ivl_eia case port of goteborg
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
1/7
1
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
ke Sjdin & Erik FridellIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
Environmental impact assessment, case:
Port of Gteborg
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Introduction and motives for the case
Port of Gteborg:
- rapidly developing major NSR port
- located inside a major city spatial and
environmental barriers
- in the frontline as regards environmental actions- presently in the process of applying for legal and
environmental permits for major expansion
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
2/7
2
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Description of the case Port of Gteborg
Harbours (terminals):1. Tors harbour (oil)
2. Skarvik harbour (oil)
3. Rya harbour (oil)
4. lvsborg/Arendal (ro/ro)
5. Skandia (container, car)
788,000 containers TEU
574,000 ro/ro units
304,000 cars
19.5 million tonnes of oil 37.2 million tonnes of goods
Total number of berths: 151
Total lenght of berths: 12 kilometres
Figures in 2005:
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Measures taken to reduce environmental impact
Shore-side electricity supply
Vapour recovery
Electrified railway transports
Emission control on working
machinery/non-road vehicles
Heavy ecodriving
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
3/7
3
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Future situation port expansion scenario
A doubling of the harbour traffic in 2012 compared to 2001,
involving expansion of the ro/ro- and container harbour areas
(terminals, quais) and associated activities
Subsequent increases in road transports and associated
needed changes in road traffic infrastructure
Increase in rail transports and subsequent changes in railway
infrastructure
Increase of depth of fairways leading into ports
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Expansion of container and car terminals
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
4/7
4
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Expansion of ro/ ro-terminal
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Environmental impact assessment
1. Air qua lity
NO2 standardexceeded insome points
Port trafficcontribute by 5%in 2001, and by2% in 2005
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
5/7
5
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Environmental impact assessment
2. Water quality, soils, sediments
Concentrations of oil pollutants in su r face w a te r from the port
are and the environmental impact considered marginal
Amounts of mineral oils released from port activities to the
w a st e w a t e r network are small and considered having a
marginal impact on municipal waste water treatment
Impact t ox i cs i n an t i f ou l i ng agen ts and b a l la st w a t e r on
water organisms may not be excluded
Impact of d r e d g i n g considered small
Negative impacts ofsw e l l and e ros ion may occur
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Environmental impact assessment
3. Noise
Standardsexceeded in someresidential areas
Situationunchanged in 2012
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
6/7
6
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Environmental impact assessment
4. Cultural heritage and natural habitats
Exploitation of the small island Lilla Aspholmen, part of the
national historical interest the 17th century military fortress
lvsborgs Nya Fstning, for the expansion of the ro/ro-terminal
Intrusion of the NATURA 2000-reservation area Torsviken by
new road and rail infrastructure through the area, connecting to
a new ro/ro harbour at Stora Risholmen
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Measures to reduce spatial andenvironmental barriers for port development
Emissions to air: non-road vehicles and working machinery renew, ecodriving ships shoreside electricity, exhaust aftertreatment, fuels green electricity and heat consumption within port
Emissions to water and soil: education of port staff
green bunkering equipping surface and waste water wells with oil filters promotion of environmental friendly antifouling agents
Noise: non-road vehicles and working machinery renew, ecodriving ships shoreside electricity load/reload, container handling new improved standards
-
8/3/2019 IVL_EIA Case Port of Goteborg
7/7
7
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Conclusions and recommendations
Air emissions (in particular SO2 and NOX) from ships need tobe reduced:
abatement technologies exist and are very cost-effective effective policies are lacking actors: EU, national governments, local and port authorities
Noise emissions from ports and port activities need to bereduced:
technical solutions not available at a satisfying point need of research and standardisation key actor: European Commission
Railway network and associated transports connecting to
ports need to be improved
Careful and advanced planning to protect natural habitatsand cultural heritage
SUTRANET Presentation Seminar, Aalborg, March 22, 2007
Thank you for your attent ion!