led lighting parking lot case study

5
Page: 1 Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study New LED Fixtures or Re-lamping HID Fixtures Rapid Payback from LED Fixture Replacements & Retro-fits LED outdoor lighting fixtures in parking lots offer numerous advantages, including lower energy costs and no maintenance for the life the LED fixture. First costs have been perceived to be higher, thus there is the economic hurdle to seek paybacks from the savings to support the replacement with new fixtures. In this Case Study of LED Parking Lot Lighting, the replacement of high pressure sodium (HPS) fixtures with LED fixtures is shown to be the compelling choice instead of re-lamping and replacing of ballasts. Commercial Outdoor Office Park Lighting Issues This Class A, Commercial Office Building, is part of a 1.7 million square foot property development outside of Albany, N.Y. The property management company was examin- ing whether to do a periodic re-lamping and maintenance of existing HPS parking lot fixtures or install LED fixtures. These new LED luminaires would have to light the park- ing lot, driveway, building façade, and flag poles. The planned maintenance activities would have replaced the HPS lamps, ballast and starter components. The HPS fixtures were approximately ten years old, and were in acceptable condition. Existing HPS Parking Lot Lighting System At this office building, there were eighteen pole fixtures for the parking lots, consuming 440 watts each, two entrance shoe box fixtures, at 195 watts each, and six façade flood lights, and flag pole lights, using 150 watts each. The total installed load was 9.2 kilowatts (KW), and it is estimated that 41,106 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is used per year. Parking Lot Lighting - Engineering, Audit and Life-Cycle Analysis The site was surveyed and an audit was prepared of the lighting conditions, and costs. The Parking Lot lighting was engineered using AGI32 to fully simulate the proposed lighting. The lighting analysis used photometric data generated from the LM-79 report from a certified test lab. All the LED Parking Lot Fixtures are from Evolucia Lighting. Based upon the lighting solution engi- neered, the fixture count was increased to 32 luminaires. The parking lot used 21 IES Type III ESB LED Shoebox fix- tures from Evolucia Lighting at 85 watts each, instead of the 440 watt HPS lumi- naires. For the driveway, three IES Type II ESB LED Shoebox Fixtures replaced the HPS legacy fixtures, and two 55 watt ESB Shoeboxes, were used at the build- ing entrance instead of the 150 watt existing lamps. The building façade and flag poles were illuminated with 30 watt landscape flood lighting, replacing the old 150 watt, HPS Flood Lights. © 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice. Class ‘A’, Office Park, Albany, N.Y. - The Property Manager conducted an analysis of whether to re-lamp HPS lighting or replace with new LED fixtures. Contact Information: 1.518.409.8090 [email protected] www.MetroLEDLighting.com

Upload: steven-talbot

Post on 14-Jun-2015

2.553 views

Category:

Real Estate


3 download

DESCRIPTION

LED lighting offers the opportunity to reduce costs in parking lot lighting. This case study shows how replacing HPS pole fixtures with LED parking lot lights is more economical than re-lamping and changing ballasts. Paybacks are very rapid, rebates on the LED fixtures are available, and no maintenance will be needed are all achieved by upgrading from HPS pole fixtures to LED lighting.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LED Lighting Parking Lot Case Study

Page: 1

Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study New LED Fixtures or Re-lamping HID Fixtures

Rapid Payback from LED Fixture Replacements & Retro-fits

LED outdoor lighting fixtures in parking lots offer numerous advantages, including lower

energy costs and no maintenance for the life the LED fixture. First costs have been

perceived to be higher, thus there is the economic hurdle to seek paybacks from the

savings to support the replacement with new fixtures. In this Case Study of LED Parking

Lot Lighting, the replacement of high pressure sodium (HPS) fixtures with LED fixtures

is shown to be the compelling choice instead of re-lamping and replacing of ballasts.

Commercial Outdoor Office Park Lighting Issues

This Class A, Commercial Office Building, is part of a 1.7 million square foot property

development outside of Albany, N.Y. The property management company was examin-

ing whether to do a periodic re-lamping and maintenance of existing HPS parking lot

fixtures or install LED fixtures. These new LED luminaires would have to light the park-

ing lot, driveway, building façade, and flag poles. The planned maintenance activities

would have replaced the HPS lamps, ballast and starter components. The HPS fixtures

were approximately ten years old, and were in acceptable condition.

Existing HPS Parking Lot Lighting System

At this office building, there were eighteen pole fixtures for the parking lots, consuming

440 watts each, two entrance shoe box fixtures, at 195 watts each, and six façade

flood lights, and flag pole lights, using 150 watts each. The total installed load was 9.2

kilowatts (KW), and it is estimated that 41,106 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is

used per year.

Parking Lot Lighting - Engineering, Audit and Life-Cycle Analysis

The site was surveyed and an audit was prepared of the lighting conditions, and costs.

The Parking Lot lighting was engineered using AGI32 to fully simulate the proposed

lighting. The lighting analysis used photometric data generated from the LM-79 report

from a certified test lab. All the LED Parking Lot Fixtures are from Evolucia Lighting.

Based upon the lighting solution engi-

neered, the fixture count was increased

to 32 luminaires. The parking lot used

21 IES Type III ESB LED Shoebox fix-

tures from Evolucia Lighting at 85 watts

each, instead of the 440 watt HPS lumi-

naires. For the driveway, three IES Type

II ESB LED Shoebox Fixtures replaced

the HPS legacy fixtures, and two 55 watt

ESB Shoeboxes, were used at the build-

ing entrance instead of the 150 watt

existing lamps. The building façade and

flag poles were illuminated with 30 watt

landscape flood lighting, replacing the

old 150 watt, HPS Flood Lights.

© 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice.

Class ‘A’, Office Park, Albany, N.Y. -

The Property Manager conducted an analysis of

whether to re-lamp HPS lighting or replace with

new LED fixtures.

Contact Information:

1.518.409.8090

[email protected]

www.MetroLEDLighting.com

Page 2: LED Lighting Parking Lot Case Study

Page: 2

Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study (Cont.)

Re-Lamping and Ballast Replacement Costs

To maintain the HPS lighting system, required skilled electricians, the use of a bucket

truck and replacement lamps, ballasts and starters. The costs of labor and the bucket

truck was roughly equal to installing the new LED Parking Lot fixture. The cost per fix-

ture for routine maintenance, was quoted at approximately $255 per fixture, including

parts.

New LED Fixtures v. Re-lamping in the Parking Lot

The new LED lighting system for the parking lots and accessory fixtures, installed cost

was approximately $15,800. The outdoor lighting system upgrade used fixtures from

Evolucia Lighting, which are DesignLights™ Consortium (DLC) listed and qualified for

rebates of $3,000. Most importantly, the reduction in electric costs was reduced by an

estimated $3,207 in the first year. After accounting for re-lamping, ballast replace-

ments, electrician labor and the savings in electric costs, the net differential was

$2,930 additional for the LED lighting system v. the HPS lights. Substantial future

benefits accrue from lower operating costs, and no maintenance costs. Using electric

savings only, the payback period is 1 year and 10 months, for the LED fixtures.

LED Parking Lot Lighting – Property Benefits

The LED Parking Lot lights require no maintenance as

opposed to the HPS fixtures which have continuing

replacements requirements. The ten year savings from

maintenance is estimated to be $19,180. The LED

lights save substantial energy was estimated to save

$36,150 over ten years. Additionally studies have

shown that green office buildings rent at a premium,

and achieve higher occupancy to their competitors.

Further, these building demonstrate superior income

potential in the rental market.

© 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice.

HPS Fixtures require periodic replacement of

electrical components by skilled electricians

and the use of costly bucket trucks.

HPS Fixtures components replaced during

maintenance.

Contact Information:

1.518.409.8090

[email protected]

www.MetroLEDLighting.com

HPS Fixture Re-Lamping New LED Fixtures

Lamps

($30 x 26) $780 LED Fixtures Installed $15,800

Ballasts

($65 x 26) $1,690 Rebate <$3,000>

Electrician & Truck $4,160

Year 1 - Electricity $5,640 Year 1 - Electricity $2,433

Year 1 Costs $12,270 Year 1 Costs $15,233

Year 1 Difference $2,963, 1 Yr.— 10 Months Payback

Green Labeled Buildings:

Achieve 7.3% to 17.3% higher

rents

Sell at a significant premium

Unique visual appeal attracts

tenants driving occupancy

Reduction in operating ex-penses support more competi-

tive rents

Page 3: LED Lighting Parking Lot Case Study

Page: 3

Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study (Cont.)

The Case for LED Parking Lot Lighting

In general, multi-tenant office properties, have 56% of their costs related to utilities,

repairs and maintenance. Upgrading parking lots with LED lighting is an efficient use of

funds. It lowers operating costs, and is an economical means to drive energy costs

lower. There are next to no impacts on building tenants during installation. Utility bills

will be reduced, and replacing the costly components of outdoor lighting fixtures will be

an activity of the past. The property’s appearance will be improved, and tenant satisfac-

tion is increased. The one-time costs for re-lamping and maintaining old legacy high

intensity discharge (HID) parking lot fixtures are now cost-comparable to replacing

them with new LED fixtures. New LED Parking Lot lighting installation is a very compel-

ling activity to be undertaken when routine maintenance is being considered on any

legacy lighting system in outdoor lighting.

© 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice.

Contact Information:

1.518.409.8090

[email protected]

www.MetroLEDLighting.com

Driveway Lighting :

80W LED Shoe Box

Entrance Lighting :

80W LED Shoe Box

Page 4: LED Lighting Parking Lot Case Study

Page: 4

Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study (Cont.)

© 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice.

Contact Information:

1.518.409.8090

[email protected]

www.MetroLEDLighting.com

Front Parking Area :

80W LED Shoe Box

Handicap Parking Lighting :

80W LED Shoe Box

Driveway & Entrance:

55W LED Shoe Box

Page 5: LED Lighting Parking Lot Case Study

Page: 5

Parking Lot Lighting - A Case Study (Cont.)

© 2012 Metro LED Lighting, All specifications subject to change without notice.

Contact Information:

1.518.409.8090

[email protected]

www.MetroLEDLighting.com

Side Parking Area :

80W LED Shoe Box

About Metro LED Lighting

Back Parking Lot:

80W LED Shoe Box

Metro Luminescent Technologies is the company behind MetroLEDLighting.com. We are

experts in LED core technologies, outdoor lighting engineering and design, life-cycle eco-

nomic analysis, and how to build outdoor lighting systems that perform well in commer-

cial or institutional settings. We constantly are investigating and analyzing LED lighting

offerings that meet commercial, municipal, and institutional requirements for reliable,

high performing, at the lowest cost of ownership for outdoor lighting.

We build product partnerships with innovative and inventive solid-state lighting compa-

nies that bring superior product benefits to our Clients. Our product partners have exten-

sive expertise in the development of lighting products, and typically hold patents on these

devices. We address the needs of property owners for better and more efficient lighting.