CLINICAL TIP

ABSTRACT

Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fracture: The Crucial Starting Point and Minimizing Complications

THE ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL AT HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL42

Michael Aynardi, MD1,2

Kempland C. Walley BS1

Jacob M. Wisbeck MD2

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State Hershey Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA

2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital. Baltimore, MD

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Michael C. Aynardi, MDPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center30 Hope Drive, EC089P.O. Box 859Hershey, PA 17033Phone: (717) 531-4801Fax: (717) 531-0498maynardi@pennstatehealth.psu.edu

©2019 by The Orthopaedic Journal at Harvard Medical School

The authors report no conflict of interest related to this work.

Intramedullary screw fixation of the fifth metatarsal for metaphyseal-diaphyse-

al and diaphyseal fractures results in improved time to bony union, faster return

to sport, and lower rates of repeat fracture compared to nonoperative treatment

with immobilization. Although excellent outcomes have been described, compli-

cations may still occur.

In this technical tip, the authors present a technique for reproducibly achieving

the correct entry point for intramedullary screw fixation of a Jones Fracture, facil-

itating proper trajectory during guidewire insertion, and safely guiding wire pas-

sage in cases of a sclerotic fracture site.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V Expert Opinion

KEYWORDS Jones fracture, fifth metatarsal fracture, intramedullary screw fixation, foot fracture, surgical complications, foot surgery technique

Intramedullary screw fixation of the fifth metatarsal for metaphyseal-diaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures results in improved time to union, faster return to sport, and lower rates of repeat fracture compared to nonoperative management with immobili-zation.2,3,7,11,13 For these reasons, this technique has become the standard of care when these fractures are treated surgically.

Although excellent outcomes have been described,2 complications still occur. Non-union, refracture, symptomatic hardware, and sural nerve injury are the most frequent complications following intramedullary screw fixation.4,6,15 Authors have described several techniques to minimize the risk of these complications including the utilization of larger diameter screws, passage of threads distal to the fracture site, percutaneous placement of pointed reduction forceps, and ensuring the proper entry point with correct trajectory within the medullary canal.3,10,13

A commonly cited technical article describes the “high and inside” guidewire starting point for optimal screw positioning.7,10 While the “high and inside” mantra is often repeat-ed to orthopaedic trainees, achieving this position may still be difficult. Improper entry can result in refracture, delayed union or non-union,6,15 or surgical injury to the lateral dorsal cutaneous nerve.5

It is important to appreciate certain osseous characteristics—specifically the size, shape, and cortical quality—when performing surgical fixation of the fifth metatarsal. Failure to note the natural curvature of the bone may impede guidewire placement and lead to intraoperative com-plications. The width of the canal should be measured on the anteroposterior (AP) view of the foot, as the oblique image may lead to overestimation of the canal width. Improper measurement may result in compromise of the lateral cortex by the screw or drill and may precipitate fracture development. In addition, the fracture site may be sclerotic, depending upon the timing of injury and etiology of the fracture. Sclerosis can make passage of the guidewire difficult.

Volume 20 June 2019 43

Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fracture

In this clinical tip, the authors present a technique for re-producibly achieving the correct entry point for the guidewire, facilitating proper trajectory during guidewire insertion, and safely guiding the passage of the wire in cases of a sclerotic fracture site.

STARTING POINT TECHNIQUE

The authors generally perform fixation of fifth metatarsal frac-tures without the use of tourniquet as the tourniquet can precip-itate ischemia to tissues, muscular injury, leg pain, neurovascu-lar injury, and postoperative bleeding.1,8,9,12,14 However, surgeons may elect to utilize a tourniquet in order to improve visualization. After prepping and draping, the foot is positioned on the C-arm and a true AP image is obtained. The guidewire is placed over the center of the intramedullary canal and marked on the skin. It is important to note that the intramedullary canal of the fifth meta-tarsal is more medial than it appears on surface anatomy. Pressing the wire against the foot may help to achieve appropriate align-ment (Figure 1A).

Many technical descriptions emphasize establishing the posi-tion of the guidewire on the oblique view.7 However, the authors

recommend against the use of the oblique view for this purpose. The canal is narrowest on the AP imaging, and this measurement is representative of the true width of the canal. A lateral radio-graph is then performed, and the guidewire is centered on the fifth metatarsal with its trajectory marked on the skin. Ensuring that the guidewire is centered on the AP and lateral views is paramount for achieving the correct trajectory of the screw.

At this point, there are two lines drawn on the skin. Next, the lateral view is used to mark a point 1 cm proximal to the fifth metatarsal base, and a 1-cm skin incision is made proxi-mally to this mark but along the lateral line. This incision en-sures that soft tissue will not resist guidewire positioning. Blunt dissection is utilized to protect the peroneus brevis and sural nerve (Figure 1A-E).

The guidewire is inserted utilizing the AP view of the foot as the surgeon and assistant ensure that the path of the guidewire is paralleling the lines drawn. Depending on patient anatomy, it may be beneficial to freehand the wire onto the start point because the lateral foot may impede optimal positioning of the wire driver (Figure 1E). Radiographs are performed to ensure a central location in the AP and lateral views. The wire should be driven up to but not past the fifth metatarsal curvature to avoid risk of cortical penetration.

Guidewire placed over fifth metatarsal shaft on image intensifier (A); position of guidewire on the true AP radiograph (B); guidewire placed atop the skin over the canal of the fifth metatarsal preparing for a lateral radiograph (C); lateral radiograph demonstrating the position (D); freehand insertion of the guidewire following the marking drawn at the beginning of the case (E).

FIGURE 1

A. B. C.

D. E.

THE ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL AT HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL44

Aynardi et al.

FREEHAND DRILLING TECHNIQUE

The use of a freehand drilling technique can aid in passing the guidewire beyond a sclerotic fracture site while ensuring that the wire passes centrally within the fifth metatarsal canal. For this technique, the start point is determined as previously described. However, the guidewire is only inserted far enough to obtain the start point but not engage the sclerotic bone. Un-der fluoroscopy, the drill is advanced along the proper trajectory up to and across the fracture site, opening the canal (Figure 2). The guidewire is then inserted through the drill and safely be-yond the fracture site (Figure 3). Its position is confirmed on two fluoroscopic views, and the screw is measured, tapped, and inserted (Figures 4 and 5).

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary fixation of Jones’ fractures can result in improved patient outcomes in athletic populations,2,6,11 but avoiding complications is paramount. The majority of intra-operative complications result, either directly or indirectly, from improper starting point and poor screw trajectory.7

The technical pearls in this article have helped the authors to avoid these complications, and these techniques may result in improved component alignment, decreased surgical time, and improved surgical technique for resident and fellow or-thopaedic trainees.

Radiograph demonstrating sclerosis of the fracture site. The drill was advanced using a freehand technique.

FIGURE 2

After drilling past the fracture site, the guidewire is placed through the cannulated drill and the distal aspect of the metatarsal is predrilled.

FIGURE 3 The fracture and metatarsal shaft are tapped with a standard screw tap before screw insertion.

FIGURE 4

Volume 20 June 2019 45

Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fracture

REFERENCES

1. Bogdan Y, Helfet DL. Use of Tourniquets in Limb Trauma Sur-gery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2018 Apr;49(2):157-165.

2. Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth meta-tarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun;(315):238-41.

3. DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fracture of the fifth metatar-sal. Am J Sports Med. 1983 Sep-Oct;11(5):349-53.

4. Donley BG, McCollum MJ, Murphy GA, Richardson EG. Risk of sural nerve injury with intramedullary screw fixation of fifth metatar-sal fractures: a cadaver study. Foot ankle Int. 1999 Mar;20(3):182-4.

5. Fansa AM, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. The lateral dorsal cutaneous branch of the sural nerve: clinical importance of the surgical approach to proximal fifth metatarsal fracture fixa-tion. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):1895-8.

6. Glasgow MT, Naranja RJJ, Glasgow SG, Torg JS. Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: the Jones fracture. Foot ankle Int. 1996 Aug;17(8):449-57.

7. Den Hartog BD. Fracture of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jul;17(7):458-64.

8. Horlocker TT, Hebl JR, Gali B, Gali B, Jankowski CJ, Burkle CM, Berry DJ, Zepeda FA, Stevens SR, Schroeder DR. Anesthetic, patient, and surgical risk factors for neurologic complications af-ter prolonged total tourniquet time during total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):950-5.

9. McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Tourniquet safety: preventing skin inju-ries. Surg Technol. 2002;34(8):6-15.

10. Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):171-80.

11. Quill GEJ. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;26(2):353-61.

12. Sharma JP, Salhotra R. Tourniquets in orthopedic surgery. In-dian J Orthop. 2012 Jul;46(4):377-83.

13. Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical man-agement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Feb;66(2):209-14.

14. Wilgis EF. Observations on the effects of tourniquet ischemia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971 Oct;53(7):1343-6.

15. Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt RSJ, Nuber GW. Refrac-ture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;28(5):732-6.

Oblique postoperative views after solid screw insertion (A); AP postoperative view after screw insertion (B).

FIGURE 5

A. B.