koper evaluation

24
ERASMUS+ ''Ready for our lives'' Evaluation Questionnaire Koper 6-11/10/2016

Upload: maria-filippa-la-porta

Post on 08-Feb-2017

21 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Koper evaluation

ERASMUS+''Ready for our lives''

Evaluation Questionnaire Koper 6-11/10/2016

Page 2: Koper evaluation

1. Gender

Page 3: Koper evaluation

2. You are from.

Page 4: Koper evaluation

3. Meeting organization: Information (about travel, accommodation etc.) received before the meeting from host partner, responding in time

Page 5: Koper evaluation

4. Meeting organization: General organization during the meeting.

Page 6: Koper evaluation

5. Meeting organization: Duration and timing of the meeting.

Page 7: Koper evaluation

6. Meeting organization: Domestic arrangements (accommodation, meals etc.).

Page 8: Koper evaluation

7. Meeting contents: The subjects discussed were relevant.

Page 9: Koper evaluation

8. Meeting contents: The activities carried were relevant.

Page 10: Koper evaluation

9. Meeting contents: Balance between different types of activities (work session, social and cultural events, team building, free time etc.), realistic timescales.

Page 11: Koper evaluation

10. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled the established objectives.

Page 12: Koper evaluation

11. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled my personal expectations.

Page 13: Koper evaluation

12. Quality of European partnership: Effective communication amongst partners.

Page 14: Koper evaluation

13. Quality of European partnership: Development of teamwork, positive attitudes.

Page 15: Koper evaluation

14. Quality of European partnership: The commitment to the project by each partner (fulfilling the responsibilities set out for this project meeting, quality of the presentations and products, sharing responsibility for the meeting).

Page 16: Koper evaluation

15. Quality of European partnership: Intercultural interaction/ respect of personal and cultural values.

Page 17: Koper evaluation

16. What do you consider to be the main strength of this project meeting?

Page 18: Koper evaluation
Page 19: Koper evaluation

17. Were there any weak points?

Page 20: Koper evaluation
Page 21: Koper evaluation

18. Can you see any problem areas for the project that should be tackled as soon as possible?

Page 22: Koper evaluation
Page 23: Koper evaluation

19. If so please suggest some measures or ways for solving the problem(s).

Page 24: Koper evaluation