leroy elementary - riverside school district - state facilities report

8/14/2019 Leroy Elementary - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report

1/48

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary

Program Type Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting Rural

Assessment Name Copy of Leroy Elementary School - Final

Assessment Date 2008-03-18

Cost Set: 2007

Building Name Leroy Elementary

Building IRN 20180

Building Address 13613 Painesvil le Warren Road

Building City Painesville

Building Zipcode 44077

Building Phone (440) 254-4543

Acreage 18.5

Current Grades K-5

Teaching Stations 20

Number of Floors 2

Student Capacity 239

Current Enrollment 315

Enrollment Date 2007-08-23

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms 18

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal Ms. Heidi Stark

Building Type Elementary

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary Page 1


2/48

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Leroy Elementary(20180)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

29,898 Total Existing Square Footage

1929,1959,1994 Building Dates

K-5 Grades

315 Current Enrollment

20 Teaching Stations

18.5 Site Acreage

Leroy Elementary School is a two (2) story structure totaling 29,898 s.f. The original facility of 8,943 s.f. was constructed in 1929. A classroom wing addition of 10,104 s.f. wasconstructed in 1959. The administration and media center addition of 10,851 s.f. was constructed in 1994. The facility contains one (1) gymnasium of 1,902 s.f. which also serveas student dining, one (1) kitchen of 479 s.f. and one (1) media center of 1,275 s.f. Leroy Elementary currently provides space for grades K-5. The majority of the complex is notaccessible and does not conform to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Guidelines. Typical classrooms throughout the complex are undersized and do not conform the current standards established by the State of Ohio. The school facility is located on an 18.5 acre site in a rural area. School buses load/unload at a primary entry to the schoo

complex. The existing structure is constructed wi th load bearing masonry walls with supported deck and slab on grade construction. The 1929 building was constructed with woofloor structures. The structure is outfitted with a motion sensor security system and a fire alarm system with manual pull stations. The complex does not contain a suppressionsystem and the majority of the complex is not air conditioned. A limited portion of the 1994 addition is provided with an air conditioning system.

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Leroy Elementary(20180) Page 2


3/48

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180)

Name Year Handicapped Access F loors S quare Feet

Original Building 1929 no 2 8,943

Classroom Wing Addition 1959 no 1 10,104

Administration/Media Center Addition 1994 yes 1 10,851

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180) Page 3


4/48

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180)

AdditionAuditorium

FixedSeating

CorridorsAgriculturalEducation

Lab

PrimaryGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks

AdultEducation

BoardOffices

OutsideAgencies

AuxiliaryGymnasiu

Original Building (1929) 1488

Classroom WingAddition (1959)

1469 1902 479

Administration/MediaCenter Addition (1994)

1861 1275

Master Planning Considerations

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180) Page 4


5/48

Existing CT Programs for AssessmentNext Page

Previous Page

Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet

No Records Found

Legend:

Not in current design manual

In current design manual but missing from assessment

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16: Page 5


6/48

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180)

Building Summary - Leroy Elementary (20180)

District: Riverside Local Local SD

Name: Leroy Elementary

Address: 13613 Painesville Warren Road

Painesville,OH 44077

Bldg. IRN: 20180

County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

Contact: Ms. Heidi Stark

Phone: (440) 254-4543

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18 By: Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 18.5

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 20

Current Enrollment 315 Classrooms: 18

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number ofFloors

Current SquareFeet



Administration/Media CenterAddition

1994 yes 1 10,851

Total 29,898

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2007 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $867,042.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $147,525.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $140,852.25 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $145,801.00 -

F. Windows 3 $128,920.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 3 $23,360.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $119,207.50 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $195,843.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $433,232.35 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $149,490.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $74,745.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $29,898.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $44,847.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $295,589.80 -

P. Site Condition 3 $324,064.00 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $34,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 3 $9,300.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $497,168.50 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $76,188.00 -

W. Technology 3 $319,310.64 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $987,080.49 -

Total $5,043,464.53

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 200 178 89% Satisfacto

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 400 284 71% Satisfacto

3.0Plant Maintainability 200 142 71% Satisfacto

4.0Building Safety and Security 400 294 74% Satisfacto

5.0Educational Adequacy 400 268 67% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 400 264 66% Borderl

Commentary

Total 2000 1430 72% Satisfacto

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 104.16

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $5,253,272

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180) Page 6


7/48


Original Building (1929) Summary





Bldg. IRN: 20180



Phone: (440) 254-4543








Current SquareFeet




1994 yes 1 10,851

Total 29,898



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 3 $34,104.00 -




F. Windows 3 $58,080.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $13,414.50 -







U. Life Safety 3 $419,064.75 -


W. Technology 3 $95,511.24 -


- $496,149.62 -

Total $2,535,064.81









Commentary


C=Under Contract






8/48


Classroom Wing Addition (1959) Summary





Bldg. IRN: 20180



Phone: (440) 254-4543








Current SquareFeet




1994 yes 1 10,851

Total 29,898



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 3 $37,464.00 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $0.00 -


F. Windows 3 $70,840.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 3 $0.00 -


I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $0.00 -





N. Fire Alarm 3 $15,156.00 -






T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $42,838.00 -


W. Technology 3 $107,910.72 -


- $274,647.84 -

Total $1,403,306.66









Commentary


C=Under Contract






9/48


Administration/Media Center Addition (1994) Summary





Bldg. IRN: 20180



Phone: (440) 254-4543








CurrentSquare Feet




1994 yes 1 10,851

Total 29,898


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 3 $75,957.00 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $0.00 -


F. Windows 3 $0.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 3 $0.00 -


I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $0.00 -





N. Fire Alarm 3 $16,276.50 -






T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $35,265.75 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $0.00 -

W. Technology 3 $115,888.68 -


- $216,283.03 -

Total $1,105,093.06




2.0Structural and MechanicalFeatures

400 284 71% Satisfacto





Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summaryrequested from a Master Plan.



10/48

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the 1929 and 1959 structures is a converted gas fired furnace system. The existing system for the 1994 addition is a gasfired boiler system which is original to the date of construction. The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning. A limited portionof the 1994 structure is provided wi th an air conditioning system.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the entire heating, ventilation, and cooling system throughout the entire complex due to condition, use ofdated equipment, and lack of proper ventilation and air conditioning. Convert to fully ducted system to conform to OSDM standards and current

ventilation requirements.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

OriginalBuilding (1929)8,943 ft

Classroom WingAddition (1959)10,104 ft

Administration/MediaCenter Addition (1994)10,851 ft

Sum Comments

HVAC SystemReplacement:

$22.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $657,756.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration piping layout and new controls, air conditioning)

Convert To DuctedSystem Replacement

$7.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $209,286.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings,soffits, etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC SystemReplacement if the existing HVAC system is non-ducte

Sum: $867,042.00 $259,347.00 $293,016.00 $314,679.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:Facility Assessment Page 10
http://-/?-http://-/?-


11/48

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The existing roof system for the entire complex is comprised of a modified bituminous system,a metal canopy system, and a coal tar system thatwere installed in various stages from 1978-2007. The majority of the existing assemblies exceed 15 years of age.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the existing dated roof assemblies. The modified bituminous roof system installed in 2007 at a portion of the1959 addition is satisfactory. Provisions for replacement of the metal canopy system are identified in plate "U".

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1929)8,943 ft

Classroom Wing Addition (1959)10,104 ft

Administration/Media Center Addition (1994)10,851 ft

Sum Comments

Built-up Asphalt:$7.00sq.ft. (Qty) 4,872 Required 5,352 Required 10,851 Required $147,525.00

Sum: $147,525.00 $34,104.00 $37,464.00 $75,957.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


12/48


13/48

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system for the entire complex is a 208/120 volt 3 phase 1,600 amp service. District officials noted the main electrical service andthe distribution system were updated in the recent past. The original 1929 building is constructed with wood framed floor assemblies. Renovationof this structure will impact system installations throughout the building.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the electrical system at the 1929 building. System installations at the 1959 and 1994 additions aresatisfactory.





Sum Comments

SystemReplacement:

$15.75sq.ft. Required $140,852.25(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for lifesafety systems. Does not include telephone or data cable orequipment) (Use items below ONLY when the entire system isNOT being replaced)

Sum: $140,852.25 $140,852.25 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


14/48

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The school facility contains 6 group restrooms (3 girls, 3 boys) and 3 single occupancy toilet rooms. Fixtures are a combination of newer andolder equipment. Waterclosets/toilets are typically floor mounted. A portion of the urinal installations are equipped with a continual flush system.The majority of the toilet facilities are not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA. The restrooms at the 1994 addition provideaccessible accommodations. A portion of the lavatories are lacking accessible faucet assemblies/hardware. District off icials noted domesticsupply piping is copper.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of all floor and wall mounted fixtures at the 1929 and 1959 buildings due to age, condition, or OSDM requirements.Provide for replacement of floor mounted watercloset assemblies at the 1994 addition. Provide accessible hardware at lavatories; provisionsidentified in Plate O. Provide complete plumbing system replacements at the 1929 building due to renovation/replacement of wood floorstructure.


Original Building(1929)8,943 ft


Administration/Media CenterAddition (1994)10,851 ft

Sum Comments

Back FlowPreventer:

$5,000.00unit 1 Required $5,000.00

Water TreatmentSystem:

$15,000.00unit 1 Required $15,000.00(Domestic Water System, softeninonly, per system)

Domestic SupplyPiping:

$3.50sq.ft. Required $31,300.50(remove / replace)

Sanitary WastePiping:

$3.50sq.ft. Required $31,300.50(remove / replace)

Toilet: $3,800.00unit 4 Required 2 Required 5 Required $41,800.00(new)

Urinal: $3,800.00unit 2 Required 1 Required $11,400.00(new)

Sink: $2,500.00unit 2 Required 2 Required $10,000.00(new)

Sum: $145,801.00 $110,401.00 $16,400.00 $19,000.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


15/48

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The window assemblies throughout the complex were updated with thermally efficient window assemblies wi th double pane glazing. Districtofficials noted the existing installations were installed in the distant past and now exceed 15+ years of age. A portion of the assemblies displaysigns of deterioration and glazing seals are compromised in multiple areas. The insert panels reduced daylight quantities over originalinstallations. The assemblies are operable and cannot be equipped with integral blinds. A portion of the structure is equipped with dated glassblock assemblies. District officials noted the window openings at the 1929 building were prone to leaking. The window assemblies at the 1994addition are original to date of construction and appeared to be in satisfactory condition.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of all window and glass block assemblies at the 1929 and 1959 additions to conform to OSDM standards andinclude integral blinds. The window assemblies at the 1994 addition are satisfactory.



Classroom Wing Addition(1959)10,104 ft

Administration/Media Center Addition(1994)10,851 ft

Sum Comments

InsulatedGlass/Panels:

$55.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,056 Required 1,288 Required $128,920.00(includesblinds)

Sum: $128,920.00 $58,080.00 $70,840.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


16/48

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The existing complex contains a masonry/concrete foundation system. There were a few areas of deterioration especially at the 1929 building.There was evidence of water infiltration at several areas of the ground floor (basement) areas of the 1929 building. A portion of the below gradewall structures have been temporarily covered with sheathing to hide areas of water infiltration from view at the below grade classroom areas.


Recommendations: Provide a waterproof membrane and drainage system at the exterior wall structures of the habited and classroom areas of the ground floor of the1929 building to prevent below grade water infiltration at the perimeter of the structure.





Sum Comments

Waterproofing Membrane: $5.00sq.ft.(Qty)

3,232 Required $16,160.00(include excavation abackfill)

Drainage Tile Systems /Foundation Drainage:

$18.00ln.ft. 400 Required $7,200.00(include excavation abackfill)

Sum: $23,360.00 $23,360.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


17/48

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The existing structures are constructed with masonry walls with brick exteriors. There are several areas of deterioration especially at olderportions of the complex. The 1929 building requires a moderate degree of tuckpointing. There are noteable areas of water infiltration especially atwindow openings and the perimeter of ceiling structures. Masonry lintels display evidence of corrosion at multiple locations.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide for replacement of deteriorated/corroded lintels at the original building. Provide masonry cleaning, tuckpointing, masonry repairs andmasonry sealing.





Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $7.50sq.ft.(Qty)

2,032 Required 1,160 Required $23,940.00(wall surface)

Exterior MasonryCleaning:

$1.50sq.ft.(Qty)

4,064 Required 5,804 Required 6,440 Required $24,462.00(wall surface)

Exterior MasonrySealing:

$1.00sq.ft.(Qty)

4,064 Required 5,804 Required 6,440 Required $16,308.00(wall surface)

Exterior Caulking: $2.50ln.ft. 264 Required 591 Required 224 Required $2,697.50(removing and replacing)

Replace Brick VeneerSystem:

$30.00sq.ft.(Qty)

60 Required $1,800.00(total removal and replacementincluding pinning and shoring)

Masonry LintelReplacement:

$250.00ln.ft. 200 Required $50,000.00(total removal and replacementincluding pinning and shoring)

Sum: $119,207.50 $77,860.00 $24,687.50 $16,660.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


18/48

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction for the 1959 and 1994 additions are slab on grade construction and a steel joist system. The roof system for the additionsare a steel joist system. The 1929 building is constructed with a wood floor and roof structure. Ceiling clearance at the ground floor is very low.Portions of the structure have a head clearance height of only 6-4.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the wood floor structures and provide a rated separation at the existing wood roof structure at the 1929building.





Sum Comments

Replace Wood Floor System $45.00sq.ft.(Qty)

4,038 Required $181,710.00

Fire Rated Drywall over ExistingWood Ceiling Joists

$3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

4,038 Required $14,133.00(per square feet ofrequired drywall)

Sum: $195,843.00 $195,843.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


19/48

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The current finishes at the 1929 and 1959 structures are dated, casework is wood and worn. The majority of the complex is lackinglockers/cubbies. The corridors are equipped with coat hooks. Distr ict officials did not provide the specific date of kitchen equipment but noted themajority of kitchen equipment is dated. The majority of the finishes at the 1994 addition are satisfactory except for flooring. District officials notedthe quality and durability of the existing vinyl tile has been an ongoing issue of concern..


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of all finishes, casework, locker/cubbies and kitchen equipment due to condition and extent of renovation work at the

1929 and 1959 additions. Replace deteriorated flooring and finishes disturbed by proposed renovation work at the 1994 addition.





Sum Comments

Paint: $2.00sq.ft. Required $21,702.00(partial finish - floor area/prep and installation)

Acoustic Ceiling: $3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

10,851 Required $37,978.50(partial finish - tear out and replace per area)

VCT: $2.50sq.ft.(Qty)

9,576 Required $23,940.00(partial finish - tear out and replace per area)

Carpet: $3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,275 Required $4,462.50(partial finish - tear-out and replace per area)

CompleteReplacement ofFinishes andCasework:

$13.85sq.ft. Required Required $263,800.95(middle, per building area, with removal of existing

Toilet Par tit ions: $1,000.00perstall

4 Required 2 Required 4 Required $10,000.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet AccessoryReplacement

$0.20sq.ft. Required Required $3,809.40(per building area)

Total KitchenEquipmentReplacement:

$141.00sq.ft.(Qty)

479 Required $67,539.00(square footage based upon only existing area offood preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas anwalk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existikitchen equipment)

Sum: $433,232.35 $129,649.15 $211,500.20 $92,083.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


20/48

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The entire complex contains fluorescent and incandescent lighting. Lighting levels are: computer lab-42.1 FC, music classroom-41.1 FC, mediacenter-70.0 FC, and typical classrooms-39.7 FC-49.9 FC.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting due to addition of suppression system, HVAC system and under illuminated spaces.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding Original Building(1929)8,943 ft



Sum Comments

Complete Building LightingReplacement

$5.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $149,490.00Includes demo of existinfixtures

Sum: $149,490.00 $44,715.00 $50,520.00 $54,255.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


21/48

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The current security system is a motion sensor security system with magnetic lock controlled entry. Site lighting is provided by a combination ofbuilding mounted and a few pole mounted fixtures. The provisions provide limited illumination of the exterior site.


Recommendations: Provide upgrade of the current security system and exterior lighting to conform to OSDM standards.




Sum Comments

Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $44,847.00(complete, area ofbuilding)

Exterior SiteLighting:

$1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $29,898.00building

Sum: $74,745.00 $22,357.50 $25,260.00 $27,127.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-


22/48

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The complex is equipped with exit signs and emergency egress lighting. The system was updated in the recent past. A portion of the existingfixture installations are ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommmended renovation work.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the emergency/egress lighting system due to the addition of sprinkler and HVAC systems.




Sum Comments

Emergency/EgressLighting:

$1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $29,898.00(complete, area ofbuilding)

Sum: $29,898.00 $8,943.00 $10,104.00 $10,851.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


23/48

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The complex is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations with zoned detection and horn/strobe signals. The existing system islacking horn/strobe signals in a portion of the occupiable rooms/spaces. The media center addition is equipped with smoke detectors. A portion ofequipment is ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm system. Provide an addressable system with horn/strobe signals in all occupiable rooms/spacesthroughout the entire complex.





Sum Comments

Fire AlarmSystem:

$1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $44,847.00(complete new system, including remoof existing)

Sum: $44,847.00 $13,414.50 $15,156.00 $16,276.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-


24/48

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: The existing complex provides partial accessibility but does not fully conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines in all areas. The 1929 and1959 additions do not provide accessible accommodations. Toilet rooms/restrooms and the floor levels at the 1929 structures are not accessible.A portion of the existing door assemblies do not provide the required maneuvering clearances. A portion of the facilitys means of egress are notaccessible due to interior and exterior level changes. A portion of the drinking fountains are not accessible. The majority of the door installationswere equipped with lever hardware but the door assemblies are dated in many areas. The 1994 addition was designed to provide accessibleaccommodations but a portion of the fixtures are lacking accessible faucets/hardware.


Recommendations: Provide for full accessibility throughout the entire complex in conformance with the provisions of the ADA and OSFC requirements.





Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required Required $2,989.80(per building area)

Lifts: $15,000.00unit 1 Required $15,000.00(complete)

Elevators: $50,000.00each 2 Required $100,000.00(per stop, $100,000 minimum)

Electric Water Coolers: $1,800.00unit 2 Required 1 Required $5,400.00(replacement double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit 7 Required 5 Required 2 Required $53,200.00(new ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 2 Required $2,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)

ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,100.00leaf 11 Required 24 Required $38,500.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroomdoor/light, includes hardware)

Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 9 Required 5 Required $70,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate

ADA standards when door opening is set back fromedge of corridor and cannot accommodate awheelchair.)

Other: Accessiblefaucets/valves

$500.00each 2 Required $1,000.00Accessible faucets/valves

Sum: $295,589.80 $188,194.30 $95,710.40 $11,685.10


http://-/?-http://-/?-


25/48

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: Buses load/unload at a primary entry to the school complex and share a common path of travel with vehicular traffic. Asphalt pavements displaysigns of deterioration. Sidewalks are cracked, raised, and/or spalled at limited locations. A portion of the existing egress door assemblies arelacking an accessible path of travel. P layground equipment was updated in the recent past. The soft surface play areas are lacking a containmentbarrier.


Recommendations: Replace deteriorated walks and pavements. Provide a dedicated bus loading/unloading zone. Provide an accessible path of travel from all egress

door assemblies. Provide a containment barrier at soft surface play areas.


OriginalBuilding(1929)8,943 ft

ClassroomWing Addition(1959)10,104 ft


Sum Comments

Playground Equipment: $1.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,788Required

2,020 Required2,170 Required $8,967.00(up to $100,000, per sq.ft . of school)

Removal of existing PlaygroundEquipment:

$2,000.00lump sum Required $2,000.00

Replace Existing AsphaltPaving:

$30.00sq. yard 1,655Required

1,875 Required 1,985 Required $165,450.00(including drainage / tear out for light oheavy duty asphalt)

Bus Drop-Off for Elementary $110.00perstudent

400 Required $44,000.00(Number of students should berounded up to the nearest 100. $550per bus; 40 students per bus; 80% ofelementary school students riding)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

600 Required 600 Required 1,000 Required $8,800.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance forUnforeseen Circumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two.(Applies for whole building, so only onaddition should have this item)

Sitework Allowance forUnforeseen Circumstances forbuildings between 0 SF and100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $44,847.00Include this one or the next. (Eachaddition should have this item)

Sum: $324,064.00 $164,146.50 $76,836.00 $83,081.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-


26/48

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The facility is served by an on site sewage treatment system. District officials noted the system functioned satisfactorily.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: The system is satisfactory, no work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1929)

8,943 ft

Classroom Wing Addition (1959)

10,104 ft

Administration/Media Center Addition (1994)

10,851 ft

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


27/48

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: District officials reported that domestic supply piping is copper. The complex is served by an on site well system. District officials reported thesystem was in satisfactory condition and provided adequate pressure to serve the current needs of the complex.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: No work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1929)8,943 ft Classroom Wing Addition (1959)10,104 ft Administration/Media Center Addition (1994)10,851 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


28/48

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: The existing door assemblies are a combination of newer and dated installations. A portion of the assemblies are deteriorated and/or containsingle pane glazing. The storefront door assemblies at the media center addition contain single pane glazing.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of dated/deteriorated door assemblies. Replace door assemblies equipped with single pane glazing with thermallyefficient installations.





Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame andHardware:

$2,000.00perleaf

4 Required 5 Required 8 Required $34,000.00(includes removal ofexisting)

Sum: $34,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,000.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


29/48

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: District officials have provided information identifying hazardous materials in this facility.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials as identified by the Hazardous Materials Consultant. A full EEHA assessment will be required to verify theaccuracy of the provided information.




Sum Comme

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal, IncludingMastic

$3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

3,100 Required $9,300.00See J

Sum: $9,300.00 $9,300.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


30/48

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The entire complex is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. The 1929 building is equipped with three exterior egress stairassemblies that are unenclosed and/or inappropriately enclosed. The egress stair assembly exiting the upper floor of the building is barracadedwith caution tape to prevent use of the deteriorated installation. The handrail/guardrail systems at a portion of the interior stairs do not conform tocurrent code provisions or ADA accessibility requirements.


Recommendations: Provide an automated fire suppression system throughout the entire complex. Enclose/replace open exterior stair assemblies and provide

compliant handrail systems.





Sum Comments

Sprinkler / FireSuppression System:

$3.25sq.ft.(Qty)

8,943 Required 10,104 Required 10,851 Required $97,168.50(includes increase of servicepiping, if required)

New Exterior StairEnclosure

$42,500.00perlevel

6 Required $255,000.00(all inclusive)

Well Pump (Electric): $30,000.00unit 1 Required $30,000.00

Storage Tank (known byowner):

$50,000.00unit 1 Required $50,000.00(30,000-35,000 gallon tanks)

Well: $45,000.00unit 1 Required $45,000.00

Handrails: $5,000.00level 2 Required 2 Required $20,000.00

Sum: $497,168.50 $419,064.75 $42,838.00 $35,265.75


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


31/48

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: Typical classrooms are furnished with a combination of newer and older equipment. The majority of the media center addition is equipped withnewer aged furnishings.


Recommendations: Provide for furnishing replacement based upon the rating of 5 given for item 6.17 of the attached CEFPI rating.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1929)8,943 ft Classroom Wing Addition (1959)10,104 ft Administration/Media Center Addition (1994)10,851 ft Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 4 to 5$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $76,188.00

Sum: $76,188.00 $35,772.00 $40,416.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


32/48

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: Typical classrooms are equipped with 4 data ports for teacher and student use, televisions, ceiling mounted projectors, and smart boards.Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.


Recommendations: Replace all wiring due to extensive renovations to be undertaken and to fully conform to OSDM standards.




Sum Comme

ES portion of building with total SF< 50,000

$10.68sq.ft.(Qty)

8,943 Required 10,104 Required 10,851 Required $319,310.64

Sum: $319,310.64 $95,511.24 $107,910.72 $115,888.68


http://-/?-http://-/?-


33/48

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $4,056,384.04

7.00% Construction Contingency $283,946.88

Subtotal $4,340,330.92

16.20% Non-Construct ion Costs $703,133.61

Total Project $5,043,464.53

Construction Contingency $283,946.88

Non-Construction Costs $703,133.61

Total for X. $987,080.49

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Land Survey 0.03% $1,302.10

Soil Borings 0.10% $4,340.33

Agency Approval Fees 0.15% $6,510.50

Construction Testing 0.25% $10,850.83

Printing 0.27% $11,718.89

Advertising 0.03% $1,302.10

Builders Risk 0.11% $4,774.36

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $325,524.82

CM Compensation 6.00% $260,419.86

Commissioning 0.33% $14,323.09

Maintenance Plan Advisor 0.11% $4,774.36

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.32% $57,292.37

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $703,133.61


http://-/?-http://-/?-


34/48

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Jeff Tuckerman Date of Appraisal 2008-03-18

Building Name Leroy Elementary

Street Address 13613 Painesville Warren Road

City/Town, State, Zip Code Painesville, OH 44077

Telephone Number(s) (440) 254-4543

School District Riverside Local Local SD

Setting: Rural

Site-Acreage 18.5 Building Square Footage 29,898

Grades Housed K-5 Student Capacity 239

Number of Teaching Stations 20 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 315

Dates of Construction 1929,1959,1994

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:School Facility Appraisal Page 34
http://-/?-http://-/?-


35/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25

The building sits on an 18.5 acre site.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 20

The site is geographically located to serve the school community.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 6

The site is located in a rural area with consistant high speed traffic.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 8

The site contains mature trees, open lawn, and low shrubbery.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 9

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

Playground equipment was updated in the recent past. The soft surface play areas are lacking a containment barrier.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 5

The site was relatively flat without steep inclines.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 3

The site was excessively wet at the time of the site visit but this is likely the result of recent heavy snows and rain.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

There was no designated area for this activi ty. The site is equipped with a playground area surrounded by woods.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 4

A limited portion of pavements were deteriorated.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 5

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

District officials noted there was adequate parking at this facility to serve the needs of the school.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 89


Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 35
http://-/?-http://-/?-


36/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


StructuralPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

The majority of the complex does not provide accessible accommodations or conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines. The 1994 addition providesaccessible accommodations.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 10

The roofs are comprised of various roof systems. Installations are a combination of newer and older assemblies. The majority of the roofs are dated.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 7

There were no significant signs of deterioration, settlement, or cracking, but there were noted areas of water infiltration.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 8

A portion of the complex is equipped with control joints. There were no significant areas of deterioration.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 8

The location of exits is adequate for student circulation. A portion of entrances are not accessible.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 8

The majority of the existing window assemblies were updated with thermally efficient units with double pane glazing.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 5

District officials provided a hazardous materials report indicating areas of known asbestos.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 6

The majority of the complex was not designed for flexibility of use.

Mechanical/ElectricalPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 10

Lighting levels do not conform to OSDM standards in some areas.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 12

Domestic supply piping is copper. District officials reported the system was satisfactory. The system is served by an on site well.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications 15 12

Typical classrooms are equipped with 4 data ports and a portion of the classrooms are equipped with projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equippedwith telephones.



37/48

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 10

Electrical service panels are located in the mechanical areas. The electrical system was recently updated.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for thedisabled

10 6

The majority of drinking fountains were not accessible and do not provide multi-height accommodations at the 1929 and 1959 buildings.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 6

The majority of the toilet facilities were not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA at the 1929 and 1959 buildings.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 9

The site is served by an on site sewage system. District officials noted the system was satisfactory.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 7

The facility is not equipped wi th a suppression system. The fire alarm system is lacking horn/strobe signals in some occupiable areas.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the officeand instructional areas

10 5

Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 3

A limited quantity of hose bibb connections are provided at the exterior of the structure.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 142


http://-/?-http://-/?-


38/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 12

The majority of window installations were updated. A poriton of the exterior doors contain single pane glazing.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 8

Floor surfaces were terrazzo, carpet, vinyl tile, and wood. Wood flooring was loose and deteriorated at the 1929 building.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

Suspended acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings were plaster.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 5

Casework installations are limited. The majority of casework is dated, a portion of casework was wood.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 9

The majority of the door assemblies were equipped with lever/ADA compliant hardware.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 6

The fixtures were a combination of wall and floor mounted units. Original/dated installations remain in many areas.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 7

Custodial space is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9

School officials noted electrical provisions were adequate to serve the facilitys current needs. The electrical system was updated in the recent past.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8

Exterior lighting was provided primarily by buiding mounted fixtures.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 71


http://-/?-http://-/?-


39/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 10

Buses load/unload at a primary entry to the school complex.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 7

Walkways are deteriorated in limited areas. There was no accessible path of travel to the site.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

The main ingress/egress drive is not equipped with a signal system.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 4

Vehicular entrances were not equipped with turning lanes.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground equipment was updated in the recent past. The soft surface play areas are lacking a containment barrier.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 15

The boilers and furnaces were located in the mechanical areas. Classrooms were equipped with unit ventilators.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 10

The facility contains multiple stair assemblies. A portion of the installations were not enclosed in rated assemblies. Exterior egress stair assemblies wereunenclosed.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 8

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic devices. A portion of installations are deteriorated.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

The facility was equipped with an emergency/egress lighting system.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 10

The majority of classroom doors are recessed and open outward. A portion of the installations do not provide the required maneuvering clearances.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 6



40/48

The facility contains a motion sensor system with controlled magnetic lock entry.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 2

Classrooms/educational areas were equipped with vinyl tile. Corridors were terrazzo and vinyl ti le. Tile is suspected to contain asbestos. Flooring is damaged inmany areas.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4

Stair risers do not exceed 7.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4

Safety glazing was identified at some locations.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains project into corridors.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 4

Main corridors lead to exits. A portion of the schools egress stair assemblies were unenclosed.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 13

Fire extinguishers were provided throughout the facility.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 10

Remote means of egress were provided from most areas. A portion of the structure is equiped with exterior egress stai rs.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 10

Rated assemblies could not be identified. Masonry construction may provide equivallence ratings.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 11

The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations. A portion of the occupiable spaces are lacking horn/strobe signals.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 147


http://-/?-http://-/?-


41/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 18

Typical classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 10

There is no designated space for this activi ty. Classrooms are undersized.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 7

The media center is located in the 1994 building at a remote location. The gymnasium is located in a classroom wing.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 5

There is no designated space for this activi ty. Classrooms are undersized.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 5

The majority of the complex was not equipped with lockers or cubbies. Classrooms and corridors were equipped with coat hooks.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 6

Storage space is limited. There is little casework in classrooms at the 1929 and 1959 additions.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 9

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 7

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 9

The media center is located in the 1994 addition and provides a pleasant environment.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

The gymnasium is utilized as student dining.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 7

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.



42/48

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 3

Music education takes place in a dedicated classroom. There are limited sound treatments.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 3

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 4

Technology education takes place in a dedicated classroom.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 1

There is no designated place for this activity.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3

Classroom storage provisions are limited at older portions of the complex.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 9

The teachers lounge is located in the 1994 addition.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 4

The gymnasium serves as student dining. The kitchen is undersized.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturi ty of the students served 5 5

Administrative offices are located in the 1994 addition.

5.20 Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 4

The administrative offices were a recent addition.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 4

The clinic is located in the administrative area of the 1994 addition.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 4

Administrative offices are located in the 1994 addition and provide a pleasant environment.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 4

Administrative offices are located in the 1994 addition and provide a pleasant environment.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 134


http://-/?-http://-/?-


43/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 10

Exterior masonry construction is appropriate for educational design.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 7

The site contains mature trees and open lawn, with few additional amenities.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 7

The site is located in a rural area with consistent high speed traffic.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 8

A portion of entrances were equipped with overhangs.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

The facility materials are consistent at the 1929 and 1959 additions. The 1994 addition provides a pleasant design.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 15

Portions of the complex are equipped with a unified color scheme.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 8

The majority of the facility is not equipped with air conditioning. A portion of the 1994 addition is equipped with an air conditioning system.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 8

The ventilation system does not conform to current OSDM standards at the 1929 and 1959 additions.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 12

Lighting levels are below OSDM standards in some areas.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 8

The majority of drinking fountains and toilet rooms do not provide accessible accommodations at older portions of the complex.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 7

The gymnasium and the media center provide the only common areas for socialization.

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 7



44/48

The complex corridors lead to exits. A portion of the exits were unenclosed.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 6

The gymnasium and the media center provide areas for interaction.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 6

The gymnasium also serves as student dining.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 6

Acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings are plaster.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 8

The majority of the window assemblies are equipped with insulated glazing, installations are updated at most areas.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 5

Furnishing and equipment is a combination of newer and dated installations.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 132


http://-/?-http://-/?-


45/48

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Leroy Elementary

K-5

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. The building is not suppressed.

2. The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 45
http://-/?-http://-/?-


46/48


Building Summary - Leroy Elementary (20180)





Bldg. IRN: 20180



Phone: (440) 254-4543








Current SquareFeet




1994 yes 1 10,851

Total 29,898



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 3 $147,525.00 -




F. Windows 3 $128,920.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $44,847.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $497,168.50 -


W. Technology 3 $319,310.64 -


- $987,080.49 -

Total $5,043,464.53









Commentary


C=Under Contract




Previous Page



47/48

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Leroy Elementary (20180) - Original Building

Owner: Riverside Local Local SD Bldg. IRN: 20180

Facility: Leroy Elementary BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00

4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00

6. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00

8. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00

10. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 3100 $3.00 $9,300.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00

12. (Sum of Lines 1-11) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $9,300.00

13. (Sum of Lines 1-9) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 1980

1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00

2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00

3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable

Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1. 8943 0 $0.05 $0.00

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None Reported

Description Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.00

2. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries

1. A12, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $9,300.002. A13, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $0.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and ti les; fireproofing; 12"12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16: Page 47


48/48

leroy elementary - riverside school district - state facilities report

Documents