ism tc itpa april2011 - general atomics filet&c itpa meeting, ism modelling activity on current...
TRANSCRIPT
1I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
ISM
modellin
g a
cti
vit
y o
n c
urr
ent
ram
p
up
Pre
sente
d b
y I VO
ITSEK
HO
VIT
CH
on b
ehalf o
f IS
M g
roup
Pre
sente
d b
y I VO
ITSEK
HO
VIT
CH
on b
ehalf o
f IS
M g
roup
Pre
sente
d b
y I VO
ITSEK
HO
VIT
CH
on b
ehalf o
f IS
M g
roup
Pre
sente
d b
y I VO
ITSEK
HO
VIT
CH
on b
ehalf o
f IS
M g
roup
TF Leader : G. Falchetto
Deputies: R. Coelho, D. Coster
ISM Leader: X. Litaudon
ISM Deputy Leader: I. Voitsekhovitch
EFDA CSU Contact Person: D. Kalupin
T&C ITPA group meeting, 4-6 April 2011
2I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Outlin
e
�IS
M g
roup &
acti
vit
y: genera
l in
form
ati
on
ISM
gro
up &
acti
vit
y: genera
l in
form
ati
on
ISM
gro
up &
acti
vit
y: genera
l in
form
ati
on
ISM
gro
up &
acti
vit
y: genera
l in
form
ati
on
�V
alidati
on o
f tr
ansport
models
for
curr
ent
ram
p
Validati
on o
f tr
ansport
models
for
curr
ent
ram
p
Validati
on o
f tr
ansport
models
for
curr
ent
ram
p
Validati
on o
f tr
ansport
models
for
curr
ent
ram
p
up p
lasm
as
up p
lasm
as
up p
lasm
as
up p
lasm
as
�C
urr
ent diffu
sio
n a
nd
Curr
ent diffu
sio
n a
nd
Curr
ent diffu
sio
n a
nd
Curr
ent diffu
sio
n a
nd li lililisim
ula
tions
sim
ula
tions
sim
ula
tions
sim
ula
tions
�Pro
jecti
on t
o ITER
Pro
jecti
on t
o ITER
Pro
jecti
on t
o ITER
Pro
jecti
on t
o ITER
3I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
�C
reate
dC
reate
dC
reate
dC
reate
din
2007 a
s ITM
in
2007 a
s ITM
in
2007 a
s ITM
in
2007 a
s ITM
cro
ss
cro
ss
cro
ss
cro
ss- ---p
roje
ct
pro
ject
pro
ject
pro
ject.
. . . Sta
tus
Sta
tus
Sta
tus
Sta
tus
of
of
of
ofIT
M
ITM
IT
M
ITM
pro
ject
pro
ject
pro
ject
pro
ject
sin
ce
sin
ce
sin
ce
sin
ce
2010
2010
2010
2010
�R
esourc
es
Resourc
es
Resourc
es
Resourc
es
in 2
010/2
011:
in 2
010/2
011:
in 2
010/2
011:
in 2
010/2
011:
- ---47 p
art
icip
ants
, 6.8
6 P
PY
(basic
47 p
art
icip
ants
, 6.8
6 P
PY
(basic
47 p
art
icip
ants
, 6.8
6 P
PY
(basic
47 p
art
icip
ants
, 6.8
6 P
PY
(basic
and
and
and
and
pri
ori
typri
ori
typri
ori
typri
ori
tysupport
)support
)support
)support
)
- ---C
CFE, C
EA, EN
EA
, C
CFE, C
EA, EN
EA
, C
CFE, C
EA, EN
EA
, C
CFE, C
EA, EN
EA
, IP
PIP
PIP
PIP
P- ---G
arc
hin
gG
arc
hin
gG
arc
hin
gG
arc
hin
g, , , , IS
TIS
TIS
TIS
T- ---P
ort
ugal
Port
ugal
Port
ugal
Port
ugal, F
OM
, FZJ, R
FX
, , FO
M, FZJ, R
FX
, , FO
M, FZJ, R
FX
, , FO
M, FZJ, R
FX
, O
AW
, V
R, EFD
AO
AW
, V
R, EFD
AO
AW
, V
R, EFD
AO
AW
, V
R, EFD
A- ---C
SU
CSU
CSU
CSU
- ---coord
inate
dcoord
inate
dcoord
inate
dcoord
inate
dby X
. Lit
audon (Leader)
by X
. Lit
audon (Leader)
by X
. Lit
audon (Leader)
by X
. Lit
audon (Leader)
and
and
and
and
I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch
I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch
I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch
I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch
( (((Deputy
Deputy
Deputy
Deputy
) )))
�M
eeti
ngs: 3
Meeti
ngs: 3
Meeti
ngs: 3
Meeti
ngs: 3 w
ork
ing
work
ing
work
ing
work
ing
sessio
ns
sessio
ns
sessio
ns
sessio
ns p
er
per
per
per
year
year
year
year
+
+
+
+ r
egula
rre
gula
rre
gula
rre
gula
rre
mote
rem
ote
rem
ote
rem
ote
meeti
ngs (~
meeti
ngs (~
meeti
ngs (~
meeti
ngs (~every
every
every
every
two
two
two
two
weeks
weeks
weeks
weeks).
).
).
).
�Suit
es
Suit
es
Suit
es
Suit
es o
fof
of
ofcodes
codes
codes
codes involv
ed
involv
ed
involv
ed
involv
ed: : : : A
STRA
, C
RO
NO
S, JETTO
, TRA
NSP,
ASTRA
, C
RO
NO
S, JETTO
, TRA
NSP,
ASTRA
, C
RO
NO
S, JETTO
, TRA
NSP,
ASTRA
, C
RO
NO
S, JETTO
, TRA
NSP,
SA
NC
O, SO
UL 1
D, ED
GE2D, EM
C3
SA
NC
O, SO
UL 1
D, ED
GE2D, EM
C3
SA
NC
O, SO
UL 1
D, ED
GE2D, EM
C3
SA
NC
O, SO
UL 1
D, ED
GE2D, EM
C3- ---E
IREN
E, M
ISH
KA
, M
ETIS
, EIR
EN
E, M
ISH
KA
, M
ETIS
, EIR
EN
E, M
ISH
KA
, M
ETIS
, EIR
EN
E, M
ISH
KA
, M
ETIS
, H
ELIO
S.
HELIO
S.
HELIO
S.
HELIO
S.
ETS (
ETS (
ETS (
ETS (Euro
pean
Euro
pean
Euro
pean
Euro
pean
Tokam
ak
Tokam
ak
Tokam
ak
Tokam
ak S
olv
er
Solv
er
Solv
er
Solv
er)
) ) ) at
at
at
at
the
the
the
the
user
test phase.
user
test phase.
user
test phase.
user
test phase.
�C
lose c
ollabora
tion
Clo
se c
ollabora
tion
Clo
se c
ollabora
tion
Clo
se c
ollabora
tion w
ith
wit
hw
ith
wit
hIO
, IT
PA
gro
ups (T&
C
IO, IT
PA
gro
ups (T&
C
IO, IT
PA
gro
ups (T&
C
IO, IT
PA
gro
ups (T&
C a
nd
and
and
and
IOS)
IOS)
IOS)
IOS) and
and
and
and
experi
menta
lists
experi
menta
lists
experi
menta
lists
experi
menta
lists
(JET, A
UG
, Tore
Supra
)(J
ET, A
UG
, Tore
Supra
)(J
ET, A
UG
, Tore
Supra
)(J
ET, A
UG
, Tore
Supra
)
ISM
: genera
lin
form
ati
on
4I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Scie
ntific
acti
vitie
s:
�A
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
y- ---1
: S
upport
Validation o
f th
e E
TS
1 : S
upport
Validation o
f th
e E
TS
1 : S
upport
Validation o
f th
e E
TS
1 : S
upport
Validation o
f th
e E
TS
�A
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
y- ---2
:
2 :
2 :
2 : D
evelo
pin
gD
evelo
pin
gD
evelo
pin
gD
evelo
pin
gand
and
and
and v
alidating
validating
validating
validating
pla
sm
a
pla
sm
a
pla
sm
a
pla
sm
a
scenari
os
scenari
os
scenari
os
scenari
os: sim
ula
tions for
: sim
ula
tions for
: sim
ula
tions for
: sim
ula
tions for
exis
ting
exis
ting
exis
ting
exis
ting
devic
es
devic
es
devic
es
devic
es
�A
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
yA
cti
vit
y- ---3
: S
upport
to
3 : S
upport
to
3 : S
upport
to
3 : S
upport
to p
redic
tive
pre
dic
tive
pre
dic
tive
pre
dic
tive
scenari
o
scenari
o
scenari
o
scenari
o
modellin
gm
odellin
gm
odellin
gm
odellin
gfo
r fu
ture
fo
r fu
ture
fo
r fu
ture
fo
r fu
ture
devic
es
devic
es
devic
es
devic
es
(ITER
, J
T60SA,
(ITER
, J
T60SA,
(ITER
, J
T60SA,
(ITER
, J
T60SA,
etc
etc
etc
etc
) )))
The m
odellin
g o
f curr
ent
ram
p u
p p
hase is
addre
ssed w
ithin
all t
hre
e a
cti
vit
ies
5I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
AC
T1: benchm
ark
ing o
f th
e E
TS c
ode a
gain
st
ASTR
A/C
RO
NO
S/J
ETTO
/SA
NC
O for
JET O
H
curr
ent
ram
p u
p d
ischarg
e (#71827)
�ETS d
evelo
pm
ent:
ETS d
evelo
pm
ent:
ETS d
evelo
pm
ent:
ETS d
evelo
pm
ent:
- ---in
put data
: scripts
convert
ing
the J
ET P
PFs, C
RO
NO
S &
TR
AN
SP o
utp
utin
to the input
CPO
for
ETS
-2 K
eple
rW
Fs
for
equilib
rium
+
curr
ent diffu
sio
n+Te+Ti
-Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
& C
oppi-Tang
models
are
im
ple
mente
d in W
Fs
-over 20 H
&C
D c
odes p
ort
ed o
n
the G
ate
way, 11 K
eple
racto
rs
delivere
d, th
eir
im
ple
menta
tion
in W
Fs
is in p
rogre
ss
�Exam
ple
s o
f ETS b
enchm
ark
ing
Exam
ple
s o
f ETS b
enchm
ark
ing
Exam
ple
s o
f ETS b
enchm
ark
ing
Exam
ple
s o
f ETS b
enchm
ark
ing
for
#71827:
for
#71827:
for
#71827:
for
#71827:
-ste
ady
sta
te e
quilib
rium
and
curr
entdiffu
sio
n a
fter100 s
of
sim
ula
tion t
ime
obta
ined
with
measure
dpla
sm
a p
rofile
s (ne,
Te, Ti)
-im
purity
sim
ula
tions w
ith A
DAS
cro
ss-s
ections: benchm
ark
ing o
f ra
dia
tive
pow
er in
ETS &
SA
NCO
Para
llel
curr
ent
density,
MA
/m2
Safe
ty facto
r
ETS
ETS
ETS
ETS
ASTRA
ASTRA
ASTRA
ASTRA
JETTO
JETTO
JETTO
JETTO
D. K
alu
pin
, et al, G
enera
l IT
M m
eeting, Septe
mber 2010
I. Ivanova-S
tanik
, IT
M C
ode C
am
p, M
arc
h 2
011
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,0
200
300
400
500
600
700
Shot 71827, Run 50, ∆ ∆∆∆ = 10-3s for SANCO Seq. 235
Radiative Power, W/m-3
Norm
alize radius
ETS/IMPURITY/ADAS, t = 1s
ETS/IMPURITY/ADAS, t = 1.5s
SANCO, t= 1s
6I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
AC
T2: sim
ula
tions o
fcurr
ent
ram
p
up
on e
xis
ting
devic
es
�M
ulti
Multi
Multi
Multi- ---m
achin
e d
ata
base for
modellin
g: A
UG
, JET, Tore
m
achin
e d
ata
base for
modellin
g: A
UG
, JET, Tore
m
achin
e d
ata
base for
modellin
g: A
UG
, JET, Tore
m
achin
e d
ata
base for
modellin
g: A
UG
, JET, Tore
Supra
. M
odellin
g for D
III
Supra
. M
odellin
g for D
III
Supra
. M
odellin
g for D
III
Supra
. M
odellin
g for D
III- ---D &
CM
OD
in c
ollabora
tion w
ith
D &
CM
OD
in c
ollabora
tion w
ith
D &
CM
OD
in c
ollabora
tion w
ith
D &
CM
OD
in c
ollabora
tion w
ith
T&
C ITPA
gro
up is in p
rogre
ss.
T&
C ITPA
gro
up is in p
rogre
ss.
T&
C ITPA
gro
up is in p
rogre
ss.
T&
C ITPA
gro
up is in p
rogre
ss.
�O
pera
tional space:
Opera
tional space:
Opera
tional space:
Opera
tional space:
- ---dIp
l/dt
dIp
l/dt
dIp
l/dt
dIp
l/dt
= 0
.19
= 0
.19
= 0
.19
= 0
.19 - ---
0.3
6 (JET)
0.3
6 (JET)
0.3
6 (JET)
0.3
6 (JET) - --->
0.7
(A
UG
) > 0
.7 (A
UG
) > 0
.7 (A
UG
) > 0
.7 (A
UG
) - --->
0.9
(TS) M
A/s
> 0
.9 (TS) M
A/s
> 0
.9 (TS) M
A/s
> 0
.9 (TS) M
A/s
- ---q95 =
3
q95 =
3
q95 =
3
q95 =
3 – –––
5 (TS)
5 (TS)
5 (TS)
5 (TS)
- ---n/n
GW
n/n
GW
n/n
GW
n/n
GW
= 0
.2
= 0
.2
= 0
.2
= 0
.2 - ---
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
- ---P PPP
aux
aux
aux
aux= 0
.6 (TS)
= 0
.6 (TS)
= 0
.6 (TS)
= 0
.6 (TS) - ---10 M
W: IC
RH
, N
BI, L
HC
D, EC
CD
10 M
W: IC
RH
, N
BI, L
HC
D, EC
CD
10 M
W: IC
RH
, N
BI, L
HC
D, EC
CD
10 M
W: IC
RH
, N
BI, L
HC
D, EC
CD
�Teste
d m
odels
: Teste
d m
odels
: Teste
d m
odels
: Teste
d m
odels
:
- ---em
piric
al scaling
em
piric
al scaling
em
piric
al scaling
em
piric
al scaling- ---b
ased m
odel w
ith p
rescri
bed r
adia
l based m
odel w
ith p
rescri
bed r
adia
l based m
odel w
ith p
rescri
bed r
adia
l based m
odel w
ith p
rescri
bed r
adia
l shape o
f shape o
f shape o
f shape o
f χ χχχe =
e =
e =
e =
χ χχχi used for th
e w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
i used for th
e w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
i used for th
e w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
i used for th
e w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
- ---sem
isem
isem
isem
i- ---em
piric
al m
odels
: em
piric
al m
odels
: em
piric
al m
odels
: em
piric
al m
odels
: B
ohm
Bohm
Bohm
Bohm
- ---gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
and
and
and
and C
oppi
Coppi
Coppi
Coppi- ---Tang
Tang
Tang
Tang
used for
the w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
used for
the w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
used for
the w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
used for
the w
hole
pla
sm
a r
egio
n
- ---th
eory
theory
theory
theory
- ---based (G
LF23) used for
0
based (G
LF23) used for
0
based (G
LF23) used for
0
based (G
LF23) used for
0 ≤ ≤≤≤ρ ρρρ≤ ≤≤≤
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
7I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Validati
on o
ftr
ansport
models
(I):
scaling
based, B
ohm
-gyro
Bohm
, G
LF23
F. Im
beaux e
t al, IAEA
2010,
subm
itte
d to N
ucl. F
usio
n
Te
keV
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS 2
010
JET low
densit
y O
H p
uls
e 7
1827:
nl=
10
19
m-3
, dI p
l/dt=
0.1
9 M
A/s 5 s
11 s
Tore
Supra
EC
CD
assis
ted
curr
ent ra
mp-u
p (co-E
CC
D
applied a
t ρ
= 0
.3) fr
om
0.5
s
(halfw
ay the Ip
ram
p u
p)
8I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Validati
on o
ftr
ansport
models
(II):
scaling
based, B
ohm
-gyro
Bohm
, C
oppi-Tang,
GLF23
AU
G O
H s
hot. T
he p
lasm
a c
urr
ent is
ra
mped u
p to 0
.8 M
A in 0
.9 s
. Edge
radia
tion d
ue to im
purities
(wall
conditio
nnin
g) ->
edge
cooling
& low
Te
F. Im
beaux e
t al, IA
EA
2010,
subm
itte
d to N
ucl. F
usio
n
JET O
H s
hot: n
l=1.4
*10
19m
-3, dI p
l/dt=
0.1
9
MA
/s. O
rigin
al Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
model over-
pre
dic
ts T
e, accura
te p
redic
tion w
ith
χe=3.3χe_Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
.
Why this
result is d
iffe
rent w
ith 7
1827?
Data (symbols), sim
ulations with
χ χχχe=χ χχχe_B/gB(dashed curves)
and χ χχχe=3.3χ χχχe_B/gB (solid
curves)
I. V
oitsekhovitch e
t al, P
PCF 2
010
9I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Diffe
rent
pla
sm
a c
ondit
ions in #
71827 a
s
com
pare
d to a
naly
sed d
ata
base o
f JET O
H
curr
ent
ram
p u
p d
ischarg
es
71827 0.19 1.05 0.13 2 2.9
-#71827: lo
w c
urr
ent ra
mp r
ate
, but
als
o low
ne, hig
h T
e a
nd late
r
saw
teeth
(aft
er 9 s
) ->
slo
w c
urr
ent
diffu
sio
n;
-curr
ent pro
file
evolu
tion is c
loser to
low
density #
72460 (slo
w c
urr
ent
penetr
ation a
nd late
r saw
teeth
-aft
er
6 s
)
Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
model pre
dic
tion:
-re
lati
vely
accura
te
at hig
h T
e/s
low
curr
ent diffu
sio
n:
#72460 (rm
s< 2
2%
),
#71827
-lo
w p
redic
tive
accura
cy a
t hig
her
ne, lo
wer
Te a
nd
faste
r curr
ent
diffu
sio
n
Para
mete
rs o
f sim
ula
ted d
ischarg
es
Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
pre
dic
tive a
ccura
cy o
bta
ined u
nder diffe
rent assum
ptions
10
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
ISM
–T&
C ITPA
collabora
tion: benchm
ark
ing
of C
oppi-Tang m
odel in
ASTR
A &
CO
RSIC
A for
DIII-D
dis
charg
e
Tom
Casper, Iri
na V
oitsekhovit
ch
ISM
WS N
ov 2
9 -
Dec. 3 2
010, C
ulh
am
DII
I-D
OH
curr
ent
ram
p u
p d
ischarg
e (136779)
Sqrt(torflux)
-over-estimated Te with original Coppi-Tang m
odel (as published in Jardinet al, Nucl.Fusion1993)
-different implementation of Coppi-Tang m
odel in ASTRA and CORSICA: original model in ASTRA,
additional multiplier 2.5 is used in CORSICA for OH and L-m
ode plasmas
-better agreement with data has been obtained in ASTRA simulations after introducing this
multiplier, but still there is an important deviation from m
easured Te1.4 s
0.7 s
Origin
al C
oppi-Tang
model (d
ashed), re-
norm
alised C
oppi-
Tang m
odel (s
olid),
data
(sym
bols
)
Origin
al C
oppi-Tang
model (d
ashed), re-
norm
alised b
y
facto
r 8 C
oppi-Tang
model (s
olid), d
ata
(sym
bols
)
JET O
H d
ischarg
e –
str
ong T
e o
vere
stim
ation w
ith
Coppi-Tang m
odel [V
oitsekhovitch e
t al PPC
F 2
010]
6 s
3 s
11
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Validati
on o
f tr
ansport
models
-sum
mary
�Em
pir
ical scaling
Em
pir
ical scaling
Em
pir
ical scaling
Em
pir
ical scaling- ---b
ased m
odel:
based m
odel:
based m
odel:
based m
odel: t
he o
ptim
al agre
em
ent betw
een e
xperi
ment
the o
ptim
al agre
em
ent betw
een e
xperi
ment
the o
ptim
al agre
em
ent betw
een e
xperi
ment
the o
ptim
al agre
em
ent betw
een e
xperi
ment
and s
imula
tions is o
bta
ined u
sin
g e
ither H
96
and s
imula
tions is o
bta
ined u
sin
g e
ither H
96
and s
imula
tions is o
bta
ined u
sin
g e
ither H
96
and s
imula
tions is o
bta
ined u
sin
g e
ither H
96- ---L
= 0
.6 o
r H
IPB98 =
0.4
.L =
0.6
or
HIP
B98 =
0.4
.L =
0.6
or
HIP
B98 =
0.4
.L =
0.6
or
HIP
B98 =
0.4
.
�B
ohm
Bohm
Bohm
Bohm
- ---gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
model:
model:
model:
model:
• •••O
H d
ischarg
es:
OH
dis
charg
es:
OH
dis
charg
es:
OH
dis
charg
es:
- ---good p
redic
tive c
apabilit
y for JET d
ischarg
es w
ith s
low
inw
ard
curr
ent diffu
sio
n
-over-pre
dic
ted T
e in J
ET d
ischarg
es w
ith fast
curr
ent
diffu
sio
n/low
q.
-under-pre
dic
ted T
e for
AU
G d
ischarg
e (la
rge e
dge radia
tion)
• •••auxilia
ry h
eati
ng: re
lati
vely
accura
te p
redic
tion (except off
auxilia
ry h
eati
ng: re
lati
vely
accura
te p
redic
tion (except off
auxilia
ry h
eati
ng: re
lati
vely
accura
te p
redic
tion (except off
auxilia
ry h
eati
ng: re
lati
vely
accura
te p
redic
tion (except off
- ---axis
JET
axis
JET
axis
JET
axis
JET
ICR
H d
ischarg
e)
ICR
H d
ischarg
e)
ICR
H d
ischarg
e)
ICR
H d
ischarg
e)
�G
LF23 m
odel applied a
t G
LF23 m
odel applied a
t G
LF23 m
odel applied a
t G
LF23 m
odel applied a
t ρ ρρρ≤ ≤≤≤
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
- ---0.8
50.8
50.8
50.8
5: :::clo
se t
o the
clo
se t
o the
clo
se t
o the
clo
se t
o the B
ohm
Bohm
Bohm
Bohm
- ---gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
gyro
Bohm
model
model
model
model
pre
dic
tion for a n
um
ber of cases. N
ot
applicable
near
the e
dge.
pre
dic
tion for a n
um
ber of cases. N
ot
applicable
near
the e
dge.
pre
dic
tion for a n
um
ber of cases. N
ot
applicable
near
the e
dge.
pre
dic
tion for a n
um
ber of cases. N
ot
applicable
near
the e
dge. L LLLess
ess
ess
ess
accura
te a
t hig
h N
BI pow
er.
accura
te a
t hig
h N
BI pow
er.
accura
te a
t hig
h N
BI pow
er.
accura
te a
t hig
h N
BI pow
er.
�Coppi-Tang m
odel: a
ccura
te p
redic
tion for
DII
I-D
, but
needs to b
e r
e-
norm
alised for m
atc
hin
g t
he J
ET d
ischarg
es a
t le
ast
within
31%
of rm
sdevia
tion:
-in
cre
ase b
y facto
r 8
is n
eeded for O
H p
lasm
as
-in
cre
ase b
y facto
r (4
.7-4
.9) is
needed for N
BI and IC
RH
heate
d d
ischarg
es
-bett
er
agre
em
ent w
ith d
ata
when facto
r 2.5
has b
een
intr
oduced, but sti
ll a
larg
er m
ult
iplier
is n
eeded for JET d
ischarg
es
12
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Curr
ent
diffu
sio
n: is
it consis
tent
wit
h
neocla
ssic
al pre
dic
tions?
�I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010:
I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010:
I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010:
I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010:
earl
y M
SE m
easure
ments
earl
y M
SE m
easure
ments
earl
y M
SE m
easure
ments
earl
y M
SE m
easure
ments
(@
~1s) aft
er th
e b
reakdow
n a
t (@
~1s) aft
er th
e b
reakdow
n a
t (@
~1s) aft
er th
e b
reakdow
n a
t (@
~1s) aft
er th
e b
reakdow
n a
t JET A
T s
cenari
o: to
o fast
JET A
T s
cenari
o: to
o fast
JET A
T s
cenari
o: to
o fast
JET A
T s
cenari
o: to
o fast
reducti
on o
f q0
reducti
on o
f q0
reducti
on o
f q0
reducti
on o
f q0
�G
.M.D
. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS
2010, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al
2010, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al
2010, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al
2010, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al
PPC
F 2
010
PPC
F 2
010
PPC
F 2
010
PPC
F 2
010 – –––
too r
apid
to
o r
apid
to
o r
apid
to
o r
apid
re
ducti
on o
f q0 in J
ET ITER
reducti
on o
f q0 in J
ET ITER
reducti
on o
f q0 in J
ET ITER
reducti
on o
f q0 in J
ET ITER
- ---like d
ischarg
es w
ith fla
t like d
ischarg
es w
ith fla
t like d
ischarg
es w
ith fla
t like d
ischarg
es w
ith fla
t Zeff
Zeff
Zeff
Zeff
(Zeff
(Zeff
(Zeff
(Zeff≥ ≥≥≥2), b
ut
possib
le t
o m
atc
h
2), b
ut
possib
le t
o m
atc
h
2), b
ut
possib
le t
o m
atc
h
2), b
ut
possib
le t
o m
atc
h
q0 b
y p
layin
g w
ith
q0 b
y p
layin
g w
ith
q0 b
y p
layin
g w
ith
q0 b
y p
layin
g w
ith Z
eff
Zeff
Zeff
Zeff
pro
file
pro
file
pro
file
pro
file
�A
ccura
te N
CLA
SS p
redic
tion
Accura
te N
CLA
SS p
redic
tion
Accura
te N
CLA
SS p
redic
tion
Accura
te N
CLA
SS p
redic
tion
of q p
rofile
evolu
tion for
3 D
III
of q p
rofile
evolu
tion for
3 D
III
of q p
rofile
evolu
tion for
3 D
III
of q p
rofile
evolu
tion for
3 D
III- ---
D d
ischarg
es (
D d
ischarg
es (
D d
ischarg
es (
D d
ischarg
es (Zef
Zef
Zef
Zef≤ ≤≤≤
1.5
)1.5
)1.5
)1.5
)
I. J
enkin
s e
t al EPS 2
010
JET 7
2823 (LH
),
5s
I. V
oit
sekhovitch, A
STR
A s
imula
tions o
f
curr
ent diffu
sio
n for D
III-D
dis
charg
e
Rgeo
from
ON
ETW
O, m
atc
hed
pla
sm
a v
olu
me, data
Zeff
: 5->
3
13
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
li s
imula
tions: sensitiv
ity
to T
e p
rofile
li s
imula
tions
li s
imula
tions
li s
imula
tions
li s
imula
tions w
ith
wit
hw
ith
wit
hdiffe
rent
diffe
rent
diffe
rent
diffe
rent
transport
tr
ansport
tr
ansport
tr
ansport
models
models
models
models
: :::
�em
piric
al tr
ansport
models
(Bohm
-gyro
Bohm
and s
caling b
ased m
odels
):
the
lidynam
ics is p
redic
ted w
ithin
+/-
0.1
5 a
ccura
cy
�Coppi-Tang o
r G
LF23 m
odels
(applied u
p t
o the L
CFS): o
vere
stim
ate
or
undere
stim
ate
the inte
rnal in
ducta
nce b
eyond this
accura
cy (m
ore
than
+/-
0.2
dis
cre
pancy in s
om
e c
ases)
JET O
H s
hot
71827: pla
sm
a c
urr
entis
ram
ped
up
to 2
.5 M
A in 1
0 s
F. Im
beaux e
t F. Im
beaux e
t F. Im
beaux e
t F. Im
beaux e
t al
al
al
al, IA
EA
2010,
, IA
EA
2010,
, IA
EA
2010,
, IA
EA
2010, subm
itte
dsubm
itte
dsubm
itte
dsubm
itte
dto
Nucl. F
usio
nto
Nucl. F
usio
nto
Nucl. F
usio
nto
Nucl. F
usio
n
14
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
li s
imula
tions: sensitiv
ity
to q
atth
eedge
�C
ircula
rC
ircula
rC
ircula
rC
ircula
rpla
sm
as
pla
sm
as
pla
sm
as
pla
sm
as w
ith
with
with
with
pre
scri
bed
pre
scri
bed
pre
scri
bed
pre
scri
bed
q
q
q
q a
nd
and
and
and
pre
ssure
pro
file
s, li
pre
ssure
pro
file
s, li
pre
ssure
pro
file
s, li
pre
ssure
pro
file
s, li
is isisissim
ula
ted
sim
ula
ted
sim
ula
ted
sim
ula
ted
�li
li
li
li is isisis
str
ongly
str
ongly
str
ongly
str
ongly
sensit
ive t
o q
sensit
ive t
o q
sensit
ive t
o q
sensit
ive t
o q
outs
ide
outs
ide
outs
ide
outs
ideρ ρρρ≥ ≥≥≥
0.9
50.9
50.9
50.9
5, , , , w
hile
while
while
while
even
even
even
even
sig
nific
ant
sig
nific
ant
sig
nific
ant
sig
nific
ant
changes in
changes in
changes in
changes in t
he
the
the
the
centr
al part
centr
al part
centr
al part
centr
al part
of
of
of
ofq qqq- ---p
rofile
pro
file
pro
file
pro
file
are
are
are
are
not
not
not
not
necessari
lynecessari
lynecessari
lynecessari
lyvis
ible
in li
vis
ible
in li
vis
ible
in li
vis
ible
in li
li(3
)=1.1
1 (solid), 1
.26 (dashed)
li(3
)=1.2
48 (solid), 1
.263
(dashed)
J. H
obirk, pri
vate
com
munic
ation, IS
M W
S N
ovem
ber 29-D
ecem
ber 3 2
010
15
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
ACT3: pro
jections to ITER, sensit
ivity
to t
ransport
models
, saw
tooth
oscilla
tions a
nd
pla
sm
a d
ensity
I. Voitsekhovitch et al, PPCF 2010
GLF23, BgB
GLF23, BgB
Ti0
Te0
ECRH assisted current ramp up: scan in ECRH
power and power deposition at ne/nGW=0.5.
Sawtooth
mixing m
aintains q0 close to 1.
OH current ramp-up with ne/nGW=0.25: profiles at 100 s
(end of Ip
ramp-up), as calculated by 2 transport m
odels,
under different assumptions on Te(edge) and neprofile
shape. No sawtooth
mixing.
tim
e=80 s
tim
e=80 s
G.M.D. Hogeweij et al, EPS 2010
16
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Work
in p
rogre
ss:
�M
odellin
g o
f curr
ent ra
mp
Modellin
g o
f curr
ent ra
mp
Modellin
g o
f curr
ent ra
mp
Modellin
g o
f curr
ent ra
mp
up for JET H
Sup for JET H
Sup for JET H
Sup for JET H
S
�O
pti
mis
ation o
f curr
ent
Opti
mis
ation o
f curr
ent
Opti
mis
ation o
f curr
ent
Opti
mis
ation o
f curr
ent
ram
p u
p for
ITER
HS
ram
p u
p for
ITER
HS
ram
p u
p for
ITER
HS
ram
p u
p for
ITER
HS
(G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al,
(G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al,
(G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al,
(G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al,
EPS 2
011): 1
2 M
A, off
EPS 2
011): 1
2 M
A, off
EPS 2
011): 1
2 M
A, off
EPS 2
011): 1
2 M
A, off
- ---axis
axis
axis
axis
LH
CD
or
EC
CD
LH
CD
or
EC
CD
LH
CD
or
EC
CD
LH
CD
or
EC
CD
�C
urr
ent
ram
p u
p
Curr
ent
ram
p u
p
Curr
ent
ram
p u
p
Curr
ent
ram
p u
p
sim
ula
tions for D
III
sim
ula
tions for D
III
sim
ula
tions for D
III
sim
ula
tions for D
III- ---D a
nd
D a
nd
D a
nd
D a
nd
com
pari
son w
ith J
ET
com
pari
son w
ith J
ET
com
pari
son w
ith J
ET
com
pari
son w
ith J
ET – –––
in
in
in
in
pre
para
tion for IO
S ITPA
pre
para
tion for IO
S ITPA
pre
para
tion for IO
S ITPA
pre
para
tion for IO
S ITPA
gro
up m
eeti
ng, A
pri
l 11
gro
up m
eeti
ng, A
pri
l 11
gro
up m
eeti
ng, A
pri
l 11
gro
up m
eeti
ng, A
pri
l 11- ---1
4
14
14
14
2011
2011
2011
2011
Safe
ty facto
r
40 s
80 s
G.M
.D.H
ogew
eij
et
al, E
PS 2
011
ECCD [M
A/m
2], U
PL 1
0 M
W, sta
rtin
g a
t 40 s
+ E
QL 1
0 M
W, sta
rtin
g a
t 75 s
ρ ρρρ
17
I. Voitsekhovitch for ISM group. T&C ITPA meeting, 4-5 April 2011, San-Diego
Publicati
ons a
nd p
resenta
tions
used in t
his
talk
:
1.
1.
1.
1.
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS 2
007
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS 2
007
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS 2
007
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij e
t al, E
PS 2
007
2.
2.
2.
2.
V. Para
il e
t al,
V. Para
il e
t al,
V. Para
il e
t al,
V. Para
il e
t al, N
ucl
Nucl
Nucl
Nucl. F
usio
n 4
9 0
75030 2
009
. Fusio
n 4
9 0
75030 2
009
. Fusio
n 4
9 0
75030 2
009
. Fusio
n 4
9 0
75030 2
009
3.
3.
3.
3.
G.M
.D.
G.M
.D.
G.M
.D.
G.M
.D. H
ogew
eij, J. Citri
n, J. G
arc
ia e
t al, E
PS 2
010
Hogew
eij, J. Citri
n, J. G
arc
ia e
t al, E
PS 2
010
Hogew
eij, J. Citri
n, J. G
arc
ia e
t al, E
PS 2
010
Hogew
eij, J. Citri
n, J. G
arc
ia e
t al, E
PS 2
010
4.
4.
4.
4.
F. Im
beaux e
t al, 2
3rd
IA
EA F
usio
n E
nerg
y C
onfe
rence
F. Im
beaux e
t al, 2
3rd
IA
EA F
usio
n E
nerg
y C
onfe
rence
F. Im
beaux e
t al, 2
3rd
IA
EA F
usio
n E
nerg
y C
onfe
rence
F. Im
beaux e
t al, 2
3rd
IA
EA F
usio
n E
nerg
y C
onfe
rence
( (((ITR
/P1
ITR
/P1
ITR
/P1
ITR
/P1- ---2
020
20
20),
),
),
), D
aejo
nD
aejo
nD
aejo
nD
aejo
n, Republic o
f K
ore
a, O
cto
ber
10
, Republic o
f K
ore
a, O
cto
ber
10
, Republic o
f K
ore
a, O
cto
ber
10
, Republic o
f K
ore
a, O
cto
ber
10- ---1
6th
16th
16th
16th
2010, subm
itte
d t
o N
ucle
ar
Fusio
n2010, subm
itte
d t
o N
ucle
ar
Fusio
n2010, subm
itte
d t
o N
ucle
ar
Fusio
n2010, subm
itte
d t
o N
ucle
ar
Fusio
n
5. I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al, P
PC
F 5
2 1
05011 2
010
5. I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al, P
PC
F 5
2 1
05011 2
010
5. I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al, P
PC
F 5
2 1
05011 2
010
5. I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch e
t al, P
PC
F 5
2 1
05011 2
010
6. I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010
6. I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010
6. I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010
6. I. J
enkin
s e
t al, E
PS 2
010
7. G
.M.D
. H
ogew
eij e
t al, ISM
work
ing s
essio
n, M
arc
h 7
7. G
.M.D
. H
ogew
eij e
t al, ISM
work
ing s
essio
n, M
arc
h 7
7. G
.M.D
. H
ogew
eij e
t al, ISM
work
ing s
essio
n, M
arc
h 7
7. G
.M.D
. H
ogew
eij e
t al, ISM
work
ing s
essio
n, M
arc
h 7
- ---11
11
11
11
2011,
2011,
2011,
2011, C
adara
che
Cadara
che
Cadara
che
Cadara
che, to
be p
resente
d a
t EPS 2
011
, to
be p
resente
d a
t EPS 2
011
, to
be p
resente
d a
t EPS 2
011
, to
be p
resente
d a
t EPS 2
011
8. T. C
asper, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch, IS
M w
ork
ing s
essio
n,
8. T. C
asper, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch, IS
M w
ork
ing s
essio
n,
8. T. C
asper, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch, IS
M w
ork
ing s
essio
n,
8. T. C
asper, I. V
oit
sekhovit
ch, IS
M w
ork
ing s
essio
n,
Novem
ber 29
Novem
ber 29
Novem
ber 29
Novem
ber 29 - ---
Decem
ber
3 2
010, C
ulh
am
Decem
ber
3 2
010, C
ulh
am
Decem
ber
3 2
010, C
ulh
am
Decem
ber
3 2
010, C
ulh
am