khurram shehzad st104789 14 may 2008
DESCRIPTION
Interactions between Geogrid and Sand with/without Tire Chips Including Sensitivity Analyses and Simulations. Khurram Shehzad st104789 14 May 2008. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Contents. Introduction Objectives Scope of Work Methodology and Laboratory Test - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Interactions between Geogrid Interactions between Geogrid and Sand with/without Tire and Sand with/without Tire Chips Including Sensitivity Chips Including Sensitivity Analyses and SimulationsAnalyses and Simulations
Khurram ShehzadKhurram Shehzad
st104789st104789
14 May 200814 May 2008
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
ContentsContents
1.1. IntroductionIntroduction
2.2. ObjectivesObjectives
3.3. Scope of WorkScope of Work
4.4. Methodology and Laboratory TestMethodology and Laboratory Test
5.5. Numerical SimulationsNumerical Simulations
6.6. Sensitivity AnalysesSensitivity Analyses
7.7. ConclusionsConclusions
IntroductionIntroduction
When earth structures are constructed on When earth structures are constructed on soft clay deposit following problems are soft clay deposit following problems are occurred;occurred;
Large vertical settlementsLarge vertical settlements
Lateral deformationsLateral deformations
IntroductionIntroduction
Solution of the problems;Solution of the problems;
Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) StructureStructure
Lightweight backfill materialsLightweight backfill materials
Objectives Objectives
To determine the index properties of To determine the index properties of Ayutthaya sand and tire chips-sand Ayutthaya sand and tire chips-sand mixture. mixture.
To determine the To determine the Shear strength parameters Shear strength parameters Interaction coefficientsInteraction coefficients Efficiency of geogridEfficiency of geogrid
ObjectivesObjectives
To simulate the pullout and direct shear To simulate the pullout and direct shear tests results using FE software PLAXIS 2Dtests results using FE software PLAXIS 2D
Sensitivity analyses of the important Sensitivity analyses of the important parameters affecting the pullout testparameters affecting the pullout test
Scope of WorkScope of Work
Laboratory TestsLaboratory Tests
Numerical SimulationsNumerical Simulations
Materials for this StudyMaterials for this Study
1.1.AyutthayaAyutthaya sandsand
2.2.Tire chips-sand mixtureTire chips-sand mixture
3.3.Polyfelt geogridPolyfelt geogrid
Basic Concepts of MSEBasic Concepts of MSE
Fill material
Reinforcing material
Facingmaterial
Soil/ReinforcementSoil/Reinforcement InteractionInteraction
Soil or rigid block
A= PulloutA= Pullout ResistanceResistance
B=Direct Shear ResistanceB=Direct Shear Resistance
Laboratory TestsLaboratory Tests
Direct Shear TestsDirect Shear Tests
Pullout TestsPullout Tests
Large Scale Direct Shear TestsLarge Scale Direct Shear Tests
Large Scale Direct Shear TestsLarge Scale Direct Shear Tests
Longitudinal section
Cross section
Large Direct Shear Apparatus
Large Scale Direct Shear TestsLarge Scale Direct Shear TestsDirect shear failure envelopes of the sand and tire chips-sand mixture without geogrid
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Normal pressure (kPa)
Max
imu
m d
irec
t s
he
ar s
tres
s (k
Pa)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Sand only Tire chips-sand mix
Supawiwat (2002) Prempramote (2005)
Shehzad (2008) Shehzad (2008)
Sand only Tire chips-sand mixture
Large Scale Direct Shear TestsLarge Scale Direct Shear TestsDirect shear failure envelopes of the sand and tire chips-sand mixture with geogrid
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Normal pressure (kPa)
Max
imu
m d
irec
t s
he
ar s
tres
s (k
Pa)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Tire chip-sand mix Sand
Prempramote (2005) Shehzad (2008)
Series6 Series7
Shehzad (2008)
Tire chips-sand mix Sand only
(Polyfelt geogird) (Polyfelt geogird)
(Polyfelt geogird)
Pullout TestsPullout Tests
Pullout TestsPullout Tests
Longitudinal section
Cross section
Pullout Apparatus
Pullout TestsPullout Tests
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Normal stress (kPa)
Ma
xim
um
pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
Sand Only Tire Chip-Sand Mix
Supawiwat (2002) Prempramote (2005)
Series7 Series8
Shehzad (2008) Shehzad (2008)
Sand only Tire chips-sand mix
Slippage failure
Breakage failure
(Hexagonal grid)
(Geogrid) (Geogrid)
(Geogrid)
Maximum pullout resistance versus normal stress for sand and tire chips-sand mixture
Interaction CoefficientsInteraction CoefficientsDirect shear interaction coefficients between backfill materials and geogrid
Interaction CoefficientsInteraction CoefficientsPullout interaction coefficients between backfill materials and geogrid
Geogrid EfficienciesGeogrid Efficiencies
Backfill Materials
Prempramote (2005) Shehzad (2008)
EEφφ Ec EEφφ Ec
Sand only -- -- 98.19 89.12
Tire chips-sand mixture (30:70 % by
weight)
98.06 87.10 97.37 88.01
Geogrid efficiencies from pullout and direct shear tests
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Direct shear displacement (mm)
Dir
ect
sh
ear
str
ess
(kP
a)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
FEMMeasured
Direct Shear Tests SimulationsDirect Shear Tests SimulationsComparison of measured (R=0.98) and predicted (R=0.9) direct shear resistance from sand backfill using PLAXIS software
(R=0.9)(R=0.98)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Diect Shear Displacement (mm)
Dir
ect
Sh
ear
Str
ess
(kP
a)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
FEMMeasured
Direct Shear Tests SimulationsDirect Shear Tests SimulationsComparison of measured (R=0.95) and predicted (R=0.9) direct shear resistance from tire chips-sand backfill using PLAXIS software
(R=0.9)(R=0.95)
PulloutPullout TestsTests SimulationsSimulations
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llou
t re
sis
tan
ce
(kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
PLAXIS Measured
Comparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from sand backfill
R=0.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llou
t re
sis
tan
ce
(kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
PLAXIS Measured
PulloutPullout TestsTests SimulationsSimulationsComparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from tire chips-sand backfill
R=0.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
FLAC (Hypoplaticity)Measured PLAXIS (MC)
PulloutPullout TestsTests Simulations Simulations ComparisonComparison
Comparison of predicted pullout resistance from PLAXIS and FLAC for sand backfill
Sensitivity AnalysesSensitivity Analyses
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
Measured R = 0.7 R = 0.9
Comparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from sand Backfill at different R values using PLAXIS software
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
Measured R = 0.6 R = 0.9
Sensitivity AnalysesSensitivity AnalysesComparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from tire chips-sand backfill at different R values using PLAXIS software
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
EA = 583 kN/m EA = 1000 kN/mMeasured
Sensitivity AnalysesSensitivity AnalysesComparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from sand backfill at different axial stiffness values using PLAXIS software
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pullout displacement (mm)
Pu
llo
ut
res
ista
nc
e (
kN
/m)
σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa σ = 30 kPa
σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa σ = 60 kPa
σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa σ = 90 kPa
σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa σ = 120 kPa
EA = 583 kN/m EA = 1000 kN/mMeasured
Sensitivity AnalysesSensitivity AnalysesComparison of measured and predicted pullout resistance from tire chips- sand backfill at various axial stiffness values using PLAXIS software
ConclusionsConclusions
Weight of the MSE can be reduced by Weight of the MSE can be reduced by 28% using tire chips-sand mixture28% using tire chips-sand mixture
Cost of MSE structure can be reduced Cost of MSE structure can be reduced 30% by using Tire chips mixture30% by using Tire chips mixture
Efficiency of the geogrid can be Efficiency of the geogrid can be increased by improving axial stiffness increased by improving axial stiffness and interaction coefficient of the geogridand interaction coefficient of the geogrid