judge peter mcbrien secret unlawful demand for transcript excerpt in carlsson case for benefit of...
Upload: sacramento-family-court-news-sacramento-superior-court-controversy-investigative-reporting
Post on 23-Oct-2015
42 views
DESCRIPTION
Judge Peter McBrien secret unlawful demand for transcript excerpt in Carlsson case for benefit of Sacramento judge pro tem attorney Charlotte Keeley client. Described in the sworn testimony of court reporter Robbi Joy at Commission on Judicial Performance prosecution of Judge McBrien. For complete news coverage of Sacramento County Family Court visit Sacramento Family Court News at: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.comArticles include:Judge Peter McBrien Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/PETER%20J.%20McBRIENJudge Pro Tem Attorney Charlotte Keeley Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/CHARLOTTE%20KEELEYCarlsson Case Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/CARLSSON%20CASEDivorce Attorney Sharon Huddle Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/SHARON%20HUDDLE Temporary Judge Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/temporary-judges.htmlJudicial Misconduct: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/JUDICIAL%20MISCONDUCTCourt Employee Misconduct: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/EMPLOYEE%20MISCONDUCT Sacramento County Bar Association Family Law Section Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/FLECThird District Court of Appeal Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/3rd-district-court-casino.htmlJudge Pro Tem Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/JUDGE%20PRO%20TEMSystemic Violations of State Law, Court Rules, Attorney Ethics, Judicial Ethics: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/COLOR%20OF%20LAW%20SERIES Judge Matthew Gary Controversy: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/MATTHEW%20J.%20GARY Family Court Watchdogs: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/WATCHDOGSTRANSCRIPT
1
2
3 - -- -- - -- -- -- ------- -- -
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
;.~.
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
--000--
INQUIRY CONCERNING JUDGE PETER J. McBRIEN oRI-GINALCJP NO. 185
- -- -- - ---- -- - ----- -- --I
TRANSCRIPT OF THE
HEARING BEFORE SPECIAL MASTERS
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 2, 2009
VOLUME 2, PAGES 251 525
REPORTED BY: SANDRA LEHANE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL REPORTER
CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER NO. 7372 155 Orr Road
Alameda, California 94502 (510) 864-9645
L-----------IN RE CJF NC. 185 4/2/09--------~-----l
251
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q. At some point, did the Court clerk tell you
that the judge wanted a partial transcript?
A. Yes, she did.
Q. When did she tell you that?
A. You know -- I'm sorry. It was during that
brief break, I believe, that the judge gave to
Ms. Huddle. And the clerk called me over, and she
whispered to me, "The judge wants just this particular
portion of the transcript for himself, and he
instructs you not to tell anyone."
MR. MURPHY: Objection, Your Honor. Hearsay.
SPECIAL MASTER CORNELL: Overruled. The
lawyer opened the door. Go ahead.
MR. BLUM: You may finish.
THE WITNESS: This was a while back, but that
I remember as being so incredibly remarkable.
BY MR. BLUM:
Q. Okay. I'm not sure the record picked up what
the clerk was saying.
A. Oh. She told me that the judge was
requesting a particular portion that had to do with
Mr. Carlsson's employment and that I was not to tell
the other parties. And she repeated that, "He said
not to tell anyone." And I said I even have a form
that says, "Such and-Such has been transcribed and is
L------------------------IN RE CJF NO. 185 - 4/2/09--------------------~
384
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
available to you." I've been taught that you are to
make whatever is transcribed that is now public record
available to all parties. And I did, as soon as I had
the opportunity in the lobby, approach both counsel
and told them exactly what he had asked for and asked
if they wanted a copy also.
Q. Other than this occasion, have you ever had a
judge, either directly or through the clerk, ask for a
transcri and direct you not to tell anybody else?
A. No. I've had, most especially in a court
trial, a judge want to review a certain part of the
transcript, but I've never been instructed to not tell
anyone.
Q. Did you transcribe that portion of the
transcript, the testimony that the judge requested?
A. Yes, I did. I sent it the next day_ I sent
it through the Administrative Office. And the judge's
clerk called me and said they didn't get it. I then
sent a copy directly to chambers. They said they
still didn't get it and that it would be best to
email it. So that, I did.
Q. The second request you just described, was
that sometime after the trial?
A. Yes.
Q. Do you know approximately when, what month
4/2/09 _____.______--1L-------------------------IN RE CJF NO. 185 385
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
perhaps?
A. I produced the first one just the next day,
and then got the phone call from her probably three
weeks later. I send everything UPS and had a tracking
number, so I'm very certain of these things and that
there was a signature obtained. I believe it I'm
actually guessing. I believe it was about three weeks
later. I've done so many trials.
Q. Sure. You've done some transcripts before in
your career?
A. A couple.
Q. But you were asked for it a third time?
A. Yes.
Q. Was that some months later?
A. Yes.
Q. And did you send it again that time?
A. Yes. By that time, I had already moved to
San Jose, and I e-mailed it probably within a day.
Because it was already done; it was just a matter of
attaching a file.
SPECIAL MASTER CORNELL: To whom did you
e-mail it?
THE WITNESS: I e-mailed it to the address
his clerk gave to me, which was her personal e-mail.
SPECIAL MASTER CORNELL: Thank you.
L------------------------IN RE CJF NO. 185 - 4/2/09---------------------
386