king farm cct presentation 2011-10-25
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
1/21
Corridor Cities Transitway:King Farm AvoidanceFeasibility Study Update
October 26, 2011
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
2/21
Meeting Goals
Recap project description Explain and discuss the King Farm Avoidance
Feasibility Study and results Identify residents specific concerns about the
CCT on King Farm Boulevard Discuss next steps
2
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
3/21
What is the CCT?
Transit project that would provide alternative transit servicein Rockville, Gaithersburg, Germantown and Clarksburg
The 13- to 15-miles long transit line would run on adedicated transitway with connections to Metro, MARC and
local buses Features 14-16 stations, depending on LPA selection of
the alignment; up to three additional stations to be builtpost-2030 depending on development and redevelopmentin the area
Transit modes: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)or Light Rail Transit (LRT)
3
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
4/21
2010 SEA Public Hearing
New alternative options for Crown Farm, LifeSciences Center and the Kentlands
Public and private testimony received fromattendees
King Farm Community expressed concerns overthe CCT Master Plan alignment on King FarmBoulevard
Comment summary available on the CCT
website www.mta.maryland.gov/cct
4
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
5/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
January 25, 2011 letter from the Rockville Mayorand City Council requesting evaluation of twoalternative CCT alignments along I-370 and
Shady Grove Road Project limits were identified with the City of
Rockville The two study corridors (I-370 and Shady Grove
Road) were compared against the King FarmBoulevard alignment
5
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
6/21
6
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
STUDYCORRIDORS
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
7/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
Performance Standards Identified: No or minimal erosion to ridership No or minimal additional capital or annual
operations and maintenance costs Minimal reductions in
transportation performance
No or minimal additionalimpacts to natural andhuman environment
7
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
8/218
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
POTENTIALALIGNMENTS
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
9/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
Alternatives Eliminated: Exclusive BRT or LRT Transitway in the I-370
median was not feasible due to median width
LRT was dismissed on the I-370 corridor dueto excessive cost to upgrade and separateLRT from highway and ramp movements
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
10/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
Alternatives Eliminated: I-370 Median
10
I-370 west of MD 355
I-370 east of MD 355
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
11/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyAlternatives Eliminated: Crabbs Branch Way to I-370
11
I-370 CORRIDOR
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
12/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyShady Grove Road: 13 Options Evaluated
12
SHADY GROVEALIGNMENT
OPTIONS
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
13/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyI-370: 4 Options Evaluated
13
I-370 ALIGNMENTOPTIONS
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
14/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
Criteria for Evaluation of Alternatives: Length Number of crossings
Number of parcels affected/acreage required Number of displacements Potential stations 2035 estimated travel time/reliability Change in 2035 daily ridership and
capital and operating costs
14
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
15/21
Evaluation Results
15
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
16/21
King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study
Results Summary
16
Ridership decreased from 2,380 to 7,695 per day
Increased distance: from 0.2 miles to over 2.5miles
Requires significant property impacts
Capitol Costs would increase from $20M to$220M for LRT and from $15M to $200 M for BRT
Annual operations and maintenance costs wouldincrease from $340,000 to $1.8 M
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
17/21
King Farm Coordination
Summary of comments received through outreach efforts withthe community:
King Farm Boulevard median Street mobility/circulation
Transit vehicles Noise Pedestrian access Traffic impacts MD 355 and Gaither Road crossings
Station location and design Construction Impacts Shuttle operations
17
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
18/21
King Farm Coordination
MTA is working to address communityconcerns:
Additional studies and reports completed orunderway
Creation of Area Advisory Committees
18
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
19/21
BRT and LRT Rendering Studies
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
20/21
Next Steps
LPA Recommendation Mode/Alignment Operations & Maintenance Facility Location
Secretary/Governor LPA Announcement MTA Advanced Conceptual Engineering Public Outreach
Area Advisory Committees Ongoing meetings with community Newsletters/Flyers/Postcards
20
-
8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25
21/21
Schedule
Select Preferred Alternative Fall 2011 Request Permission to Enter Winter 2012
Preliminary Engineering
PE and Final Environmental Fall 2013Impact Statement Completed
Begin Final Design Summer 2014
Begin Construction 2018
Note: Dependent on FTA approvals and available funding
21