isabella romero supervised by dr. danielle burchett california state university, monterey bay in...
DESCRIPTION
Model of Psychopathology Three Factor Model of Psychopathology: The internalizing and externalizing dimensions, have received the most empirical support within general populations (Eaton, et al., 2012, Krueger, 1999) Internalizing Externalizing Thought Dysfunction Schizophrenia Mania Substance Abuse Antisocial Personality Attention- Hyperactivity Depression Anxiety Somatic Disorders (?)TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ISABELLA ROMEROS U P E RV I S E D B Y D R . D A N I E L L E B U R C H E T T
C A L I F O R N I A S TAT E U N I V E R S I T Y, M O N T E R E Y B AY
I N C O L L A B O R AT I O N W I T H D R . D AV I D
G L A S S M I R E
PAT T O N S TAT E H O S P I TA L
Mental Disorder Assessment:Mapping the MMPI-2-RF Substantive
Scales onto Internalizing, Externalizing and Thought Dysfunction Dimensions
![Page 2: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why Validate Assessments?
Tools which inform important processes for mental health practitioners Give clinical picture Must be accurate to inform effective treatment plan
Diagnostic construct validity
http://www.fairfaxmentalhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/psychologists-prescribing-medications.jpg http://www.californiapainmedicinecenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/
psychotherapy-los-angeles.jpg
![Page 3: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Model of PsychopathologyThree Factor Model of Psychopathology: The internalizing and externalizing dimensions, have
received the most empirical support within general populations (Eaton, et al., 2012, Krueger, 1999)
Internalizing ExternalizingThought
Dysfunction
Schi
zoph
reni
a
Man
ia
Subs
tanc
e Ab
use
Antis
ocia
l Pe
rson
ality
Atte
ntio
n-H
yper
activ
ity
Dep
ress
ion
Anxi
ety
Som
atic
D
isor
ders
(?)
![Page 4: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MMPI-2-RF Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-
Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF, Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/2011)
Emotional Internalizing Dysfunction
Behavioral Externalizin
g Dysfunction
Thought Dysfunction
![Page 5: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MMPI-2-RF Technical Manual of the MMPI-2-RF (Tellegen & Ben-
Porath, 2008/2011)
Internalizing SP Scales: eg. SUI,
HLP, AXY
Somatic SP Scales: MLS,
HPC
Introversion-r
RCd Demoralizatio
n
Interpersonal SP Scales: eg:
SHY,SAV
Negative Emotionality/ Neuroticism -r
EID Emotional/ Internalizi
ng Dysfunctio
nRC1 Somatic Complaints
RC2 Low Positive
Emotions
RC7Dysfunctional
Negative Emotions
Low AES & MEC: Aesthetic-Literary Interests & Mechanical Interests
![Page 6: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MMPI-2-RF
Externalizing SP Scales: JCP, SUB
AGG-r Aggressiveness
RC4 Antisocial Behavior
RC9 Hypomanic Activation
DISC-r Disconstraint
Interpersonal SP Scales: FML:
Family Problems
Internalizing SP Scales:
ANP: Anger Proneness
BXD Behavioral
Externalizing
Dysfunction
![Page 7: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MMPI-2-RF
PSYC-r Psychoticism
RC6 Ideas of Persecution
THDThought
Dysfunction
RC8 Aberrant Experiences
![Page 8: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Current Study: Research Question
Past MMPI-2-RF Research: Compared mean scores for specific diagnostic
groups (eg. Bipolar disorder, v. schizophrenia, Sellbom, et al., 2012)
Current Study: Does the MMPI-2-RF distinguish between forensic
inpatients with and without 1. Internalizing Disorders 2. Externalizing Disorders 3. Thought Dysfunction Disorders ?
![Page 9: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Method
Participants 641 forensic inpatients, Males (72.1 %) Mean Age =
40.96 years
Total =
1,110
Valid =
641
Internalizing
Externalizing
Yes (n =320)
No (n =321)
Yes (n =469)
Thought
No (n = 172)
Yes (n = 562)
No (n = 69)
![Page 10: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Hypotheses
Scales Internalizing Externalizing Thought Dysfunction
Higher- OrderScales
EID BXD THD
Restructured Clinical Scales
RCd, RC1, RC2, RC,7
RC4 & RC9 RC6 & RC8
Specific Problems Scales
Internalizing, Somatic,
Intrapersonal
ANP, Externalizing Scales, FML
Interest Scales Low AES & MEC
Personality Pathology-5 Scales
NEGE-r & INTR-r
DISC-r &AGG-r
PSYC-r
![Page 11: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Method: Statistical Analyses
M1 M2
*Independent Samples t-test:Comparing means of independent samples Hedges' g
values:Comparing size of difference between two means
• Small: .20-.49• Medium: .50-.7
9• Large: .80+
Cohen (1988)
![Page 12: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results: Internalizing DiagnosisMMPI-2-RF Scales Yes (n = 320) No (n = 321) g
Higher-Order Scales M SD M SDEID: Emotional/ Internalizing Dysfunction
53.9 12.6 49.3 10.5 0.39*
Restructured Clinical ScalesRCd: Demoralization 55.7 11.9 51.6 10.7 0.35*RC1: Somatic Complaints 55.7 11.0 51.7 10.6 0.33*RC2: Low Positive Emotions 53.8 13.8 50.9 11.6 0.22*RC7: Dysfunctional Negative Emotions 51.5 11.2 47.4 10.7 0.37*Somatic Specific Problems Scales
MLS: Malaise 53.92 15.4 52.8 10.7 0.29* GIC: Gastrointestinal Complaints 52.98 11.92 49.66 9.41 0.31*
HPC: Head Pan Complaints 51.88 10.52 50.36 9.48 0.15*
NUC: Neurological Complaints 59.91 12.57 55.45 12.58 0.35*
COG: Cognitive Complaints 54.77 12.95 51.57 11.49 0.26*
Interest ScalesAES: Aesthetic-Literary Interests 50.08 10.04 49.97 11.24 0.01
MEC: Mechanical Interests 53.81 10.70 56.05 10.68 -0.21*
![Page 13: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Yes (n = 320) No (n = 321) g
Internalizing SP Scales M SD M SD
SUI: Suicidal/Death Ideation 53.92 15.39 49.98 10.59 0.30*
HLP: Helplessness 52.52 13.63 49.36 11.27 0.25*SFD: Self-Doubt 52.96 11.50 49.46 9.69 0.33*NFC: Inefficacy 53.18 10.60 50.46 10.83 0.25*STW: Stress and Worry 51.13 11.15 47.70 9.59 0.33*AXY: Anxiety 55.50 14.11 52.15 12.88 0.25*ANP: Anger Proneness 50.50 10.12 47.13 8.91 0.35*BRF: Behavior restricting Fears 55.75 13.47 52.43 11.64 0.26*MSF: Multiple Specific Fears 51.71 9.32 49.11 9.20 0.28*Interpersonal Specific Problems ScalesIPP: Interpersonal Problems 48.43 10.43 48.52 9.72 -0.01
SAV: Social Avoidance 50.66 10.85 49.34 10.94 0.12
SHY: Shyness 49.36 9.42 47.69 8.44 0.19*
DSF: Disafiliativeness 54.46 12.66 53.40 12.08 0.09
Personality Pathology- 5 Scales
NEGE-r: Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised
52.51 10.78 48.28 10.30 0.40*
INTR-r: Introversion-Revised 52.13 11.73 51.42 11.68 0.06
![Page 14: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Results: Externalizing DiagnosisMMPI-2-RF Scales Yes (n = 469) No (n = 172) g
Higher-Order Scales M SD M SDBXD: Behavioral Externalizing Dysfunction
58.60 10.63 53.72 10.39 0.46*
Restructured Clinical ScalesRC4: Antisocial Behaviors 62.13 11.43 56.70 10.90 0.48*
RC9: Hypomanic Activation 48.03 10.86 46.95 10.99 0.10
Internalizing Specific Problems Scale
ANP: Anger Proneness 49.19 9.83 47.78 9.18 0.15
Externalizing Specific Problems Scales
JCP: Juvenile Conduct Problems 61.34 13.11 55.60 12.64 0.44*
SUB; Substance Abuse 57.11 10.35 50.49 9.96 0.65*
AGG: Aggression 49.78 10.97 48.20 9.95 0.15*
ACT: Activation 47.36 12.17 46.03 11.55 0.11
Interpersonal ScalesFML: Family Problems 51.59 12.10 50.72 12.45 0.07
Personality Pathology-5 ScalesAGGR-r: Aggressiveness-Revised 51.48 10.43 51.13 9.48 0.03
DISC-R: Disconstraint-Revised 57.07 10.15 52.78 9.75 0.43*
![Page 15: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Results: Thought Dysfunction Diagnosis
MMPI-2-RF Scales Yes (n = 572) No (n = 69) g
Higher-Order Scales M SD M SD
THD: Thought Dysfunction 58.05 15.14 53.96 14.09 0.27*
Restructured Clinical ScalesRC6: Ideas of Persecution 61.72 15.83 60.59 15.75 0.07
RC8: Aberrant Experiences 55.19 12.57 52.26 11.90 0.23*
Personality Pathology-5 Scales
PSYC-r: Psychoticism-Revised 56.22 14.91 52.94 13.65 0.22*
![Page 16: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DiscussionKey Findings:
Higher-Order (H-O) scales demonstrated strong construct validity
Somatic problems are significantly associated with Internalizing domain
Interestingly, Ideas of Persecution scores were similar across groups; may be result of controlled settings (Morgan, Rozycki, & Wilson, 2004)
Strengths: High base rates of severe mental illness across all three domains
Limitations & Future Directions Overlapping vs. pure diagnostic groups
VS.
![Page 17: ISABELLA ROMERO SUPERVISED BY DR. DANIELLE BURCHETT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. DAVID GLASSMIRE PATTON STATE HOSPITAL](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082621/5a4d1b497f8b9ab0599a4f42/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Acknowledgements & References Eaton, N. R., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Keyes, K. M., Skodol, A. E., Wall, M., Grant, B. F. (2012). The structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 86–92. doi: 10.1037/a0029598
Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(10), 921–926. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.921
Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): Technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Weinborn, M., Orr, T., Woods, S. P., Conover, E., & Feix, J. (2003). A validation of the Test of Memory Malingering in a forensic psychiatric setting. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(7), 979-990.
Thanks to the following for making this study possible:University of Minnesota
Press, which supported data collection
Dr. Glassmire of Patton State Hospital
Dr. Danielle Burchett CSUMB Undergraduate
Research Opportunities Center (UROC)