Lieutenant Colonel Command Screening Process

Purpose

• To share observations from the FY-14 Lieutenant Colonel Command Selection Board in order to:– Maximize the opportunity for successful officers to compete for Lieutenant Colonel

Command if they so desire– Ensure the most competitive officers are postured to continue representing the

Marine Corps at the ranks of Colonel and General Officer as “the best and most fully qualified” Marines

UNCLASSIFIED 2

Defining the Environment

• Competition for promotion to LtCol is tight and getting tighter– FY-14 LtCol Selection: 69%– FY-15 LtCol Selection: 65%

• Progressing farther is even harder– 18% of LtCols are selected for Command

• Command is “almost a must” for Colonel• “Stringing” makes it a balanced process

– 12% of LtCols are selected for Top Level School• TLS is an “indicator” for Colonel selection

– 48% of LtCols are promoted to Colonel– 1-3% of Cols are promoted to Brigadier General

Majors

LtCol: 65%

Cmd: 20%

TLS: 12%

Col: 48%

BGen: 1-3%

Senior Officer Competition

UNCLASSIFIED 3

Boardroom Echo

4

• Where it all happens!

Your MBS; What is says about YOU

• USMC Board process is all about one briefer telling your story in 6 minutes for the board of 21 to decide on your potential for continued service

• The briefer’s picture is painted by the Master Brief Sheet, which is fed by FITREPs• Performance

– Objective Assessment (Math): Relative Value (RV) is a numerical representation of how a single fitness report compares to other reports written by the same RS on Marines of the same grade

• Upper: 93.34 to 100• Middle: 86.67 to 93.33• Lower: 80.00 to 86.66

– Subjective Assessment (English): Section I

• More verbiage is not better• Key phrases have meaning• Comments must align with the RV

• Complete/Accurate Package– Picture, Ht/Wt, Training, Awards, PME Understanding the

MBS and Relative Value

UNCLASSIFIED 5

Writing FITREPs With a Purpose

• You are writing to/for the board members

• Put the good stuff up front. Don’t hide it

• Your comments need to be all about why the Marine should get promoted and/or selected

• Technical stuff and numbers are nice but this is more about your endorsement for further responsibility-the briefer will not likely be from your MOS

• Be clear, be emphatic, be repetitive

• This is not the place to take care of the MRO’s feelings – if he/she shouldn’t be promoted or get selected– don’t recommend it!

UNCLASSIFIED 6

Writing FITREPs With a Purpose

• Boards will group packages into six categories: – 6- Water Walker– 5- W/ Enthusiasm– 4- W/ Confidence – 3- W/ Reservation– 2- Not Recommended– 1- Show Cause

• Packages below a 4 typically won’t even be considered • Make sure the Math and the English match

– Painting a confusing picture will only confuse the board member and hurt the MRO– An actual LtCol RS example:

• “One of my top majors, recommend for selection to LtCol and command of an HMM or VMM.”

UNCLASSIFIED 7

Examples of FITREP Categories4- “W/ Confidence”

• Objective: Cumulative Relative Values < 86• Subjective: “Solid Marine.”• Indicative of a 4-5 block marking by RO

RS: Highly capable, detailed and effective Commander. Provided Engineer support and planning throughout the entire MAGTF. A trusted advisor to the GCE who always gives well thought out recommendations to accomplish the overall mission. Advise the Ground Combat Element (GCE) on matters related to Mobility, Counter-Mobility, Survivability, Engineer Recon, Tactical Electric Supply, & employing external/theater engineer assets. MRO easily navigated the challenges with his detailed approach and the utmost professionalism. His outstanding initiative, dedication, and skill allow him to execute flawlessly. There is no doubt that this officer will perform well at TLS and I believe he is perfectly suited to be the CO of the Engineer School.

RO: LtCol Hard Charger is a solid, dependable and extremely knowledgeable Engineer Support Bn Commander. Effectively leveraged all assets available to provide quality Engineer support across all of the Helmand Province AO. Anticipates requirements and applies resources appropriately.

No break out comments.

UNCLASSIFIED 8

• Objective: Cumulative Relative Values of 86-93• Subjective: “Potential Commander.”• Indicative of a 6 Block marking by RO

RS: Performing very well as a Battalion Commander; thoughtful, aggressive and understands the full extent of the mission, knows how to train his Marines to perform, then execute in terrific fashion. Selfless in support of his peers and other units; structure changes mandated sending a Company to the DS CLB. LtCol Hard Charger ensured the best equipment was made available, ahead of schedule and provided SMEs to stand up the company well ahead of schedule. Mature in his outlook and approach to Command. Implemented a Force Protection Program that fully met the intent of CMC’s initiatives; saw tangible results in reduction of incidents and high morale. A must for TLS and promotion to Colonel. Future CLR CO.

RO: Superb Battalion Commander whose innovative, aggressive approach to training has prepared his unit for any mission assigned. I personally observed his Force Preservation council and saw first-hand his engaged leadership style that has paid noticeable dividends in the morale of his unit. Physically fit and poised. He should be selected for TLS on this board followed by challenging Joint assignment where he will represent the Marine Corps very well. Select for Colonel at first opportunity and put him back into operational command.

UNCLASSIFIED 9

Examples of FITREP Categories5- “W/ Enthusiasm”

• Objective: Cumulative Relative Values > 93• Subjective: “Highly recommend with enthusiasm for Command (or promotion or

resident school).”• Indicative of a 7-8 Block marking by RO

RS: Impressive/extremely competent, committed, seasoned, MAGTF Officer. Possesses operational/tactical savvy 2nd to none. Force multiplier in any equation, Engineer/logistician I want on my team. "No Excuses" is mantra MRO lives by...Keen insight into needs of supported invariably leads to unheralded customer satisfaction. Totally engaged, organized, exacting/deliberate in approach; from admin/legal/manpower, to ops, maint, staff/Co Cmdr/SNCO development...he did it all routinely. Integral to post OEF rebuild; PTP/PME, ensuring Bn/individual are mission ready/prepared for next fight, as evidenced by superb FASMO results following deployment. Principled, concerned leader guided by warrior ethos/integrity/work ethic; positive influence rallies troops, impetus to unit morale, cohesion, identity. Truly unlimited potential, unquestionably prepared and my top recommendation to send to TLS/MCWAR, a must promote to O6 and slate for DS CLR or MWSG Cmd!

RO: LtCol Hard Charger remains my #1 Battalion Commander and LtCol within 1st MLG and 1st MLG(Fwd); there are currently 29 LtCols assigned. He is a top-notch combat seasoned Commander. He has clearly set the standard of excellence within 1st MLG. No challenge is beyond Chesty’s ability. Exuding confidence; he is hard as nails with uncompromising expectations, yet possesses genuine concern for his Marines. His personal concern for the families of our fallen heroes since his redeployment has epitomized the concept of Marines taking care of their own. He is a principled leader who has readily garnered the trust and loyalty of his Marines and Sailors. They would follow him anywhere/anytime. He has continued to render superior General Support Engineer support to I MEF, this time in garrison. He is clearly the impetus for his Battalion's highly successful post OEF reconstitution/rebuild efforts and pre-deployment preparedness for pending OEF 11.2 deployment, setting the conditions for his successor’s success. This Officer is definitely a frontrunner with characteristics of the best general officers. He has my strongest endorsement for attendance at the Marine Corps War College followed by service as a Faculty Advisor at Marine Corps Command and Staff College. Promote to Colonel on first vote! He is ready for command of a Direct Support (DS) Combat Logistics Regiment or MWSG now!

UNCLASSIFIED 10

Examples of FITREP Categories6- “Water Walker”

General Considerations for MROs

• “Grow where you are planted”– Perform in KEY MOS BILLETS when given the opportunity, but don’t go easy in billets

outside of your MOS• Request to be involved in every operational/deployment opportunity • Seek billets/experiences to develop as a MAGTF Officer vs. an MOS Officer only

– Seek a career path across the MAGTF and up/down the MAGTF hierarchy– Seek opportunities for PME and education– Do your best to get the key billets at the right time. Consider risks of “off-track”

programs . . .• Review and update your OMPF

– Bad initial impression = No photo, no questionnaire, out of date PFT/CFT, exceptionally weak PFT/CFT, no MCMAP (very bad) or MCMAP not at mandated level (e.g., Green for 0302), missing FITREPs (30 days or more)

– Multiple problems of this kind: if you don’t care, the board doesn’t either• Understand your Master Brief Sheet – strong and weak points

– Understand comments and marks; discuss with RS and ROUNCLASSIFIED 11

Stringing

UNCLASSIFIED 12

• MCO 1300.64.A Cmd Screening Program Dec 12• Best/brightest and equitable opportunity• Equitable: based on ~ equal % of

population• ~18 PMOS Cmds and ~22 Strung Cmds: ~

less ½ available each year• Bottom Line:

• 1302s slate for Engr Cmds first, come closest to 20% opportunity goal faster, thus less represented in the CLBs or MWSSs

1302 3002 0402 Strung Group 1st CEB 1st SupBn MSOSG CLB 1 MWSS 171

2d CEB 2d SupBnMCCSSS, Log Ops CLB 2 MWSS 172

4th CEB 3d SupBn Ft Lee CLB 3 MWSS 2716th ESB 4th SupBn CLB 4 MWSS 2727th ESB 1st MntBn CLB 5 MWSS 2738th ESB 2d MntBn CLB 6 MWSS 3719th ESB 3d MntBn CLB 7 MWSS 372

4th MntBn CLB 11 MWSS 373 MCCSSS, Sup CLB 13 CLB 15 CLB 22 CLB 24 CLB 26 CLB 31

Return to Defining the Environment

FY-14 Command Screening Board

MOS Eligible PMOS GROUP NPMOS TOTAL OPP %

STRUNG GROUP / NPMOS CMDS

0180 33 1 0 3 4 12% (3) 8006

0202 64 5 2 2 9 14% (2) 8006, (2) 8007 – Recon

0302 145 17 3 3 23 16% (4) 8007, (2) 8007 – Recon

0402 90 3 8 1 12 13% (8) CLB / MWSS, (1) 8006

0602 48 5 0 0 5 10%

0802 49 5 2 0 7 14% (2) 8007 – ANGLICO

1302 23 4 0 0 4 17%

1802 11 2 0 0 2 18%

1803 6 2 0 0 2 33%

3002 36 2 3 0 5 14% (3) CLB

3404 20 0 0 2 2 10% (2) 8006

4302 9 0 0 1 1 11% (1) 8006

4402 44 0 0 2 2 5% (2) 8006

5803 7 3 0 0 3 43%

Back-Ups

Understanding the MBS

NAME

MARINE, J.S.

GRADE

O4

CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT

US Central Command

BILLET DESCRIPTION

J-3 Future Ops Officer

DCTB

20030717

SSN

123456789

TRAINING SUMMARY

RIFLEPISTOLPFTMCMAP

E/340M/3401/289TAN

199319931987199019901989

199809199809200309200308

MILITARY

Winter Mountain LeaderSummer Mountain LeaderAirborneAssault ClimbersInfantry Officer (TBS)Basic School

199019861982

BA, BiologyAssociates DegHS

CIVILIAN

LANGUAGES

FrenchSpanish

PME

2002199719951994

Command & Staff Non-ResAWS Ph IIAWS Ph IWarfighting Skills Prog

19941990

RANK

MAJ

MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES

PMOSAMOS1AMOS2AMOS3

Infantry OfficerCommunications Officer

03020602

LCN

12345678

EDUCATION SUMMARY

AMOS4AMOS5JOINTBMOS Unrestricted Officer9910

AWARDS

121

MMNCNA

DOR

19990501

TIG

4yr 10mo

******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY *******

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS

MASTER BRIEF SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

KEY DATE SUMMARY

DEAFTIS

PEBDAFADBD

OSCDACC COMM

DOR COMM

DOR LDODSG PILOT

DCADBEAS

1989070214yr 11mo

1989052019890520

1995011519890520

19890531

19890520INDEF

******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) *******

0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6 4/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6 5/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8

Grade

BMOS Type

OCC From

To

Months

Co

Billet Description

Ad RV at ProcRS HighRS AvgRpt AvgReports

PerReporting Senior

Promote

EvalJudDecPMCoEnsSetDevLeaIniEffCouPro

Cum RV

Reviewing Officer

Obser ConcurRpt at High

RO marks - same grade at processing

RO marks - same grade cumulative

Capt

0302 N

GC 19980801

19990503

9 Company Commander

100.004.573.524.5713 of 16

FLtCol B

Yes

CEECDDEEEDEDF

100.00

Col T

Suff Yes1

Maj

0302 N

AN 19990504

19990801

3 Operations Officer

96.114.504.134.364 of 7

ELtCol B

Yes

DDECEDEDDEECE

96.11

Col R

Suff Yes1

Maj

0302 N

CH 19990801

20000119

6 Operations Officer

100.004.504.134.507 of 7

ELtCol B

Yes

DEECEDEDDEEDE

100.00

Col A

Suff Yes2

Maj

0302 N

TR 20000119

20000414

3 BN Executive Officer

100.004.934.464.936 of 14

FLtCol S

Yes

EDDDDDFEFGDDF

100.00

Col A

Suff Yes1

0/1 0/2 9/3 12/4 23/5 11/6 3/7 0/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 2/6 0/7 0/8

1/1 0/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8

1/1 0/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 0/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 2/3 7/4 7/5 5/6 0/7 0/8

Maj

9910 N

CH 20000415

20010507

12

X

Commanding Officer

93.685.575.125.2921 of 21

FCol A

Yes

EEDDEEEEFEFFF

93.68

BGen C

Suff Yes1

1/1 0/2 3/3 3/4 18/5 20/6 12/7 0/8

2/1 0/2 5/3 7/4 24/5 26/6 16/7 1/8

Maj

9910 N

CH 20010508

20020702

14 Commanding Officer

83.875.865.335.145 of 8

FCol T

Yes

EEEEEEEEFEEEE

86.44

BGen M

Suff No1

0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6 4/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6 5/7 1/8

Maj

9910 N

TR 20020703

20030630

12

X 83.675.004.423.797 of 12

CCol F

Yes

DDDDDCDDCDDDD

80.00

BGen M

Suff Yes1

Command

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

MCRS Pittsburg

MCRS Pittsburg

Commanding Officer

MCRS Pittsburg

CREATED: 12 JUL 2004

UNCLASSIFIED 14

Administrative Summary and Reporting Senior Markings

15UNCLASSIFIED

16

• RV is a numerical representation of how a single fitness report compares to other reports written by the same RS on Marines of the same grade

• RV= TOOL that displays RS’s marking philosophy

• RV should be used within the context of all other information on the report

What is Relative Value?

UNCLASSIFIED

17

What do the numbers mean?

• It is of the utmost importance to remember that the context of the particular report is always important!

• Relative Value- 90 RV is not the magic #– RV broken down into thirds

• Upper: 93.34 to 100• Middle: 86.67 to 93.33• Lower: 80.00 to 86.66

• Para 4006.4.b, “Grades are earned by the MRO’s displayed efforts and apparent results; they are not given to attain a perceived fitness report average or relative value.”

UNCLASSIFIED

Add the value of observed marks - 43Divide by # of observed marks - 43/13 = 3.30

FitRep Avg = 3.30What if (a C to D) 44/13? FitRep Avg = 3.38

18

Calculating The Report Average

PER PRO COU EFF INI LEA DEV SET ENS COM PME DEC JUD EVAL RES

E D C C C D C C D C B C C H

PER PRO COU EFF INI LEA DEV SET ENS COM PME DEC JUD EVAL RES

5 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 0

As it appears on the MBS:

As it translates numerically: (A=1 to G=7, Not Obs H = 0)

UNCLASSIFIED

19

How does RV Work?• Calculate the FITREP Average (FRA)

• Each attribute equates to a value • A=1, B=2, C=3, D=4, E=5, F=6, G=7, H=Not

Observed• Avg. of all observed attributes=Fitrep Average

• i.e. a straight B report (28/14) = 2.0

• Calculate the Relative Value (80 to 100 linear scale)• 100 = Highest report from that RS on that grade• 90 = RS’s Avg of all reports for that grade• 80 = Difference between the 100 and the 90, then

subtracting that from the 90

• RS average (90) • Total value of all observed reports divided by the

total number of observed reports 1.5+2.0+3.0+4.0+4.4+4.6+5.0/7=3.5

• RS must process at least three reports on Marines of the same grade before RV is displayed on MBS

• REMEMBER: Approximately Half of all observed FITREPs (Sgt – LtCol) will be less than 90 RV

80 10090

RS Average = 3.51.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.4 4.6 5.0

Below 90 RV

does NOT mean

Unsatisfactory Performance

UNCLASSIFIED

20

Promote Reports Rpt Avg RS Avg RS High Rpt at High RV at Proc Cum RVYes 8 of 10 3.30 3.31 4.36 1 90.49 89.91

RVs Displayed On MBS

For this specific fitrep; remains constant forever.

Will change as the RS writes more reports.

UNCLASSIFIED

The Finer Details of RV

21

This Marine’s attributes increased in three areas. The second report is a full mark to the left of the RS high.

UNCLASSIFIED

22

This Marine has an RV of 80 but what is the RS spread? This Marine has one attribute marked to the left of the RS average; two attributes

to the left of the RS High.

The Finer Details of RV

UNCLASSIFIED

23

NAME

MARINE, J.S.

GRADE

O4

CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT

US Central Command

BILLET DESCRIPTION

J-3 Future Ops Officer

DCTB

20030717

SSN

123456789

TRAINING SUMMARY

RIFLEPISTOLPFTMCMAP

E/340M/3401/289TAN

199319931987199019901989

199809199809200309200308

MILITARY

Winter Mountain LeaderSummer Mountain LeaderAirborneAssault ClimbersInfantry Officer (TBS)Basic School

199019861982

BA, BiologyAssociates DegHS

CIVILIAN

LANGUAGES

FrenchSpanish

PME

2002199719951994

Command & Staff Non-ResAWS Ph IIAWS Ph IWarfighting Skills Prog

19941990

RANK

MAJ

MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES

PMOSAMOS1AMOS2AMOS3

Infantry OfficerCommunications Officer

03020602

LCN

12345678

EDUCATION SUMMARY

AMOS4AMOS5JOINTBMOS Unrestricted Officer9910

AWARDS

121

MMNCNA

DOR

19990501

TIG

4yr 10mo

******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY *******

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS

MASTER BRIEF SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

KEY DATE SUMMARY

DEAFTIS

PEBDAFADBD

OSCDACC COMM

DOR COMM

DOR LDODSG PILOT

DCADBEAS

1989070214yr 11mo

1989052019890520

1995011519890520

19890531

19890520INDEF

******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) *******

0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6 4/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6 5/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8

Grade

BMOS Type

OCC From

To

Months

Co

Billet Description

Ad RV at ProcRS HighRS AvgRpt AvgReports

PerReporting Senior

Promote

EvalJudDecPMCoEnsSetDevLeaIniEffCouPro

Cum RV

Reviewing Officer

Obser ConcurRpt at High

RO marks - same grade at processing

RO marks - same grade cumulative

Capt

0302 N

GC 19980801

19990503

9 Company Commander

100.004.573.524.5713 of 16

FLtCol B

Yes

CEECDDEEEDEDF

100.00

Col T

Suff Yes1

Maj

0302 N

AN 19990504

19990801

3 Operations Officer

96.114.504.134.364 of 7

ELtCol B

Yes

DDECEDEDDEECE

96.11

Col R

Suff Yes1

Maj

0302 N

CH 19990801

20000119

6 Operations Officer

100.004.504.134.507 of 7

ELtCol B

Yes

DEECEDEDDEEDE

100.00

Col A

Suff Yes2

Maj

0302 N

TR 20000119

20000414

3 BN Executive Officer

100.004.934.464.936 of 14

FLtCol S

Yes

EDDDDDFEFGDDF

100.00

Col A

Suff Yes1

0/1 0/2 9/3 12/4 23/5 11/6 3/7 0/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 2/6 0/7 0/8

1/1 0/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8

1/1 0/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8

0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 0/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 2/3 7/4 7/5 5/6 0/7 0/8

Maj

9910 N

CH 20000415

20010507

12

X

Commanding Officer

93.685.575.125.2921 of 21

FCol A

Yes

EEDDEEEEFEFFF

93.68

BGen C

Suff Yes1

1/1 0/2 3/3 3/4 18/5 20/6 12/7 0/8

2/1 0/2 5/3 7/4 24/5 26/6 16/7 1/8

Maj

9910 N

CH 20010508

20020702

14 Commanding Officer

83.875.865.335.145 of 8

FCol T

Yes

EEEEEEEEFEEEE

86.44

BGen M

Suff No1

0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6 4/7 0/8

0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6 5/7 1/8

Maj

9910 N

TR 20020703

20030630

12

X 83.675.004.423.797 of 12

CCol F

Yes

DDDDDCDDCDDDD

80.00

BGen M

Suff Yes1

Command

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

MCRS Pittsburg

MCRS Pittsburg

Commanding Officer

MCRS Pittsburg

CREATED: 12 JUL 2004

MBS: Reviewing Officer

UNCLASSIFIED

24

RO Distribution On The MBS

K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS

2. EVALUATION: Concur Do Not Concur1. OBSERVATION: Sufficient

3. COMPARATIVEASSESSMENT : Provide acomparative assessement ofpotential by placing an "X" in theappropriate box. In marking thecomparison, consider all Marines ofthis grade whose professionalabilities are known to youpersonnally.

DESCRIPTION COMPARATIVE EVALUATION

THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE

ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED

A QUALIFIED MARINE

UNSATISFACTORY

PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE

MAJORITY OF THIS GRADE

ONE OF THE FEW

EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED MARINES

Insufficientx

0

2

7

10

10

4

1

0

4. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS: Amplify your comparative assessment mark; evaluate potential for continued professional development toinclude: promotion, command, assignment, resident PME, and retention; and put Reporting Senior marks and comments in perspective.

x

x

(8)

(7)

(3)

(6)

(2)

(5)

(1)

(4)

As it appears in the OMPF :

0/1 1/2 4/3 13/4 14/5 8/6 2/7 0/8

RO: 0/1 1/2 4/3 10/4 10/5 7/6 2/7 0/8As it appears on the MBS:

UNCLASSIFIED

25 25

RV SUMMARY

UPPER

MIDDLE

LOWER

N/A

ABOVE

WITH

BELOW

CuAt

66.7%

11.1%

22.2%

1

At80.0%

10.0%

10.0%

0

Cu

23.6%

27.6%

48.8%

5.9%

32.0%

62.1%

COMP ASSESSMT

RS/RO Distribution Summary

80.0%

10.0%

10.0%

5.9%

32.0%

62.1%

UNCLASSIFIED

26

RS/RO Summary Tab

Return to 1302 Career Planning Brief

UNCLASSIFIED