katie m. shaw youth development leadership graduate program

18
Positive Youth Development and High- Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences: Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program College of Health, Education, and Human Development Clemson University

Upload: danyl

Post on 09-Feb-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Positive Youth Development and High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences: Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities. Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program College of Health, Education, and Human Development Clemson University. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Positive Youth Development and High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences:

Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities

Katie M. ShawYouth Development Leadership Graduate Program

College of Health, Education, and Human Development

Clemson University

Page 2: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Introduction• High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor

Experiences– Sense of place• Basic Needs and Self Determination Theory

– Resiliency Training• Families are essential component to

youth development Outdoor

Experiences Important

Family Important

Lack of Connection

Page 3: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Problem• Youth partaking in fewer HYNBOE and

efforts to promote participation lack family inclusiveness

• Programs remove youth from proximal environment to promote PYD– Deter: • Optimal development • Internal motivation

Constraints to Family

Participation in HYNBOE

Reliance on Engineered Entertainme

nt

Less Engagement

in Natural World

Page 4: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Purpose

• Resulting data will help ascertain– Thematic overlap in parental perceptions – Potential programming needs and transferable efforts

within the field that address parental perceptions

Qualitative Evaluation

Parent Perceptions

Constraints

Benefits

Outdoor Organization

s

Family Inclusive Efforts

Page 5: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Guiding Questions1) What are parents' perceived benefits of participation in high-yield,

nature-based, outdoor experiences?

2) What are parents' perceived barriers or constraints to participation in high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences?

3) Do barriers or constraints to partaking in high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences preclude the benefits gained from participation?

4) Do outdoor organizations aim to make the benefits of participation as identified by parents attainable through family inclusive, high-yield, nature-based, outdoor programming?

5) Do outdoor organizations aim to overcome barriers or constraints as identified by parents to make participation in family inclusive, high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences possible?

Page 6: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review• High-Yield Activities (Sibthorp &

Morgan, 2011)

HYNBOE

Cognitive & Behavior

Competency Keen

Awareness & Sensory

Skills

Learning Performanc

e

Motivation

InitiativeContributing to Self, Family,

Community, & Society

Empathy

Strong Sense of Identity

Strong Relationshi

ps with Adults &

Peers

Moral Character

Page 7: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review

• National Kids Survey (Cordell, Green, Larson, Stephens, Fly, & Schexnayder,

2011)– 63%, >80%, 50% – Types of outdoor activities cause concern• Louv's (2008) Nature Deficit Disorder

– Engineered entertainment outdoors • Constraints Theory (Crawford, Jackson, & Godbey,

1991)

Page 8: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review

• Needs Attention: – Integration of families and communities

in outdoor program design and implementation

– Constraints: Safety and Feasibility – Benefits: Gap in Literature

Page 9: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

• Qualitative Investigation: – Grounded Theory

• Population & Sample: – Parents – Outdoor Organizations

Methodology

Page 10: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Data Collection: – Parent

• Semi Structured Interview – Organization

• Document Review• Instrumentation: – Researcher– Script– Audio-Recorder– Form

Page 11: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Parent Data Analysis: Inductive Process– Open Coding (Bogdan & Biklen, 1992, as cited in Creswell, 2009)– Axial Coding of Constraints Constraint

Theory Model– Selective Coding of Benefits Broader

Themes –Member Checking– Tabulation

Page 12: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Outdoor Organization Data Analysis:

Inductive Process–Member Checking – Tabulation– Coding and Thematic Identification– Compare & Contrast • Current Efforts with Identified Needs

Page 13: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Limitations & Delimitations

• Thematic Saturation• Language and Scheduling• Census• One School • One Parent

Page 14: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Implications• Promote PYD – Better Descriptors: • Perceived benefits and constraints to

participation in HYNBOE• Family-inclusive needs, opportunities, and

transferable practices in the regional community

Page 15: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Beightol, J., Jevertson, J., Gray, S., Carter, S., & Gass, M. (2009). The Effect of an Experiential, Adventure-Based "Anti-Bullying

Initiative" on Levels of Resilience: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal Of Experiential Education, 31(3), 420-424. Brennan, M. A. (2008). Conceptualizing resiliency: an interactional perspective for community and youth development. Child

Care in Practice, 14(1), 55-64.Brown, J. (2008). We don't need your help, but will you please fix our children. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 29(2), 61-69.

Cheng-Sian Chang, Tzung-Shi Chen, & Wei-Hsiang Hsu. (2010). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobil learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228-1239.

Collins, K., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Jiao, Q. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(3), 267-294.

Cordell, K., Green, G., Larson, L., Stephens, R., Fly, M., & Schexnayder, S. (2011). Kids are Going Outdoors?. Parks & Recreation, 46(10), 40-41.

Crawford, D.W., Jackson, E.L., Godbey, G.C. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approach, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage Publications.Doug, E. & Chick, G. (2005). Culture constraints on leisure through cross-cultural research. Canadian Association for Leisure

Studies. Retrieved from http://lin.ca/Uploads/cclr11/CCLR11-30.pdf Evenson, K. R., Murray, D. M., Birnbaum, A. S., & Cohen, D. A. (2010). Examination of perceived neighborhood characteristics

and transportation on changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior: The Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls. Health & Place, 16(5), 977-985. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.002

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine DeGruyter.

Glasser, W. ( 2001). Choice theory in the classroom. New York, New York: HarperCollins Inc. Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Xiangyou Sharon, S. (2010). Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two

Decades. Journal Of Leisure Research, 42(1), 111-134.Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology,

15, 169-182.

Page 16: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Kimbro, R., & Schachter, A. (2011). Neighborhood poverty and maternal fears of children's outdoor play. Family Relations, 60(4),

461-475. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00660.xKimbrough, S. (2007). Research Update: Promoting Self-Efficacy Through Play. Parks & Recreation, 42(10), 24-29. Kriesberg, D. (2003). The Gift of the OUTDOORS. New York State Conservationist, 58(1), 22. Louv, R. (2008). Last Child in the Wood: Saving our children form nature-deficit disorder. New York, Ney York: Algonquin. Mainella, F. P., Agate, J. R., & Clark, B. S. (2011). Outdoor-based play and reconnection to nature: A neglected pathway to positive

youth development. New Directions For Youth Development, 2011(130), 89-104. 10.1002/yd.399Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B., & Graefe A. (2002). A comparison of leisure constraints among three outdoor recreation

activities: whitewater rafting, canoeing, and overnight horseback riding. Proceedings of the 2002 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. 152-157. Retrieved from http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_ne302/gtr_ne302_152.pdf.

Oliver, M., Witten, K., Kearns, R. A., Mavoa, S., Badland, H. M., Carroll, P., & ... Ergler, C. (2011). Kids in the city study: research design and methodology. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 587-598. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-587

Padilla-Walker, L. M., Hardy, S. A., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Adolescent Hope as a Mediator Between Parent-Child Connectedness and Adolescent Outcomes. Journal Of Early Adolescence, 31(6), 853-879. 10.1177/0272431610376249

Place, G. (2004). Youth Recreation Leads to Adult Conversation. Parks & Recreation, 39(2), 29-38.Quality Time. (2011). Working Mother, 34(4), 76-78. Shellman, A., & Ewert, A. (2010). A multi-method approach to understanding empowerment processes and outcomes of

adventure education program experiences. Journal Of Experiential Education, 32(3), 275-279. Sibthorp, J. (2010). A Letter From the Editor: Positioning Outdoor and Adventure Programs Within Positive Youth Development.

Journal Of Experiential Education, 33(2), 106. 853-879. 10.1177/0272431610376249 Sibthorp, J., & Morgan, C. (2011). Adventure-based programming: Exemplary youth development practice. New Directions For

Youth Development, 2011(130), 105-119. 10.1002/yd.400State of Connecticut. (2012). No Child Left Inside. Retrieved March 25, 2012 from http://www.ct.gov/ncli/cwp/view.asp?

a=4005&q=471158&ncliNav_GID=2004Success Oriented Achievement Realized. (2012). Retrieved March 26, 2012 from http://www.soarnc.org/about.htmlTaylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow.

Environment & Behavior, 30(1), 3.

Page 17: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). COPING WITH ADD. Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 54. Texas Parks and Wildlife. (2012). Texas Outdoor Family. Retrieved March 25, 2011 from

http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/outdoor-learning/texas-outdoor-family/ Weir, L. A., Etelson, D., & Brand, D. A. (2006). Parents' perceptions of neighborhood safety and children's

physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 212-217. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.024Wendy, K. (n.d). Groups aim to 'plant seeds' with kids. USA Today. Wittkowski, A. A., Zumla, A. A., Glendenning, S. S., & Fox, J. E. (2011). The experience of postnatal

depression in South Asian mothers living in Great Britain: a qualitative study. Journal Of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 29(5) 480-492. doi:10.1080/02646838.2011.639014

You, S., & Nguyen, J. T. (2011). Parents' involvement in adolescents' schooling: a multidimensional conceptualisation and mediational model. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 547-558. 10.1080/01443410.2011.577734

Page 18: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program