legal issues of anti-doping policy in pro-sports
TRANSCRIPT
Legal Issues of Anti-Doping Policy in Professional Sports
2015 KADA Pro Sports Anti-Doping Symposium 2015. 11. 26.
Dal-Young Chang, Attorney at law @ APEX LLC.
APEX LLC. is an independent member firm of the EY global network.
Page 2
Background
Russia doping scandal
<source : NYT >
Page 3
Background
Park’s doping scandal
<source : http://zez2002.tistory.com/5089>
Page 4
Background
Pro Sports doping scandal in Korea
<source :http://www.newspim.com/view.jsp?newsId=20150625000425>
Page 5
Anti-doping law revision
제 35 조의 2( 선수의 도핑 검사 ) 경기단체에 등록된 선수는 문화체육관광부령으로 정하는 바에 따라 도핑방지위원회의 도핑 검사를 받아야 한다 . 이 경우 도핑 검사의 대상자 선정기준 및 선정방법은 도핑방지위원회가 정한다 .[ 본조신설 : 2015.5.18.][ 시행일 : 2015.11.19.]
국민체육진흥법
제 2 조 ( 정의 )11. " 경기단체 " 란 특정 경기 종목에 관한 활동과 사업을 목적으로 설립되고 대한체육회나 대한장애인체육회에 가맹된 법인이나 단체 또는 문화체육관광부장관이 지정하는 프로스포츠 단체를 말한다 .
Page 6
Anti-doping law revision
국민체육진흥법 시행규칙 제 39 조의 2( 선수의 도핑 검사 ) ① 법 제 35 조에 따른 한국도핑방지위원회 ( 이하 " 도핑방지위원회 " 라 한다 ) 는 법 제 35 조의 2 에 따른 도핑 검사를 위하여 매년 도핑 검사 대상자 , 검사 일정 등이 포함된 도핑 검사 계획을 수립한 후 이에 따라 도핑 검사를 실시하여야 한다 .② 도핑방지위원회는 제 1 항에 따라 도핑검사를 실시하려는 때에는 검사 대상 선수와 해당 경기단체에 도핑 검사에 필요한 협조를 요청할 수 있다 . 이 경우 해당 선수와 경기단체는 이에 협조하여야 한다 .③ 제 1 항 및 제 2 항에서 규정한 사항 외에 도핑 검사의 절차 , 방법 , 결과 관리 등에 필요한 사항은 도핑방지위원회가 정한다 .[ 본조신설 : 2015.9.25.][ 시행일 : 2015.11.19.]
Page 7
Anti-Doping System in Pro Sports
Steps1: Whereabouts moduleSteps2: TUE moduleSteps 3, 4 and 5: Doping control moduleStep 6: Lab result moduleSteps 7: Results management module
Whereabouts Whereabouts
Mission Order
Sample
Lab
Result
Lab Result
1
2
3
4
6
7
Sample
Lab Result
TUE TUE
5
<EX. Pro Baseball, KBO>
Page 8
Grounds of Regulations
제 35 조의 2( 제 39 조의 2)
Doping Test
국민체육진흥법 ( 시행규칙 )
Results Management
Sanctions
WhereaboutsSampling
Grounds of Regulations ?
Page 9
Grounds of Regulations
Anti-Doping ProgramDoping Test
Results Management
Sanctions
WhereaboutsSampling
Player’s Consent
Agreement
Regulations
CBA
JDA
Page 10
Prohibited Substances
국민체육진흥법 시행규칙 제 39 조의 2
Page 11
Prohibited Substances
NSF Product and Service Listings
A. Drugs of Abuse
B. Performance Enhancing Substances
C. Stimulants
D. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
E. Adding Prohibited Substances to the Program
Page 12
Sample Collection
In-Competition Testing
Out of Competition Testing
Off-season
Championship seasonPost-season
Blood collection
urine collection
Random selection
Target selection
Page 13
Sample Collection
In-Competition Testing
Out of Competition Testing
Blood collection
Off- season
Effectiveness of anti doping programs
Protection of Right of Player
RTP Selection criteria
Sample collection
Page 14
Sample Collection
3. TESTING
A. Performance Enhancing Substances, Stimulants and
DHEAB. Drugs of Abuse
C. Reasonable Cause Testing
D. Follow-Up Testing
E. Collection Procedures and Testing Protocols
All testing conducted pursuant to the Program shall
be conducted in compliance with the Collection
Procedures and Testing Protocols of the Program
and the protocols of the Montreal Laboratory.
Page 15
Provisional Suspension
Interim Suspensions
Page 16
Harmonization on Sanctions
Severe punishment Strict Liability Principle
Disqualification from a particular competition and suspension from Future competition.
Disqualification of results in the event during which an anti doping rule violation occurs
The Burden of Proving the Violation
Reducing or Eliminating Suspension in Exceptional Circumstances
principle of nulla poena sine culpa
Need for Flexibility
Page 17
Harmonization on Sanctions
JDA
Page 18
Harmonization on Sanctions
JDA
Page 19
Sanction & Appeals
<source : KADA>
Organization of Committee
Page 20
Sanction & Appeals
Appeal CommitteeSanction CommitteeHearing Panel
Organization of Committee
Decisions
Page 21
Sanction & Appeals
Arbitration Panel
Appeal Committee
Independence Fairness
Sanction Committee
Hearing Panel
Compositions of Committee
Page 22
Sanction & Appeals
(9) “Arbitration Panel” shall mean the impartial arbitrator or, where either Party elects in advance of the opening of the hearing in a matter, a tripartite panel so empowered and composed of the impartial arbitrator and two party arbitrators, one appointed by the Association, the other appointed by the LRD. The impartial arbitrator, who shall in all instances be designated as the Panel Chair, shall be appointed by agreement of the Association and the LRD. In the event the Association and the LRD are unable to agree upon the appointment of the impartial arbitrator, they jointly shall request that the American Arbitration Association furnish them a list of prominent, professional arbitrators. Upon receipt of said list, they shall alternate in striking names from the list until only one remains.
The arbitrator whose name remains shall be deemed appointed as the impartial arbitrator. At any time during the term of this Agreement either the Association or the LRD may terminate the appointment of the impartial arbitrator by serving written notice upon him and the other Party; provided that no such termination shall in any way impair the authority of the impartial arbitrator to render awards with respect to matters fully submitted to him. Within 30 days of any such termination, the Association and LRD shall either agree upon a successor impartial arbitrator or select a successor from an American Arbitration Association list, as set forth above. Decisions of the Arbitration Panel shall be made by the impartial arbitrator or, where the panel is tripartite, by majority vote.
CBA
Compositions of Committee
Page 23
Arbitration Panel
Appeal Committee
Decisions
Finality
Resort to a court of law
Page 24
Finality
(c) Notwithstanding the definition of “Grievance” set forth in subparagraph (a) above, “Grievance” shall not mean a complaint or dispute which involves the interpretation or application of, or compliance with the provisions of the first sentence of paragraph 3(c) of the Uniform Player’s Contract. However, nothing herein shall alter or abridge the rights of the Parties, or any of them, to resort to a court of law for the resolution of such complaint or dispute. Anything in the Grievance Procedure provided for in the Basic Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, complaints or disputes as to any rights of the Players or the Clubs with respect to the sale or proceeds of sale of radio or television broadcasting rights in any baseball games by any kind or method of transmission, dissemination or reception shall not be subject to said Grievance Procedure. However, nothing herein or in the Grievance Procedure shall alter or abridge the rights of the Parties, or any of them, to resort to a court of law for the resolution of such complaint or dispute.
CBAResort to a court of law
Page 25
Finality
CBAResort to a court of law
Page 26
Thanks You
Doping Zero, Clean Pro-Sports