Line Engineering Engineering

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Unique Id. LES

Rev 0

Page 1 of 4

Eskom Holdings Limited Reg No 2002/015527/06

ENQUIRY NO NAME OF BUYER NAME OF PM Thabo Majola PROJECT Gau-Gauteng Tower Strengthening Project1

SCOPE

Supply all material required as per scope and strengthen the 33m tower at Brakfontein RS. Supply all material required as per scope and strengthen the 30m tower at Princess SS. Supply all material required as per scope and strengthen the 64m tower at Lethabo PS. Supply all material required as per scope and strengthen the 39m tower at Eiger SS. Appointed contractor shall supervise, accept and sign off the towers on behalf of ET.

CONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER

Name and Details

PURPOSE

To assess whether the above-mentioned supplier/s submitted the required technical documentation as required in the Enquiry referenced above, and that the documentation complies with the specified requirements.

REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION

Technical Evaluation Guideline GBEG 474-011 Note: The list of reference documentation could vary depending on the nature of the enquiry

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Notes: The score for all method statements will not be exclusively based on submission; the content and quality of the method statement will be considered.

Comments field to be populated for all scores. If the contractor complies with the all the requirements, he will achieve maximum score (5). The engineering gatekeeper is 70%.

Line Engineering Engineering

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Unique Id. LES

Rev 0

Page 2 of 4

Eskom Holdings Limited Reg No 2002/015527/06

QUALITATIVE EVALUATION CRITERIA

DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS WEIGHT AND SCORE % RESULT

1. Competency

Item No. Item Weighted (10%)

Weight (W)

Actual (A)

Max (M)

Result(R) (A / M) X W

1.1

Submit a method statement detailing how the work will be executed: Technical Approach: The evaluation of the bidder’s ability to demonstrate technical sufficiency in their proposed technical and management approach to perform and support the requirements as indicated in the scope of works. In particular the method statement shall be evaluated in detail. Provide a Sanding (tower cleaning ) Method statement

20% X 5 X

1.2 Provide a detailed member replacement Method statement 20% X 5 X

1.3 Provide a detailed Tower coating and painting Method statement 20% X 5 X

`Result (R) = (A / M) X W Maximum : 10%

Subsection = sum of Result (R)

%

Comments

1.1

1.2

1.3

2. Capability

Item No. Item Weighted (70%)

Weight (W)

Actual (A)

Max (M)

Result(R) (A / M) X W

2.1

A list of past projects of the similar nature completed successfully: Previous Experience: The tenderer’s experience in delivering projects of a similar nature and scale in the timeline specified will be assessed

20% X 5 X

2.2

Provide details of the trained and certified staff and climbers by providing the job profiles Capability: The qualifications and experience of the key staff (Contract Manager, Site Agent, Foreman) identified in the proposed organizational chart and recorded in the curriculum vitae will be evaluated in the context of the requirements of the proposed project.

20% X 5 X

Result (R) = (A / M) X W Maximum : 70%

Subsection = sum of Result (R)

%

Comments

2.1

2.2

Line Engineering Engineering

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Unique Id. LES

Rev 0

Page 3 of 4

Eskom Holdings Limited Reg No 2002/015527/06

Technical Evaluation Guideline GBEG 474-011 TECHNICAL THRESHOLD

Table 2: Description of the scores

Overall Comments

REVIEWED BY Sibonelo Nzama

09/09/2020

Name Signature Date

Line Engineering Engineering

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Unique Id. LES

Rev 0

Page 4 of 4

Eskom Holdings Limited Reg No 2002/015527/06

APPROVED BY

Suren Natesan

09/09/2020

Name Signature Date