l2c learning to collaborate

18
L2C L2C Learning to Learning to Collaborate Collaborate A Description A Description

Upload: hester

Post on 21-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

L2C Learning to Collaborate. A Description. Table of Contents. Total Expected Funding: 3.024.213,75 € Duration: 24 Months Key Action Addressed: e-Learning. Project Summary. Project Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: L2C Learning to Collaborate

L2CL2CLearning to CollaborateLearning to Collaborate

A DescriptionA Description

Page 2: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Table of ContentsTable of Contents

Project SummaryProject Summary

Project ObjectivesProject Objectives

Outputs & DeliverablesOutputs & Deliverables

Financial PlanFinancial Plan

Budget & Resource DistributionBudget & Resource Distribution

Project Work-planProject Work-plan

Consortium StructureConsortium Structure

Page 3: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Project SummaryProject Summary

Total Expected Funding: Total Expected Funding: 3.024.213,753.024.213,75 €€

Duration: 24 MonthsDuration: 24 Months Key Action Addressed: e-LearningKey Action Addressed: e-Learning

Page 4: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Project ObjectivesProject Objectives provide a clear understanding of the factors inhibiting effective provide a clear understanding of the factors inhibiting effective

collaboration dynamics and leading to the failure of collaboration dynamics and leading to the failure of collaboration initiatives (“collaboration initiatives (“Collaboration Traps & ChallengesCollaboration Traps & Challenges”), ”), and of the interventions required to reduce these risks and of the interventions required to reduce these risks (“(“Collaboration Management CompetenciesCollaboration Management Competencies”). ”).

develop an innovative framework (develop an innovative framework (Advanced Collaboration Advanced Collaboration Dynamics and Technologies - ACDT FrameworkDynamics and Technologies - ACDT Framework)) addressing addressing the effective development of collaboration competencies. the effective development of collaboration competencies.

develop a set of widely deployable, advanced, interactive and develop a set of widely deployable, advanced, interactive and experiential technology-enhanced solutions (“experiential technology-enhanced solutions (“ACDT Simulation ACDT Simulation GamesGames”) guaranteeing the effective understanding and ”) guaranteeing the effective understanding and internalization of: internalization of:

(1) cognitive, motivational and attitudinal factors, (1) cognitive, motivational and attitudinal factors, (2) complexity of knowledge integration processes and distributed, (2) complexity of knowledge integration processes and distributed,

ICT-supported teamwork, and ICT-supported teamwork, and (3) management competencies determining the success or failure (3) management competencies determining the success or failure

of collaboration dynamics in diverse and distributed contexts.of collaboration dynamics in diverse and distributed contexts.

Page 5: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Outputs & DeliverablesOutputs & Deliverables

In terms of specific outputs, the project will produce:In terms of specific outputs, the project will produce:

• A comprehensive online Knowledge Base and active Virtual A comprehensive online Knowledge Base and active Virtual Learning Community on Advanced Collaboration Dynamics Learning Community on Advanced Collaboration Dynamics & Technologies (ACDT) & Technologies (ACDT)

• ACDT Framework: An e-Learning Framework to address the ACDT Framework: An e-Learning Framework to address the effective development of Collaboration Competencies in the effective development of Collaboration Competencies in the Information SocietyInformation Society

• ACDT Simulation Games Prototypes: Validated computer-ACDT Simulation Games Prototypes: Validated computer-enhanced learning Solutions deployable in educational and enhanced learning Solutions deployable in educational and organizational contextsorganizational contexts

Page 6: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Outputs & Deliverables :Outputs & Deliverables : Graphic Overview of Project Graphic Overview of Project OutputsOutputs

ACDT Framework &

ACDT Simulation Games Prototypes

Online Knowledge Base

(collaboration dynamics – research, practice and

learning solutions)

integration,design

&development

Pilots 1(within target users groups

from Acad & Industr. Partners)

Pilots 2(with broader users target

groups – SMEs, Univ., Gov.)

refinements

ACDT Simulation Games Version 1.0

Collaborative R&D cycle

Dissemination

versioning

closureACDT = Advanced Collaboration Dynamics & Technologies

ACDT DynKB

(Output)

(Output)

(Output)

ACDT Framework

(Output)

IndividualLevel

GroupsLevel

OrganizationalLevel

Inter-Organ’lLevel

Motivational and Cultural

Dynamics

Knowledge Integration Dynamics

Distributed WorkteamsDynamics

CollaborationCompetenciesBest Practices

EffectiveACDT Learning

Solutions

EmergingSim.& AgentsTechnologies

ACDT Virtual Learning Community

(Output)

Page 7: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (1)Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (1)Del. no.

Deliverable name WP no.

Leader person-months

Nature Dissem.

level

Delivery date (M)

D7.1 Quality Assurance Plan WP7 INSEAD 10.8 R PU 2

D1.1 ACDT Knowledge Harvesting and Integration Report

WP1 UAFM 55,5 R PU 6

D5.1 Dissemination and Exploitation Plan

WP5 ALPHA 7 R RE 6

D2.1 ACDT Knowledge Mgt Tools WP2 FVA 25.5 + 27

R+P RE 8

D6.1 Evaluation Plan WP6 UCSC 10 R PU 8

D6.2 Technical and Pedagogical Evaluation Criteria and Metrics

WP6 UCSC 9 R PU 8

D3.1 ACDT Framework, Simulation Scenario and Design

WP3 OFAI 24 + 21 R PP 12

D3.2 ACDT Simulation Games Prototype

WP3 OFAI 23.5 P RE 12

D6.3 Evaluation Report of the First Prototype

WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 12

D4.1A Pilots Report - Round 1 WP4 INSEAD 14 R PU 18

D4.2A ACDT KM Tools Versioning Report - Round 1

WP4 INSEAD 14 R+ P PU 18

Page 8: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (2)Outputs & Deliverables: Deliverables List (2)

Del. no.

Deliverable name WP no.

Leader person-months

Nature Dissem.

level

Delivery

date (M)

D4.3A ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and Framework Versioning Report - Round 1

WP4 INSEAD 11 R+ P PU 18

D6.4 Evaluation Report of the Final Prototype WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 18

D4.1B Pilots Report - Round 2 WP4 INSEAD 13 R PU 22

D4.2B ACDT Knowledge Management Tools Versioning Report - Round 2

WP4 INSEAD 12 R+ P PU 22

D4.3B ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and Framework Versioning Report - Round 2

WP4 INSEAD 12 R+ P PU 22

D5.2 Dissemination Actions Report WP5 ALPHA 37 R PU 22

D5.3 Final Packaging and Distribution Strategy Report

WP5 ALPHA 22 R PU 22

D6.5 Evaluation Report of Simulation Games prototypes

WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 22

D6.6 Project’s Assessment / Comparative Analysis (Final Report)

WP6 UCSC 6.5 R PU 24

TOTAL 375.25

Page 9: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Financial PlanFinancial Plan

Total project budget: Total project budget: 3.024.213,75 3.024.213,75 €€. . Project coordination managing costs:Project coordination managing costs: 134.307,75134.307,75 €€. . The management cost is within the 7% limit of EC The management cost is within the 7% limit of EC

contribution. contribution. Travel budget: less than 6% of total budget allocated. Travel budget: less than 6% of total budget allocated. Distribution of resources: Distribution of resources: L2C represents a total effort of L2C represents a total effort of 375.25 Person-Months375.25 Person-Months, ,

with a total budget of with a total budget of 3.024.213,75 3.024.213,75 €€ corresponding to a corresponding to a funding request of funding request of 1.999.921,30 1.999.921,30 €€. .

Page 10: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Budget & Resource DistributionBudget & Resource Distribution

Type of Activities % Total Budget % EC Contribution

Research/innovation activities

93 91

Demonstration Activities 3 2

Consortium management activities

4 7

TOTAL 100 100

Page 11: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Research & InnovationResearch & Innovation

PARTNERSPARTNERS INSEAD

UCSC

UAFM

OFAI

OU SCIL IF ALBA UC Métis

FVA Alpha SU Total

Research & InnovationResearch & Innovation

WP1: Knowledge Harvesting and Integration 10 5 8 5,5 5 2,5 1 4,5 1 2,5 2 3,5 5 55,5

WP2: Knowledge Management Tools Development 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 6 11,5 5 3 52,5

WP3: ACDT Framework & Simulation Games Prototypes Development 16 3 4,5 11 2 4 2 3 2 4 8,5 7,5 1 68,5

WP4: Pilots & Prototyping Cycles

19,0 3,5 2,0 3,0 0,0 2,5 4,5 5,0 4,5 11,0 5,0 4,5 0,0 64,5

WP5: Exploitation and Dissemination

12,0 4,0 2,0 2,0 2,5 2,0 3,0 6,0 3,0 15,0 7,5 5,0 1,5 65,5

WP6: Embedded, Contin. Evaluation 6,0 7,5 4,0 3,5 3,0 4,0 2,5 4,0 2,5 4,5 1,0 0,0 4,0 46,5

Total research/innovation 69 27 24,5 27 14,5 17 15 25,5 15 43 35,5 25,5 14,5 353

Page 12: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Demonstration &ManagementDemonstration &Management

PARTNERSPARTNERS INSEAD

UCSC UAFM

OFAI

OU SCIL IF ALBA UC MeTis

FVA Alpha

SU TOTAL PARTNERS

Demonstration activitiesDemonstration activities

WP4: Pilots and WP4: Pilots and Prototyping Prototyping CyclesCycles 3,0 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,5 1,0 0,5 11,5

Total Total demonstrationdemonstration 3,0 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,5 1,0 0,5 11,5

Management activitiesManagement activities

WP7: Project WP7: Project ManagementManagement 4,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,8 0,5 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 10,8

Total consortium Total consortium managementmanagement 4,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,8 0,5 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 10,8

TOTAL TOTAL ACTIVITIESACTIVITIES 76,0 28,5 25,5 28

15,5 18,0 16 27,3 16,5 45,0 36,5 27,0 15,5 375,25

Page 13: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Total Budget (1)Total Budget (1)

  Rate

Direct mm Cost MMS

Personnel

CostsOverhe

ad

Consumables Travel

Other specific cost / Audit EQUIP.

SUBCONTARCTING Total costs

EC-Contribution

INSEAD 40% 6500 76,0 494000 197600 1000 17000 3500 10000 23000

746.100,00

389.405,00

UCSC 20% 5000 28,5 142500 31600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 190.600,00

190.600,00

UAFM 20% 5000 25,5 127500 28600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 172.600,00

172.600,00

OFAI 20% 5000 28,0 140000 31100 1000 13000 2500 0 0 187.600,00

187.600,00

OU 20%

5000 15,5 77500 18600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 112.600,00

112.600,00

SCIL 20%5000 18,0 90000 21100 1000 13000 2500 0 0

127.600,00

127.600,00

IF 40%10000 16,0 160000 64000 1000 13000 2500 0 0

240.500,00

124.450,00

Page 14: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Total Budget (2)Total Budget (2)

  Rate

Direct mm Cost MMS

Personnel Costs

Over-head

Consumabl. Travel

Other specific cost / Audit

EQUIP.

SUBCONTARCTING Total costs

EC-Contributio

n

ALBA 20% 5000 27,3 136250 33550 1000 16000 2500 5000 7000 201.300

104.100,00

UC 40%5000 16,5 82500 33000 1000 13000 2500 0 0

132.000

68.450,00

MeTis 45%

4300 45,0 193500 87075 1000 15000 2794,75 4000 9000

312.369,75

160.264,50

FVA 20%

5380 36,5 196370 39274 1000 13000 2500 6000 6000

264.144,00

134.951,80

AlphaLabs 50%

5000 27,0 135000 67500 1000 13000 2500 5000 0

224.000,00

114.500,00

SU 20%

5000 15,5 77500 18800 1000 13000 2500 0 0

112.800,00

112.800,00

TOTAL    

375,25

2.052.620

671.799

13.000

178.000

33.794,75

30.000

45.000

3.024.213,75

1.999.921,3

Page 15: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Project Work-planProject Work-plan

Page 16: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Consortium Composition/RolesConsortium Composition/Roles

1.1. INSEAD-Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies - CALTINSEAD-Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies - CALT 2.2. Università Cattolica, Milano Università Cattolica, Milano

3.3. University of Armed Forces, Munich University of Armed Forces, Munich

4.4. Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI) WienAustrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI) Wien

5.5. OPEN University OPEN University

6.6. St Gallen University – Swiss Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL)St Gallen University – Swiss Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL)

7.7. FIAT –Isvor FIAT –Isvor

8.8. Athens Laboratory of Business AdministrationAthens Laboratory of Business Administration ( (ALBA)ALBA)

9.9. UniCredit UniCredit

10.10. MeTisMeTis

11.11. FVAFVA

12.12. Alpha LabsAlpha Labs

13.13. Strathclyde UniversityStrathclyde University

Page 17: L2C Learning to Collaborate

Participant Participant No Code Country Role Key ContributionKey Contribution

INSEADINSEADCentre for Advanced Learning Centre for Advanced Learning

Technologies (CALT)Technologies (CALT) 1 INSEA

DF Co-ord Learning Technology, Simulations Design, Collaboration Learning Technology, Simulations Design, Collaboration

Dynamics expertise, and Executive Education expertiseDynamics expertise, and Executive Education expertise

Universita Cattolica MilanoUniversita Cattolica Milano2 UCSC I Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on technological Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on technological

and psychological aspects, and evaluation expertiseand psychological aspects, and evaluation expertise

University of the Armed University of the Armed Forces MunichForces Munich 3 UAFM D Partner

Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on knowledge Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on knowledge management and integration aspects, and students management and integration aspects, and students learning expertiselearning expertise

Austrian Research Institute Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Intelligence

(OFAI) Wien(OFAI) Wien4 OFAI A Partner

Design and development of agent-based systems, human Design and development of agent-based systems, human cognitive and learning processes, and technical cognitive and learning processes, and technical evaluation expertiseevaluation expertise

OPEN UniversityOPEN University5 OU UK Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and

distributed learning expertisedistributed learning expertise

St Gallen UniversitySt Gallen UniversitySwiss Center for Innovations Swiss Center for Innovations

in Learning (SCIL)in Learning (SCIL) 6 SCIL CH PartnerCollaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on Collaboration Dynamics expertise – focus on psychological, sociological and team dynamics aspects, psychological, sociological and team dynamics aspects, and students learning expertiseand students learning expertise

Isvor FIATIsvor FIAT7 IF I Partner Corporate Training (industrial and public sector) and Corporate Training (industrial and public sector) and

Collaboration Practice expertiseCollaboration Practice expertise

Athens Laboratory of Athens Laboratory of Business Administration Business Administration

(ALBA)(ALBA)8 ALBA Gr Partner SMEs Training expertiseSMEs Training expertise

UniCreditUniCredit9 UC I Partner Corporate Training (financial services sector) and Corporate Training (financial services sector) and

Collaboration Practice expertiseCollaboration Practice expertise

MeTisMeTis10 MeTis Gr Partner

Strategic planning and business analysis of corporate Strategic planning and business analysis of corporate training. Public policy analysis on e-learning.training. Public policy analysis on e-learning.Innovation management and know-how transfer.Innovation management and know-how transfer.

FVAFVA11 FVA I Partner User Interface development and usability evaluation User Interface development and usability evaluation

expertiseexpertise

AlphaLabsAlphaLabs12 Alpha F Partner

Simulation games Kernels development, virtual Simulation games Kernels development, virtual community facilitation and simulation games diffusion community facilitation and simulation games diffusion expertiseexpertise

Strathclyde University, Strathclyde University, GlasgowGlasgow 13 SU UK Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and Collaboration Dynamics expertise – all dimensions, and

management learning expertisemanagement learning expertise

Page 18: L2C Learning to Collaborate

<Thank<Thank You>You>