land use planning and business models for urban ...€¦ · pr d y wrzoski 4 6 izbicko 94 94 a4...

Land Use Planning and Business Models for Urban Distribution

Centers

Tomasz Dowgielewicz

Institute of Logistics and Warehousing

��

��

��

��

� ��

Profile

R&D activities in public sector are commissioned by:• The Ministry of Economy• The Ministry of Infrastructure• The State Committee for Scientific Research

Core competences

• Logistics Management Consulting• Supply Chain Logistics• Macro-logistics Systems• e-business

POLLOCO

www.polloco.pl

Logistics knowledge networking and dissemination

Tomasz Dowgielewicz – Institute of Logistics and Warehousing

��

The State’s goal

To balance the transportation system technically, spatially, economically, socially and environmentally, concerning the circumstances of developing economy and international competition.


��

Strategic Goals:�The newly built logistics centers should

be an element of national plan of integrated network of logistics centers

�The plan should consider their integration with functioning European logistics centers


��


Stage 1 – Goods flow identificationStage 2 – Location studyStage 3 – Feasibility study

��


��

Tasks:

Goods flows analysis were carried on the basis of:

- deliveries structure in goods distribution processes,- volumes of goods import and export for Opole voivodship- volume of goods flow within the region.

The goal:

To estimate goods flow to be serviced by the Opole Logistics Center


Brzeg

Nysa

Strzelce Opolskie

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

le

Głubczyce

Krapkowice

Prudnik

Namysłów

Opole

Kluczbork

39

A4

94

Byczyna

Olesno

11

Biedziany

Zawada

45

Ozimek

Dobrodzie

�

46

Zimnice

Wi �kszyce

45

Pakosławice

Pr �dy

Wrzoski

46

Izbicko

94

94A4

Otmuchów

Paczków

46

Piorunkowice

41

LaskowiceGłuchołazy

40

40

40

Głogówek

41

Pawłowiczki

38

39

39

Domaszowice

Wołczyn

42

Rogalice

Praszka

Rudniki

42

45

4211

12,2

8,2

11,1

5,4

2,0

1,0

1,8

1,7

1,1

1,5

2,2

Skorogoszcz

29,2

25,3

20,0

17,8

20,7

25,3

2,5

1,83,4 4,2

1,3

2,3

4,5

2,8

0,6

2,0

1,4

2,1

1,8

42

1,6

43

42

43

Jaworzno0,56,5

3,1

4,4

4,2

4,7

5,6

4,0

3,0

6,8

Niemodlin

3,2

12,2

6,44,5

6,6

4,8 6,9

8,0

8,1

7,1

8,7

0,1

WOJ. DOLNO

�

L

�

SKIE

WOJ. WIELKOPOLSKIE

WOJ. ŁÓDZKIE

WOJ.

�

L

�

SKIE

CZECHY

Młodoszowice

Skarbimierz

Czeska Wie

�

5

8

13

4

13

910

11

12

LEGENDA

- oznaczenie lokalizacji CL

- granica powiatu

- granica pa

�

stwa

- granica gminy

- granica województwa

6

2Olszanka

Półwie

�

Metalchem

Linopłyt

KSR

7

SAG (Ujazd)

ZA K dzierzyn

Port

Blachownia 3Blachownia 4

- potok towarowy (drogowy)

Goods flows in motorway transport for Opole

voivodship

��


��

762 685629 829463 564341 461221 946123 485Good stream assumed to be serviced by the OLC [tons]

9,50%8,50%7,00%5,50%4,00%2,50%Absorption coefficient

104,09%104,09%100,82%104,09%103,68%103,84%GDP dynamics coefficient

8 028 2657 409 7526 622 3406 208 3855 548 6394 939 392Total road transportation [tons]

201820162013201020072004Goods streams in following years

Forecasted volume of goods flow for the Opole Logistics Center

The volume of streams serviced by OLC in 2004-2018 was estimated on the basis of GDP forecast and concerning the base absorption coefficient on the level of 2.5%


��

127 582105 35877 54557 12037 12720 657Store-yards renting

127 582105 35877 54557 12037 12720 657On yard storing

165 857136 966100 80974 25648 26526 854Warehouses renting

165 857136 966100 80974 25648 26526 854Warehousing and order picking

99 51482 17960 48544 55328 95916 112Cross-docking

76 29263 00346 37134 15722 20112 352Container service

201820162013201020072004

Goods stream in years [tons]Service

The share of stream volume according to the kind of services


��

The goal:To estimate the optimal location for the logistics center for the voivodship of Opole.

Tasks:� to evaluate the need of creating the logistics center in the

region� to identify the role and function of the future logistics center� to recommend logistics center’s number within the

voivodship


��

Main groups of criteria for logistics centers locating:

1. location (the location’s abundance)

2. economical (the regions potential)

3. distributional (distribution costs)


��

Issues to be recognized when analyzing potential locations:

1. Land destination – spatial plan conformity2. Land development – accessibility and efficiency

of media3. Ownership structure – lands’ legal status4. Infrastructure

5. Communication network accessibility


��

Strzelce OpolskieUjazd Strefa Aktywno

�

ci Gospodarczej (SAG)-w �zeł A4 „Olszowa”„Nogawczyce”

13

OpoleZACh „Metalchem”12

OpolePółwie

�

11

KluczborkWołczynZPL „Linopłyt”10

KluczborkKluczborkKluczborska Strefa Rozwoju (KSR)9

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leK �dzierzyn-Ko

�

lePort8

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leK �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leZCh „Blachownia 4”7

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leK �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leZCh „Blachownia 3”6

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

leK �dzierzyn-Ko�

leZA ”K �dzierzyn”5

BrzegSkarbimierzSkarbimierz - lotnisko4

BrzegOlszankaCzeska Wie

�

- Jankowice3

BrzegOlszankaOlszanka – w �zeł A4 „Przylesie”2

BrzegGrodkówMłodoszowice – w �zeł A4 „Przylesie”1

PoviatCommuneNameNo.

Locations to be verified


��

2 149(100%)

175(8,1%)

266(12,4%)

39(1,9%)

Number of foreign investments over 1 M$12

17,5%21,5%15,7%18,2%Unemployment rate11

2 045,11 973,42 094,41 865,5Average gross salary [PLN]10

9 7167 3289 1546334Goods retail sales per capita [PLN]9

12 96012 09617 39111 573Sold industry production per capita [PLN]8

500 780,7(100%)

35 940,6(7,2%)

84 174,8(16,8%)

12 530,3(2,5%)

Sold industry production [millions of PLN]7

3 1413 7062 5982 048Investments expenditures per capita [PLN]6

121 362,9(100%)

11 012,0(9,1%)

12 573,1(10,4%)

2 217,2(1,8%)

Investments expenditures [millions of PLN]5

17 72518 32419 50915 146GDP per capita [PLN]4

684 981,9(100%)

54 516,0(8%)

94 773,1(13,8%)

16 458,2(2,4%)

GDP [millions of PLN] 3

379,7328,2349,1326,2Working population per 1000 people2

38 632 453(100%)

2 970 094(7,7%)

4 830 472(12,5%)

1 080 505(2,8%)

Population1

POLANDDOLNO-�

L

�

SKIE

�

L

�

SKIEOPOLSKIEIndexNo.

Economical indexes


��

DOLNO

�

L

�

SKIE

MAZOWIECKIE

ŁÓDZKIE

MAŁOPOLSKIE

PODLASKIE

WARMI

�

SKO-MAZURSKIE

ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIE

POMORSKIE

KUJAWSKO-POMORSKIE

LUBELSKIE

PODKARPACKIE

LUBUSKIE

OPOLSKIE

�

L

�

SKIE

�

WI

�

TOKRZYSKIE

WIELKOPOLSKIE

Stan ludno

�

ci

3 360 000 do 5 070 000 (2)2 640 000 do 3 360 000 (4)2 140 000 do 2 640 000 (3)1 470 000 do 2 140 000 (3)1 020 000 do 1 470 000 (4)

Produkcja sprzedanaprzemysłu i handlu

210 000

w mln. zł.

Liczba inwestycji zagranicznych

1 Punkt = 10 inwesty cji


��

Analysis of logistics distribution costs

The logistics costs analysis of distribution centers functioning

was carried on the basis of the Institute’s methodology. It

was estimated regarding the following:

� real structure of goods stream flow

� costs indexes of the second half of 2002

� issuing point located in Germany

� receiving points in all voivodship capitals of Poland


��

100,0%18,6%5,8%75,6%Costs share

108,62 944,3548,6171,72 224,0Country avg.

120,33 260,5639,4166,22 454,8Białystok16

118,83 219,6606,0158,82 454,8Rzeszów15

116,63 159,5539,6165,02 454,8Lublin14

114,43 100,9639,4165,52 296,0Olsztyn13

112,43 046,5639,4179,42 227,6Gda

�

sk12

110,02 982,7774,3176,62 031,7Szczecin11

109,52 969,2506,6166,62 296,0Kraków10

109,42 966,0441,8228,22 296,0Warszawa9

109,02 954,5506,6171,72 276,2Katowice8

107,02 899,4441,8161,62 296,0Kielce7

105,42 858,2409,7172,32 276,2Łód

�

6

103,32 800,8606,0163,02 031,7Zielona Góra5

100,92 734,2506,6174,12 053,4Pozna

�

4

100,52 723,8506,6163,82 053,4Bydgoszcz3

100,52 722,9506,6162,92 053,4Opole2

100,02 710,5506,6172,22 031,7Wrocław1

[tys PLN][tys. PLN][tys. PLN][tys. PLN]

The cheapest location

= 100

TOTALDistribution costs

Warehousing costs

Transport costsLocationRank

Locations rank according to logistics costs


��

Source: Institute of Market Economy Research

Investment attractiveness for voivodships’ capitals in Poland


��

Pan European transport corridorsCorridor I: Warszawa - Białystok - Suwałki - z odgał �zieniem: - Elbl �g -Gda

�

sk;

Corridor II:

�

wiecko - Pozna

�

- Warszawa – Terespol;

Corridor III: Zgorzelec - Wrocław - Opole -Katowice - Kraków - Rzeszów -Medyka;

Corridor IV:

Gda

�

sk/Gdynia - Warszawa -Katowice – Zwardo

�

– Pozna

�

- Katowice


��

CONCLUSIONS

�The necessity of building a logistics center within Opole voivodship has been proved

� It should operate within and for the city of Opole having regional character

� It should co-operate with another logistics centers in Poland

� Within international operability it should co-operate with the closest international logistics center that has international character


��

lokalizacyjne gospodarcze dystrybucyjne

Skarbimierz 0,5 0,5 0 1

Młodoszowice 0,5 0,5 0 1

Przylesie 0,5 0,5 0 1

Czeska Wie

�

0 0,5 0 0,5

Strzelce Opolskie 1 0 0,5 1,5

ZAK 0,5 0 0 0,5

Port 0,5 0 0 0,5

Blachownia 3 1 0 0 1

Blachownia 4 0,5 0 0 0,5

Półwie

�

0 1 1 2

Metalchem 0,5 1 1 2,5

Linopłyt 0,5 0 0 0,5

KSR 1 0 0 1

KryteriumŁ �cznie

Brz

egK

�dzie

rzyn

-Ko

� leO

pole

Klu

czbo

rkLokalizacja

Final result


��

Brzeg

Nysa

Strzelce Opolskie

K �dzierzyn-Ko

�

le

Głubczyce

Krapkowice

Prudnik

Namysłów

Opole

Kluczbork

39

A4

94

Byczyna

Olesno

11

Biedziany

Zawada

45

Ozimek

Dobrodzie

�

46

Zimnice

Wi �kszyce

45

Pakosławice

Pr �dy

Wrzoski

46

Izbicko

94

94A4

Otmuchów

Paczków

46

Piorunkowice

41

LaskowiceGłuchołazy

40

40

40

Głogówek

41

Pawłowiczki

38

39

39

Domaszowice

Wołczyn

42

Rogalice

Praszka

Rudniki

42

45

4211

Skorogoszcz

4243

42

43

Jaworzno

Niemodlin

WOJ. DOLNO

�

L

�

SKIE

WOJ. WIELKOPOLSKIE

WOJ. ŁÓDZKIE

WOJ.

�

L

�

SKIE

CZECHY

Młodoszowice

Skarbimierz

Czeska Wie

�

5

8

13

4

13

910

11

12

LEGENDA

- oznaczenie lokalizacji CL

- granica powiatu

- granica pa

�

stwa

- granica gminy

- granica województwa

6

2Olszanka

Półwie

�

Metalchem

Linopłyt

KSR

7

SAG (Ujazd)

ZA K dzierzyn

Port

Blachownia 3Blachownia 4

Location of the future logistics center


��

Goal:To estimate optimal organizational form of the center and economical effectiveness of the project.

Tasks:� logistics centers’ market analysis in Poland and Europe� defining the range of logistics services� elaboration of the initial plan of OLC’s development plan� organizational forms’ analysis� impact on environment� elaboration of 15 years financial forecast� identification of possible financing sources� evaluation of the investment’s financial effectiveness


��

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

90,0

1998 1999 2000 2001 1)

w m

ln P

LN

Incomes from logistics services sales


��

The range and stages of the investment

22 1502 8002 8503 4503 4509 600m2Maneuver yards and ways

3 0001 0001 0001 000m2Container yard

18 8003 1003 1003 1003 1006 400m2Storing yards

35 6006 7005 4006 7006 70010 100m2Warehouses

11,10,82,10,82,15,3haLands

Razem20162013201020072004UnitInvestment range


��

��

��

PSP

SO

H

B

- obiekt magazynowy (rok inwest.- )

- plac kontenerowy (rok inwest.- )

- plac składowy (rok inwest.- )2004

2012

2015

P - stacja paliw

- parking samochodów ci � �

ar.

- stacja obsługi pojazdów

PS

2004

SO

- obiekt hotelowy

- obiekt biurowy

H

2012

2015

B

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

54

METALCHEM

Obwodnica Opolska

54

53

ul. O�w

i� cimska

53

5 4

Obiekty CL

Obiekty towarzysz �ce

Spatial development concept


��

OLC’s Managing Operator

Local government Private investors

The real estateapprox. 6 mln zł

Cash contributionapprox. 4 mln zł

Co-financing resourcesapprox. 24 mln zł

Debt (credit, bonds)approx. 36 mln zł

EU Financial institutions


Utilization costs

of the Opole LC

(2004-2018)

25 402 387 Total costs

4 535 975 Depreciation

998 068 Unexpected costs reserve

5 703 255 Management costs

-Space renting

72 285 Parking lots

476 737 Container yards

69 862 Hiring service

1 241 964 yards service

1 311 827 Storing yards

7 442 319 picking service

4 164 259 cross-docking service

790 693 Hiring service

12 397 269 Warehouses

14 258 120 Direct costs

Costs (2004 - 2018)[EUR] Category

��


Income of

the Opole LC

(2004-2018)

-Space renting

96 279 Parking lots

2 525 581 Containers yards

1 513 340 Hiring service

1 920 698 yards service

3 434 037 Storing yards

20 680 116 picking service

10 734 977 Cross-docking service

8 820 301 Hiring service

40 235 394 Warehouses

46 195 013 Total income

Incomes (2004 - 2018) [EUR] Category

��


Investment Expenditures of the Opole LC (2004-2018) [EUR]

16 105 112 TOTAL

442 791 8 Tools, movables and equipment

2 697 132 7 Means of transport

1 278 534 2 Objects of land engineery

10 655 743 1 Buildings

1 030 912 0 Grounds

��


Internal Return Rate of the investment project for Opole LC (independent of the financial source)

13,7 % IRR

Internal Return Rate

��


All questions concerning the presentation please refer:

[email protected]

www.polloco.pl+48 / 61 / 850 49 49

!��"#

$��

land use planning and business models for urban ...€¦ · pr d y wrzoski 4 6 izbicko 94 94 a4...

Documents