library webinar –february 21, 2019 counter code of … · 2019-02-25 · • book requests...
TRANSCRIPT
Release 5
LIBRARY CONNECT WEBINAR – February 21, 2019
Deep Dive into COUNTER Code of Practice Release 5 (COP5)
Lorraine EstelleCOUNTER Project Director
Elena Zapryanova‐HadjinikolovaDirector Analytics, ElsevierCOUNTER Executive Member
https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library‐connect‐webinars
Are you ready for COUNTER COP5?
About COUNTER
Membership organisation
Members create and maintain the Code of Practice
Executive Committee
Technical Advisory Group
Input of wider membership through consultation
Why Release 5
• The Code of Practice has been developed over more than a decade
• Development of new technologies and needs increased complexity, and reduced consistency among reports
• 2016 survey about the current usage reports • A new COP focusing on reducing the complexity of the current reports and increasing consistency and clarity
• The new Code of Practice is flexible, reducing the number of reports and more adaptable for future changes to requirements
Consistency
Simplicity
Transparency & Flexibility
Clarity
ConsistencyAddressing changing needs and reducing the complexity of the Code of Practice to ensure publishers and content providers are able to achieve compliance.
• Reporting Layout • Reporting Formats • Vocabulary & Terminology
The COUNTER Code of Practice 5
Consistency
Simplicity
Transparency & Flexibility
Clarity
Simplicity Four Master Reports streamlined for the most common reporting needs for librarians, publishers and content providers.
• Four Master Reports • Pre‐set, Filtered Standard Views • Fewer Metric Types• New Item & Usage Attributes
The COUNTER Code of Practice 5
Consistency
Simplicity
Transparency & Flexibility
Clarity
Flexibility Comprehensive reporting attributes empower users to generate necessary drill‐down reports with ease.
• Granular Reports with Attributes • Specific Reporting for Data Needs• Reduce Redundancy
The COUNTER Code of Practice 5
Consistency
Simplicity
Transparency & Flexibility
Clarity
Clarity Using clear and consistent terminology on all metrics types and attributes brings clarity.
• Reducing and renaming metrics types for clarity
• Using consistent metric types across all reports, as applicable
The COUNTER Code of Practice 5
Consistency
Simplicity
Transparency & Flexibility
Clarity
9
Reports & Metrics
Four Master Reports are the Foundation of COUNTER R5 Reports
10
Platform Master Report
Database Master Report
Title Master Report
Item Master Report
COUNTER Release 5:Reports
Example of user
interface
01/01/2017 12/31/2017
Total_Item_Request
Journal
Controlled
Regular
“Standard Views”
Address the Most Common Use Cases
12
Platform Master Report
• Platform Usage
Database Master Report• Database Search and Item Usage• Database Access Denied
Title Master Report• Book Requests (Excluding OA_Gold)• Book Access Denied• Book Usage by Access Type• Journal Requests (Excluding OA_Gold)• Journal Access Denied• Journal Usage by Access Type• Journal Requests by YOP Requests (Excluding OA_Gold)
Item Master Report
• Content Item Requests• Multimedia Item Requests
COUNTER Release 5: Metric Types
Metric_Type identifies activities and the nature of the activity being reported on.
In COUNTER Release 5, three activity groups are reported: • investigation & requests• access denied • search
• Searches_Regular• Searches_Federated• Searches_Automated• Searches_Platform
• Total_Item_Investigations• Total_Item_Requests• Unique_Item_Investigations• Unique_Item_Requests• Unique_Title_Investigations• Unique_Title_Requests
Metric Types
• No_License• Limit_Exceeded
Metric Types:Investigations
vsRequests
Investigations & Requests Investigations report user actions related to a content item or title. Actions on part of an item or information about an item or the item itself are reported.
Total_Item_Investigationsthe total number of times a content item or information related to a content item was accessed.
Unique_Item_Investigationsthe number of unique content items investigated by a user in a session.
Unique_Title _Investigationsthe number of unique titles investigated by a user in a session (only applies to Books).
COUNTER Release 5: Metric Types
Investigations & Requests requests report user requests for a content item or chapter of a book. A request is specifically related to viewing or downloading the full content item.
Total_Item_requeststhe total number of times the full text of a content item was downloaded or viewed.
Unique_Item_requeststhe number of unique content items requested by a user in a session.
Unique_Title _requeststhe number of unique titles requested by a user in a session (only applies to Books)
COUNTER Release 5: Metric Types
User finds article in search results list
COP5 reports: 1 Unique Item Request, 2 Total Items Request,1 Unique Item Investigation, 2 Total Item Investigation
HTML PAGELands on HTML
Access & entitlement background check takes user directly to the full text article (FTA) HTML
ScienceDirect: Typical user flow
1 Total Item Request1 Unique Item Request
1 Total Investigation1 Unique Investigation
1 Total Item Request0 Unique Item Request
1 Total Investigation0 Unique Investigation
Access Type = Controlled
Investigation on the HTML article page
Investigation on Search Result page
• Only the “open” action results in an investigation being counted
• The same rules apply to Graphical Abstracts, if available
SearchesThere are four different types of search metrics in Release 5.Searches_Regular
the number of times a user searches a database, where they have actively chosen that database from a list of options OR there is only one database available to search. Metric captured at the database level.
Searches_Automatedthe number of times a user searches a database, where they have not actively chosen that database from a list of options. Metric captured at the database level.
Searches_Platformthe number of times a user performs a search on the platform, regardless of the number of databases involved in the search. Metric captured at the platform level.
Searches_Federatedthe number of times a search is run through Federated Search Service/Engine. Metric captured at the database level.
COUNTER Release 5: Metric Types
Access Denials In Release 5, two types of access denial metrics are tracked.
No_licenseuser is unable to retrieve full‐text of a unique content because his/her institution does not have a license to the content.
Limit_Exceededuser is unable to retrieve full‐text of a unique content because his/her institution has exceeded access limits.
COUNTER Release 5: Metric Types
COUNTER Release 5: Data Types
Data_Type identifies the general type of content being accessed or for which usage is being reported.
This attribute is used when creating Standard Views for Books and Journals and is an optional parameter for the Title Master Report and can be used to generate summaries in a Database Master Report or Platform Master Report.
• Article• Book• Book Segment• Database• Dataset• Journal• Multimedia• Newspaper or Newsletter• Platform• Other• Repository Item• Report• Thesis or Dissertation
Data_Types
COUNTER Release 5: Section Types
Section_Type identifies whether content is delivered in “chunks” (sections) or item level. This describes what that section is, e.g. a book may be accessed by the chapter; content in a journal is accessed by article.
This attribute is an optional parameter for the Title Master Report.
• Article• Book• Chapter• Other• Section
Section_Types
COUNTER Release 5: Access Types
Access_Type describes the nature of access control that was in place when the content item was accessed.
This attribute is in “filtering” for Standard Views and Master Reports and is included in Book Usage by Access Type and Journal Usage by Access Type Standard Views. It’s primary role is to differentiate usage of gold open access content from content that requires a license.
OA_Delayed is content that became open access after an embargo period has expired.
* OA_Delayed is NOT part of the initial release of R5. It will be introduced at a future date (with sufficient advance notice) after further study.
• Controlled• OA_Gold• Other_Free_to_Read
(repositories only)• OA_Delayed* (reserved
for future use)
Access_Types
COUNTER Release 5: Access Methods
Access_Method indicates whether the usage related to investigations and requests activities were conducted by a human user browsing and searching a website (“regular”) or by Text and Data Mining processes (TDM).
This attribute appears as an optional parameter in the four Master Reports.
TDM usage is excluded from the standard views for Journal and Book usage.
• Regular• TDM
Access_Method
COUNTER Release 5: Year of Publication
YOP is the year of publication for the content item accessed.
If content is available in print and online format and the publication dates of these two formats differ, the year of publication of version of record (normally the format that is published first) is used.
YOP is an option attribute in Title Master Report, Database Master Report and Platform Master Report. It appears as a column in the Journal Requests by YOP (Excluding OA_Gold) Standard View.
• yyyy• 0001 (unknown)• 9999 (articles in press)
YOP
27
Release 5 Reports
COUNTER Release 5:Title Report |Standard View Reports
Report ID
TR_B1
TR_B2
TR_B3
TR_J1
TR_J2
TR_J3
TR_J4
3
Release 51
2
4
Release 4
Key Changes
Title Reports TR_J1 vs JR 1
1. Limited to Controlled usage only
2. Shows additional Unique Item Requests metric
3. No HTML vs PDF metrics
4. Journals with zero usage are excluded
5
5. No Total for all journalsline
Title Reports TR_J1 vs JR 1
Release 5 TR_J1 report shows lower usage counts due to the exclusion of Gold OA usage
TR_J1 Usage = JR1 Usage – JR1 GOA
Key Changes
1
Title Reports TR_J2 vs JR 2
Key Changes1. Name of metric has
changed
Release 5
Release 4
Key ChangesTitle Reports TR_J3 vs JR 1/JR1 GOA
12
3
1. Shows usage by access type (total usage will matchJR1)
2. Shows additional metrics: Unique Item Requests Total Item InvestigationsUnique Item Investigations
3. No HTML vs PDF metrics
Release 5
Release 4
Key Changes
Title Reports TR_J4 vs JR 5
1
2
3
4 5
Release 5
Release 4
1. Limited to Controlledusage only
2. Shows additional Unique Item Requests metric
4. Each year has a separate line rather than being a column
3. No year grouping for older years
5. Usage is shown per month
Title Reports TR_B3 vs BR 2 Release 5
Release 4
Key Changes1. Usage split out by
access type1 23
2. Shows additional metrics: Unique Item Requests, Unique Title Requests, Total Item Investigations Unique Title Investigations
3. Publication year is shown for each book
Title Reports TR_B2 vs BR 3
12
Release 5
Release 4
Key Changes1. Metric has changed
name
2. Year of publication has been added
Title Reports TR_B3 vs BR 2 Release 5
Release 4
Key Changes1. Usage split out by access
type1 23
2. Shows additional metrics: Unique Item Requests, Unique Title Requests, Total Item Investigations Unique Title Investigations
3. Publication year is shown for each book
Platform Report PR_P1 (new for SD)
1
2
Key Changes1. Shows new metrics:
Unique Item Requests Unique Title Requests
2. Item Requests cover both books and journals
Scopus: Platform Report PR_P1 vs Platform Report
1
2
Key Changes
2. Regular Searches and Searches Federated and Automated are rolled up in Searches Platform
Release 4
Release 5
1. Shows new metric: Unique Item Requests
3
3. Total Item Requestsequals Record Views
Scopus: Database Report DR_D1 vs Platform Report
1
2
Key Changes
2. Result Click metric has been replaced by new metric Total Item Investigations
Release 4
Release 5
1. Searches Federated and Automated are split in two separate metrics
COUNTER 5 reporting widget in AdminTool & E‐PIC will allow creation of customized reports/ data feeds
Supplementary Report: Total Item Requests by Platform
Supplemental ReportAccount:C000000593:Elsevier ‐ Demonstration Account
Period covered by Report:2019‐01‐01 to 2019‐10‐31Date Run:
06/10/2019Total Item Requests
Journal Publisher Platform Total Total SD/JBS Total DUL Jan‐19 Feb‐19 Mar‐19Total for all journals SD/JBS & DUL 1177145 1153484 23661 89898 106156 102976Journal 1 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 40262 39453 809 19 60 25
Journal 2 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 3537 3466 71 42 21 66
Journal 3 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 1690 1656 34 73 63 62
Journal 4 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 99660 97657 2003 11 12 10
Journal 5 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 1451 1422 29 150 108 177
Benefits:• Provides aggregate view with
transparency into platform types
• Easy to use format: 1 line/row per journal
Supplementary Report: Total Item Requests by Access Type
Supplemental ReportAccount:C000000593:Elsevier ‐ Demonstration Account
Period covered by Report:2019‐01‐01 to 2019‐10‐31Date Run:
06/10/2019Total Item Requests
Journal Publisher Platform Total Controlled OA Gold Jan‐19 Feb‐19 Mar‐19Total for all journals SD/JBS & DUL 1177145 1106516 70629 89898 106156 102976Journal 1 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 40262 37846 2416 19 60 25
Journal 2 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 3537 3325 212 42 21 66
Journal 3 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 1690 1589 101 73 63 62
Journal 4 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 99660 93680 5980 11 12 10
Journal 5 Elsevier SD/JBS & DUL 1451 1364 87 150 108 177
Benefits:• Provides aggregate view with
transparency into access types
• Easy to use format: 1 line/row per journal
43
DUL in COUNTER R5 REPORTS
DistributedUsageLogging
DUL
Distributed Usage Logging (DUL) allows publishers to capture traditional usage activity related to their content that happens on sites other than their own so they can provide reports of “total usage” regardless of where that usage happens
Mendeley and Digital Science are collaborating to deliver DUL reporting with COUNTER Release 5
What does Distributed usage
logging (DUL) allow?
Framework to report usage of
DOI-identified content
A complete representation of
content usage
Report_Name Title Master ReportReport_ID TRRelease 5Institution_Name Johns Hopkins UniversityInstitution_IDMetric_Types Total_Item_RequestsReport_Filters Data_Type=JournalReport_AttributesExceptionsReporting_Period Begin_Date=2018‐09‐01; End_Date=2018‐11‐30Created 2019‐01‐14T15:15:29ZCreated_By Elsevier Services
Title Publisher Platform Print_ISSN Metric_Type
Reporting_Period_ Total Sep‐18 Oct‐18 Nov‐18
AASRI Procedia Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 2212‐6716 Total_Item_Requests 4 3 0 1ACC Current Journal Review Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 1062‐1458 Total_Item_Requests 2 0 0 2
AEU ‐ International Journal of Electronics and Communications Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 1434‐8411 Total_Item_Requests 28 8 11 9AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 0972‐8600 Total_Item_Requests 1 0 1 0AORN Journal Elsevier DUL Mendeley 0001‐2092 Total_Item_Requests 4 0 0 4AORN Journal Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 0001‐2092 Total_Item_Requests 113 52 38 23APCBEE Procedia Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 2212‐6708 Total_Item_Requests 4 3 1 0APS Journal Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 1058‐9139 Total_Item_Requests 4 2 0 2Academic Emergency Medicine Elsevier DUL Mendeley 1069‐6563 Total_Item_Requests 1 0 1 0Academic Pediatrics Elsevier ScienceDirect licensed content 1876‐2859 Total_Item_Requests 963 209 523 231Academic Radiology Elsevier DUL Mendeley 1076‐6332 Total_Item_Requests 3 0 3 0
DUL will be reported in the Master report
DUL usage on Mendeley
User downloads PDF copy of article from publisher site and stores it in their Mendeley Library
(log-in required)
COUNTER Reporting: Initial download only reported by Publisher
DUL transactions recorded:1) User downloads/ views/ reads a stored PDF in their Library2) User downloads/ reads a stored PDF shared in a Private Group 3) User searches Mendeley Catalogue and views/ downloads a
PDF (only OA)COUNTER Reporting: Subsequent views/ downloads reported
by Mendeley as DUL usage
Publisher
Mendeley
48
SUSHI for COUNTER R5
COUNTER Reports Delivery
COUNTER_SUSHI for Release 5
RESTful interface returning JSON‐formatted reports
Familiar to most web developers
Allows retrieval of full reports, or snippets of usage
Allows usage display to be embedded in other applications
Join our email forums
Contact to COUNTER with further questions/requests:
Additional information:
https://www.projectcounter.org
Release 5
LIBRARY CONNECT WEBINAR – February 21, 2019
Thank you and Questions
Lorraine EstelleCOUNTER Project Director
Elena Zapryanova‐HadjinikolovaDirector Analytics, ElsevierCOUNTER Executive Committee Member
https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library‐connect‐webinars