ionization sources - ii

34
Ionization Sources - II • EI and CI have limitations – Both require a volatile sample – Samples must be thermally stable – Neither lends itself to LC/MS analysis • Other techniques have been developed – FAB (Fast Atom Bombardment) – MALDI (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption) – ESI (Electrospray) – APCI (Atmospheric Pressure CI)

Upload: eudora

Post on 13-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Ionization Sources - II. EI and CI have limitations Both require a volatile sample Samples must be thermally stable Neither lends itself to LC/MS analysis Other techniques have been developed FAB (Fast Atom Bombardment) MALDI (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption) ESI (Electrospray) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ionization Sources - II

Ionization Sources - II

• EI and CI have limitations– Both require a volatile sample– Samples must be thermally stable– Neither lends itself to LC/MS analysis

• Other techniques have been developed– FAB (Fast Atom Bombardment)– MALDI (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption)– ESI (Electrospray)– APCI (Atmospheric Pressure CI)

Page 2: Ionization Sources - II

FAB

• Sample is dissolved in a non-volatile liquid matrix– Glycerol and m-Nitrobenzyl alcohol are

common matrices

• A high energy (5kV) beam of neutral atoms (typically Ar or Xe) is focused onto the sample droplet

• Dissolved Ions and Molecules are ejected into the gas phase for analysis

Page 3: Ionization Sources - II

FAB

Page 4: Ionization Sources - II

FAB

• For Organic Molecules M+H and M+Na ions are typically observed

• M+H ions typically fragment more than M+Na ions

• Salts such as NaI can be added to the matrix to induce M+Na formation

Page 5: Ionization Sources - II

FAB

Advantages

• Stable Molecular Ion

• High Mass Compounds (10,000 amu)

• Thermally Labile Compounds (R.T.)

Disadvantages• No Fragment Library• Solubility in Matrix

(MNBA, Glycerol)• Quantitation Difficult• Needs Highly Skilled

Operator• Not amenable to

automation• Relatively Low

Sensitivity

(nanomole)

Page 6: Ionization Sources - II

MALDIMatrix Assisted Laser Desorption

• Sample dissolved in a solid matrix• Typically mixed in solution• Small droplet applied to target and dried

• A wide variety of matrices exist• Choose based on hydrophobic/hydrophilic

character of sample• Also based on laser absorbance (usually UV)

• An ionization agent is often added• Agent must bind to the sample• TFA and its Na+ Ag+ salts are common

Page 7: Ionization Sources - II

MALDI

Page 8: Ionization Sources - II

MALDI

• Choice of matrix based on empirical evidence

• http://polymers.msel.nist.gov/maldirecipes/maldi.html

• Typically singly charged ions observed• Some matrix adducts/cluster ions• Difficult to analyze low MW compounds

due to matrix background• Typically used for MW 500-500,000

Page 9: Ionization Sources - II

MALDI

Page 10: Ionization Sources - II

MALDI

OOMe

CH3

()

Page 11: Ionization Sources - II

UV-MALDI MatricesMatrix Application Structure

α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid(CCA)

peptides

OHNC

OHO

3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (sinapinic acid)

proteins HO

H3CO

H3CO

O

OH

2,5 Dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) peptides, proteins, polymers, sugars

O OH

OH

HO

3-Hydroxypicolinic acid (HPA) oligonucleotidesN

OH

OH

O

Dithranol (anthralin) polymers

OOH OH

Page 12: Ionization Sources - II

MALDI

Advantages

• Parent Ion

• High Mass Compounds (>100,000 amu)

• Thermally Labile Compounds (R.T.)

• Easy to Operate

• Easily Automated

Disadvantages• No Fragment Library• Wide variety of matrices• Quantitation Difficult• Matrix Background

(low femtomole)

Page 13: Ionization Sources - II

ESIElectrospray Ionization

• Sample dissolved in a polar solvent• Solution flows into a strong electric field

(3-6 kV potential) • Electric field induces a spray of highly

charged droplets (charges at surface)• As droplets shrink, repulsion increases

until they break into smaller droplets• In small enough droplets, surface

charges can be desorbed into the gas phase.

Page 14: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

Page 15: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

• Ions formed via charge-residue or ion-evaporation

• Molecules form M+H+ or M-H- ions– Large molecules: 1 charge / 1000 amu– Small molecules: Usually singly charged

• Molecules with no acid/base groups– Can form adduct ions with Na+ K+ NH4

+ Cl-

OAc-, etc.– Salts may be added or already present in

sample.

Page 16: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

• ESI ions formed at high pressure must be transferred into high vacuum

• Differential pumping is needed to move ions through small openings while maintaining low pressures

• Ions become super-cooled by expansion. Solvent can recondense– Two methods to reduce cluster formation

• High temperature transfer tube• Heated counter-current flow of N2

Page 17: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

Page 18: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

Page 19: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

Page 20: Ionization Sources - II

ESI-Multiply Charged Ions

• Large Molecules produce an envelope of charge states

• Deconvolution must be done to determine the charge states if isotopic resolution is not possible

• Typically, MS data systems use software to deconvolute automatically

Page 21: Ionization Sources - II

ESI-Multiply Charged Ions

Δm = 1 amuΔ(m/z) ≈ 0.10

Δm = 1 amu ; ∆(m/z) ≈ 0.055; z = 18

z = 10

M=16953

Page 22: Ionization Sources - II

ESI-Multiply Charged Ions

• Consider (M+zH)z+

– z1m1 = M + z1mp (m1 = measured m/z)

• Consider a peak of m/z=m2 which is (j-1) charge states away from peak m1

– m2(z1-j) = M + (z1-j)mp

z1 =j(m2-mp)

(m2-m1)M = z1(m1-mp)

Page 23: Ionization Sources - II

ESI-Multiply Charged Ions

z1 =j(m2-mp)

(m2-m1)M = z1(m1-mp)

1303.8 1621.3j=10

z1 =10(1621.3-1.0073)

(1621.3-1303.8)= 51.0 M = 51.0(1303.8-1.0073)

M = 66485

Page 24: Ionization Sources - II

ESI-Multiply Charged Ions

Page 25: Ionization Sources - II

ESI

Advantages• Parent Ion• High Mass Compounds

(>100,000 amu)• Thermally Labile

Compounds (<0º C)• Easy to Operate• Interface to HPLC• Zeptomole sensitivity

with nanospray

Disadvantages• No Fragmentation• Need Polar Sample• Need Solubility in Polar

Solvent (MeOH, ACN, H2O, Acetone are best)

• Sensitive to Salts• Supression

(low femtomole to zeptomole)

Page 26: Ionization Sources - II

APCIAtmospheric Pressure CI

• Sample solution flows into a pneumatic nebulizer

• Droplets of sample/solvent are vaporized in a quartz heater

• Vapor passes by a region of corona discharge where electrons ionize N2 gas and solvent (protonated solvent molecules predominate)

• Protonated solvent reacts with sample

Page 27: Ionization Sources - II

APCI

Page 28: Ionization Sources - II

APCI

Page 29: Ionization Sources - II

APCI

Page 30: Ionization Sources - II

APCI

Advantages

• Parent Ion

• Insensitive to Salts

• Interface to HPLC

• Can use Normal Phase Solvents

• Handles High Flow Rates

Disadvantages• Need Volatile Sample• Need Thermal Stability

(high femtomole)

Page 31: Ionization Sources - II

Multimode

• Most instruments use dedicated ESI and APCI sources– samples must be run twice to obtain both

spectra

• Some vendors offer sources which rapidly switch between ESI and APCI– duty cycle/sensitivity are lost, especially

when coupled with fast chromatography

• Agilent has developed a source which ionizes by ESI and APCI without switching

Page 32: Ionization Sources - II

Multimode

Page 33: Ionization Sources - II

Multimode

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 34: Ionization Sources - II

Multimode