janet dukerich university of texas at austin janet ... dukerich university of texas at austin...

32
Janet Dukerich University of Texas at Austin [email protected]

Upload: ngodien

Post on 10-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Janet Dukerich University of Texas at Austin

[email protected]

2

  Why are we here?   Self Analysis of styles, hot buttons, conflict

experiences   Conflict Resolution (5 Strategies)

  Thomas-Kilmann inventory   Ladder of Inference   Stages of Conflict   Resolving Conflict Exercise   Methods and tips for Resolving Conflict   Mediation

3

  Aim is to improve team management through increased understanding of ourselves, including our preferred conflict resolution style.

◦  Conflict is . . . any situation in which your concerns or desires differ from those of another person…

  Once we understand our own styles, we can look at our team styles and improve the team dynamic as well.

  We will learn to assess conflict situations

  Practice using different conflict modes

And….it’s OK if we have fun during the session and laugh a little at ourselves while we do that!!

Write a brief summary of two recent conflict situations:

1.  In which you were satisfied with the outcome.

2.  In which you were less than satisfied.

4

5

Task Oriented Conflict   Focuses on ideas, not

personalities   Can occur during

times of creativity and productivity

  Affect is neutral, or positive

  Unrelated, or positively related, to group functioning

Personal (Affective) Conflict

  Focuses on people, not ideas

  Can occur at any time   Affect is negative   Negatively related to

group functioning   Can escalate rapidly

6

CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSES

Behaviors which keep conflict to a minimum

DESTRUCTIVE RESPONSES

Behaviors which escalate or prolong conflict

PRECIPITATING EVENT AND/OR HOT BUTTONS

TASK-FOCUSED CONFLICT (Cognitive)

• Focus on task and problem solving • Positive affect • Tension decreases • Group functioning improves

PERSON-FOCUSED CONFLICT (Affective)

• Focus on personalities • Negative emotions (anger, frustration) • Tension increases • Group functioning decreases

CONFLICT DE-ESCALATES CONFLICT ESCALATES

INITIATE CONFLICT

7

People or situations which may irritate you enough to provoke conflict by producing destructive responses

The “hotter” the hot button, the more likely it is to produce: ◦ Strong negative emotions ◦ Feelings of personal provocation ◦ Automatic and impulsive responding ◦ Increased tension

WHAT ARE YOUR HOT BUTTONS? Write them down and note whether they are triggered by specific people, situations, or behaviors.

8

From Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument by K. W. Thomas and R. H. Kilmann, 1974, 2000. Palo Alto, CA: Xicom, Incorporated, subsidiary of CPP, Inc. Copyright 1974, 2000 by CPP, Inc. Used with permission.

9

  Taking quick action   Making unpopular decisions   Standing up for vital issues   Protecting yourself

Competing Skills   Arguing or debating   Using rank, position, or influence   Asserting your opinions and feelings   Standing your ground   Stating your position clearly

“My way or the highway”

10

Overuse of Competing   Lack of feedback   Reduced learning   Low empowerment   Surrounded by “yes people” Underuse of Competing   Restricted influence   Indecision   Delayed action   Withholding of contributions

11

  Showing reasonableness   Developing performance   Creating goodwill   Keeping “peace”   Retreating   Maintaining perspective Accommodating Skills   Forgoing your desires   Selflessness   Obedience   Ability to yield

“It would be my pleasure”

12

Overuse of Accommodating   Overlooked ideas   Restricted influence   Loss of contribution   Anarchy Underuse of Accommodating   Lack of rapport and low morale   By-the-book reputation   Inability to yield

13

  Leaving unimportant issues alone   Reducing tensions   Buying time   Knowing your limitations   Allowing others ownership   Recognizing issues as symptoms Avoiding Skills   Withdrawing   Sidestepping   Sense of timing   Ability to leave things unresolved

“I’ll think about it tomorrow”

14

Overuse of Avoiding   Lack of input from you   Decisions made by default   Festering issues   Climate of caution Underuse of Avoiding   Hostility/hurt feelings   Work overload—too many causes   Lack of prioritization/delegation

15

  Integrating solutions   Learning   Merging perspectives   Gaining commitment   Improving relationships Collaborating Skills   Ability to listen, understand, and

empathize   Nonthreatening confrontation   Input analysis   Identifying underlying concerns

“Two heads are better than one”

Biswas Tarango Coutant1611111

Overuse of Collaborating   Too much time on trivial matters   Diffused responsibility   People who take advantage   Work overload Underuse of Collaborating   Mutual gains deprivation   Lack of commitment   Low empowerment   Loss of innovation

17

  Resolving issues of moderate importance

  Reaching resolution with equal power and strong commitment

  Creating temporary solutions   Dealing with time constraints   Backing up competing/ collaborating Compromising Skills   Negotiating   Finding a “middle ground”   Making concessions   Assessing value

“Let’s make a deal”

18

Overuse of Compromising   Loss of big-picture perspective   Lack of trust   Cynical climate Underuse of Compromising   Unnecessary confrontations   Frequent power struggles   Inability to negotiate effectively

19

  Avoiding ◦  Goal is to delay. Low assertiveness and low cooperativeness. An

attempt to avoid conflict rather than openly dealing with it. A cover-up tactic. Results in no solution.

  Accommodation ◦  Goal is to yield. Low assertiveness and high cooperativeness.

  Competing ◦  Goal is to win. High assertiveness and low cooperativeness. Use of

position, authority, or peer pressure to settle conflict. Results in win-lose decision.

  Compromise ◦  Goal is to find middle ground. Moderate assertiveness and moderate

cooperativeness. Results in a lose-lose decision if neither side will be committed to a diluted solution. Best used when trying to avoid a win-lose decision.

  Collaboration ◦  Goal is to find a win-win solution. High assertiveness and high

cooperativeness. Emphasis is on solving the problem rather than on defining a position. Ultimately, the best of each individual’s thinking emerges, the assumption being that the combined efforts exceed the sum of the individual person’s contribution. Results in a win-win approach.

20

  After reviewing the information we just covered, guess as to which conflict resolution style you use the most.

  Which is the least used style?   Any others you use often?   Make a note to yourself, so you can compare with

the actual report.

21

Adapted from The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook, Peter Senge, Richard Ross, Bryan Smith, Art Kleiner, and Charlotte Roberts, Currency Doubleday, New York, 1994.

I take actions based on my beliefs. I adopt beliefs about the world.

I draw conclusions. I make assumptions based on the meanings I

added I add meanings (cultural and personal).

I select “data” from what I observe

Observable “data” and experiences (as a videotape recorder might capture it)

We can’t count on John, he is unreliable.

John always comes late.

John knew exactly when the meeting was to start. He deliberately came late.

The meeting was called for 9AM and John came in at 9:30. He didn’t say why.

22

23

  Dealing With Emotions When the climate gets emotional, try to focus on relevant facts rather than feelings.

Don’t be intimidated by anger expressed by others. Don’t be uncomfortable with the expression of sorrow by others. Remain rational. Act with quiet dignity. Be patient and confident.

  The Rules of Dominance 1.  Those in control of situations, things, ideas, or themselves are relaxed, project

outward, and encompass the interaction. 2.  Those not in control are tense, take peripheral positions, project inwardly, and are

engulfed by interaction.

  Selling Your Viewpoint 1.  Talk less. Listen more. 2.  Don’t interrupt. 3.  Don’t be belligerent or argumentative. 4.  Don’t be in a hurry to bring up your points. Hear out the other person completely. 5.  Restate the other person’s position as soon as you understand it. 6.  Identify your key points one at a time and then stick to them. 7.  Be “for” your point of view, not “against” the other person.

“People are to be taken in small doses.” -Mark Twain

24

  Conflicts cause all kinds of problems, sapping mental energy as they get in the way of relationships and getting the job done. Here are five tips to manage the problem.

1.  Listen – Hear the other person’s feeling as well as arguments. Don’t interrupt.

2.  Accept the right of the other person to a satisfactory solution to the problem. Recognize that this person has legitimate rights that must be respected.

3.  State your opinions and feelings frankly but calmly. Know and respect the important difference between being assertive and aggressive.

4.  Don’t start the conversation with your mind made up. If you do, no new ideas will be heard and a constructive solution is almost impossible.

5.  Don’t try to win. Winning arguments inflated the ego but doesn’t solve problems. Being smarter than someone else is not important; being smart enough to solve a serious problem is very important – and very smart.

26

  Same principles apply, whether for yourself, or when helping others

  As a team manager, you’ll be asked to intervene

  Lessons for 3rd party interventions STEP 1: Select a SETTING

  Neutral Sites preferred – both sides can feel comfortable   Position yourself in the middle, head of the table   Place to break-out, “Caucus”

27

STEP 2: The Opening Statement ◦  Introduction – who we all are, nature of mediation ◦  Explain YOUR role – “I’m going to try to help…” ◦  Explain THEIR role – “Work together, then we’ll decide…” ◦  Shape their EXPECTATIONS – talk together, sometimes separately,

sometimes as a group; if all goes well, we’ll formalize in writing ◦  Give the GROUND RULES – all will get a chance to talk, no

interruptions; everything is confidential; agreements are binding! ◦  QUESTIONS?

28

STEP 3: Managing the Joint Session ◦  What are the ISSUES? ◦  What were the POSITIONS at the time of impasse? ◦  What is your RELATIONSHIP?... Past & future?

◦  STYLES diverge from here   May start to explore immediately   May separate the two sides permanently (“shuttle diplomacy) or

temporarily   May offer solutions, or not (costs & benefits)   May just sit and wait! “What ideas or proposals do YOU have?”

29

  RED FLAG MESSAGES: ◦  Evaluation ◦ Control ◦  Strategic Displays ◦ Apathy ◦ Certainty/Dogmatism

Shift from Defensiveness to Problem Solving!

  SHIFT TOWARD… ◦ Description ◦  Problem Focus ◦  Spontaneous Messages ◦  Empathy ◦  Flexibility

During the session, maintain a good climate by watching for “red flags”…

30

How “Active” should you be?!   Involve THEM MORE when… ◦ The problem is COMPLEX ◦ There is RELATIONAL concern ◦ You have less need for OUTCOME control ◦ You feel comfortable with intervention SKILLS

(Kolb & Glidden)

  TRAP: Do not immediately default to arbitration!

31

  Highlight Similarities ◦  Shared Goals or Interests ◦  Interpersonal similarities ◦ Relational Concerns

  Reduce tension early in the process ◦  (early can mean BEFORE the official process even begins!) ◦ Use of humor, friendly remarks ◦ Active listening skills ◦ Take breaks when fatigued or angry ◦ Divide and Conquer?!