ligo-g070079-00-z d. ugolini, lsc march 2007 1 progress report on charging measurements at trinity...
TRANSCRIPT
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 1LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Progress Report on Charging Measurements at Trinity University
Dennis Ugolini, Robert McKinney, Mark GirardTrinity University
March LSC MeetingMarch 21, 2007
Goal: To develop a vacuum-compatible capacitive probe to measure the charge magnitude and relaxation time constant on LIGO optics
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 2LIGO-G070079-00-Z
The Capacitive Probe
Use chopper to alternately expose/occlude sample
Aluminum probe body with Kapton-shielded wire
Sensitivity calibrated with surface DC voltmeter to be
(3.5 +/- 0.5) × 105 e-/cm2 (to be published in Rev. Sci. Instr.)
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 3LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Optical Measurement Setup
Chopper shielded by aluminum box
Optic held by viton O-rings epoxied to aluminum clamps
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 4LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Measurement Setup (cont.)
Viton O-rings
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 5LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Vacuum System
Pfeiffer-Balzers Turbomechanical
drag pump (~10-5 torr)
Pressure gauge goes here (returned for servicing)
Feedthrough (on either side)
Glass viewport
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 6LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Obstacles in Moving to Vacuum
Pickup by probe signal lead from chopper driver wires» Used two feedthroughs, one for chopper, one for probe
» Chopper wires tied to optical table, kept far from probe lead
Intermittent probe noise peak» Caused by contact between probe lead and nearly anything (chopper
shielding box, optical table, walls of the vacuum chamber)
» Vibrational or electrical?
» Kapton wire is rigid, hold position well
Applied charge decays too rapidly to pump down system» Strong function of humidity, dehumidifier purchased
» Spark?
» Options for applying charge inside chamber (brush?)
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 7LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Readout Problem
Charge on LIGO Optical Sample 02/20/07
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Time (minutes)
Pro
be
sig
nal
(m
icro
volt
s)
Finally trapped large charge on optic on February 20th
Probe readout oscillated, didn’t damp out over many hours
Drift in chopper frequency shifted peak on spectrum analyzer
Switched to lock-in amp, used chopper driver as reference
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 8LIGO-G070079-00-Z
16-Day Results
Charge on Optical Sample 2/21/07
y = 2.156E+02e-5.916E-03x
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (days)
Pro
be
sig
nal
(m
icro
volt
s)
Corresponds to time constant of ~170 days
Appears to level off around day 13
Large phase change on “dropouts” – problem with reference?
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 9LIGO-G070079-00-Z
UV Discharging
Optic exposure to UV light
174
176
178
180
182
184
186
188
190
192
194
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (minutes)
Pro
be
sig
nal
(m
icro
volt
s)
Exposed to Hg discharge tube (no UV) for several hours – no effect
Exposed to Pen-Ray UV Lamp (253.7nm, 4.4mW/cm2 at 19mm), exhibits discharging shown
Glass viewport has ~15% transmission at this wavelength
D. Ugolini, LSC March 2007 10LIGO-G070079-00-Z
Summary
Probe has been successfully moved to vacuum
Decay of charge deposited on optical sample has been observed with a time constant of ~170 days» What are the differences between this setup and Moscow State?
Optical substrate? Surface contact? Pressure?
Demonstrated UV discharging with glass viewport
Next stepsLonger time Triplicate setupCharge vs. position Different substrates, coatings, etc.Besocke Kelvin probe Quartz viewport?Discharging vs. λ?