interlocking directorates and anti-competitive risks ? an enforcement gap in europe ?
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks
An Enforcement Gap in Europe?Florence Thépot (Glasgow, D&C)
Florian Hugon (D&C)Mathieu Luinaud (D&C)
CRESSE CONFERENCERhodes - 2 July 2016
![Page 2: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
• US: Section 8 Clayton Act prohibits interlocking directorates between competitors
• The practice of interlocking directorates is the root of many evils. It offends laws human and divine. Applied to rival corporations, it tends to the suppression of competition and to violation of the Sherman law. Applied to corporations which deal with each other, it tends to disloyalty and to violation of the fundamental law that no man can serve two masters(Brandeis, 1914)
• “the Small World of Corporate Governance”/ “cooperative capitalism’
![Page 3: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
DIRECTINDIRECT
NETWORK
Types of interlocks
![Page 4: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Key facts & trends
• Continental Europe v. Anglo-American countries• Type of capitalism, Liberal or coordinated market economies, Role of the banks
etc.
• Since 1990s• Decline but persistance national corporate networks? • Banks, state, deregulation, internationalisation?
• Functions of corporate networks• Representation of investors, expertise, social elite…collusion
• Impact of interlocks on the value of the firm • Negative/Ambivalent (Prinz, 2006)
little information on intra-sectoral networks 4
![Page 5: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Kees van Veen & Jan Kratzer (2011)
![Page 6: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Overview of paper• Anti-competitive effects raised by interlocks• Coordinated and unilateral effects
• Corporate law & Corporate Governance • Italy, France
• EU Competition Law• EU Merger Control• Article 101 TFEU• Article 102 TFEU
6
![Page 7: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Anti-competitive effects• Coordinated effects• Information exchange• Density of corporate networks and cartel statistics (J. Connor)
• 52 firms convicted for anticompetitive practices• 17 German or French 37% of the international cartels• 9 US or UK firms 15 % of cartels
• Unilateral effects• Reduced rivalry
• Efficiency gains7
![Page 8: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Corporate law & Corporate Governance
• Italy• Protection of Competition and crossed structural links in the markets of banking
and finance (Law Decree No 201/2011)
• France• No more than 5 mandates to public limited companies (Code de Commerce)• Loi Macron (2015): no more than 3 mandates (listed companies)
• Principles of Corporate Governance • Independance and fiduciary duties• Generally non-binding & conflict of interest
Very limited solutions8
![Page 9: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EU competition law• EU Merger Regulation• Interlocking directorates part of the assessment
• Thyssen/Krupp; AXA/GRE and Allianz/AGF• Need of lasting change in control
• BUT: Does not apply to interlocks in distinction
• Article 101 TFEU• Agreement between undertakings?
• Nomination of board member• Concerted practice
• Information exchange: YES but in practice?
• Article 102 TFEU• Dominance as a pre-requisite• Unlikely to apply
9
![Page 10: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Summary Corp Gov Principles
Corporate Law
EU Merger Control
Article 101 Article 102
THEORY Yes Partially Yes Yes Not really
LIMITATIONS Not binding
Conflict interest
Only a few MS
3 or 5 is too much
Only if part of an acquisition
Agreement?
Private board discussion
Unilateral effects?
Dominance
10
![Page 11: Interlocking Directorates and Anti-Competitive Risks ? An Enforcement Gap in Europe ?](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022202/587ec3951a28abf37b8b593b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusion• Mind the gap!
• Does it matter?• Economic impact of interlocking directorates • Focus on ties between competitors
• Proxy for bigger issue? (corporate elite)
• How to remedy the enforcement gap• European ‘Section 8’• Member States through corporate laws
11