joining techniques
DESCRIPTION
Pages From Impact Engineering of Composite Structures - S. Abrate Springer 2011 BBS(1)TRANSCRIPT
1
Joining composites
14/11/2013 1CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Introduction
• Joints should be avoided as much as possible, it always causes stress concentrations and quite often, failure occurs at the joint or close to itoccurs at the joint, or close to it.
• With composites, it is possible to manufacture very complex structures in one piece. However, in some cases, this is not possible, or dissassembly is necessary
• For complex joints, with 3D loads, a metal connection element can be preferred, because of its isotropic nature.
14/11/2013 2CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Why are mechanical fasteners used?
• Usually to join composite parts with other (metal) parts
• When it is absolutely necessary to allow disassembly
2
Possibilities for connecting composite parts
• Mechanical fastening
– Bolts
– rivets
• Adhesive bonding
• Combined mechanical‐adhesive bonding
• Fusion bonding (thermoplastics only)
14/11/2013 3CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Types of mechanical fasteners
• Bolts
– With or without chamfered head (countersunk)
14/11/2013 4CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
3
Example of bolts in (segmented) turbine blades
14/11/2013 5CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Example of bolts in (segmented) turbine blades
Carrot T‐bolt
14/11/2013 6CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
4
Example of bolts in (segmented) turbine blades
Connection using imbedded bolts
14/11/2013 7CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
777
Bron: SANDIA REPORTSAND2008‐4648Unlimited ReleasePrinted July 2008Blade System Design Studies Phase II:Final Project ReportDerek S. Berry
Mounting a turbine blade, using the T‐bolts
14/11/2013 8CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
http://youtu.be/xFI3Dy2k6oQ
5
Types of mechanical fasteners
• Rivets
– Normal rivets(access to both sides is necessary)
– Blind rivets(access to only one side suffices)
14/11/2013 9CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Rivets to attach stiffeners in an airplane wing
14/11/2013 10CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
6
Most common test methods for mechanical fasteninga) Unstabilized single shear b) double‐shear test c) Stabilized single shear
14/11/2013 11CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Mechanical fastening: other possible geometries
14/11/2013 12CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
7
Most common failure modes for mechanical fastening
14/11/2013 13CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Most common failure modes for mechanical fastening
14/11/2013 14CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
14
8
Most common failure modes for mechanical fastening
14/11/2013 15CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
15
Most common failure modes for mechanical fastening
14/11/2013 16CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
16
9
Most common failure modes for mechanical fastening
14/11/2013 17CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
17
Mechanical connections
Advantages
• Higher resistance against the environment (temperature and moisture)
• Higher resistance against fatigue (lower stress concentrations)
• High reliability
• Possibility for repetitive assembly and disassembly
14/11/2013 18CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
18
• High reproducibility
• Easy to inspect
• No specific surface preparations necessary
10
Mechanical connections
Disadvantages
• Necessity to drill/provide holes– Specific tools to drill
– Significant wear on the drilling tools (unless waterjet or lasercutting is considered)
– Possibility of inducing (significant) damage in the vicinity of the holes (both drilling and waterjet)
– Creating extra free edges (delaminations)
• Stress concentrations in the vicinity of the holes
• Combining orthotropic material and isotropic
14/11/2013 19CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
19
• Combining orthotropic material and isotropic material results in stress concentrations
• Different thermal expansion
• Possible galvanic corrosion
What about sandwich materials?
Inserts, embedded during or after manufacturing
14/11/2013 20CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
11
Sandwich materials: Blind insert
14/11/2013 21CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
19/01/04 21
Sandwich materials
14/11/2013 22CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
19/01/04 22
12
Possibilities for connecting composite parts
• Mechanical fastening
– Bolts
– rivets
• Adhesive bonding
• Combined mechanical‐adhesive bonding
• Fusion bonding (thermoplastics only)
14/11/2013 23CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Adhesive bonding
Advantages
• Fairly high ratio of strength to mass
• Possibility of smooth surfaces (depending on the geometry)Possibility of smooth surfaces (depending on the geometry)
• Low number of parts (two + adhesive layer)
• No need to provide holes
• No stress concentrations due to holes or resulting damage are present
• Galvanic corrosion of metal fasteners is not present– When composite parts are joined with metal parts this off course
14/11/2013 24CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
When composite parts are joined with metal parts, this off course remains an issue
• Can be quite cheap (but not necessarily)– To lower the production cost, the adhesive can be co‐cured with the
pre‐cured parts
24
13
Adhesive bonding
Disvantages
• Sometimes extensive surface preparation necessary– Roughening/grinding/sandblasting of the surfaces– Roughening/grinding/sandblasting of the surfaces
– Cleaning/degreasing of the surfaces
– Applying extra chemical agents
• Large stress concentrations, depending on the used geometry
• Curing/hardening can be time consuming
N t l k h th h i l ti ill
14/11/2013 25CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Not always known how the mechanical properties will change over time– Ageing due to UV‐light, temperature
• Can be susceptive to creep
25
Commonly used adhesive joint geometries
14/11/2013 26CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
14
Some design criteria for adhesive joints
• Main objective:
– Adhesive joint should have longer life than its constituents
• Consequences
– Surface of the elements should be prepared properly
– Failure due to creep in the adhesive is not
14/11/2013 27CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Failure due to creep in the adhesive is not tolerated
27
Some design criteria for adhesive joints
• Consequences (cont.)‐ Avoid or lower the number of discontinuities in the construction (stress concentrations)the construction (stress concentrations)
‐ Static loading should not exceed the yield stress of the adhesive film
‐ Fatigue: adhesive layer should only take elastic loads
‐ Avoid normal stresses, load the adhesive in shear
14/11/2013 28CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
28
,
‐ In case of a metal constituent: as soon as the metal yields, consider failure of the adhesive/joint
15
Stress analysis in adhesive joints
• Theory of Volkersen
• Theory of Goland and Reisner
• Finite element modelling
14/11/2013 29CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Stress analysis according to Volkersen
• Simple elastic analysis
• Joining elements are considered as membranes, so they cannot take a bending moment
• Tensile stresses normal to the adhesive layer (=peel stress) is not considered.
• Maximum shear stress are expected near the
14/11/2013 30CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
30
pends. However, these are free surfaces, so stress must be zero singularity
16
Volkersen – double lap specimen (no bending)
2PP
t1t2ta
y
x1.cosh
x.cosh.1k
sinhgem
x K.K.K.
K 21
21
21
21
2
1 2.
with anda KG t t
Px
14/11/2013 31CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
31
Ref. : VOLKERSEN, O., « Die Nietkraftverteilung in Zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen mit konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. «Luftfahrtforschung, 15, pp. 41 – 47, (1938)
2 1
with and.
a
KEt t t
Influence of the overlap length of the adhesive layer (Volkersen)
(x) [MPa]
max
min
SCF
14/11/2013 32CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
32
Increasing the overlap hardly increases the maximum shear stress, but the stress concentration factor (SCF) increases almost linearly
17
Influence of the shear modulus of the adhesive (Volkersen)
(x) [MPa]
14/11/2013 33CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
33
Increasing the shear modulus of the adhesive increases the shear stress and the SCF
Influence of the adhesive thickness (Volkersen)(x) [MPa]
14/11/2013 34CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
34
Increasing the adhesive thickness results in a lower SCF
18
Volkersen for single lap shear
With
Where
14/11/2013 35CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Lucas F.M. daSilva, Paulo J.C. dasNeves, R.D. Adams, A. Wang, J.K. Spelt. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints ‐ PartII: Comparative study. int. J. Adhes Adhes 2009; 29: 331‐341.
Stress analysis according to Goland –Reissner
• Limitations:– Thickness of the adhesive layer should be small with respect to the thickness of the adherendsrespect to the thickness of the adherends
– Visco‐elastic behaviour
• Hypotheses:– Stresses in the adhesive layer are constant through the thickness
– Plane strain assumption, deformations perpendicular to the loading direction are allowed
14/11/2013 36CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
36
the loading direction are allowed
– Acting loads: axial load + bending moment
19
Goland‐Reisner: adhesive shear stress
tat
2c
x
z
P
P
With
2c
14/11/2013 37CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Goland‐Reisner: adhesive Peel stress
With
Where
14/11/2013 38CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Lucas F.M. daSilva, Paulo J.C. dasNeves, R.D. Adams, A. Wang, J.K. Spelt. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints ‐ PartII: Comparative study. int. J. Adhes Adhes 2009; 29: 331‐341.
20
Stress distribution for a low shear modulus (Goland ‐ Reissner)
avg
14/11/2013 39CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
39
• Ga= 10,55 MPa
• Ea = 35,85 MPa
• ta = 0,18 mm
Stress distribution for a high shear modulus (Goland ‐Reissner)
• Ga= 1,24 GPa
• Ea = 3,45 GPa
• ta = 0,08 mm
14/11/2013 40CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
40
avg
21
Finite element simulation
2 mm
1 mm
• 2D model, to reduce calculation time
• Simple elastic simulation with non‐linear deformations
• No cohesive layers necessary to illustrate the stress distribution
14/11/2013 41CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• A very dense mesh is necessary to capture the behaviour, especially near the free edges of the adhesive layer
Finite element simulation
14/11/2013 42CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Both Volkersen and Goland‐Reisner are accurate predictions
• Only the FEM can capture the shear behaviour on the free edge
22
Critical length of an adhesive joint
Such a critical lenght exits
Double
overlap
h Such a critical lenght exits
• for every joint configuration
• for every material combination
Single
overlap
Joint strength
14/11/2013 43CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
43
Overlap length
Influence of temperature on the adhesive
[MPa]a
14/11/2013 44CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
44
[mm/mm]a
23
General remarks
• The (shear) stress distribution will have higher stress concentrations when:
Th dh i l i hi– The adhesive layer is thinner
– The adhesive layer is longer
– The adhesive is stiffer
• Ageing in general will have an important influence
• There is a critical length
14/11/2013 45CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Assessment of the different parameters:http://users.ugent.be/~sfjacque/FlandersDrive
Common errors in adhesive joints
• Strokes (by hand) on the adhesive surface
• Cold area’s during curing
• Curing time too short
• Porosities – inclusions and other foreign contents
• Dry spots
• Discontinuities in the adhesive layer
• ‘Kissing bond’ surfaces touch each other or the
14/11/2013 46CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
46
• Kissing bond surfaces touch each other or the adhesive layer, but no effective bond has formed. Very dangerous, as this is very difficult to detect.
24
Possibilities for connecting composite parts
• Mechanical fastening
– Bolts
– rivets
• Adhesive bonding
• Combined mechanical‐adhesive bonding
• Fusion bonding (thermoplastics only)
14/11/2013 47CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Combined mechanical‐adhesive bonding
• The mechanical fasteners takes the general load
• The adhesive layer provides a margin against shearfailure
• Design so that the adhesive film introduces the forces into the joint, before the constituents deform/move to load the mechanical fastener difficult
• When properly designed, they are usually better than both mechanical and adhesive joints:
• Failure modes
14/11/2013 48CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
48
– Failure in tension of the constituents
– Interlaminar failure of the constituent
25
Possibilities for connecting composite parts
• Mechanical fastening
– Bolts
– rivets
• Adhesive bonding
• Combined mechanical‐adhesive bonding
• Fusion bonding (thermoplastics only)
14/11/2013 49CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Fusion bonding
• Only for thermoplastics (at least one part)
• Consists of
– Surface preparation (if necessary)
– Heating the polymer to a viscous state
– Physically causing polymer chains to interdiffuse
– Cooling of the joint for consolidation
14/11/2013 50CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Classification
– Usually based on the heat generation (friction, thermal or electromagnetic)
26
Fusion bonding techniques
ThermalWelding
Friction WeldingElectromagnetic
Welding
Hot Tool Welding
Hot Gas welding
Extrusion Welding
Spin Welding
Vibration Welding
Ultrasonicldi
Induction Welding
Dielectric Welding
Microwaveldi
14/11/2013 51CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Infrared Welding
Laser Welding
Welding
Stir Welding
Welding
ResistanceWelding
Friction Welding
• Generation of heat at a joint interface fromfrictional work under pressure, followed bycooling and consolidation
14/11/2013 52CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
27
Linear vibration welding• Main advantages
– High production rates– Short cycle times– Ability to weld a number of components
Weld interface
Ability to weld a number of componentssimultaneously
– Small to medium sized parts– Easy process control– Insensitive to surface preparation
• Disadvantages– Not suitable for not‐flat specimens– Causes fibre distortion/displacement at the
14/11/2013 53CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
– Causes fibre distortion/displacement at the interface
– Expensive machinerie
• Applications– Automotive (light assembly, spoilers,
instrument panels, reservoirs, …)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG3t0Q7UuCU
Spin Welding• Main advantages
– High weld quality– High speed– SimplicitySimplicity– High reproducibility– Little surface preparation necessary
• Main disadvantage– Non‐uniform heat distribution
(heating depends on relative linearvelocity V=R x ), thus yieldingresidual stresses
14/11/2013 54CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Appliciations– Tubes and circular parts (e.g. sealing
a water‐filled compass)– Attaching studs to plastic parts
28
Ultrasonic Welding
• Uses a high (ultrasonic, e.g. 20 to 40kHz) frequency mechanical vibration to weld.
• Vertical or parallel oscillation is possible
• Heat generation: surface and intermolecular
• Energy directors are often used/necessary
– Design is important for the quality of the weld
14/11/2013 55CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Ultrasonic Welding
• Main advantageFast and clean process– Fast and clean process
• Main disadvantage– Need for energy directors (not always
possible on sheet components)– Risk of fibre disruption at interfaces– Heat conduction in carbon, resulting in
long weld times– It is spot welding (difficult but not
14/11/2013 56CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
It is spot welding (difficult, but not impossible, to weld larger area’s)
– Expensive equipment
• Application– Automotive parts, floppy disks, medical
deviceshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2uFi65IWxM
29
Friction Stir Welding• Originally developed for aluminium (1991), but also succesfully
applied for composites.
• Two parts are firmly pushed together and a metal tool drills and plunges into the parts The softened polymer is stirred andplunges into the parts. The softened polymer is stirred and forged behind the trailing face of the head pin (HP)
• Great potention for particle‐filled and short‐fibre reinforced thermoplastics
• Careful design of the HP and accurate control of
14/11/2013 57CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
the process could improve fibre breakage at the interface
• more research needed
Thermal Welding
• Consists of two stages
– An external heating stage
– A forging stage
• A heat source applies heat directly on both surfaces to melt the matrix. Then, the heat source is removed and the bonding surfaces are brought in contact under a forging pressure.
14/11/2013 58CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Limitations lie in the size of the components (entire welding surface heated in one stage), long heating time and high welding pressures needed.
30
Hot‐Tool (or plate) Welding
• Main advantages– Surface temperature can be accurately controlled
– Surface inaccuracies can taken into account
– It can handle complex geometries
• Main disadvantage
14/11/2013 59CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Main disadvantage– Melted polymer is likely to stick to the tool and non‐stick materials (teflon) tend to break down at high temperature (teflon: 200°C)
• Appliciations– Automotive (battery cases, fuel tanks, …)
– Infrastructure (gas and water pipelines, …)
Infrared welding
• Surfaces to be bonded are exposed to intense infrared radiotion, usually produced by high intensity quartz lampsintensity quartz lamps.
14/11/2013 60CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
31
Infrared welding
• Main advantage– Fast process– Can join combinationsCan join combinations of flat and curved parts
– Strong welds are possible
– Automization is possible
• Main disadvantage– Possible
14/11/2013 61CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Possible deconsolidation
– Warpage of substrates during heating
Hot gas and extrusion welding
• Similar to gas welding of metals• Thermoplastic filler rod is pushed into the groove• Extrusion: molten filler is extruded into the joint• Slow process not suitable for high production
14/11/2013 62CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Slow process, not suitable for high production rates
• Only suited for particle filled or short fibre composites
32
LASER welding
• Mostly used for metals, but can be used for composites
14/11/2013 63CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Laser transmission welding is also possible
• Usually only considered for the tape laying process
Electromagnetic welding
• A high frequency magnetic field causes magnetic materials at the weld interface to get hot and start melting the surroundingget hot and start melting the surrounding matrix.
• Then, molten polymer diffuses under the applied pressure to form a bond.
• When necessary, inserts or powders such as
14/11/2013 64CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
iron oxide, stainless steel, ferrite and graphite are added in the polymer matrix between the parts to be joined.
33
Induction welding
• High frequency electromagnetic field (200‐500kHz) heats up an implant in the joint
• Implant can be a foil or particles, typically containing
14/11/2013 65CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
some polymer for adequate flow and consolidation, e.g. a polymer impregnated metal mesh
Induction welding
• Weld depends on uniform heating which depends on• Weld depends on uniform heating, which depends on the uniformity of the magnetic field. Hence, the coil design is very important.
– Single: magnetic field around the inner diameter
– Multi turn: for remote areas
– Pancake: for large flat areas
14/11/2013 66CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
Pancake: for large flat areas
34
Induction welding
• Main advantage
– Fast and clean process
– Complex geometries
– Weld can be reopened by induction re‐heating
• Main disadvantage
– High cost of insert materials
f h d b h b dl
14/11/2013 67CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
– Non‐uniform heat distribution in the bondline
– Difficult to weld large parts
Dielectric welding
• Electric field in the MHz region
• Polymers with high dielectric loss factor convert some of the field energy into heat
14/11/2013 68CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
• Main problem is bulk heating of the entire element
• Mostly used for heating and melting of thermoplastics and curing of thermosets
35
Microwave heating
• Intense microwave energy in GHz region applied to electromagnetic absorbent material
• Can also be made as contionuous process, but
14/11/2013 69CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
p ,shielding is required.
• It is clean and fast, but for smaller size parts (dimensions of the oven)
Resistance welding
• Uses an electrically resistive element (metal mesh or b h)
14/11/2013 70CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
carbon mesh)
• Electrical current is applied, to generate Joules heat
• Insulation of the mesh improves the weld quality, as it prevents current leakage
36
Resistance welding
• Main advantages– Fast, simple, clean and cheap
A li bl f l t t– Applicable for larger structures
• Main disadvantages– Because of power limitations, only narrow welds are possible
– Implant remains inside the weld (can cause stress concentrations)
14/11/2013 71CompositesIves De Baere and Joris Degrieck – 2013‐2014
)
• Applications– Automotive
– Aerospace (leading edge of Airbus A340 and A380)