La cola-Editor sacude el perro-Investigación

Exigencias y metricas:

Como los repositorios abiertos permatan a las universidades

de gestionar, medir y maximizar.sus productividad cientifica

Stevan HarnadCanada Research Chair in Cognitive Sciences,

Université du Québec à Montréal

&

Department of Electronics and Computer Science,

University of Southampton

Limited Access: Limited Research Impact

Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal

Impact cycle begins:Research is done

Researchers write pre-refereeing

“Pre-Print”

Submitted to Journal

Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review”

Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors

Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal

12-1

8 M

on

ths

New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research

Limited Access: Limited Research Impact

Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal

Impact cycle begins:Research is done

Researchers write pre-refereeing

“Pre-Print”

Submitted to Journal

Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review”

Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors

Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal

12-1

8 M

on

ths

New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research

This limited subscription-based access can be supplemented by self-archiving the Postprint in the author’s own institutional repository as follows:

New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research

Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal

Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal

Impact cycle begins:Research is done

Researchers write pre-refereeing

“Pre-Print”

Submitted to Journal

Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review”

Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors

Maximized Research Access and Impact Through Self-Archiving

Post-Print is self-archived

in University’s Eprint Archive

12-1

8 M

on

ths

More impact cycles:

La exigencia de Harvard: conservar los derechos de autor

La exigencia de los National Institutes of Health (NIH): el depósito central

La exigencia Depósito Inmediata/Acceso Opcional DI/AO

Indicatores métricos

EurOpenScholar (EOS)

European Universities Association (EUA

AUSTRALIA: IIIIFF

AUSTRIA: I

BELGIUM: IF

BRAZIL: (p)

CANADA: F

EUROPE: F (ppp)

FRANCE: I (p)

INDIA: II (p)

IRELAND: (p)

ITALY: F

PORTUGAL: I

RUSSIA: I

SWITZERLAND: IIF

TURKEY: I

UK: IIIFFFFFFFFFFFFF

US IFF (p)

Total 40 (+ 8 prop)

INST: 18 (+ 3 inst)

FUND: 22 (+ 5 prop)

Exigencias de lasInstituciones y de losFinanciadores

EUROPE [(EUA) 791 universities, 46 countries]

UK (3) Brunel ISCM, Southampton ECS, Southampton?

BELGIUM (1) Liege

FRANCE (1) CNRS Lab PNC [INSERM]

PORTUGAL (1) Minho

SWITZERLAND (2) Cern Zurich

RUSSIA (1) CEM Inst Russian Academy of Sciences

TURKEY (1) MET University

INDIA (2) Bharathidasan NIT Rourkela

US (1) Harvard FAS

AUSTRALIA (3) Charles Sturt QUT Tasmania

Exigencias

institucionales

el acceso libre aumenta las citaciones en todas las disciplinas

95% de los investigadores en todo el mundo cumplirán a una exigencia de auto-archivar

Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Jun-04

Jul-04

Aug-04

Sep-04

Oct-04

Nov-04

Dec-04

Jan-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-05

Actualdocuments

DESTpublications

University of Tasmania+Repository -Incentive -Mandate

Green line: total annual outputRed line: proportion self-archived

University of Queensland +Repository +Incentive -Mandate

Green line: total annual output Red line: proportion self-archived

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

03/02/200403/03/200403/04/200403/05/200403/06/200403/07/200403/08/200403/09/200403/10/200403/11/200403/12/200403/01/200503/02/200503/03/200503/04/200503/05/200503/06/200503/07/200503/08/200503/09/200503/10/2005

Documents

Totaldocuments

DESTdocuments

Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

Queensland University of Technology +Repository +Incentive +Mandate

Green line: total annual output Red line: proportion self-archived

Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

24/05/200424/06/200424/07/200424/08/200424/09/200424/10/200424/11/200424/12/200424/01/200524/02/200524/03/200524/04/200524/05/200524/06/200524/07/200524/08/200524/09/2005

Documents

Documents

DEST-reportable

RAE 2001

Rankings for

Psychology

Research Assessment, Research Funding, and Citation Impact

“Correlation between RAE ratings and mean departmental citations +0.91 (1996) +0.86 (2001) (Psychology)”

“RAE and citation counting measure broadly the same thing”

“Citation counting is both more cost-effective and more transparent”

(Eysenck & Smith 2002) http://psyserver.pc.rhbnc.ac.uk/citations.pdf

• La ventaja competitiva del acceso libre y exigenia a auto-archivar

91% de las revistas son verdes

Accesso libre: Como?

Las universidades obtoptarán la exigencia

(DI/AO):

Depósito Inmediata+

Acceso Opcional+

El botón

From: DemoPrints XXX@ecs.soton.ac.ukDate: July 28, 2007 12:51:43 AM EDT (CA)To: XXX@ecs.soton.ac.ukSubject: Request for "Open Access Mandates and Metrics”

The following item: Harnad, S (2007) Open Access Mandates and Metrics. Science Editor 5 (2): 500-510.

has been requested from DemoPrints by: inewton@cambridge.ac.uk

The following reason was given: "Please send me a copy for research purposes. -- I. Newton (Cambridge U)”

Please respond by clicking one of the following:

Accept the request (click here to email eprint automatically)

Reject the request (click here to decline request)

Sample of candidate OA-era metrics:

• Citations (C)• CiteRank• Co-citations• Downloads (D)• C/D Correlations• Hub/Authority index• Chronometrics:

Latency/Longevity• Endogamy/Exogamy • Book citation index

• Research funding• Students• Prizes• h-index• Co-authorships• Number of articles• Number of publishing

years• Semiometrics (latent

semantic indexing, text overlap, etc.)

El crecimiento de citaciones y telecargas

RESUMEN:

AL: cómo? Universidades y subvencionadores exigan a depósitar

Depósitar dónde? En los repositorios institucionales

Depósitar cómo? 6 minutos de pulsaciones de teclado por documento

Depósitar qué? La ultima version del autor, revisado por pares

Depósitar dónde? Justo en el momento en que es aceptada por la revista

Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How?

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/136-guid.html

1. To maximise the uptake, usage, applications and impact of the research output of each university’s research output

1. To measure and reward the uptake, usage, applications and impact of the research output of each university (research metrics)

1. To collect, manage and showcase a permanent record of the research output and impact of each university

Open Access: Why?

Author’s URLs (UQAM & Southampton):http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON OA IMACT ADVANTAGE:http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

BOAI Self-Archiving FAQ: http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/

CITEBASE (scientometric engine): http://citebase.eprints.org/

EPRINTS: http://www.eprints.org/

OA ARCHIVANGELISM: http://openaccess.eprints.org/

ROAR (Registry of OA Repositories): http://roar.eprints.org/

ROARMAP (Registry of OA Repository Mandates): http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/

ROMEO/EPRINTS (Directory of Journal Policies on author OA Self-Archiving): http://romeo.eprints.org/