡: 7205428-1



Location: 1C, Silver Paint - Chiller Tower - Metal - Elec. Box Lab ID-Version‡: 7205429-1



Location: 2A, White Flange Caulk - Chiller Tower - West Lab ID-Version‡: 7205430-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Caulk 2% Chrysotile



The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".




ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 2B, White Flange Caulk - Chiller Tower - North Lab ID-Version‡: 7205431-1



Location: 2C, White Flange Caulk - Chiller Tower - East Lab ID-Version‡: 7205432-1



Location: 3A, Stucco Wall - Chiller Tower Room - South Wall - Wall to be Inspected Lab ID-Version‡: 7205433-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Stucco ND


Location: 3B, Stucco Wall - Chiller Tower Room - South Wall - Wall to be Inspected Lab ID-Version‡: 7205434-1









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 3C, Stucco Wall - Exterior Wall - West Wall - Wall to be Inspected Lab ID-Version‡: 7205435-1



Location: 4A, Flange Gaskets - Valves - Chiller Tower - Flange Lab ID-Version‡: 7205436-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Gasket 50% Chrysotile


Location: 4B, Flange Gaskets - Valves - Chiller Rm - (Not Tower) Flange Lab ID-Version‡: 7205437-1



Location: 4C, Flange Gaskets - Mechanical Room - Valve Flange Lab ID-Version‡: 7205438-1









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 5A, Concrete Pad - Chiller Tower Rm Lab ID-Version‡: 7205439-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Concrete with Paint ND


Location: 5B, Concrete Pad - Chiller Rm Lab ID-Version‡: 7205440-1



Location: 5C, Concrete Pad - Mechanical Room - Pad Under Pump Lab ID-Version‡: 7205441-1



Location: 6A, Drywall/Joint Compound - Chiller Rm - Partition Lab ID-Version‡: 7205442-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentWhite Drywall ND

White Joint Compound NDTape ND

White Compound with Paint NDComposite Non-Asbestos Content: 20% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Good







ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 6B, Drywall/Joint Compound - Chiller Rm - Perimeter Wall (West) Lab ID-Version‡: 7205443-1




Location: 6C, Drywall/Joint Compound - Mech. Room Lab ID-Version‡: 7205444-1




Location: 7A, White and SI Mastic on End of Fiberglass and SI - Chiller Rm - CW Supply Lab ID-Version‡: 7205445-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentOff-White Mastic 2% Chrysotile


Location: 7B, White and SI Mastic on End of Fiberglass and SI - Chiller Rm - CW Return Lab ID-Version‡: 7205446-1


Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Glass FibersSample Composite Homogeneity: Good







ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 7C, White and SI Mastic on End of Fiberglass and SI - Mechanical Room - CW Supply - After Pump Lab ID-Version‡: 7205447-1



Location: 8A, Blk, Neoprene - Glue (Neoprene Painted Green) - Chiller Room - On Tank - (Part of Chiller Equipment) Lab ID-Version‡: 7205448-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Non-Fibrous Material with Paint ND


Location: 8B, Blk, Neoprene - Glue (Neoprene Painted Green) - Chiller Room - On Tank - (Part of Chiller Equipment) Lab ID-Version‡: 7205449-1



Location: 8C, Blk, Neoprene - Glue (Neoprene Painted Green) - Chiller Room - On Pipe - (Part of Chiller Equipment) Lab ID-Version‡: 7205450-1






Appendix 2

Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody - Lead

Acct. No.:

Project: Contra Costa College - C1067,21001

Location:

Project No.:

QuanTEM Set ID: 264975

Date Received: 06/14/16

Received By: Rachel Brooks

Date Sampled:

Time Sampled:

Date of Report: 6/15/2016

C018

Mission Bell, San Publo, CA

R1167404

Matrix Parameter Results Units MethodClient ID

QuanTEM

ID

Reporting

Limits

Date/Time

Analyzed

Environmental Chemistry Analysis Report

Client: RGA Environmental

K. Pilgrim

1466 66th Street

Emeryville, CA 94608

Analyst: CR

AIHA ID: 101352

Lead <0.00494 0.00494 % 06/15/16 16:15 P EPA 7000B (1)PaintPb-1001


Lead 0.0825 0.00493 % 06/15/16 16:15 P EPA 7000B (1)PaintPb-3003






Lead 0.00522 0.00488 % 06/15/16 16:15 P EPA 7000B (1)PaintPb-9009

Authorized Signature:_______________________________________________

Cherry Rossen, Technical Manager

Page 1 of 1

Note: Sample results have not been corrected for blank values.

This report applies only to the standards or procedures indicated and to the specific samples tested. It is not indicative of the qualities of apparently

identical or similar products or procedures, nor does it represent an ongoing assurance program unless so noted. These reports are for the exclusive use of

the client and are not to be reproduced without specific written permission. QuanTEM is not responsible for user-supplied data used in calculations.

Unless otherwise noted, upon receipt the condition of the sample was acceptable for analysis.

Wipe materials must meet ASTM E1792 criteria. Method detection limits and resultant reporting limits may not be valid for non-ASTM E1792 wipe

material.

EPA Method 7000B (1) = EPA 600/R-93/200 Preparation Modified. EPA 7000B Analysis Modified

EPA Method 7082 (2) = EPA 600/R-93/200 Preparation Modified. EPA 7082 Analysis Modified

Supplemental Report

QAQC Results

QA ID: 14232 Date: 6/15/2016

Test: Lead

Notes:

Matrix: Paint Approved By: Cherry Rossen

Date Approved: 6/15/2016

Blank Data:

Duplicate Data:

Recovery Data:

Standards Data:

Lab Number: 264975

Type of Blank Blank Value

0FCB

0ICB

0Matrix Blank

Sample Number Result Spike Level Result +

Spike

Dup. Result +

Spike

% Spike RPD% Recovery % Dup.

Recovery

2.000 1.6640.000 83.2264975-002

1.991 1.8190.000 1.91691.3 96.2 5.2LCS-P3

Standard Low Limit Obtained High Limit

4.5 5.54.6218CCV

4.5 5.54.6198FCV

0.9 1.11ICV

Page 1 of 1

Authorized Signature:_______________________________________________

Cherry Rossen, Technical Manager

Appendix 3

Sample Location Figure

Figure 1

Contra Costa Community CollegeSan Pablo, California

R1167404PROJECT NO.:Survey Date: 6/13/2016

Applied ArtsSample Locations

Not to Scale

N

Appendix 4

Inspector Certificates

limited hazardous materials survey report

Documents