lexisnexis casemap national webinar

79
eDiscovery & Litigation Management Solutions Daniel Gold Twitter: @LexisGold

Upload: daniel-gold

Post on 26-Jun-2015

223 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

This is a national presentation I designed and gave on LexisNexis CaseMap

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

eDiscovery & Litigation Management Solutions

Daniel Gold

Twitter: @LexisGold

Page 2: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Growth in Data

2

Benefits of “The Cloud”

1

E-discovery Cases

3

Page 3: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Growth in Data

2 1

E-discovery Cases

3

Benefits of “The Cloud”

Page 4: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

eDiscovery cases on the rise

Source: Gibson Dunn 2011 Mid-Year eDiscovery Update, July 22, 2011

Page 5: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Sanction filings on the rise

Source: Gibson Dunn 2011 Mid-Year eDiscovery Update, July 22, 2011 Over 50% increase in 1 year!

Page 6: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Sanction awards on the rise

Source: Gibson Dunn 2011 Mid-Year eDiscovery Update, July 22, 2011

Page 7: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

1989

Page 8: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Judge Wayne E. Alley

Page 9: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

” “ If there is a hell to which

disputatious, uncivil, vituperative lawyers go, let it be one in which the damned are eternally locked in discovery disputes with other lawyers of equally repugnant attributes.

Kreuger v. Pelican Prod. Corp., C/A No. 87-2385-A, slip. op. (W .D. Okla. Feb. 24, 1989).

Page 10: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Plaintiff’s attorney “simply did not understand the technical depths to which electronic discovery can sometimes go.”

Chief Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez GFI Acquisition, LLC v. Am. Federated Title Corp. (In re A&M Fla. Props. II, LLC), 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1217 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2010)

Page 11: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

How many times can a litigant ignore his discovery obligations before his misconduct catches up with him … the record shows that [Plaintiff] failed to comply with a document request and two court orders compelling production of materials within the party’s control.

Judge Neil Gorsuch Lee v. Max International, LLC, 2:09-CV-0175-DB, US

Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit (May 3, 2011)

Page 12: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Plaintiff has evidenced a pattern of inexcusable disregard for the authority of this Court … and the larger civil discovery process and warrants imposition of substantial ameliorative and punitive sanctions.

Judge Mary S. Scriven  Bray & Gillespie Mgmt., LLC v. Lexington

Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 400 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2010)

Page 13: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

There still is no doubt in this Court's mind that this massive discovery failure resulted from significant mistakes, oversights, and miscommunication on the part of both outside counsel and Qualcomm employees.

Judge Barbara L. Major Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.,

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33889 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2010)

Page 14: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it … the duty to preserve means what it says and that a failure to preserve records … will inevitably result in the spoliation of evidence.”

Judge Shira Scheindlin Pension Comm. of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of Am. Sec., LLC, 685 F. Supp. 2d 456, 462 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Page 15: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The defendant’s “acts of spoliation be treated as contempt of this court, and that as a sanction ... he be imprisoned for a period not to exceed two years”

Judge Paul Grimm Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.,

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93644 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010)

Page 16: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Judge Paul Grimm Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.,

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93644 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010)

To impose sanctions for spoliation in the 4th circuit, there must be: 1) bad faith 2) willfulness, 3) gross negligence, or 4) ordinary negligence

Page 17: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Rule 37(b)(2)

Thanks  to  Ralph  Losey  on  the  inspira2on  on  the  graphic!  

Page 18: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The defendant willfully violated … [had] blatant disregard for the Court's Discovery Order … [and showed a] lack of appreciation of the discovery process in general.

Judge T. John Ward Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20353 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2011)

Page 19: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The defendant had to provide a copy of this Order to every Plaintiff in every case it had against it going back two years or pay $500k as a fine if it did not within 30 days. For the next 5 years, it has to attach a copy of this Order with its first pleading or filing on every new lawsuit, no matter in what capacity they are involved.

Judge T. John Ward Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20353 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2011)

Page 20: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 21: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Lawyers, Clients & Judges “have an interest in establishing a culture of cooperation in the discovery process. Over-contentious discovery is a cost that has outstripped any advantage in the face of ESI and the data deluge…

Page 22: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

“…It is not in anyone’s interest to waste resources on unnecessary disputes, and the legal system is strained by ‘gamesmanship’ or ‘hiding the ball,’ to no practical effect … [and] it is an exercise in economy and logic.”

Page 23: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The essence of the proportionality principle is that the legal system ought not to make e-discovery so burdensome that people with meritorious claims are deprived of their ability to win.

Source: The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, April 2010

Richard A. (Doc) Schneider Partner, E-discovery Practice Group King & Spalding

Page 24: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Ultimately, our challenge is to achieve a proportional result, so that we don't spend $500,000 on electronic discovery in a case that's worth $1 million.

Browning Marean III Senior Counsel at DLA Piper

Page 25: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The idea is to take the 100 gigabytes of data you just collected … process and review only what is potentially relevant. You can wind up saving hundreds of thousands of dollars in a case.

Kelly F. Farmer Manager of Data Governance and Discovery Services

Page 26: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Growth in Data

2

E-discovery Cases

3 1

Benefits of “The Cloud”

Page 27: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

What’s a gigabyte?

Page 28: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

256 kb!

Page 29: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

1.4 MB!

Page 30: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

100 MB!

Page 31: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

1 GB!

Page 32: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

75,000 Number physical pages that equal 1GB of data

Page 33: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 34: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

350,000 Number of physical pages that make up 1 DVD of data

Page 35: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

35  1 Terabyte

Cornell Law Library!

Page 36: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

36  137 Terabytes

Library of Congress!

17 Million Books!

Page 37: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

1,024 TB equals 1 Petabyte

Page 38: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Want to see what a petabyte looks like?

16GB iPad!

Page 39: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

2,717 feet tall!!

Burj Dubai Tower!

2,604 feet tall!!

62,500 fully loaded 16GB iPads!

Source: http://wikibon.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/cloud-storage-v2.html

Page 40: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

equals 1 Exabyte 1,048,576 TB

Page 41: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

equals 1 Zettabyte 1,073,741,824 TB

Page 42: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

1,099,511,627,776 TB equals 1 Yottabyte

Page 43: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The bad news?

Page 44: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

It won’t get better.

Page 45: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

The growth of “Big Data” (massive amounts of unstructured data that are not traditionally stored in a Relational form in enterprise databases) in the next 5 years, says Gartner.

800%

Page 46: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

IDC (International Data Corporation) estimates that by 2020, transactions on the Internet will reach 450 billion per day!

Client data is doubling every 3 years

Enterprise-generated content will exceed 240 Exabytes!

Page 47: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Court and Regulatory-Imposed ESI

Court Imposed Responsibility to Monitor Client’s ESI

Sanctions for Failure to Disclose

Capability of In-House IT Systems & Administrative Costs

Recovering IT Costs in Compliance with Ethical Rules

Increased Regulatory & Litigation Workload

Federal and State Rules and Case Law

Page 48: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Gartner Research Study 2011

by 2013 $1.5B

E-Discovery spend to hit

Page 49: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Average Outside Counsel Total Litigation Costs

Source: Lawyers for Civil Justice et al., Statement on Litigation Cost Survey of Major Companies (May 2010)

$66M increase

in 8 years

Page 50: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Source: Fulbright's 7th Annual Litigation Trends Survey Report 

over last year 12%

E-Discovery spend increased

Page 51: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Increased demand for AFA’s since 2008

400%

Page 52: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Volume Relevancy

Analysis  

Processing  

Document  Review  

Presenta2on  Produc2on  Informa2on  Management   Iden2fica2on  

Preserva2on  

Collec2on  

Page 53: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Growth in Data

2 1

E-discovery Cases

3

Benefits of “The Cloud”

Page 54: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

54  

What is the cloud?

Page 55: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

55  

Electric Grid

Page 56: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 57: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

3 flavors

Page 58: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

SaaS PaaS

IaaS (Infrastructure-as-a-Service)

(Platform-as-a-Service)

(Software-as-a-Service)

Page 59: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 60: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 61: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

61  

Page 62: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Gartner Highlights Key Predictions for IT Organizations & Users in 2010 and Beyond

By 2012, 20 percent of businesses will own no IT assets.

By 2014, over 3 billion of the world's population will be able to transact electronically via mobile or Internet technology.

By 2013, mobile phones will overtake PCs as the most common Web access device worldwide.

http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1278413

Page 63: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

What about law firms?

Page 64: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

64  

Page 65: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Increase your firm's capacity

Why use it for your firm?

Decrease data management costs

Reduce your risk

Increased productivity

Page 66: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Managed Solutions# On-Demand Storage# Online Review# Dedicated Field Engineers# Disaster Recovery# World-Class Data Centers# Personalized Customer Service#

What do you look for?

Page 67: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Ethical Considerations Professional Ethics Committee of the Florida Bar Op. 10-2 (2011)

Pennsylvania Bar Association Ethics Opinion No. 2010-060 (2010)

North Carolina Bar 2011 Formal Ethics Opinion 6 (2011)

Iowa Committee on Practice Ethics and Guidelines Ethics Opinion 11-01 (2011)

New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Professional Ethics Op. 842 (2010)

Page 68: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

“a law firm may contract with a vendor of software as a service provided the lawyer uses reasonable care to safeguard confidential client information.”

Ethical Considerations

Page 69: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Most lawyers are already dependent upon some form of SaaS whether it’s voice mail or email or Lexis research trails.

Lawyers must also engage in periodic education about ever-changing security risks presented by the internet ... [and] if you don’t understand the technology and/or are not willing to keep updated as it develops, you will need to retain someone who will handle that for your firm.

http://virtuallawpractice.org/2012/02/nc-cloud-computing-opinion-published/

Page 70: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

“As the technology and products improve, cloud-computing platforms will become a more palatable alternative for large and small firms alike.”

Page 71: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

So now what?

Page 72: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

4-fold solution to handling eDiscovery

Ralph Losey Partner & e-Discovery Team Lead Jackson Lewis

1. Lawyers, technology, firm management = eDiscovery Team

2.  Education and training 3. Cooperation and transparency 4. Metrics and new technology

Page 73: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Questions to ask:

What few things must absolutely go right in order for you to have protocol in place for handling eDiscovery?

Page 74: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

What is your budget?

What is the volume of documents?

What kind of data do you have?

What is your timeframe?

Questions to ask:

Page 75: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Can this really be done in-house?

Do you have an eDiscovery process?

Do you have the people & resources needed to be successful?

Is there firm-wide buy-in process that is needed?

Questions to ask:

Page 76: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Is a hosted solution or an in-house software solution makes sense?

What kind of training, rollout and implementation can you get?

If you chose in-house, could you demo the software before buying?

How long before everyone is up and running on the software?

Questions to ask:

Page 77: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar
Page 78: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

LexisNexis E-Discovery Solutions Gain greater control over e-discovery with flexible, integrated software and hosting options.

lexisnexis.com/ediscovery-solutions

[email protected]

Page 79: LexisNexis CaseMap National Webinar

Daniel Gold

Twitter: @LexisGold