karen h. pearce senior legislative policy analyst office of legislative and public affairs

30
Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Upload: erwin

Post on 19-Mar-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs. NSF and Congress. Committee on Science, Space & Technology Subcommittee on Research and Science Education Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies. Health, Education, Labor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Karen H. PearceSenior Legislative Policy Analyst

Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Page 2: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NSF and Congress

Page 3: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NSF’s Congressional Players

Committee on Science, Space & Technology

Subcommittee on Research and Science Education

Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Commerce, Science and Transportation Comm.

Subcommittee on Science and Space

Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

House SenateA

u tho

rizat

ion

Au t

horiz

atio

n

App

ropr

iatio

ns

App

ropr

iatio

ns

Page 4: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Authorization versus Appropriation Committees

• Authorize funding• Develop legislation to set program priorities, and to establish, continue,

modify, or alter programs and program operations• Oversight functions

• Hold “power of the purse”• Set specific expenditures of money by U.S. government, e.g.,

allocates funds to numerous government agencies, departments, and organizations

• Disperse spending allocations to Appropriations Subcommittees• Responsible for supplemental spending bills

Role of authorization committees

Role of appropriation committees

Page 5: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

The NSF Budget

Page 6: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONFY 2012 Senate CJS Mark

BY ACCOUNT

(Dollars in Millions)   

FY 2011 Enacted

FY 2012 Request

Senate Mark

FY 2012

FY12 Sen. Mark vsFY12 Request

FY12 Sen. Mark vsFY11 Enacted   

    Amount Percent Amount Percent

R&RA $5,563.870 $6,253.54 $5,443.00 -$810.54 -13.0% -$120.87 -2.2%

EHR $861.034 $911.20 $829.00 -82.20 -9.0% -32.03 -3.7%MREFC $117.060 $224.68 $117.06 -107.63 -47.9% 0.00 0.0%AOAM $299.400 $357.74 $290.40 -67.34 -18.8% -9.00 -3.0%OIG $13.972 $15.00 $14.20 -0.80 -5.3% 0.23 1.6%NSB $4.531 $4.84 $4.40 -0.44 -9.1% -0.13 -2.9%

TOTAL, NSF   $6,859.870 $7,767.00 $6,698.10 -$1,068.91 -13.8% -161.78 -2.4%

Totals may not add due to rounding.

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONFY 2012 House CJS Mark

BY ACCOUNT

(Dollars in Millions)   

FY 2011 Enacted

FY 2012 Request

House Mark

FY 2012

FY12 House Mark vs

FY12 Request

FY12 House Mark vs

FY11 Enacted       Amount Percent Amount PercentR&RA $5,563.870 $6,253.54 $5,606.96 -$646.58 -10.3% $43.09 0.8%EHR $861.034 $911.20 $835.00 -76.20 -8.4% -26.03 -3.0%MREFC $117.060 $224.68 $100.00 -124.68 -55.5% -17.06 -14.6%AOAM $299.400 $357.74 $299.40 -58.34 -16.3% 0.00 0.0%OIG $13.972 $15.00 $13.97 -1.03 -6.9% 0.00 0.0%NSB $4.531 $4.84 $4.53 -0.31 -6.4% 0.00 0.0%

TOTAL, NSF   $6,859.870 $7,767.00 $6,859.87 -$907.13 -11.7% -0.00 -0.00

Totals may not add due to rounding.

Page 7: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

FY 2012 House vs Senate CJS Mark

BY ACCOUNT

(Dollars in Millions)

   

FY 2011 EnactedFY 2012 Request

House MarkFY 2012

Senate Mark FY 2012

House vsSenate

      

AmountR&RA $5,563.870 $6,253.54 $5,606.96 $5,443.00 -$163.96

EHR $861.034 $911.20 $835.00 $829.00 -6.00

MREFC $117.060 $224.68 $100.00 $117.0617.06

AOAM $299.400 $357.74 $299.40 $290.40-9.00

OIG $13.972 $15.00 $13.97 $14.20 0.23

NSB $4.531 $4.84 $4.53 $4.40 -0.13

TOTAL, NSF   $6,859.870 $7,767.00 $6,859.87 $6,698.10 -$161.77

Totals may not add due to rounding.

Page 8: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017$0.0

$2.0

$4.0

$6.0

$8.0

$10.0

$12.0

$14.0

Recent and Outyear NSF Funding

NSF Appropriations ARRA Appropriations President's Plan for Science & Innovation America COMPETES Act

Fiscal Year

$ in Billions

Page 9: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

National Science Foundation FY12 BudgetFunding Highlights

• Provides $7.8 B for the NSF. Investments are made in areas that contribute to the President’s Plan for Science and Innovation. Savings are also created by reducing funding for low-performing and lower-priority education and research programs.

• Demonstrates the Administration’s commitment to R&D as a driver of economic growth, consistent with the President’s plan to double funding for key basic research agencies.

• Fosters the development of a clean energy economy by providing $998 million for a cross-agency sustainability research effort focused on renewable energy technologies and complex environmental- and climate-system processes.

• Supports job creation in advanced manufacturing and emerging technologies with significant increases for multidisciplinary research targeted at next-generation computer chips, wireless communications, and robotics technologies.

Page 10: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

• Invests in the growth of America’s science and technology workforce with $20 million for recruiting and retaining undergraduate students from under-represented groups.

• Invests in the next generation of math and science teachers with a new $20 million research and development program aimed at improving the preparation and professional development of future educators in these fields.

• Builds first-of-a-kind distributed research facilities to continuously monitor the Nation’s environment and oceans.

National Science Foundation FY12 BudgetFunding Highlights, cont.

_____________________________________________________

Page 11: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Obama Administration FY 2012Priorities

______________________________________________________

• Growing the economy and spurring job creation by America's businesses, is the top priority.

• 5-year freeze on all discretionary spending outside of security, but not across the board.

• “…we-as a Nation-must devote our resources to these fundamental areas of scientific inquiry.”

– Increasing investment in R&D that contributes to fields as varied as biomedicine, cyber-security, nano-technology, and advanced manufacturing.

– Significant investment in clean energy technology, boosting investment by 1/3rd

• Historic investment in repairing, rebuilding, and modernizing our transportation infrastructure.

• Ambitious effort to speed development of a cutting-edge, high-speed wireless data network.

• Double U.S. exports by 2014.

Page 12: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NSF in the “Big Picture”

Page 13: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

U.S. BUDGET IS

$3,729,000,000,000

Page 14: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Federal Budget Growth

• 1789-1987 (198 Years) 1st Trillion

• 1987-2002 (15 Years) 2nd Trillion

• 2002-2007 (5 Years) 3rd Trillion

Page 15: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

FEDERAL R&D

$ 147,911,000,000 3.97%

Page 16: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NSF RESEARCH BUDGET

$ 6,320,000,000 4.3%

Page 17: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NASA6.6%

Defense51.8%

NSF4.3%

HHS21.9%

All Other5.5%

Commerce1.1%

Energy8.8%

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT2012 R&D Budget

($147.9 Billion)

$77.5

$11.0

$1.7

$8.5$32.2

$5.6

$11.2

Page 18: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

NSF Role in Research and DevelopmentFiscal Year 2008

Industry69%

Federal23%

Other8%

Total U.S. National R&D $398B

Other96%

NSF4%

Total Federal R&D Obligations $115B

Other87%

NSF13%

Total Federal Basic Research $28B

Other79%

NSF21%

Total Federal Academic Basic Research $14B

Latest complete data currently available.

Source: NSF/SRS: Science and Engineering Indicators FY 2008, Appendix Table 4-3; Federal Funds for Research and Development, 2007-9, Tables 4, 28, and 66.

Page 19: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Federal Government Budget

FY 2012 and Beyond

Page 20: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT2012 Proposed Outlays

($3.729 Trillion)

57%

36%

7%

Mandatory

Discretionary

Net Interest$ 1.340

$ 242

$ 2.140

Page 21: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Mandatory Spending is Overwhelming the Rest of the Budget

26%

68%

6%

57%

36%

7%

Mandatory Discretionary Net Interest

1962 2012

Page 22: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

FEDERAL GOVERNMENTProposed Outlays

57%

36%

7%

61%

24%

15%

Mandatory Discretionary Net Interest

2012Proposed Outlays($3.729 Trillion)

2021 Proposed Outlays

($5.697 Trillion)$242

$1.367

$3.475

$.844

$1.340

$2.140

Page 23: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Mandatory Spending

• Not in the jurisdiction of Appropriations Committees

• Many programs are increased for Cost of Living Adjustments

• Major Three - Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid

Page 24: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Important Trends

Page 25: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Federal Support for research

• In inflation-adjusted dollars, federal funding for the physical sciences has been flat for several decades

• This comes at a time when other nations are increasing their public investments in R&D

• The America Competes Act will hopefully represent a reversal of this trend.

Page 26: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs
Page 27: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs
Page 28: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Academic R&D expenditures, by source of funding: 1973-2009

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Federal governmentState/local governmentIndustryAcademic institutionsAll other sources

Percent

NOTE: Science and engineering R&D; non-S&E R&D not included.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Research and Development Expendi-tures at Universities and Colleges: FY 2009. See appendix table 5-2.

Science and Engineering Indicators 2012

Page 29: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs
Page 30: Karen H. Pearce Senior Legislative Policy Analyst Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

Innovation Resulting from US Federally-Funded Research

InnovationThe Internet Web Browser Bar Codes Fiber Optics Routers MRI Doppler Radar Speech Recognition Nanotechnology Computer Aided Design Google

Source: Losing the Competitive Advantage? American Electronics Association, 2005.

FunderDARPA/NSF NSF NSF NSF NSF NIH/NSF NSF NSF/DARPA NSF NSF/DARPANSF