interdependence and the gains from trade
DESCRIPTION
Interdependence and the Gains from Trade. PRINCIPLE #5: Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off!. Superficial explanations for why there is trade. Heterogeneity in the conditions of production decreasing costs differences in tastes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Interdependence and the Gains from Trade
PRINCIPLE #5:Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off!
Superficial explanations for why there is trade
Heterogeneity in the conditions of production
decreasing costs differences in tastes
The Principle of Comparative Advantage is the deeper explanation for why there is specialization and trade.
A model of production showing the gains from trade
Assumptions: Gilligan and the Professor live on nearby islands. Initially each is self sufficient. Two goods: food and clothing Labor is the only input and technology is fixed. Each works 600 hours. Both are indifferent between the production
activities
Gilligan’s PPFfood clothing 0 600150 300200 200300 0
Professor’s PPFfood clothing 0 200 75 100100 66.67150 0
Production Technologies Output per unit of labor
Gilligan Professorac 1 unit of C 1/3 unit of Caf ½ unit of F ¼ unit of F
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Figure 2.aGilligan
Figure 2.bProfessor
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Figure 2.aGilligan
Figure 2.bProfessor
This model illustrates Principle 7:Standards of living are determined by
the productivity of labor.
Gilligan’s PPFfood clothing 0 600150 300200 200300 0
Gilligan’s opportunity cost of productionclothing: 1/2 unit of food per
unit of clothingfood: 2 units of clothing per unit of food
Production Technologies Output per unit of labor
Gilligan Professorac 1 unit of C 1/3 unit of Caf ½ unit of F ¼ unit of F
Production Technologies Output per unit of labor
Gilligan Professorac 1 unit of C 1/3 unit of Caf ½ unit of F ¼ unit of F
Opportunity Costs of Production
Gilligan Professor
clothing ½ unit of food perunit of clothing
¾ units of food perunit of clothing
food 2 units of clothingper unit of food
4/3 units of clothingper unit of food
The producer who can produce relatively more output using a given quantity of input(s) is said to have an absolute advantage.
Equivalently, the producer having the absolute advantage can produce a given level of output using the smallest quantity of inputs.
Production Technologies Output per unit of labor
Gilligan Professorac 1 unit of C 1/3 unit of Caf ½ unit of F ¼ unit of F
Opportunity Costs of Production
Gilligan Professor
clothing ½ unit of food perunit of clothing
¾ units of food perunit of clothing
food 2 units of clothingper unit of food
4/3 units of clothingper unit of food
The producer who has the lowest opportunity cost of production is said to have a comparative advantage.
Gilligan has a comparative advantage in the production of clothing.
The Professor has a comparative advantage in the production of food.
The concept of absolute advantage focuses on
the relative abilities of producers to transform
inputs into outputs.
The concept of comparative advantage
focuses on the relative abilities of producers to
substitute one output into another output.
Insight: Even if one producer has an absolute advantage in the production of every good, the producer cannot have a comparative advantage in the production of all goods.
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Figure 2.aGilligan
Figure 2.bProfessor
Example:Gilligan initially produces and consumes 200 units of F and 200 units of C (point a).The Professor only produces clothing and consumes the 200 units (point a’).
a a’
Opportunity Costs of Production
Gilligan Professor
clothing ½ unit of food perunit of clothing
¾ units of food perunit of clothing
food 2 units of clothingper unit of food
4/3 units of clothingper unit of food
Gilligan, proposes that he specialize in the production of clothing (produce less food) and that the Professor specialize in the production of food, in order for them to exploit their comparative advantages.
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Figure 2.aGilligan
Figure 2.bProfessor
Gilligan proposes that he will give the professor 250 units of C in exchange for the Professor giving Gilligan 150 units of F.
a a’
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
250 250
a
b
c
a’
b’
c’
Figure 4.aGilligan
Figure 4.bProfessor
Changes in the Professor’s situation
production exchangenet change inconsumption
units of clothing -200 +250 +50units of food +150 -150 0
Changes in Gilligan’s situation
production exchangenet change inconsumption
units of clothing +300 -250 +50units of food -150 +150 0
Opportunity Costs of Production
Gilligan Professor
clothing ½ unit of food perunit of clothing
¾ units of food perunit of clothing
food 2 units of clothingper unit of food
4/3 units of clothingper unit of food
Through specialization and trade, each individuals, regions and countries can consume more than it is able to produce.
How can this be?
Trade allows each producer to specialize in the production of that good for which he (it) has a comparative advantage (i.e., lower opportunity cost) and trade for desired units of other goods.
250 units of C were exchanged for 150 units of F.
5/3 units of C was exchanged for each on unit of F.
one unit of C was exchanged for 3/5 units of F. The terms of trade measure the number of
units of one good that must be given up in exchange for each additional unit of the other.
Opportunity Costs of Production Gilligan Professor
clothing
½ unit of F per unit of C
¾ units of F per unit of C
food
2 units of C per unit of F
4/3 units of C per unit of F
Terms of trade in example: One unit of food can be traded for 5/3 units of clothing. One unit of clothing can be traded for 3/5ths of a unit of food.
Gilligan: His opportunity cost of producing a unit of food is 2 clothing units. His opportunity cost of trading for a unit of food is 5/3 units of clothing. Gilligan has an incentive to obtain food through trade because it is less costly.
The Professor: His opportunity cost of producing a unit of clothing is ¾ food units. His opportunity cost of trading for a unit of clothing is 2/3 food units. It is less costly for the Professor to obtain clothing through trade.
Note that trade will be mutually beneficial for any of a range of values for the terms of trade.
Gilligan and the Professor will find trade advantageous as long as the terms of trade are between 2 units of clothing per unit of food and 4/3 units of clothing per unit of good or, equivalently, between 1/2 and ¾ units of food per unit of clothing.
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Figure 2.aGilligan
Suppose Gilligan is initially self sufficient, producing and consuming the output combination at “a”.
He has the opportunity to trade F and C in a barter market where the exchange rate is 5/3 units of C for each unit of F.
Can he do better than produce and consume at “a”.
a
Opportunity cost of a unit of F in exchange: 5/3 C
Opportunity cost of a unit of F in production: 2 C
50 100 150 200 250 300
100
200
300
400
500
600
C
F
Gilligan’s production possibilities
Suppose Gilligan is initially self sufficient, producing and consuming the output combination at “a”.
He has the opportunity to trade F and C in a barter market where the exchange rate is 5/3 units of C for each unit of F.
Can he do better than produce and consume at “a”.
a
Opportunity cost of a unit of F in exchange: 5/3 C
Opportunity cost of a unit of F in production: 2 C
360
Gilligan’s consumption possibilities with trade
Specialization is beneficial when inputs are used to produce the goods and services for which they are relatively best suited (i.e., have a comparative advantage or, equivalently, relatively low opportunity cost). Such specialization is required for there to be production efficiency.
Gilligan’sProduction Possibilities
The Professor’sProduction Possibilities
Food Clothing Food Clothing0 600 0 200
150 300 75 100200 200 100 66.67300 0 150 0
Joint Production Possibilities
Food Clothing
A 0 800B 75 700C 150 600D 300 300E 450 0
200
400
600
800
100 200 300 400 50050 150 250 350 450
100
300
500
700
C
F
a
b
c
r
Figure 5