lima declaration white paper on sustainable urban mobility in latin america
TRANSCRIPT
Luis R. Gutiérrez MUSAL Executive Secretary SIBRT General Secretary
Lima Declaration White Paper on Sustainable Urban Mobility in Latin America
Claudio Orrego Mayor of the Metropolitan Region of Santiago
Pro Tempore President
Presidents of MUSAL and SIBRT in Santiago de Chile, 2014-2016
Guillermo Muñoz Director of the Metropolitan Public Transport Directory
President
Lima, August 8 - 2014
For the first time in history, the cities of Latin America gathered in the name of urban mobility
Alcaldes y representantes do Distrito Federal do México –São Paulo – Rio de Janeiro – Buenos Aires – Quito – Lima – Bogotá – Santiago de Chile – La Paz – Curitiba – Guayaquil - Guadalajara – Leon - Pachuca – Cali –Trujillo – Bucaramanga – Pereira – Cuenca – Huancayo
Mayor of Lima, Susana Villarán
Mayor of Curitiba, Gustavo Fruet
SIBRT Honorary President,
Jaime Lerner
Head of Government of the Federal District of
Mexico, Miguel Ángel Mancera
Initiative Committee: Founder:
Support:
COMMITMENT FOR JOINT PERMANENT ACTION BY LATIN AMERICAN CITIES TO ACHIEVE HIGH-QUALITY URBAN MOBILITY FOR ALL Mobilize the societies and governments of each country so that urban mobility will be recognized as a fundamental social right of the populations that they represent, establishing duly integrated legal, institutional, and state public policy frameworks that satisfactorily address people’s aspirations for happy, healthy, safe and successful lives in high-quality competitive cities.
Initially 16 cities signed on to the Declaration, however, other cities also sent letters of support.
• LAC is 85% urbanized • Car dependency causes approximately 7
million deaths per year (PAHO/WHO): • 3.3 million deaths by air pollution • 1.3 million by traffic accidents • 2.5 million by sedentarism and chronical
diseases . • Negative externalities of unsustainable urban
mobility could reach 10% of countries GDP. • Social movements demanding high quality
affordable (fare=zero) transit for all
URBAN MOBILITY IS MAINLY A PROBLEM OF PUBLIC HEALTH
1.5% 1.5% 1%
1.5% 1% 1%
2.0%
9.5%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Acccidentes Contaminacion Falta deactividad fisica
Congestion:tiempo perdido
Combustiblesperdidos
Infraestructura yequipos mal
usados
Inversion yempleo
oportunidadesperdidas
TOTAL
Negative Externalities of Unsustainable Mobility: Cost in terms of %GDP
Health Factor Transport Factor
Economic Factor
Total lost in USD million, 9.5% of 2013 Peruvian GDP:
20,153
Expert Contributions
Topic 1: Urban mobility as a social right and determining
factor for quality urban life.
João Alencar Oliveira Júnior
Nick Tyler
Topic 2: Institutionality and business structuring for
future mobility.
Gloria Hutt
Carlos Cristóbal Pinto
Patricio Pérez
Topic 3: Financing of high-quality multimodal integrated
systems for all.
Gerhard Menckhoff
Mario Córdova
Topic 4: Integrated and quality urban public transport to
structure sustainable cities.
Paulo Custodio
Salvador Herrera
Juan Tapia
Topic 5: Mobility for competitive cities.
Otávio Vieira Cunha Filho
Andre Dantas
Viviana Tobón
Topic 6: Mobility as a crucial determining factor of urban
health: road safety, air quality and physical activity.
Enrique Jacoby
Eugenia Maria Rodrigues
Munkhchuluum Ulzibayar
Topic 7: Clean transport and climate change: Mitigation
and adaptation. Position regarding the Lima COP20.
Adalberto Maluf
Jon Bickel
Topic 8: Citizen participation to oversee quality of services.
Lake Sagaris
Topic 9: Necessary human resources for the new mobility.
Juan Carlos Muñoz
Brittany Montgomery
Topic 10: Innovative Technologies focusing on quality of
services for users.
Claudio Varano
Design, Coordination, Compilation, Review and Edition.
Luis Gutiérrez
André Jacobsen
Download the digital document:
www.musalonline.org SPECIAL THANKS TO:
- PAHO/WHO THAT SUPPORTED THE PUBLICATION
- BRT COE THAT ACCOMPANIED ALL THE ELABORATION PROCESS
- WRI/EMBARQ THAT SUPORTED THE BEGINNINGS OF SIBRT
Mission
Mobilize society and constituted powers of each country
to make urban mobility be recognized as fundamental
social right of the populations they represent,
establishing legal frameworks, institutional and public
policy properly integrated , which successfully meet the
aspirations of people to have a happy, healthy, safe and
successful, competitive and high quality life in all cities.
Vision
Be the platform for governments of Latin American cities
to promote joint and continuing actions in the adoption
of public policies to achieve high quality urban mobility
for all.
Mission
Generate synergies for the promotion, consolidation
and strengthening of comprehensive integrated systems
and BRT and provide mutual cooperation and exchange
of knowledge and best practices among its members.
Support the transformation and modernization of public
transport in Latin American cities.
Vision
Serve as a strong organization, self-financing, structured
and recognized as a regional and global reference on
innovation and the development of integrated urban
transport systems.
SIBRT / MUSAL main projects:
1. New Quality Management Framework for Public Transport in Latin America. Surveys, indicators, contracts and quality certification; tools to manage quality and develop a benchmarking process and collaboration between cities. Inspired in EN13816, IBBG, TCRP 88, cities experiences and needs.
2. Santiago Project. Support the consolidation of Santiago’s
achievements to use as a main reference for all LAC: SIT; Metropolitan Authority; Concession contracts based on quality indicators; Optimization of high demand transit corridors, and Subsidies!!!
3. Public Policies. Based on the Lima Declaration. Studies, discussions and events focused on urban mobility as a fundamental social right, catalyzing public policies, programs, and actions necessary for urban mobility transformation.
SIBRT Advisory Committee of Experts:
Brittany Nikole Montgomery – USA, Expert in Planning Urban Mobility Systems, MIT PhD Student
Claudio Varano – Argentine, Expert in technological component of urban mobility, Consultant
Carlos Cristobal Pinto – Spain, Former CRTM Director of External Affairs, Consultant
Darío Carmona – Colombia, Expert in Public Transport Systems, Consultant
Edgardo Mercado Neumann – Peru, Lawyer specialized in PPP, Consultant
Gerhard Menckhoff – Switzerland, Former WB, Experto in Urban Transport, Consultant
Gloria Hutt – Chile, Former Vice Minister of Transportation, Consultant
João Alencar Oliveira Jr. – Brazil, Doctor of Science in Transport Engineering, Attorney
Juan Tapia Grillo – Peru, President of the CIDATT Group, Expert in Transport, Economist
Juan Carlos Muñoz – Chile, PhD in Transport, Presidente of the BRT Center of Excellence, Researcher and Professor
Lake Sagaris – Canada, Urban planer, PhD in Planning and Participation, Advisor of Ciudad Viva
Luis Fernando Gomez – Colombia, Epidemiologist, Researcher and professor on urban environment and health
Mario Córdova España – Mexico, Director of the Institute of Mobility and Transport of Jalisco, Professor
Mauricio Osses – Chile, Director of the International Sustainable Systems Research Center – ISSRC, Consultant
Nick Tyler – England, Chadwick Professor of Civil Engineering at the University College London
Paulo Custodio – Brasil, Expert in Sustainable Transit Solutions, Consultant
Salvador Herrera – Mexico, Expert in Sustainable Urbanism and Mobility, Consultant
Ulises Navarro – Venezuela, PhD in civil engineering with specialization in transportation, ITDP
Viviana Tobón Jaramillo – Colombia, Lawyer specialist in land transport and state responsibility
II MUSAL Summit of Latin American Leading Cities on Sustainable Urban Mobility
Mexico City 2015:
August 7th 2015
Miguel Angel Mancera Head of Government of the Federal District of Mexico
Initiative Committee of MUSAL Mexico City 2015:
Fernando Haddad Mayor of Sao Paulo
Claudio Orrego Mayor of the Metropolitan Region of Santiago. President Pro Tempore of MUSAL
Questions to elaborate on “ITS: Quality, Health and Competitiveness”
1. Why do we need to have a vision for our city and why do we need to aim for a
high quality of life in order to frame the right Integrated Transport System?
2. How can an ITS help to improve the health, quality of life and environment in the city?
How do we quantify the lives lost and the negative impact upon health and environment by the absence of a good ITS? How do we jointly mobilize the sectors of public health, environment, and urban mobility in order to push forward the best solutions? 3. How can an Integrated Transport System help to improve the efficiency and
competitiveness of a city? How do we quantify losses in efficiency, productivity,
employment and opportunities for investment because of the lack of a good ITS? How do we mobilize communities to seek urban mobility and corporate private businesses to promote the best solutions? 4. What attributes should characterize the infrastructure, fleet and technology of an ITS
with high quality service "door to door" solutions for everyone? Are
indispensable subways and "full BRT" necessary in order to have a high quality ITS? How do we get the highest quality subways and BRT’s to extend to the entire city through the ITS? How do we integrate existing motorized and non-motorized systems?
5. What authority is required in an urban conglomerate to efficiently and soundly
manage a successful high-quality ITS? How should a national public urban mobility system be structured so that it allows society to have this fundamental social right? 6. What attributes should characterize operators and collecting companies of an ITS to
enable quality service? What attributes should characterize concession contracts of
operation and collection of an ITS to stimulate a virtuous shared responsibility of public agencies and private companies? What key quality indicators should be included in contracts? How do we focus on quality contracts that are fulfilled effectively? What are the key factors for a successful business transition towards a good Integrated Transport System?
7. Which financial model is the most appropriate in order to ensure universal
coverage and a high-quality ITS, which is managed transparently and efficiently? How do we estimate the costs and fares? How do we define and commit resources? How do we include adequate funding for urban mobility in the budgetary legal framework of the country? 8. How do we reach the broadest citizen sectors so they participate actively and massively in the definition and implementation of urban mobility as a fundamental social right? How do we structure a powerful coalition of all stakeholders in improving public transport and of
the whole of urban mobility? What mechanisms for social participation and
oversight are conducive to ensuring the implementation an ITS, which delivers quality services with adequate fares and access for all? What indicators the citizens have to handle to demand quality services from providers?