ittf vertex finder performance jonathan gans

9
Jon Gans – ITTF Review ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans 1) Standard v. ITTF Vertex Finder 2) Au+Au DATAVertex Finding Comparison ITTF Tracking and Vertex Finding v. Standard Tracking and Vertex Finding 3) pp Embedding Vertex Finding Comparision ITTF pp Vertex Finding v. Standard Tracking and Vertex Finding 4) The future…

Upload: jovan

Post on 05-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans. Standard v. ITTF Vertex Finder 2) Au+Au DATAVertex Finding Comparison ITTF Tracking and Vertex Finding v. Standard Tracking and Vertex Finding 3) pp Embedding Vertex Finding Comparision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

1) Standard v. ITTF Vertex Finder

2) Au+Au DATAVertex Finding ComparisonITTF Tracking and Vertex Finding v. Standard Tracking and Vertex Finding

3) pp Embedding Vertex Finding Comparision

ITTF pp Vertex Finding v. Standard Tracking and Vertex Finding

4) The future…

Page 2: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Standard algorithm For Gold• Iterative procedure:

– Find z seed using global tracks– First pass with loose dca cut in xy plane (1cm) and 3d

dca cut (10 cm).– Second pass using tighter 3D dca cut (2 cm)– Final pass using tighter 3D dca cut (0.5 cm)

• Resolution:

(x) = (y) = 0.60 cm/N(z) = 0.85 cm/N

Page 3: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

ITTF Vertex Finder• No outlier removal!

– Replace 2 function with robust fitting potential:

2 : L1

N

(x i)2

i2

i1

N

Robust : L exp( (x i)

2

2 i2

)i1

N

Page 4: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Au+Au DATAVertex Finding ComparisonITTF Tracking/VF v. Standard Tracks/VF

0cm

ITTF – Standard

X: Mean = -0.0038 cm

RMS = 0.2063cm

Y: Mean = -.0018 cm RMS = 0.1775 cm

Z: Mean = 0.0092 cm RMS = 0.1344 cm

1cm1cm

ITTF – Standard

Page 5: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Vertex Finding in Proton + Proton

For ITTF Finder, algorithm is different

Only Fit in One Dimension (z) For Seed Require CTB Match

x(z) = -0.304233 cm + -0.00065732 * zy(z) = 0.407226 cm + 0.00012396 * z

Page 6: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Proton Proton Embedding… where the fun begins!

Abort GapEvent

RECO

A lot of hard work!!Special Thanks to:Eric Hjort, Herb Ward, Pablo Yepes, Jan Balewski, Bernd Surrow

VertexEfficiency

Single ParticleEfficiency

MomentumResolution

Page 7: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Embedded Standard Tracks: ITTF VF v. Standard VFResolution and Efficiency

1985 Embedded EventsppLMV

ppLMV = 74% Efficient

ITTF

ITTF = 73% Efficient

Efficiency Proportional to Multiplicty

Page 8: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Embedded Standard Tracks: ITTF VF v. Standard VFResolution and Efficiency

1985 Embedded EventsppLMV ITTF

Page 9: ITTF Vertex Finder Performance Jonathan Gans

Jon Gans – ITTF Review

Future and Conclusion

Gold: Need to test efficiency with embedding

Proton: Performs on par with ppLMV Maybe can be tweaked to outperform ppLMV

Multiple Vertices due to pile-up?