Quantitative Social Science(a) Is one logical view point as valid as another? Discuss with example?(b) Modernization of Indian Tradition.(c) Discuss the Linkages between economic growth and displacement in India.Case A: To study this viewpoint we have to first take the case or example of Napoleon Bonaparte who was not only an able administrator and diplomat but lived from 1789 to the rest of his life. With majesty and valor. To understand the above statement in the words of Napoleon. One should not rule a country like Capuchin or captain but rule like an able administrator like Louis XVI, Frederick the great Bismarck of Germany . In the some way many implements can be seen in modern Indian history such as if we look among the four administrators among Lord Clive, Lord Wellesley Lord Cornwallis and Lord William Bentinck, we have also to look the pros and can of the British ruled Bengal . The pros side consists of the Indian society where one finds that like Napoleon or Frederick and Bismarck one have to compare the policies of Julies Caesar, Maharaja Rancid Singh, Megasthenes. These policies of Lord William Bentinck and Ishwar Chandra Vidhyasagar. One should not forget the contributions of policies of William Bentinck and Ishwar Chandra Vidhyasagar one should consider the contribution of Firozsaha Mehta, Badaruddin Tayabi and Tezbahadur Sapru and also Allan Octavian Hume. Again Gladiators ware of extreme qualified and belonged to such a class which Maharaja Rancid followed against the British again Joshef Stalin where such kinds of person was able to judge the society by themselves. They used to derive ideas from enlightened despots like Galileo Galilee Alexander Graham Bell Colonel Moron any way in this case one conclusion can be drawn then Indian had from the British regime, the nation produced Lal Bahadur Shastri, Sri Swami Vivekananda, Sri Ramakrishna Paromhonso. Where as agree if Sub has Chandra Bose had return from Germany & men like Abdul Gaffer Khan was our prime minister and Maulana was our Education Minister men like Frederick Engels and men like Karl Marx was own country law minister and external affairs Secretary then our country would have been United India. Conclusion of Case A: strategy is always better than diplomacy.Case B : On the Basis of set Theory

Suppose N is the market where various kinds of fruits are being selled in everyday life exp. Apple, Guava, Grapes and Banana.

Prove that (i) N(A) (A/G) = NG or A/G

(ii) N(A) NG= A/GIn Fig.-

N is the def= Fruits

N is the cardinal so of fruits. In the marks of fruits where four fruits are selled from day to day life such as Apple, Guava, Grapes and Banana and we can see that properties of A is replaced in G to than of Gr and to that of Ba. Again the four sets are selling only fruits but not any other commodity, Such as vegetables or sweets etc.

Now a property can be drawn among the four sets N(A) N(G) N(Gr) N(Ba) NG NGGr NGGrBa.. Arbitrary intersection of set theory

II. Where as A second relation can be drawn :-

Apple N(A) = N`A (Complement of sets complementary theory of sets)

Guava N(G) = N`G

Grapes N(Gr)= N`Gr

Banana N(Ba) = N`Ba

III. Deducting I from II we get :-

(i) N(a) or N`A NG or AG=A/G

(ii) N(G) or N` G- NGGr or GGr=G/Gr(iii) N(Gr) or N` G NGrBa or GrBa= Gr/Ba ----provedFrom II and III we get(i) N(a) or N` A A/G = NG or AG

(ii) N(G) or N`G- G/Gr= N GGr or GGr

(iii) N(Gr)or N`Gr- Gr/Ba= N Gr Ba or Gr Ba

Consider the value of M/N = M-N we get

(i) log N`A A/G= log NG or A G

(ii) log N`G G/Gr =log NGGr or G Gr(iii) log N`Gr Gr/Ba= log NGr Ba

Since therefore log m/n = log m-log N(i) Log N` A / A/G = Log NG or A G

(ii) Log N`G / G /Gr= Log NGGr(iii) Log N` Gr / Gr/Ba = Log NGrBa

Conclusions of Case B : set Theory is related Logarithms. (C ) On the basis of Economic point of view:- Case C :- In a Differentiated oligopoly market i.e considering case where there are many buyers and few seller and the senses in any foreign exchange trade fund where as the market is running difference oligopoly in market. B M Y6 R Y5 O N Y4 Sin S Tan Y3 L Y2

Y1 A Q G V X T N O

In the differentiated supply of goods oligopoly market we can see that % of demand increases supply of % of rice also increases. We know in demand = % change in quantity of rice / % change in demand and supply of price.

The increasing amount had been shown in graph by Ay13, Ay2G, Ay3V, AY4X As in demand = % change in quantity of rice / % changing in price demand= Quantity of rice increased decreased quantity of rice/Org quantity * 100% Increased Decreased price of rice /org Price*100%Now after working for four years new there is a decline of % of demand of rice in rs from N to X or N to G.Now let the original increase in demand and supply of price be ANIncreased Quantity of Rice = AQ, AG, AV, AX, AN

Decreased Quantity of Rice = NX, NV, NG, NQ, NA

In AVY3 we get that AY3 = VY32 + AV2 i.eTherefore Y4 = AX-NX AO-NO AN

AO *100%

As per % change in demand

So the general law of demand and supply is universally applicableNow in AVY3 we get that

AY32 = VY32 + AV2i.e., H2 = p2 + b2Therefore AV2 = AY32 -VY32 Therefore AY42 = XY42 + AX2 . [Pythagoras : Theorem]

Now suppose in the AY4X < A is represented