kerbside waste and recycling service
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service One year review – Additional Performance Outcomes
Additional performance outcomes data included to ensure full data set provided and respond to all queries.
June, 2021
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 432
![Page 2: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Annual tonnes collected by total collection and percentage by stream
20,721 21,588 14,472
1,692
3,366
9,850 7,143
3,485
-
2,968
7,715 7,685 17,224
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Dec 2017 to Dec2018
Jan 2019 to Jan2020
Feb 2020 to Feb2021
Total Collection (tonnes)
Green waste / FOGO
Glass
Recycling (not landfilled)
Recycling (whole loadslandfilled)
Garbage
54% 57%
35%
0%4%
8%
26% 19%
8%
0% 0%
7%
20% 20%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Dec 2017 to Dec 2018 Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 Feb 2020 to Feb 2021
Total collection (tonnes) -percentage by stream
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 433
![Page 3: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Bin volumes and presentation rates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Rubbish Recycling FOGO Glass
Bin presentation rates: Almost every household is presenting their garbage bin every fortnight
Source: bin fullness audit March 2021Source: Cleanaway invoicing, HBCC analysis
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 434
![Page 4: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Households struggling with garbage bin capacity based on 120L capacity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% 100%+
Capacity of 120L and 240L garbage bins
120L 240L
Source: garbage bin fullness audits undertaken by MRA across all suburbs, April 2021 Based on 120L bins with 100%+ capacity and 240L bins with 50%+ capacity classified as 100%
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 435
![Page 5: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Households struggling with garbage bin capacity based on 120L capacity. Figures based on 240L bins with 50%+ capacity classified as 100%
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
100%+
Overfull bins (100%+) by type (actual)
120L 240L
17%
21%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
% of total
Overfull bins (100%+) by type (% of total)
120L 240L
Source: garbage bin fullness audits undertaken by MRA across all suburbs, April 2021
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 436
![Page 6: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Overall increase in recycling volumes (with glass)
-
100
200
300
400
500
600Monthly comingled volume collected (tonnes)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 Feb 2020 with glass
Annual comingled volumes (tonnes)
Comingled recycling Separated glass
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 437
![Page 7: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Truck audits: phase 1 comparison and contamination profile
20% 24%
29%30%
5%4%8%8%
38% 33%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2020 2021
Truck audits - overall outcomes (%)
Paper
Cardboard
Aluminium cans andfoil
Plastics
Contamination
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2020 2021
Truck audits - detailed contamination profileGlass
Paper and Cardboard
Metals
Plastics
Organics
Nappies
Textile
Hazardous
Bagged material (anycontents)Bulky waste >40cm wide
Others
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 438
![Page 8: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Commercial bin audit comparison with residential collections
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Commercial Dense location Recycling bin
Landfill Recycling
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Residential Profile
Garbage Landfill
Source: Commercial Bin Audit April 2021
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 439
![Page 9: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Public realm audit data provides no evidence of material increases to dumped residential garbage in 2020
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Audit of public realm litter bins (%)
Landfill Recycling Bagged
Source: MRA public realm audits across all suburbs, April 2021
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Volume and cost of dumped rubbish in HBCC over time
cubic metres $
Source: HBCC City Services records, March 2021
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 440
![Page 10: Kerbside Waste and Recycling Service](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022012412/616c7b5defe0b44bd87733bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
impact
time
Phase 1: “big rocks”Respond to crisis, set foundations of kerbside source separation; bins / schedule; local processors
Phase 2: embedBehaviour change, improve quality of recycling, refine collection
Phase 3: transformEg, FOGO processing, behavioural incentives (“reduce”), attract more innovative local processors
New kerbside waste and recycling system change model
Horizon 1: 6-12 months
Horizon 2:12-24 months
Horizon 2:18 months – 3 years
We are here…
Attachment 8.3.1.5 Page 441