liberi v taitz (ninth circuit) - 2.0 - appellant orly taitz mediation questionnaire -...

8/6/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ (NINTH CIRCUIT) - 2.0 - Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire - TransportRoom.2.0

1/7

T]NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR TF{E NINT}I CIRCIIITCircuit Mediation Office

Phone (415) 355-7900 Fax (415) 355-8566http :/lwww.cag.uscourts.gov/mediation

MEDIATION QUE STIONNAIREThe purpose of this questionnaire is to help the court's mediators provide the best possibte mediationservice in this case; it serves no other function. Responses to this questionnaire arc not confidential.Appellants/Petitioners must electronically file this document within 7 days of the docketing of the case.9th Cir. R. 3-4 and 15-2. Appellees/Respondents may file the questionnaire, but are not required to do so.

9th Circuit Case Number(s): 1 1-560798:11-CV{0485-AG(AJWCentral District of California (Southern Division)

District CourtlAgency Case Number(s) :District Court/A gency Locati on :CaseName:If District Court, docket entry numbeds) oforder(s) appealed from:Name ofpartylparties submitting this form:

Llsa Liberi, et al. 0ur Freedoms Foundation

#227

Please briefly describe the dispute that gave rise to this lawsuit.Defendant, Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, altegedly maintains a website that has publicized public informationregarding Plaintiffs, including information pertaining to Lisa Liberi's criminal convictions, and a dispute bstweenLisa Ostella and Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. Plaintiffs have accused Defendant of violating their rights toprivacy and defamation. Defendant denies these allegations and maintains that it is exercising its First Amendmentrights, and right to participate in the public procoss.Briefly describe the result below and the main issues on appeal.Defendant filed a Motion to Strike pursuant to California Civil Code section 425.16, an "anti-SLAPP" Motion, todrsmlss Plaintrlts' lawsurt on the gfounds that lt was rmpropefly llled to prevent Lretendant lrom exefcrsrng rts lreespeech and related rights. The Motion to Strike was denied on June 14, 201 l.

Describe any procesdiog. remaining below or any related proceedings in other tribunals.This matter is set for hial on June 5, 2012, with a Pre-Trial Conference on May 21,2012. Defendant has filed arMotion to Stay the matter pending appeal, ts be heard on August 8, 2011, as well as a Motion to Dismiss underl2(b)(6) to Plaintiffs' First Amended Comptaint, to be heard on August 15, 201 1.

Page 1 of2

Case: 11-56164 07/17/2011 Page: 1 of 7 ID: 7822563 DktEntry: 2


2/7

Provide any other thoughts you would like to bring to the attention of the mediator.seekto violate Defendanfs Constitutional free speech a$d related rights; no monetary value can be placed

the loss ofthese rights.

Any pnlfy may provide additional infbrmation in conJitlenca t'lirectly to the Circuit Mediatiorr Ofl'lce atca09:[email protected]. Please provide the case name anclNinth Circuit case nurnber in yourmessage. Additional infcrrmatiorr niight include interest in including this case in the nrediation program, thecase's settlement history, issues beyond the litigation ftat the parties rnight address in a settlerneni context,or future events that might affect the parties' rvillingr,ess ol ability to ruediate the case.CERTIFICATION OF COT]NSELI certifr that:

a crurent selvice list with telephone and fax numbers and email addresses is attachedil (see 9th Circuit Rule 3-2).I understand that faihne to provide the Court with a completed form and service listil may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the appeal.Signature("#" plus attorney name may be used in lieu of a manual signature on eleotronically-filed documents.)Corxrsel for Defend Our Freedoms FoundationNote: Use of the Appellate ECF system is mandatory for all attomeys filing in this Court, unless they aregranted an exemption from using the system. To file this form electronicalty in Appellate ECF, completethe form, and then print the filled-in form to PDF (File > Print > PDF Printer/Creator). Then log intoAppellate ECF and choose Forms/Irtrotices/Disclosure > File aMediation Questionnaire.

Page 2 of 2



3/7

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ29839 Santa Margarita pkwy ste 100Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688ph949-683-5 417 t ax 949 -7 66-7 [email protected] MOLLY DWYERCLERK OF THE COURTRE APPEAL r.1-56079 AND 11-56164DEAR MS DWYERApparently there was a misunderstanding in regards to the Appeal in questionThe appeal involves 2 entities "Defend Our Freedoms Foundation" where Orly Taitz is the president andOrly Taitz as an individual. Both entities were supposed to be part of one appeal, however 2 separateappeal numbers were assigned and separate schedules were assigned. I am asking to join both appeals11-56079 and 11-56164 and issue one schedule. I am also asking for one appeal fee.Sincerely/s/ Orly Taitz ESQCounsel for Defend Our Freedoms Foundation and co-counsel for Orly Taitz



4/7

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJ\ll Docunrent 289 Filed 07114/11 Page 1 af 4 Fage lD#:6911Office of the ClerkUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitPost Office Box 193939San Francisco, California 941 19 -3939415-355-8000

Molly C. DwyerClerk of Court July 14, zDn

No.:D.C. No.:Short Title:

t1-s61648:1 1-cv-00485-AG-AJWLisa Liberi, et al v. Orly Taitz, et al

Dear AppellanVCounselA copy of your notice of appeaVpetition has been received in the Clerk's office ofthe United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court ofAppeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You mustindicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you cofirmunicate withthis court regarding this case.Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place anorder, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The courtreporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appealhave been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Orderr" pursuant to applicableFRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of theappellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automaticdismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R.42-1.Payment of the $455.00 U.S. Court of Appeals docket fee is past due. Appellantshall correct this deficiency within 14 days. Failure to respond to this order withinthe time set out will result in the dismissal of the appeal for failure to prosecute.See 9th Cir. R. 42-I. The fee is payable to the Clerk of the District Court, the TaxCourt or the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.



5/7

Case B 11-cv-{10485-AG -A.lW Docrrrnent ?&9 Filed 07/14l11 Page ?- nf 4 Page ll-)#.6912LINITED STATES COTJRT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITFILEDJUL 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER. CLERKU.S. COURT OF APPEALS

LISA LIBERI; PHILIP J. BERG,Esquire; TFIE LAW OFFICES OFPFIILP J. BERG; LISA M. OSTELLA;GO EXCEL GLOBAL,Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.ORLY TAITZ, AKA Dr. Orly Taitz,

Defendant - Appellant,and

DEFEND OTIR FREEDOMSFOLINDATIONS, INC. ; SANKEYINVESTIGATIONS, INC. ; NEILSANKEY; LAW OFFICES OF ORLYT ATTZ; ORLY T AITZ, INC. ;INTELIUS,INC.; ORACLECORPORATION; REED ELSEVIER,INC.; TODD SANKEY; LEKSNE)ilSGROUP, fNC., a Division of ReedElsevier, Inc.; LE)OSNEXIS, INC., aDivision of Reed Elsevier, Inc.;LE)OSNE)OS RISK ANDINFORMATION ANALYTICSGROUP, INC.; LE)ilSNEXIS RISKSOLUTIONS, INC., a Division of ReedElsevier, Inc.; LE)ilSNE)ilS SEISINT,[NC., a Division of Reed Elsevier, Inc.,

No. 1l-56164D.C. No. 8: 1 1 -cv-00485-AG-AJWU.S. District Court for CentralCalifornia, Santa AnaTIME SCIIEDULE ORDER



6/7

Case 8:1 1-cv-00485-AG "AJW Docurnent 289 Filed AV i14111 Page 3 of 4 Page lDDBA Accurint; LEXISNE)ilSCHOICEPOINT, INC., a Division ofReed Elsevier, Inc.; DAYLIGHTCI]EMICAL INFORMATIONSYSTEMS, INC.; YOSEF T AJTZ,Individually and as Owner/CEO ofDaylight Chemical Information Systems,Inc.,

Defendants.

The parties shall meet the following time schedule.If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-designate the transcripts pursuant to fth Cir. R. l0-3.1. If there were no reportedhearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.Thu., July 21, 20ll

Fri.o August 12r 20llThu., November 100 20llTue., Decembe r 20,201t

Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration forAppellate ECF is confirmed after this date, theMediation Questionnaire is due within one day ofreceiving the email from PACER confirming yourregistration.Transcrip shall be ordered.Transcript shall be frled by court reporter.Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shallbe served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir.R. 32-1.Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of recordshall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and9th Cir. R. 32-1.

Thu., January l9r20l2

The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteendays of service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R.32-1.Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result inautomatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R- 42-1.



7/7

Case 8:1 1-cv-00485-AG -AJW Filed ATl14l11 Page 4 of 4FOR THE COURT:Molly C. DwYerClerk of CourtFreddie BrownDeputy Clerk

Document 289#:6914Page lDCase: 11-56164 07/17/2011 Page: 7 of 7 ID: 7822563 DktEntry: 2

liberi v taitz (ninth circuit) - 2.0 - appellant orly taitz mediation questionnaire -...

Documents