joint construction with second-language writers: collaborative writing plus
DESCRIPTION
Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus. Katie Smith and Nigel Caplan University of Delaware School of Education CUCMC 2012. Source: “The Writing Process Colossal Concept Poster” http://catalog.mcdonaldpublishingcatalog.com. The Teaching-Learning Cycle. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
JOINT CONSTRUCTION WITH SECOND-LANGUAGE WRITERS: COLLABORATIVE WRITING PLUS
Katie Smith and Nigel CaplanUniversity of Delaware School of EducationCUCMC 2012
![Page 2: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Source:“The Writing Process Colossal Concept Poster”http://catalog.mcdonaldpublishingcatalog.com
![Page 3: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Teaching-Learning Cycle
Martin, 2009; adapted from Rothery, 1996
![Page 4: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Joint Construction
1. Pair Writing 2. Teacher-as-Scribe
![Page 5: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Why should it work?
Second Language Acquisition• Interaction (Gass)
• Negotiation (Pica)
• Languaging (Swain)
Genre-Based Pedagogy• Explicit attention to genre (Martin, Rothery)
Collaborative Writing• Benefits of pair writing
(Storch & Wigglesworth)
• Joint construction (Humphrey & MacNaught)
Cognitive Strategy Instruction (MacArthur)
![Page 6: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CONTEXT
![Page 7: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Context• UD English Language Institute• Pre-MBA (Conditionally admitted MBA students)• Reading/Writing for Graduate Programs (level VI)• Target genres: persuasive writing & data commentary
![Page 8: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Research Questions
1. What is the nature of the interactions in two different joint construction tasks?
2. Are the tasks qualitatively and/or quantitatively different?
3. What effects does joint construction have on the language and generic staging of ESL students’ independent writing?
![Page 9: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Methods and Data CollectionSession IV (March-April) Session V (May-June)
Persuasive Essay Pair Writing Teacher-as-Scribe
Data Commentary Teacher-as-Scribe Pair Writing
• 12 Chinese pre-MBA students in each session• 3 of the students in Session IV repeated the course in Session V• Theme of the courses was different: technology (IV) and ethics (V)• Data collected:
• Video/audio recordings of the joint construction tasks• Pair/group writing• Diagnostic essay• Post-instruction data commentary in-class essay• Final timed essay (persuasive)
![Page 10: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Challenges with Data Collection• Limitations of Technology• Limited collaboration • Task Demands• Time Demands
![Page 11: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Tentative FindingsTeacher-as-Scribe Pair WritingTeacher can involve more students Some pairs are dominated by stronger
studentTeacher can focus students to stay on topic
Students have trouble focusing and/or begin lively discussions that take them off topic
Students self-correct and correct one another
When writing, students look for perfect wording of each sentence (often independently)
Students focus more on structure, less on content
In discussions, students construct slowly, focus on word choice and grammar but mostly on content
Students rely on the instructor for corrections to grammar or content
Students rely on one another and on other class materials for corrections
![Page 12: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Future Directions• How do these joint construction tasks effect independent
student writing? (Is there any evidence of transfer?)• Do pair writing and teacher-as-scribe tasks affect student
writing in distinct ways?• What might be some successful strategies to develop for
joint construction tasks in ESL graduate student writing courses?
![Page 13: Joint Construction with Second-Language Writers: Collaborative Writing Plus](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816910550346895de028f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Nigel A. CaplanPhD Student, School of Education (Literacy)Assistant Professor, English Language [email protected]
Katie SmithPhD Student, School of Education (Literacy)[email protected]
PowerPoint and references available athttp://nigelteacher.wordpress.com/handouts/cucmc2012