introduction history: dna developed in 2002 together with ibm offered thru ibm-issl since 2003...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
245 views
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction
History: DNA Developed in 2002 together with IBM Offered thru IBM-ISSL since 2003 -> SMB & Large Accounts worldwide Stats & Benchmarks on >600K Notes Users
DNA’s Objectives: Decision Support for IBM & IBM Customers Deliver Factual Insight with Forensic Precision Offer Benchmark Comparisons in Real Life Support Technical & Management Level
Why DNA? Health Assessments / Baselines
Pre- & Post Project Comparisons SLA Design & Compliance / License Count
Critical (Performance) Situations Root Cause Analysis (Premium) Support Delivery
Platform/Server Migrations & Consolidations R8 Upgrades / Wintel -> P and/or i-Series Mergers/Acquisitions
RFP’s & Competition Microsoft Strategic Outsourcing TCO Reduction / Comparison
Target Customers
1,000+ Users or More Larger is Better (more Value) Largest so far was 100K+ users
Customers in Pain Performance / Stability Issues Competitive Situations
Customers with Plans Either Technical or Strategic
Success Stories
Sample DNA Cases: Achmea, 13K Users & Coty Inc., 6K Users
Consolidation Analysis & Server Sizing by DNA Wintel to iSeries/R7 IBM Netherlands (Nico van der Steeg)
Hella KG Hueck & Co, 12K Users TCO Reduction IBM Germany (Adrian Schüller/Joerg
Struckmeier) Analysis & Optimization Potential by DNA
Success Stories
Sample DNA Cases: Givaudan
Server Consolidation & Merger/Acquisition Demand Optimization & Server Sizing by DNA IBM Switzerland (Marc Leuscher)
T-Systems / Daimler SLA Discussions & Infra Performance IBM Deutschland (Kurt Fessel) Fact Finding, Analysis & Optimizations by DNA
Success Stories
User Population
Where are your users located?
How many users were active during analysis period of one week?
IBM: Licenses
Compliant?
DNA BASELINE:Network Bandwidth Consumption Per User
-
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
kbp
s -
serv
er t
o c
lien
t
-
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
kbp
s -
clie
nt
to s
erve
r
Server to Client 11.87 1.89 6.12 24.60
Client to Server 2.19 0.46 0.84 6.90
Demo Customer Lowest Customer DNA Average Highest Customer
Real-Life Comparison
Why is this Customer scoring twice the average?
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
7 am. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 pm.
Typical Working Day
Net
wo
rk U
tiliz
atio
n (
KB
PS
)
Demand from Normal Users Demand from 'Heavy' Users
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
7 am. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 pm.
Typical Working Day
Net
wo
rk U
tiliz
atio
n (
KB
PS
)
Demand from Normal Users Demand from 'Heavy' Users
How to Optimize Network Utilization
High Before DNA
Low After DNA
Why are Users making Complete Backups every 5 minutes ?
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Hour of the (working) Day
avg
kilo
bit
s p
er s
eco
nd
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Co
mp
ress
ion
Rat
io
% Compression June 2006 August 2006
How to Reduce Network Traffic?
After DNA
Before DNA
Enabled Network Compression on the
Notes Clients
Spot Unwanted System Activity
Am
ster
dam
Bar
anqu
illa
Bot
lek
Dur
ban
Eur
opoo
rtG
othe
nbor
gH
ambu
rg
Hou
ston
Lond
on
Mia
mi
Roi
ssy
Rou
en
Sao
Pau
lo
Sin
gapo
re
Tee
ssid
e
Unk
now
n Am
sterdam
Baranquilla
Basel
Dordrecht
Dusseldorf
Fujairah
Guaquil
Helsinki
Le Havre
Mexico C
ityP
uerto Cabello
Rotterdam
Sandefjord
Shangha
iS
ydneyT
erneuzenV
laardingen
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
replication traffic (kb)
source server location destination server location
Replication topology
Excessive Replication Activity>> use Fact Sheet to Eliminate
Did the Project Affect our Environment?
Country 2007 2005 Change 2007 2005 Change 2007 2005 Change 2007 2005 Change
Argentina 46 34 35% 2,001 1,426 40% 34 24 42% 44 42 4%Australia 59 39 51% 2,476 1,430 73% 17 24 -29% 42 37 14%Austria 14 17 -18% 249 158 58% 11 7 57% 18 9 91%Belgium 5 7 -29% 199 189 5% 12 3 300% 40 27 48%Brazil 3 7 -57% 42 1,136 -96% 4 7 -43% 14 162 -91%Canada 139 113 23% 758 3,392 -78% 47 36 31% 5 30 -82%Chile 4 2 100% 116 68 71% 12 1 1100% 29 34 -15%Columbia 1 - 50 - 1 - 50 Czech Republic 54 53 2% 1,097 1,444 -24% 38 36 6% 20 27 -25%France 580 417 39% 8,845 13,287 -33% 321 110 192% 15 32 -52%Germany 408 385 6% 8,211 3,832 114% 121 123 -2% 20 10 102%Hungary 61 40 53% 469 2,238 -79% 41 22 86% 8 56 -86%Italy 170 146 16% 1,185 1,984 -40% 60 58 3% 7 14 -49%Japan 5 - 145 - 3 - 29 - Mexico 77 70 10% 1,251 1,036 21% 33 32 3% 16 15 10%Monaco 179 167 7% 6,548 7,734 -15% 112 68 65% 37 46 -21%Netherlands 137 97 41% 1,450 1,713 -15% 62 46 35% 11 18 -40%Poland 182 162 12% 1,910 1,853 3% 95 58 64% 10 11 -8%Portugal 9 7 29% 208 61 241% 8 4 100% 23 9 166%Puerto Rico 24 17 41% 390 2,767 -86% 18 11 64% 16 163 -90%Romania 46 38 21% 781 1,534 -49% 27 23 17% 17 40 -58%Singapore 11 205 - 7 - 19 - Slovakia 21 18 17% 130 413 -69% 19 13 46% 6 23 -73%Spain 481 401 20% 2,043 2,355 -13% 160 140 14% 4 6 -28%Switzerland 94 20 370% 1,386 184 653% 49 10 390% 15 9 60%United Arab Emirates 42 25 68% 362 319 13% 35 16 119% 9 13 -32%United Kingdom 423 401 5% 2,425 3,866 -37% 189 172 10% 6 10 -41%USA 1,324 840 58% 9,392 17,013 -45% 716 377 90% 7 20 -65%
Total 4,598 3,524 30% 2,251 1,422 58% 12 22 -43%
kbps / userActive Users Network Bandwidth Consumption Concurrent Sessions
More users Consume Less Network Despite more Activity Overall Savings
Root Cause Analysis for Instability
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9 11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 8
10
12
14
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9
17
19
21
23 1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23 1 3 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 0 2 4 6 8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6
November December
Available Memory
Every hour in the past 36 days
Memory Leaks
Detailed Shopping List for New Hardware
TYPE 1 LIGHT xSeries 346 - 2 x 3.0 Ghz 2MB CACHE, 2GB mem, 2 x 73 GB 10K & 4 x 73GB 15K, remote management884015G 8840-15Y x346, Xeon 3.0GHz/800MHz, 2MB L2, 2x512MB, O/Bay U320, 625W p/s, Rack 125R8902 Intel Xeon EM64T 3.0GHz/800 MHz 2MB L2 cache, Processor 173P2865 2 x 512MB PC2-3200 ECC DDR2 SDRAM RDIMM Kit 190P1305 IBM 73.4 GB Hot-Swap U320 10K SCSI SSL Drive 290P1319 IBM 73.4 GB Hot-Swap U320 15 K SCSI SSL Drive 471P8642 IBM ServeRAID 7k Adapter Option 173P9341 IBM Remote Supervisor Adapter II SlimLine 126K5098 IBM xSeries 625W Hot-Swap Power Supply 1
TYPE 2 HEAVY xSeries 365 - 4 x 22 Ghx, 3 GB mem, 2 x 73 GB 10K & 4 x 146GB 10K, remote managementT24RXEU 8862-4RX x365, Xeon MP 2.2GHz/400MHz, 2MB, 2GB, Open Bay, 950W p/s, Rack 113N0712 2.2GHz/400MHz-2MB L3 Cache Xeon Processor MP 333L5038 512MB PC2100 CL2.5 ECC DDR SDRAM RDIMM 290P1305 IBM 73.4 GB Hot-Swap U320 10K SCSI SSL Drive 290P1306 IBM 146.8 GB Hot-Swap U320 10K SCSI SSL Drive 402R0988 IBM ServeRAID-6M SCSI Controller (256MB Cache) 159P2986 Remote Supervisor Adapter II 173P7214 IBM 950W H/Swap Power Supply 1
T24RXEU 8862-4RX x365, Xeon MP 2.2GHz/400MHz, 2MB, 2GB, Open Bay, 950W p/s, Rack 113N0712 2.2GHz/400MHz-2MB L3 Cache Xeon Processor MP 333L5038 512MB PC2100 CL2.5 ECC DDR SDRAM RDIMM 290P1305 IBM 73.4 GB Hot-Swap U320 10K SCSI SSL Drive 290P1319 IBM 73.4 GB Hot-Swap U320 15 K SCSI SSL Drive 402R0988 IBM ServeRAID-6M SCSI Controller (256MB Cache) 159P2986 Remote Supervisor Adapter II 173P7214 IBM 950W H/Swap Power Supply 1
Two type of Domino servers to be Deployed Worldwide: light and heavy servers.
DNA Produces detailed Sizing Parameters
DNA ROI Examples
Multi National Objective: Server Consolidation Scope: 25K+ Users, 300+ Locations DNA came with 3 Consolidation Scenarios
Summary of Findings: High Number of Admins (300 should be 12) Network Compression not Implemented (40%) Unused Databases (up to 80%) Overcapacity in Server Park (66%) Excessive Demand Profiles for 600 users (1.8% of total) Excessive Replication of System DB’s(20% total WAN
Traffic) Excessive Mail File Sizes (70% of total storage > 500 MB)
Typical Engagement & Planning
Day 1 Requirements Gathering: In preparation to DNA Data Collection Scope / Focus / Information transfer
Day 8 DNA Data Collection One Day, One Administrator, One Workstation
Day 9 Processing and Analysis Off-Site, performed in data warehouse at Trust Factory TF Experts Interpret DNA Results, tailored to customer objectives
Day 22 Management Briefing Present Findings & Recommendations to Management & Staff Make Results Available Electronically
2 hours 1 day
7 days 14 days
2 hours
Presentationand Reports
Processingand Analysis
Data collectionat customer site
Requirements Gathering
scopeOperated as a Service;
No software installation
DNA Engagements thru IBM are Simple, Fast, Reliable & Proven
DNA Deliverables
Management Presentation DNA Analysis Results Interpreted by TF Experts Tailored to each Specific Customer Assignment Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations relevant to
Scope & Objectives
Supporting Fact Sheets Pre-formatted Spreadsheets Actionable Facts for Follow Up Activities Made Available Electronically
Introduction DNA® DNA is Operated as a Service
¬Customer/Partner uses DNA Collector Requirements:
¬ Single Workstation, Windows XP, Notes R6/R7¬ Default Log Settings on Servers
¬Read access on log, names, catalog, statrep¬ No Access Needed on Applications or Mail files
Footprint / Capacity:¬ Unlimited Nr of Users (tested with 100K+ users)¬ No User Interruption¬ Fast (collection is ready within 24 hrs)
¬No deployment of software on servers (!)
Typical Consolidation Process Identify Existing User & System Activities Deployment Details & Checks Spot Optimization Opportunities Calculate Consolidation Potential Identify Project Risks Server Placement, Sizing & Shopping List
Typical Root Cause Analysis Identify Existing User & System Activities Deployment Integrity Checks Server Platform Health Checks Spot Anomalies & Bottlenecks Management Briefing