ipv6 working group ietf58 minneapolis november 2003 bob hinden & brian haberman chairs
TRANSCRIPT
IPv6 Working Group
IETF58 Minneapolis
November 2003
Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
Chairs
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Tuesday Agenda (1700-1800)
• Introduction and Agenda Bashing, Chairs (5 min)
• Milestone Review and Document Status, Chairs (10 minutes)
• Local Communications Goals, Tony Hain & Fred Templin (15 minutes)– draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt
– Goal: discussion of open issues
• Tunnel MIB, Dave Thaler (10 minutes)– draft-thaler-inet-tunnel-mib-00.txt
– Goal: overview of proposal, adopt as WG item?
• Proxy RA, Dave Thaler (10 minutes)– draft-thaler-ipv6-ndproxy-01.txt
– Goal: status update, adopt as WG item?
• ICMPv6 Updates, Bob Hinden (10 minutes)– draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt
– Goal: status update
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Wednesday Agenda (1300-1500)• Router Selection, Dave Thaler (10 minutes)
– draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-02.txt– Goal: issue discussion, next steps
• Neighbor Discovery Updates, Tatuya Jinmei (15 minutes)– draft-soliman-ipv6-2461-bis-00.txt– Goal: issue discussion
• Stateless Autoconfiguration Updates, Tatuya Jinmei (15 minutes)– draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt– Goal: issue discussion
• Scoped Address Arch Document, Tatuya Jinmei (10 minutes)– draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt– Goal: discussion of last call comments
• Site-Local Deprecation Document, Christian Huitema (20 minutes)– draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-site-local-01.txt– Goal: discussion of last call comments
• Unique Local Addresses Document, Bob Hinden (15 minutes)– draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt– Goal: discussion of last call comments
• Address Architecture Update, Bob Hinden (15 minutes)– draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt– Goal: review changes and plan for moving forward
• Identifier/Locator Separation, Kurt Lindqvist (10 minutes)
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
MILESTONES (1)
Done Submit Prefix Delegation requirements and submit to IESG for Informational.
Done Submit TCP MIB to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Done Submit IPv6 Node Requirements to IESG for Informational.
Done Submit Forwarding Table MIB to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Done Submit IP MIB to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Nov 03 Submit Site-Local Deprecation document to IESG for Informational
Nov 03 Submit Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Dec 03 (Nov 03) Submit update to ICMPv6 (RFC2463) to be republished at Draft Standard.
Dec 03 (Nov 03) Submit Router Preferences, More-Specific Routes, and Load Sharing to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Feb 04 (Dec 03) Submit updates to Auto Configuration (RFC2462) and Neighbor Discovery (RFC2461) to be republished at Draft Standard.
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
MILESTONES (2) Dec 03 Submit Proxy RA to IESG for Proposed Standard
Dec 03 (Oct 03) Submit Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses to IESG for Proposed
Standard.
Dec 03 (Oct 03) Submit IPv6 Scoped Addressing Architecture to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Dec 03 Submit update to IPv6 over PPP (RFC2472) to IESG for Draft Standard.
Jan 04 (Oct 03) Submit UDP MIB to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Jan 04 (Nov 03) Submit Requirements for Local Addressing to IESG for Informational
Jan 04 (Nov 03) Submit Update to Privacy Extensions for Stateless Autoconfiguration document (RFC3041) to the IESG for Draft Standard.
Jan 04 (Oct 03) Resubmit Node Information Queries to IESG for Proposed Standard.
Jan 04 Nov 03 Re-charter or close working group.
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
PUBLISHED & APPROVALS
• RFC’s Published– RFC3587, “IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format”
• IESG Approved– none
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Flow Label
• Editor: Jarno Rajahalme
• Milestone: Done– Submit for PS
• Status: – In IESG– New draft submitted to resolve IESG
comments
• Open Issues:– None known
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Proxy RA
• Editor: Dave Thaler
• Milestones: Dec 03– Submit to IESG for PS
• Status: New draft– To be discussed in WG
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Prefix Delegation Requirements
• Editor: Shin Miyakawa
• Milestone: Done– Submit for Info
• Status: In IESG– New draft submitted that responds to IESG
comments
• Open Issues:– None known
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
TCP MIB
• Editor: Rajiv Raghunarayan
• Milestone: Done– Submit for PS
• Status: Submitted to IESG
• Open Issues:– None known
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
IPv6 Node Requirements
• Editor: John Loughney
• Milestone: Done– Submit for Info
• Status: In IESG– New Draft submitted that responds to AD
comments
• Open Issues:– None known
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Forwarding Table MIB
• Editor: Brian Haberman
• Milestone: Done– Submit for PS
• Status: In IESG
• Open Issues:– None known
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Node Information Queries
• Editor: Matt Crawford
• Milestone: Oct 03– Re-submit for PS– Update milestone to Jan 04
• Status: New draft in w.g. last call– New draft need to resolve issues raised on
mailing list and at Vienna IETF
• Open Issues:
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
UDP MIB
• Editor: John Flick
• Milestone: Oct 03– Submit for PS– Update milestone to Jan 04
• Status: New draft available
• Open Issues:– none known– Ready for w.g. last call?
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
IP MIB
• Editor: Shawn Routhier
• Milestone: Done– Submit for PS
• Status: In IESG
• Open Issues: – Will be delayed by INET Address TC– Dependent on Router Selection Draft
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Default Router Preferences
• Editor: Dave Thaler
• Milestone: Nov 03– Submit to IESG for PS– Update milestone to Dec 03
• Status: AD Comments Received
• Open Issues:– Split load balancing into separate
document and resolve issues
• To be discussed in w.g.
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Link-Scoped Multicast
• Editor: Jung-Soo Park
• Milestone: Oct 03– Submit for PS– Update milestone to Dec 03
• Status: WG Last Call
• Open Issues:– No technical issues, but is it needed?– OK to advance?
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Scoped Addressing Architecture
• Editor: Jinmei Tatuya
• Milestone: Oct 03– Submit for PS– Update milestone to Dec 03
• Status: Working Group Last Call
• Open Issues:– Need to be consistent with INET Address
TC on default zone values– OK to advance (after new draft)?
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Site-Local Deprecation
• Editors: Christian Huitema, Brian Carpenter
• Milestone: Nov 03– Submit for Informational
• Status: In working group last call
• Open Issues:– Issues raised on mailing list
• To be discussed in w.g. meeting
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Unique Local Addresses
• Editor: Bob Hinden
• Milestone: Nov 03– Submit for PS
• Status: In working group last call
• Open Issues:– Issues raised on mailing list
• To be discussed in w.g. meeting
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Requirements for Local Addressing
• Editor: T. Hain, F. Templin
• Milestone: Nov 03– Submit for Informational– Update milestone to Jan 04
• Status: Individual submission
• Open Issues:– Discussion on mailing list
• Will be discussed in w.g. meeting
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
IPv6 Addressing Architecture
• Editor: Bob Hinden
• Milestone: (none)– Re-Submit for Draft Standard– New milestone Jan 04
• Status: Draft available
• Open Issues:– Dependent on Site-Local deprecation
• Will be discussed in w.g. meeting
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Work Not Started
• ICMPv6 Update
• Privacy Extensions Update
• PPPv6 Update
IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6) Minneapolis IETF
Textual Representation of IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses
• Author: Andrew Main– <draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-01.txt>
• Fixes a long history of broken ABNF definitions of textual representations– Does not cover scoped address syntax or prefix length syntax
• Important to get this right, to ensure correct parsing by UIs, etc.
• Request:– Please read it & prepare for decision whether to adopt as WG
item– Standards track vs Informational?