iptm special problems 2013 cavalier v park avenue crash analysis – edr’s copyright ruth...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IPTM Special Problems 2013
Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1
![Page 2: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Point of this Research• Research tells us that Delta V in EDR’s is a
valuable tool in reconstructing central collisions.• In non-central collisions, Delta V measured in the
EDR will typically under-report the crash. Using the Delta V to calculate closing speeds or impact speeds results in conservative estimates of speed.
• Objective: Describe and Quantify what is causing the under-reporting, then develop a simplified adjustment to correct the measurement, using the Effective Mass Ratio.
![Page 3: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1998 Cavalier
1995 Buick Park Avenue
CRASH 1 FRIDAY MAY 17 EDR’sStock X EDR under RF seat
Stock X EDR under RF seat
Ride Along EDR
Ride Along EDR
FAIL
FAIL
![Page 4: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1998 Cavalier 2766 lbs
1995 Buick Park Avenue 3368 lbs
CRASH 1 FRIDAY MAY 17 RESULTSSTOCK EDR’s – NO RECORDINGS
RIDE ALONG -4.46X, +12.1Y = PDOF 70o
RIDE ALONG -18.46X, -5.73Y =PDOF 17o
PDO
F
Ride Along EDR
Ride Along EDR
![Page 5: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
TRADITIONAL EDR ANALYSIS (No EMR)• Use Closing Speed -assuming right angle collision,
target has no velocity in Cavalier direction of travel, so Closing Speed in the Cavalier X = V1
V1 = (|Cavalier X ΔV| + |Buick Y ΔV|)*(1/(1+e))V1 = (|-18.46| + |12.1|) (1/(1+.1))V1 = 30.56 mph*.91 = 27.8 mph• Using Post Impact Speed and Delta VV1 = V3cosβ-ΔVx = 15.3cos(10) - - 18.46V1 = 15.3(0.98) + 18.46 = 15.1+18.46 = 33.56 mphFor this instrumented crash, we know the bullet was going 41 mph – so WHY did it under report?
![Page 6: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1998 Cavalier 2766 lbs
1995 Buick Park Avenue 3368 lbs
ANSWER: IT’S AN OFFSET COLLISIONMEASURE OFFSET OF PDOF FROM CG
THEN ADJUST FOR EFFECTIVE MASS RATIO
PDO
F
BUICK 48” OFFSET
CAV 22.9” OFFSET
![Page 7: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratio Calculation
CAVALIERLookup: CAV Yaw Moment of Inertial = 1490 Cav Weight = 2766Calculate k2
k2 = Iyg/W = 1490 (32.2ft/sec2)/2766 lbs k2 = 17.35
Calculate Effective Mass Ratio Gamma (ϒ)ϒ = k2/(k2 + h2) = 17.352/(17.352 + 1.92) ϒ = 0.83
![Page 8: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratio Calculation
BUICKLookup: Yaw Moment of Inertial = 2433 Weight = 3368Calculate k2
k2 = Iyg/W = 1490 (32.2ft/sec2)/3368 lbs k2 = 23.26
Calculate Effective Mass Ratio Gamma (ϒ)ϒ = k2/(k2 + h2) = 23.262/(23.262 + 4.02) ϒ = 0.58
![Page 9: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Applying the Adjustment
• Divide the measured ΔV by ϒ (Gamma)• Cavalier • (-18.46X, -5.73Y)/.83 = -22.2X, -6.9Y• Buick• (-4.46X, +12.1Y)/.58 = -7.6X, 20.7Y
![Page 10: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cavalier EDR Offset 1.9ft
EMR 0.58Adjusted DV 22.0 (7.6X, 20.7Y)
EMR Adjusted Delta V’s
Buick Offset 4.0 ftYaw Moment of Inertia 2433
Yaw Moment of Inertia 1490EMR 0.83
Adjusted DV 23.2 (22.2X, 6.5Y)
Note adjusted total DV’s are very close to equal.
![Page 11: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EMR ADJUSTED EDR ANALYSIS• Use Closing Speed -assuming right angle
collision, target has no velocity in Cavalier direction of travel, so Closing Speed in the Cavalier X = V1
V1 = (|Cavalier X ΔV| + |Buick Y ΔV|)*(1/(1+e))V1 = (|-22.2| + |20.7|)*(1/(1+.1))V1 = 42.9 mph * .91 = 39.0 (Range 35.1-42.9)• Using Post Impact Speed and Delta VV1 = V3cosβ-ΔVx = 15.3cos(10) - - 18.46V1 = 15.3(0.98) + 22.2 = 15.1+22.2 = 37.3 mph
(Range 35.1 to 39.4)
![Page 12: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Estimating Effective Mass Ratio
• If you are intimidated by the effective mass ratio calculation, the next slide shows you EMR calculations for several different vehicle sizes versus offset in feet.
• You can see where the Cavalier and Buick calculations would be consistent with the chart.
• Use the chart for first pass estimates.
![Page 13: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratios for Different Vehicles
Buick
Cavalier
![Page 14: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IPTM Special Problems 2013
Impala vs Eldorado Crash Analysis – EDR’s
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 14
![Page 15: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Point of this Crash• The Cavalier vs Buick crash a significant offset• This crash is a more central crash • The point is to show that the EDR captures this
crash well without any necessary adjustments
![Page 16: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2005 Chevy Impala
1995 Cadillac Eldorado
CRASH 2 Tuesday AM – Impala vs Eldorado
Stock X EDR under RF seat
Stock X EDR under RF seat
Ride Along EDR
FIL
FAI
![Page 17: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2005 Chevy Impala 3764 lbs
1995 Cadillac Eldorado 3891 lbsStock EDR -5.16X @ 100ms, -6.69@300
CRASH 2 Tuesday Impala vs Eldorado RESULTS
Ride alongEDR -5.73X, +19.73Y = PDOF 74o
Stock EDR -20.67X, -7.75Y =PDOF 21o
LAST REPORTED SPEED 40 MPH
PDO
FRide Along EDR
Stock EDR
Stock EDR
![Page 18: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM
18
Work the Impala EDR speed data• Use speed at impact worksheet for speed data
MIN MAXLast data 40 40Spd loss bef imp -0 1Wheel slip 0 0Speedo +/-4% -1.6 +1.6RANGE 38.4 42.6
![Page 19: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
IMPALA EDR DELTA V ANALYSIS (No EMR)
• Use Closing Speed -assuming right angle collision, target has no velocity in Impala direction of travel, so Closing Speed in the Impala X = V1
V1 = (|Impala X ΔV| + |Eldo Y ΔV|)*(1/(1+e))V1 = (|-20.67| + |19.73|) (1/(1+.1))V1 = 40.4 mph*.91 = 36.7 mph (33 to 40.4)• Using Post Impact Speed and Delta VV1 = V3cosβ-ΔVx = 22.1 cos(30) - - 20.7V1 = 22.1(0.87) + 18.46 = 19.2+20.7 = 39.9 mph (Range 37.9- 41.9)GOOD AGREEMENT WITH ACTUAL SPEED 41 MPH
![Page 20: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
EDR Reconciliation with Scene Evidence
• Momentum Analysis 38.5 • EDR Speed 38.4------------42.6 • EDR Closing Speed 33--------------40.4• EDR + postcrash 37.9----------41.9
![Page 21: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
IPTM Special Problems 2013
Impala v Saturn Crash Analysis – EDR’s
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 21
![Page 22: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Point of this Crash• Another offset crash to investigate EMR
further• We are expecting the EDR to under report,
and that it will require an EMR adjustment to more accurately reconstruct the crash
![Page 23: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2000 Impala
1994 Saturn (no stock EDR)NOT MOVING
CRASH 3 TUESDAY PM EDR’s
Stock X EDR under RF seat
Ride Along EDR
FAI
![Page 24: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2000 Impala 3389 lbs
1994 Saturn 2305 lbs
CRASH 3 TUESDAY PM EDR’sRIDE ALONG -4.46X @100ms (grows to -8.28 @ 300)
-20.37Y @ 100MS (grows to -25.46 @ 300ms)
= PDOF 78o
STOCK EDR -15.32X 50 MPH LAST REPORTED SPEED
PDOF 12 based on Saturn EDR
PDO
FRide Along EDR
Stock EDR
![Page 25: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM
25
Work the Impala EDR speed data
• Use speed at impact worksheet for speed data MIN MAX
Last data 50 50Spd loss bef imp -0 +4Wheel slip 0 0Speedo +/-4% -2.0 +2.0
48.0 56.0
![Page 26: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
TRADITIONAL EDR ANALYSIS (No EMR)• Use Closing Speed -assuming right angle collision,
target has no velocity in Cavalier direction of travel, so Closing Speed in the Impala X = V1
V1 = (|Impala X ΔV| + |Saturn Y ΔV|)*(1/(1+e))V1 = (|-15.3| + |20.4|) (1/(1+.05))V1 = 35.7 mph*.96 = 34.3 mph• Using Post Impact Speed and Delta VV1 = V3cosβ-ΔVx = 31.1cos(4) - - 15.3V1 = 31.1(0.99) + 15.32 = 30.8+15.3 = 46.1 mphFor this instrumented crash, we know the bullet was going 50 mph – so WHY did it under report?
![Page 27: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2000 Impala 3389 lbs
1994 Saturn 2305 lbs
ANSWER: IT’S AN OFFSET COLLISIONMEASURE OFFSET OF PDOF FROM CG
THEN ADJUST FOR EFFECTIVE MASS RATIO
PDO
F
SATURN OFFSET 3’
IMP OFFSET 1’
![Page 28: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Estimating Effective Mass Ratio
• If you are intimidated by the effective mass ratio calculation, the next slide shows you EMR calculations for several different vehicle sizes versus offset in feet.
• Use the chart for first pass estimates.
![Page 29: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratios for Different Vehicles
Saturn
Impala
![Page 30: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratio Calculation
IMPALALookup: Yaw Moment of Inertial = 2285 lb-ft-sec2 Weight = 3389Calculate k2
k2 = Iyg/W = 2285 (32.2ft/sec2)/3389 lbs k2 = 21.77
Calculate Effective Mass Ratio Gamma (ϒ)ϒ = k2/(k2 + h2) = 21.71/(21.71 + 1.02) ϒ = 0.96
![Page 31: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Effective Mass Ratio CalculationSATURNLookup: Yaw Moment of Inertial = 1168 Weight = 2305Calculate k2
k2 = Iyg/W = 1168 (32.2ft/sec2)/2305 lbs k2 = 16.32
Calculate Effective Mass Ratio Gamma (ϒ)ϒ = k2/(k2 + h2) = 16.322/(16.322 + 3.02) ϒ = 0.64
![Page 32: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Applying the Adjustment
• Divide the measured ΔV by ϒ (Gamma)• Impala • (-15.32X/.96) = -16.0X• Saturn• (-4.46X, -20.37Y)/.64 = -6.9X, 31.6Y
![Page 33: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Impala EDR Offset 1.0ft
EMR 0.64Adjusted DV (6.9X, 31.6Y)
EMR Adjusted Delta V’s
Saturn Offset 3.0 ftYaw Moment of Inertia 1186
Yaw Moment of Inertia 2285EMR 0.96
Adjusted DV 16.0X
![Page 34: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
EMR ADJUSTED EDR ANALYSIS• Use Closing Speed -assuming right angle collision,
target has no velocity in Cavalier direction of travel, so Closing Speed in the Cavalier X = V1
V1 = (|Impala X ΔV| + |Saturn Y ΔV|)*(1/(1+e))V1 = (|-16.0| + |31.6|)*(1/(1+..05)V1 = 47.6 mph * .96 = 45.7 (Range 41-50)• Using Post Impact Speed and Delta VV1 = V3cosβ-ΔVx = 31.10cos(4) - - 16.0V1 = 31.1(0.99) + 16.0 = 30.8+16.0 = 47.8 mph
(Range 46.2 to 49.4) BETTER AGREEMENT
![Page 35: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
EDR Reconciliation with Scene Evidence
Momentum Analysis 52 EDR Speed 48------------56 EDR Closing Speed 41------------50EDR + postcrash 46---49
![Page 36: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS• Delta V does a good job of predicting impact
speeds in CENTRAL collisions• Delta V UNDERESTIMATES impact speed in
OFFSET collisions• Using the Effective Mass Ratio adjustment
improves the accuracy of impact speed estimates.• We may need to make further adjustments to
EDR location if it more offset than CM from PDOF• We need to pay more attention to estimating
RESTITUTION when calculation closing speeds.
![Page 37: IPTM Special Problems 2013 Cavalier v Park Avenue Crash Analysis – EDR’s Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062804/5697bf711a28abf838c7dfcb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
IPTM Special Problems 2013
END
Rick Ruth 313 910 [email protected]
Copyright Ruth Consulting LLC 2012, Authorized for use by IPTM 37