international generic indicators second public...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 2
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
Welcome to the public consultation on the second draft of the FSC International Generic Indicators (IGIs) (FSCSTD01004 D20). The following instructions will help you complete the online survey. Please read them before you begin. • Read the Indicators Drafting Rules included in the preamble of the IGIs (FSCSTD01004 D20). • Provide accurate information about yourself. If you are an FSC member, please tell us which subchamber you belong to. • You do not have to complete the survey in one sitting. You can save your answers by clicking the ‘Next’ button, and then click the ‘Exit’ button to quit the survey. • It is also possible to change your responses by clicking the 'Back' button. • Where you have no opinion to provide for a particular IGI or section, please skip that section and continue filling in the rest of the survey. • When you have finished, click the ‘Done’ button. Please note that all comments made in the survey may be made publicly available, but they will not be directly attributed to the person who made them. Visit the IGI website for the IGIs Draft 20 at igi.fsc.org
2. Instructions for completing the survey
Page 4
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
2. Tell us about yourself
3. Select your region.
4. Part 1
*Full Name
Country
Email
*
4. Select what type of organization you belong to.*
North America
nmlkj
Latin America
nmlkj
Europe
nmlkj
CIS Countries
nmlkj
Africa
nmlkj
Asia Pacific
nmlkj
FSC Certificate Holder
nmlkj
FSC Accredited Certification Body
nmlkj
FSC Network Partner
nmlkj
Standards Development Group
nmlkj
Not for profit organization
nmlkj
For profit organization (Industry, company or corporation)
nmlkj
Government or local authority
nmlkj
University or Academic Institution
nmlkj
None
nmlkj
Page 6
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
6. FSC Membership
8. Are you an FSC Member? *
Yes
nmlkj
No
nmlkj
Page 8
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
8. Subchamber Information
10. Which subchamber are you a member of? *
Economic North
nmlkj
Economic South
nmlkj
Environmental North
nmlkj
Environmental South
nmlkj
Social North
nmlkj
Social South
nmlkj
Page 10
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
12. What is the legal or registered name of your organization or company?
10. Organizational Information
13. Are you the designated representative of your organization? *
Yes
nmlkj
No
nmlkj
Page 12
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
16. Do you belong to a National Office or Regional Office?
12. National Office or Regional Office
*
National Office
nmlkj
Regional Office
nmlkj
Page 14
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
18. Was your feedback chamber balanced?
14. Membership Chambers (Economic, Environmental, and Social)
*
Yes
nmlkj
No
nmlkj
Page 16
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
20. Please select your national office
16. National Offices
Australia
nmlkj
Belgium
nmlkj
Bolivia
nmlkj
Brazil
nmlkj
Canada
nmlkj
Chile
nmlkj
Czech Republic
nmlkj
Denmark
nmlkj
Ecuador
nmlkj
Estonia
nmlkj
Finland
nmlkj
France
nmlkj
Germany
nmlkj
Guatemala
nmlkj
Honduras
nmlkj
Ireland
nmlkj
Japan
nmlkj
Latvia
nmlkj
Luxembourg
nmlkj
Netherlands
nmlkj
Nicaragua
nmlkj
Peru
nmlkj
Poland
nmlkj
Portugal
nmlkj
Russia
nmlkj
Spain
nmlkj
Sweden
nmlkj
Switzerland
nmlkj
United Kingdom
nmlkj
United States
nmlkj
Page 18
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
22. Please select your Regional Office
18. Regional Offices
FSC Asia Pacific
nmlkj
FSC Africa
nmlkj
FSC Latin America
nmlkj
FSC Europe
nmlkj
FSC CIS Countries
nmlkj
Page 20
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
24. Which chamber(s) are represented in the feedback?
20. Membership Chambers II (Economic, Environmental, and Social)
*
Economic
gfedc
Environmental
gfedc
Social
gfedc
Page 22
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
22. Part 2
Page 23
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
Please let us know which version you used for this consultation.
26. Which version of the International Generic Indicators (IGIs) did you utilize for this consultation? (Check all that apply)
23. IGI Second Draft
FSCSTD01004 D20 EN FSC International Generic Indicators
gfedc
FSCSTD01004 D20 EN FSC International Generic Indicators with Notes
gfedc
Page 26
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
28. Criterion 1.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
26. Principle 1
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 27
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation29. Criterion 1.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
30. Criterion 1.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 28
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation31. Criterion 1.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
32. Criterion 1.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.4.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 29
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation33. Criterion 1.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
34. Criterion 1.7 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.7.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.7.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.7.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 30
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation35. Criterion 1.8 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
36. Please provide your general comments for Principle 1. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 1.8.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 1.8.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 36
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
46. Criterion 2.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
28. Principle 2
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.1.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 37
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation47. Criterion 2.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.2.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 38
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation48. Criterion 2.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.3.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.3.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 39
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation49. Criterion 2.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
50. Criterion 2.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.4.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.4.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 40
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation51. Criterion 2.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
52. Please provide your general comments for Principle 2 e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 2.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 2.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 46
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
60. Criterion 3.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
30. Principle 3
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 47
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation61. Criterion 3.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
62. Criterion 3.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.2.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 48
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation63. Criterion 3.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
64. Criterion 3.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.5.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 49
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation65. Criterion 3.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
66. Please provide your general comments for Principle 3. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 3.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 3.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 54
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
74. Criterion 4.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
32. Principle 4
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 55
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation75. Criterion 4.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
76. Criterion 4.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.2.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 56
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation77. Criterion 4.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
78. Criterion 4.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 57
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation79. Criterion 4.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
80. Criterion 4.7 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.6.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.7.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.7.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.7.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 58
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation81. Criterion 4.8 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
82. Please provide your general comments for Principle 4. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 4.8.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.8.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 4.8.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 62
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation88. Criterio 4.6 Para cada IGI, por favor indique que áspectos necesitan ser mejorados:
89. Criterio 4.7 Para cada IGI, por favor indique que áspectos necesitan ser mejorados:
auditabilidadaplicabilidad
globalclaridad
abordaje de la EIR
aplicabilidad para SLIMF
el indicador es bueno
Indicador 4.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.6.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
auditabilidadaplicabilidad
globalclaridad
abordaje de la EIR
aplicabilidad para SLIMF
el indicador es bueno
Indicador 4.7.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.7.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.7.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Page 63
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation90. Criterio 4.8 Para cada IGI, por favor indique que áspectos necesitan ser mejorados:
91. Por favor, proporcione sus comentarios generales para el Principio 4 aquí. ¿Hay algún requisito en alguno de los criterios que no haya sido abordado por el conjunto de indicadores correspondiente?
auditabilidadaplicabilidad
globalclaridad
abordaje de la EIR
aplicabilidad para SLIMF
el indicador es bueno
Indicador 4.8.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.8.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
Indicador 4.8.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Utilize el cuadro de cometarios para sugerir una redacción alternativa para el indicador.
55
66
55
66
Page 64
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
92. Criterion 5.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
34. Principle 5
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 5.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 65
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation93. Criterion 5.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
94. Criterion 5.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 5.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.6 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.2.7 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 5.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 66
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation95. Criterion 5.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
96. Criterion 5.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
97. Please provide your general comments for Principle 5. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 5.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 5.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 5.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 70
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
104. Criterion 6.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
36. Principle 6
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 71
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation105. Criterion 6.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
106. Criterion 6.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 72
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation107. Criterion 6.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
108. Criterion 6.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.4.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.4.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.5.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 73
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation109. Criterion 6.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.6.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.6.6 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 74
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation110. Criterion 6.7 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
111. Criterion 6.8 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.7.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.7.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.7.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.7.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.7.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.8.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.8.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 75
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation112. Criterion 6.9 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
113. Criterion 6.10 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
114. Please provide your general comments for Principle 6. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.9.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 6.9.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 6.10.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Please provide a short explanation of response.
55
66
Indicator 6.10.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Please provide a short explanation of response.
55
66
55
66
Page 82
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
126. Criterion 7.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
38. Principle 7
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 83
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation127. Criterion 7.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
128. Criterion 7.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
129. Criterion 7.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 84
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation130. Criterion 7.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
131. Criterion 7.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
132. Please provide your general comments for Principle 7. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 7.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 7.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 88
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
140. Criterion 8.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
40. Principle 8
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 8.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 89
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation141. Criterion 8.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
142. Criterion 8.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 8.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 8.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 90
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation143. Criterion 8.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
144. Criterion 8.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
145. Please provide your general comments for Principle 8. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 8.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 8.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.5.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 8.5.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 94
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
152. Criterion 9.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
42. Principle 9
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 9.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 95
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation153. Criterion 9.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
154. Criterion 9.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 9.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.2.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.2.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 9.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 96
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation155. Criterion 9.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
156. Please provide your general comments for Principle 9. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 9.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.4.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.4.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 9.4.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 100
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
For this Second Public Consultation, the feedback we are seeking is whether you think the IGIs suggested for each criterion include all the measures necessary to verify compliance with that criterion. In addition to this, and to answer concerns expressed in the first consultation, we also want to know for each IGI which of the following aspects need to be improved: • auditability (the indicator is SMART – Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant and Tangible); • global applicability (the indicator is generic, can be adapted to different forest types, legislation, etc.); • clarity (easily understandable); • addressing SIR (the indicator addresses the Scale, Intensity and Risk concept, together with the Notes developed for the indicator). *Applicable only in Criteria where SIR is mentioned. • SLIMFs applicability (the indicator can be applied to smallholders, low intensity forests, local communities, groups, indigenous people) • the indicator is good (no amendments are needed for this indicator). It is also possible to provide feedback for any IGI by writing in the comments box below it. It is especially helpful if you can suggest alternative wording for an IGI. Please be as specific as possible. There is also a comments box at the end of each Principle for Criterionlevel feedback.
162. Criterion 10.1 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
44. Principle 10
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.1.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.1.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 101
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation163. Criterion 10.2 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
164. Criterion 10.3 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
165. Criterion 10.4 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.2.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.2.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.3.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.3.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.3.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.4.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 102
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation166. Criterion 10.5 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
167. Criterion 10.6 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.5.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.6.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.6.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.6.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.6.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 103
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation168. Criterion 10.7 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.7.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.7.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.7.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.7.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.7.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.7.6 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 104
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation169. Criterion 10.8 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
170. Criterion 10.9 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.8.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.8.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.8.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.8.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.8.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.9.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.9.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 105
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation171. Criterion 10.10 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
172. Criterion 10.11 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.10.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.10.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.11.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.11.2 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.11.3 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.11.4 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.11.5 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Indicator 10.11.6 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
Page 106
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation173. Criterion 10.12 For each IGI, please indicate which aspects need improvement:
174. Please provide your general comments for Principle 10. e.g. Are there any criterion requirements not addressed by its set of indicators?
auditabilityglobal
applicabilityclarity addressing SIR
SLIMFs applicability
the indicator is good
Indicator 10.12.1 gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc
Use the comments box to suggest alternative wording for the indicator.
55
66
55
66
Page 114
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
188. Do you have any other remarks in addition to your responses and comments above?
46. General Comments
55
66
Page 116
International Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public ConsultationInternational Generic Indicators Second Public Consultation
We appreciate your participation, which will help us develop better IGIs. Le agradecemos su participación. Ésta nos ayudará a desarrollar mejores IGI.
48. Thank you! Gracias!