i

ii

©

ISBN : 978-955-612-143-8

:

iii

.

.

‘ ’

iv

“ ” “ ”

v

.

vi

(Case

Study) (Focus group discussion)

.

.

vii

. %

.

viii

i

ii

iv

ix

x

–

–

–

xi

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

xii

–

–

–

1

‘ ’

2

.

“ ” “

”

3

(Case Studies)

(Focus Group Discussion)

Multi-Stage Random

Sampling Technique

4

.

.

(SWOT Analysis)

Z (Z-Test)

Z Z

5

6

Conceptual review)

Emperical review)

(Zingiberaceae)

Curcuma domestica), (Curcuma longa)

‘ ’

(Curcumin)

7

“

‘ ’

”

‘ ’

8

(RDA)%

. %. %

. %Dietary fiber . . %

. %. %

. %C . %

E . %

. . %

. %

. %. %. %

. %. %

. . %USDA National Nutrient Data Base - 2011

(Gunter),

(Puna) (Madurasi Manjal) .

9

Kodic)

(Alleppey) (Hite)

(Captan) (Tiram)

. . .

10

.

. . .

.

Colletrotrichum calasici),

(Taphrina moculaus) . Phythum graminicolum

11

12

13

14

xv

xvi

–

992.0 11.1

xvii

(Cribbean)

xviii

’ ’.

http;/www.indianspices.com, 2011

.

http;/www.indianspices.com, 2011

xix

http;/www.indianspices.com, 2011

xx

FAO, 2004).

http;/www.indianspices.com, 2011.

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

xxi

http;/www.indianspices.com, 2011

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

xxii

xxiii

EOAS)

EOAS)

Quinaphos 0.3 (mancozeb)

Anne Platto,

xxiv

Anne

Platto,

(Small batches)

Anne Platto,

Anne Platto,

(Govindarajan, 2009).

xxv

indiagristal.com, 2011).

GTZ)

EOAS - Essential Oil and Spice)

“ ”

EOAS)

EOAS)

xxvi

% % % %

<

<

xxvii

.

% % % %

xxviii

% % % %

.

xxix

% % % %

<

>

.

% % % %

> 5

5>10

10>15

15>20

<20

xxx

xxxi

N=96

N=32 %

N=31 %

N=33 %

.

xxxii

.

¼

N=32

N=31

N=33 N=96

< .7

4<1

<1

<

xxxiii

“ ”

18.7%

25%

40.6%

15.6%

32.2% 29%

22.6%

12.9%

3.2%

24.2%

15.1% 15.1%

33.3%

12.1%

<1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 1-2

xxxiv

–

xxxv

xxxvi

.

xxxvii

.

= =

xxxviii

,

xxxix

.

xl

.

.

4139

2376

5071

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

xli

.

....

.

Z

(AI) (EO)

Z Z

xlii

Z Z Siginificant level)

Z

xliii

xliv

.

xlv

.

.

29% 30% 31%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

xlvi

.

xlvii

.

.

MOP), TSP),

xlviii

MOP TSP

MOP

TSP .

xlix

.

.

20%

23%

29%

28%

l

Z

.

.

li

.

.

(Acalypha)

(Calotropis)

lii

.

.

liii

.

%

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000/

liv

.

lv

.

lvi

. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

.

.

lvii

. .

lviii

lix

.

N=3

2

N=3

2

N=3

2

.

lx

1

‘ ’

lxi

.

lxii

.

=======

lxiii

lxiv

½

–

lxv

lxvi

lxvii

(SWOT Analysis)

.

S (Strengths

W (Weaknesses

O - (Opportunities

T (Threats

lxviii

(Weaknesses

(Opportunities

‘ ’

lxix

.

lxx

‘ ’

.

.

.

.

lxxi

.

.

lxxii

.

lxxiii

lxxiv

lxxv

‘ ’

.

lxxvi

. . (2008);

. ;

. . ;

. . . ;

. ;

. Kishtaiah C. G, (2001); Production Constraints of Turmeric Cultivation in Karinagar

district of Andhra Pradesh. India.

. Anne Plotto (2006); Turmeric Post Production Management Food and Agriculture

Organization of the United Nation. http:/www.core.lk/projects.html.

. Gunathilake H. (05/24/2009); The Anti Ageing Spice Lankadeepa.

. ;

. ;

lxxvii

.

lxxviii

–

.

lxxix

–

( )

( )

.