judging criteria for the video competition saeyls 2013

Upload: ashwini-durga-kumar

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Judging Criteria for the Video Competition SAEYLS 2013

    1/1

    POOR AVERAGE GOOD TOTAL

    (0-1) (2-3) (4-5) MARKS

    1 CONTENT

    Environmental

    practice(s)

    Appliedandfuture

    environmentalpracticesarenot

    veryefficienttowardsnature.

    Futureenvironmental

    practicesareefficient

    towardsnaturebutnot

    appliedpractices.

    Bothfutureandapplied

    practicesareefficient

    towardsnature.

    Information

    Insufficientanddiscreetgapsin

    theinformationgiven.

    Informationisina

    reasonableamountbut

    irrelevant.

    Clearand

    understandable

    informationisgiven.

    School

    surroundings

    Greenschoolsurroundingsare

    poorlytakencareofand

    insufficient.

    Greenschool

    surroundingsaretaken

    careofbutnot

    sufficient.

    Greenschool

    surroundingsaretaken

    careofandsufficient.

    Videoformat

    Formatofvideoisnotclearand

    efficientleadingtoconfusion.

    Formatofvideoisabit

    confusing,but

    understandable

    enough.

    Formatofvideois

    efficient,clearand

    understandabletothe

    viewers.

    2

    MULTI-

    MEDIADESIGN Useofmultimedia

    Graphic,audioandanimationin

    videoareirrelevant.

    Someofthegraphic,

    audioandanimationare

    irrelevant.

    Graphic,audioand

    animationusedinvideo

    arerelevantand

    enhances

    understanding.

    Technical

    Therewerealotoftechnical

    difficultiesandthevideowas

    notclear.

    Thevideowasclearbut

    therewasalotof

    technicaldifficulties.

    Thevideoisclearand

    therewerenotechnical

    difficulties.

    3

    DELIVERYOF

    PRESEN-TATION

    Verbal/non-verbal

    communication

    Inactiveorsloppyuseoftone,

    volume,eyecontact,posture,

    handgestureandarticulation.

    Appropriateuseof

    tone,volume,eye

    contact,posture,hand

    gestureandarticulation

    butfailsincapturingthe

    audience.

    Useofappropriate

    tone,volume,eye

    contact,posture,hand

    gestureand

    articulation.

    Confidenceof

    presenter

    Presentershowsthelackof

    confidenceandunsureofthe

    factsthathastobepresented.

    Presenterisnotthat

    confidentbutpresents

    factssurely.

    Presenterdisplays

    strongconfidenceand

    isabletoinducethe

    audience.

    Knowledgecontent

    ofpresenter Insufficientwithalotofgaps.

    Reasonableamountof

    knowledge.

    Sufficientamountof

    knowledge.

    Creativity

    Thepresentationwasnotvery

    effectiveorprofessional.

    Thepresentationwas

    professionalbutnottoo

    effective.

    Thepresentationwas

    bothprofessionaland

    effective.

    Appealtoaudience

    Unabletoengagethe

    audience'sinterest.

    Abletoengagethe

    audience'sinterest.

    Abletoengagethe

    audience,raiseinterest

    andpromote

    interactionbetween

    speakerandlistener.

    Timemanagement

    Doesnotendwithinthetime

    limitandnosmoothflowof

    presentation.

    Endswithintimelimit

    butnosmoothflowof

    presentation.

    Endswithintimelimit

    andsmoothflowof

    presentation.

    4 CIT ATION Credits Nosourceswerecited.

    Mostofthesources

    wereproperlycited.

    Allsourcewere

    properlycited.