joint planning, budget, and program review and assessment meeting

15
Joint Planning, Budget, and Program Review and Assessment Meeting January 24, 2008

Upload: natalya-penda

Post on 30-Dec-2015

32 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Joint Planning, Budget, and Program Review and Assessment Meeting. January 24, 2008. Purpose and Goals. Integration of Budget, Planning and Assessment Building a Minnesota State Reallocation Process. Historical Trends. Enrollment State Allocation and Tuition Changes in CPI Index - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Joint Planning, Budget, and Program Review and Assessment Meeting

January 24, 2008

Purpose and Goals

Integration of Budget, Planning and Assessment

Building a Minnesota State Reallocation Process

Historical Trends

Enrollment

State Allocation and Tuition

Changes in CPI Index

Staffing Levels

Square Footage

Minnesota State University, MankatoFY78-FY07 Fall Headcount

Fall Enrollment

14,515

11,79911,947

14,76115,942

11,507

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

Minnesota State University, MankatoFY99-FY08 FYE Students

FYE Students

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Minnesota State University, MankatoFY91-Est FY09 General Fund Revenue

FY91-Est FY09 Appropriation Vs. Tuition

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

80,000,000

Appropriation

Tuition

Minnesota State University, MankatoChanges in Consumer Price Index

CPI IndexFY 77 - 08

0

50

100

150

200

250

Minnesota State University, MankatoFY95-FY07 Staffing LevelsMinnesota State University, Mankato

General Fund FTE Staffing ComparisonFY95-FY07

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

FT

E

Unclassified Grad Assistant Classified

Minnesota State University, MankatoChanges in General Fund Square Footage

History of Square Footage

900,000

1,200,000

1,500,000

1,800,000

FY80 FY82 FY87 FY89 FY93 FY94 FY98 FY01 FY04 FY07 FY09

Planning/Budget Considerations

How much growth is required to balance budget?

How much new budget is needed to fund growth?

- Enrollment Management Funding Model

Can we accomplish the second issue while still balancing the budget? Will reallocation be required to accomplish both objectives?

Discussion of Key Concepts(Definitions)

Fiscal Years

Reallocation

Reduction

Enrollment Choices

Reallocation Model DevelopmentBrainstorming

Higher Education Reallocation Models< University of Michigan

< Washington State University

< Brigham Young University

Levels of Reduction

Elements of the Model

Reallocation Models

University of Michigan< Forced 2% reallocation each year

All areas receive 98% of prior year budget 2% set aside for Strategic Investments

Washington State University< Areas submit 3% Reduction and 3% Investment Plans

Highest Priority Investments are funded by Lowest Priority Reductions

Brigham Young University< Areas submit requests for new base funding from central pool

Any new funding requires an equal match from the division’s current base budget

Group Discussion Questions

What type of processes could be developed to identify target areas for reallocation? How do you make hard reallocation decisions in a shared governance model?

Are there potential areas within the budget that could be reviewed to positively impact the overall budget?

What are some examples of processes which could be reengineered to create savings for strategic reallocation?