king farm cct presentation 2011-10-25

Upload: scottbarman

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    1/21

    Corridor Cities Transitway:King Farm AvoidanceFeasibility Study Update

    October 26, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    2/21

    Meeting Goals

    Recap project description Explain and discuss the King Farm Avoidance

    Feasibility Study and results Identify residents specific concerns about the

    CCT on King Farm Boulevard Discuss next steps

    2

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    3/21

    What is the CCT?

    Transit project that would provide alternative transit servicein Rockville, Gaithersburg, Germantown and Clarksburg

    The 13- to 15-miles long transit line would run on adedicated transitway with connections to Metro, MARC and

    local buses Features 14-16 stations, depending on LPA selection of

    the alignment; up to three additional stations to be builtpost-2030 depending on development and redevelopmentin the area

    Transit modes: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)or Light Rail Transit (LRT)

    3

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    4/21

    2010 SEA Public Hearing

    New alternative options for Crown Farm, LifeSciences Center and the Kentlands

    Public and private testimony received fromattendees

    King Farm Community expressed concerns overthe CCT Master Plan alignment on King FarmBoulevard

    Comment summary available on the CCT

    website www.mta.maryland.gov/cct

    4

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    5/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    January 25, 2011 letter from the Rockville Mayorand City Council requesting evaluation of twoalternative CCT alignments along I-370 and

    Shady Grove Road Project limits were identified with the City of

    Rockville The two study corridors (I-370 and Shady Grove

    Road) were compared against the King FarmBoulevard alignment

    5

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    6/21

    6

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    STUDYCORRIDORS

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    7/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    Performance Standards Identified: No or minimal erosion to ridership No or minimal additional capital or annual

    operations and maintenance costs Minimal reductions in

    transportation performance

    No or minimal additionalimpacts to natural andhuman environment

    7

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    8/218

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    POTENTIALALIGNMENTS

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    9/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    Alternatives Eliminated: Exclusive BRT or LRT Transitway in the I-370

    median was not feasible due to median width

    LRT was dismissed on the I-370 corridor dueto excessive cost to upgrade and separateLRT from highway and ramp movements

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    10/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    Alternatives Eliminated: I-370 Median

    10

    I-370 west of MD 355

    I-370 east of MD 355

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    11/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyAlternatives Eliminated: Crabbs Branch Way to I-370

    11

    I-370 CORRIDOR

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    12/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyShady Grove Road: 13 Options Evaluated

    12

    SHADY GROVEALIGNMENT

    OPTIONS

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    13/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility StudyI-370: 4 Options Evaluated

    13

    I-370 ALIGNMENTOPTIONS

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    14/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    Criteria for Evaluation of Alternatives: Length Number of crossings

    Number of parcels affected/acreage required Number of displacements Potential stations 2035 estimated travel time/reliability Change in 2035 daily ridership and

    capital and operating costs

    14

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    15/21

    Evaluation Results

    15

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    16/21

    King Farm Avoidance Feasibility Study

    Results Summary

    16

    Ridership decreased from 2,380 to 7,695 per day

    Increased distance: from 0.2 miles to over 2.5miles

    Requires significant property impacts

    Capitol Costs would increase from $20M to$220M for LRT and from $15M to $200 M for BRT

    Annual operations and maintenance costs wouldincrease from $340,000 to $1.8 M

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    17/21

    King Farm Coordination

    Summary of comments received through outreach efforts withthe community:

    King Farm Boulevard median Street mobility/circulation

    Transit vehicles Noise Pedestrian access Traffic impacts MD 355 and Gaither Road crossings

    Station location and design Construction Impacts Shuttle operations

    17

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    18/21

    King Farm Coordination

    MTA is working to address communityconcerns:

    Additional studies and reports completed orunderway

    Creation of Area Advisory Committees

    18

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    19/21

    BRT and LRT Rendering Studies

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    20/21

    Next Steps

    LPA Recommendation Mode/Alignment Operations & Maintenance Facility Location

    Secretary/Governor LPA Announcement MTA Advanced Conceptual Engineering Public Outreach

    Area Advisory Committees Ongoing meetings with community Newsletters/Flyers/Postcards

    20

  • 8/3/2019 King Farm Cct Presentation 2011-10-25

    21/21

    Schedule

    Select Preferred Alternative Fall 2011 Request Permission to Enter Winter 2012

    Preliminary Engineering

    PE and Final Environmental Fall 2013Impact Statement Completed

    Begin Final Design Summer 2014

    Begin Construction 2018

    Note: Dependent on FTA approvals and available funding

    21