LBAPFunding Strategy

Workshop

East of England Biodiversity Forum

GO-East, Cambridge

June 17, 2008

Workshop overview

• Overview of the process

• Illustrated example: Beds & Luton Floodplain Grazing Marsh HAP

• Pulling everything together into a strategy

• Case study: Mid Beds planning obligations SPD

In a nutshell…

1. Eliminate ‘zero-cost’ items

2. Identify delivery mechanisms for what’s left

3. Calculate costs using the costing tables

4. Determine the most appropriate funders

5. Identify barriers to funding

1. ‘zero-cost’ items

• These items are still important for implementing the BAP

• They are simply not considered further in the funding strategy itself

• Can also include ‘de minimus’ items, which require only very small amounts (e.g., < £100)

1. ‘zero-cost’ items

• are those that:a. would be undertaken as part of

normal work programmes, and don’t require additional funding

b. have an existing identified budget (e.g., funding has already been raised)

c. are driven and/or paid for by other policy areas

d. can be met within existing budgets

1. ‘zero-cost’ items

• You might also want to eliminate– duplicate items (check your BAP

carefully for these!)– actions that nobody signed up

for (and likely won’t get done)– irrelevant or ambiguous stuff– ‘what were we thinking?!?’

2. Delivery mechanisms

• How are you going to actually do each of these actions?

• Some actions might require several delivery mechanisms

• Be specific!

2. Delivery mechanisms

• Example:– Achieve favourable condition

of the Heather Webb CWS

2. Delivery mechanisms

• How are we going to do this?

Land purchase?Grazing?Mowing?

3. Costing out everything

• Use costing tables to determine how much each delivery mechanism will cost

• Don’t forget inflation! Some of the tables are old; things are more expensive now

• Consider keeping one-time and annual costs separate

3. Costing out everything

• Example: to maintain the 0.0003 ha Heather Webb CWS requires:

– land purchase (one-time)– regular grazing (annual)

3. Costing out everything

• Sources of info: costing tables– UK Biodiversity Group. Tranche

2 Action Plans: Cost estimates – species

– GHK Consulting Ltd. UK Biodiversity Action Plan: Preparing Costings for Species and Habitat Action Plans – Revising the costs of delivering habitat action plans

3. Costing out everything

• Sources of info: other– HLS handbook– National Statistics: Retail Prices

Index (for inflation figures)– per diem rates for FWAG,

countryside project staff etc– experience from other projects

• Record your source!

3. Costing out everything

• Identify and list your assumptions– What data are your figures

based on?– How have you made your

decisions?– How has staff time been

allocated?

4. Find the funders

• Who is best placed to fund each delivery mechanism?– landfill tax?– local authorities?– charitable trusts?– businesses?– Defra?– Natural England?

4. Find the funders

• Don’t limit yourself to ‘the usual suspects’!

• Check out a range of funders:– www.funderfinder.org– www.access-funds.co.uk– www.grant-tracker.org– www.charity-commission.gov.u

k

5. Barriers to funding

• Think about these as you look for funders

• Common barriers include– projects on private land– inaccessible sites– landowner advisory projects

Illustrated example

• Beds & Luton Floodplain Grazing Marsh HAP

Pulling together your strategy

• Summarise the needs for each habitat and species:– How much money is needed?

• One-time• Annually

– Who are the key funders identified?

– How do the costs break down?

Pulling together your strategy

• Summarise your plan of action for each habitat and species– Which funders should be

approached?• By whom?• How?

– Can actions be lumped together into habitat/species projects?

Illustrated example

• Back to floodplain grazing marsh:

• Costs to deliver the plan:– £65K one-time– £30.6K annually

• Key funders:– planning gain– local authorities– Defra (HLS)

Pulling together your strategy

• Now, take a look at all of your summaries:– Are there similarities/synergies

in approaches?– Can you make bigger projects

from actions in different HAPs and SAPs?

Pulling together your strategy

• Sum it all up– How much money do you need?– Which funders should be

approached first, and for what?– Recommendations for meeting

shortfalls

Why bother?

• Case study: Mid-Bedfordshire Planning Obligations SPD

Case study

• A compulsory charge on every new dwelling in Mid-Bedfordshire District

• To cover infrastructure costs:– schools– transport– health care– green infrastructure– etc.

Case study

• Mid Beds Executive approved a planning obligations charge that includes £1529 for green infrastructure

• Of this, £770.54 is specifically for biodiversity

• More money will come from archaeology and landscape pots in the £1529

Case study

• £173.89 of the £770.24 is for wetland projects, which include floodplain grazing marsh (FGM)

Case study

• In this case, figures for habitat creation and restoration were calculated separately

• This is because the costs are different (remember the costing tables?)

• For FGM there is only restoration in Mid Beds, no habitat creation

Case study

• Going through the wetland HAPs, all the restoration sites in Mid Beds were extracted and added up

• This came to 30.5 ha

• 12.0 of this is FGM

Case study

• HAP actions covered are:

FGM7

By 2010 produce where necessary and implement management plans for Bromham Park Marshy Grassland (2.1 ha), Flitton Moor (3.5 ha) and Lepards/South Mills Pits (0.5 ha)

FGM8

Investigate and recommend by 2008 measures to restore East Hyde Riverside (2.6 ha), Arlesey Old Moat and Glebe Meadows (4.2 ha), Priestley Farm (6 ha), Westoning Moor (2 ha) and Shefford Hardwick Farm (1.3 ha)

FGM9

By 2010 implement restoration recommendations for East Hyde Riverside, Arlesey Old Moat and Glebe Meadows, Priestley Farm, Westoning Moor and Shefford Hardwick

Case study

• FGM sites include:1. Flitton Moor (3.5 ha, owned by

the County Council)

2. Priestley Farm (6 ha, owned by Beds CC but in tenancy)

3. Westoning Moor (2 ha, privately owned)

• Land purchase not needed/ not an option

First year establishment for FGM

£200/year x 20 years

12.0 of these ha are FGM

!!!

Remember where these figures came from?

Grazing marsh restoration costs for Mid-Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure

Units Rate Qty AmtLand purchase and fees (total)Land purchase ha £13,590.00 14.5 £197,055.00Professional fees ea £7,500.00 £7,500.00

£204,555.00Wetland planting costs (per ha)Ground preparation grass sward est. haGround prep ripping hapre-planting herbicide novegetation supply noannual establishment costs no £4,000.00 1 £4,000.00sluices no £1,500.00 1 £1,500.00fencing linear m £10.00 200 £2,000.00

£8,780.00Access (per ha)surfaced routes linear m £30.00 0 £0.00reinforced grass routes linear m £10.00 0 £0.00Way marking no £25.00 1 £25.00Signage interp no £1,000.00 0.2 £200.00Access infrastructure no £500.00 1 £500.00Community involvement no £500.00 0.5 £250.00Publicity and promotion no £700.00 0.5 £350.00

£1,325.00Delivery (per ha)design and proj mgmt days £250.00 5.8 £1,450.00access improvements days £250.00 0 £0.00community days £250.00 5 £1,250.00signage days £250.00 3 £750.00habitat operations days £250.00 50.6 £12,650.00

£16,100.00

contingency not including land purchase (10%) £2,620.50 £2,620.50o/h not including land purchase (3%) £786.15 £786.15

Total cost for 1 hectare £29,611.65ha in BAP 30.5Total habitat restoration cost £903,155.33

Land purchase, fees, conting, o/h £231,147.15GRAND TOTAL £1,134,302.48

£1,280.00 1 £1,280.00

Why bother?

• EA/NE comes calling, has some cash but needs to know NOW what you want to do and how much it’s going to cost because they need to get the budget spent asap…

Why bother?

• You discover one of your contacts might have some cash for data acquisition, since you hounded them so much about it…

(Fingers crossed!)

Why bother?

• You discover a new grant fund but the bid deadline is tomorrow…

Why bother?

• Gives you quick access to figures for when an opportunity comes up

• The early bird gets the worm! Even if the deadline isn’t that tight you’ll impress them that you were so quick!

Sounds like a lot of work

Don’t worry, though

• It’s definitely worthwhile– Quick access to figures and

resource needs– You will get to know your BAP a

LOT better– It will help with your next BAP

review

Don’t worry, though

• Remember you’re dealing with a subset of your entire BAP– You’ve eliminated the ‘zero-cost’

items– You’ll probably end up culling

some stuff on top of that

Don’t worry, though

• ‘I’m never going to get everyone to do all that work!’– Don’t. Do something yourself

and then ask people ‘to check it for you’

– If they can’t be bothered to respond then keep going

Don’t worry, though

• It gets easier as you get into it