integrating knowledge for decision-making in the pantanal

32
Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal Wetland Area Celso Marcatto and Rob Jongman

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jan-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal Wetland Area

Celso Marcatto and Rob Jongman

Page 2: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

The Pantanal

Page 3: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Pantanal

• Savannah wetland of 320.000km2

• Situated in Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay• The economy and the ecology of the

region are dependent from the dynamics of the rivers, the floodpulses

Page 4: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

���������� ������

� ����� ����

� ����� ����

Page 5: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Economy: Cattle Breeding

Page 6: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Economy: Fishing

Page 7: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Biodiversity: Tuiuiu/Jabiru

Page 8: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Characteristics of the TaquariWatershed

• High Taquari River basin- East of the Pantanal: 28.000 km2

• Alluvial fan of Taquari: 50.000 km2

• Beef Cattle, Fishing and Ecotourism are the major economic activities of this region

Page 9: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Major problems in the Taquari:

• Increased erosion on the Planalto• Increased sedimentation of the river during

the last 30 years by fine silt• No pattern of flood and dry periods• Permanent flooding of nearly 11.000 km2

• Decline of fish populations, decline of fisheries, decline of income

• Decline in area for cattle breeding, farms abandoned and reduced river transport

Page 10: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Erosion in the Planalto

Page 11: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Avulsions (the river changes its bed)

Page 12: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Permanent flooding in the Pantanal

Page 13: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Decline in fish populations, food and income

Page 14: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Main causes• Natural river processes • Land use changes and related vegetation

changes – Increased erosion and sediment transport– Changes in discharge patterns due to drainage– Changes in vegetation: increase in superficial and

subsurface flows

• Incorrect river management

Page 15: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Pantanal-Taquari Project

• Objective: Support the development of sustainable use in the Taquari basin, focusing on tools to facilitate policy decisions

Page 16: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Organisation

• A cooperation project of Wageningen UR, EMBRAPA, WL-Delft Hydraulics, ITC

• Support: Programa Pantanal• Funded by the Dutch programme Partners

for Water

Page 17: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

The Project Process

• Stakeholder meeting for problem analysis• Research on the physical, ecological,

land/water use and institutional aspects• Feedback to the stakeholders in finding in

solution development

Page 18: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Stakeholders and researchers discuss problems, causes and solutions

Page 19: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Who are the stakeholders

• National Authorities: the Pantanal is a world focus area for biodiversity and the words largest wetland

• State authorities: they are responsible for the management and sustainable use

• Farmers, fishers and tourist industry: they depend on it for their income

Page 20: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Problem analysis by stakeholders?

• Stakeholders have a good analysis of the problems within their timeframe and spatial context

• Problem analysis by stakeholders is biased by their position as farmer, fisherman or nature conservationist

• Stakeholders lack the insight in complex processes (climate, hydrology, geology, ecosystems)

Page 21: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Problem analysis by researchers?

• Researchers often tend to overlook local knowledge and human impacts

• Researchers have a bias related to their discipline

• Researchers know well the complex processes that occur in a river basin

• Researchers are mostly not interested in the implementation of results

Page 22: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

What knowledge is needed ?

• For integrated water management knowledge is needed on– The geological and recent history of the basin– The hydrological system– The ecological processes– The economy (partly on another scale)– The institutions (governance, stakeholders,

instruments)

Page 23: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

What does research deliver?

• Knowledge on functioning of the wetland system (physical process)

• Causes of actual and potential changes (link between physical process and present situation)

• Scenarios of consequences of changes (what does this mean for ecosystems and farmers)

• Economic and social valuation of changes (what is the importance for the region)

Page 24: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Hydrological changes

Page 25: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Water flow in Coxim after land use changes: 1974 (blue) and 1994 (orange): 30-40%

Page 26: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Impact of flooding on farms: inundated area

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

Faz2

2Faz

25Faz

4Fa

z23

Faz1

8Fa

z13

Faz1

0Fa

z7Fa

z19

Faz2

Faz3

Faz1

2Fa

z11

Faz5

Faz1

4Fa

z21

Faz6

Faz2

6Faz

17Fa

z9Fa

z8Fa

z15

Faz1

6Fa

z20

Faz1

Faz2

4

Fazendas

Áre

a (h

a)

Area (ha)

Area inundada

Page 27: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Who is the research client?

• Government, society and the stakeholders are the prime clients of applied research

• Cooperation between stakeholders and research requires: – Research to make research accessible for

stakeholders and the general public;– Stakeholders to understand the basic results

of the research done

Page 28: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Solutions

• Solutions are developed in cooperation between science and stakeholders

• Solutions can be organisational, spatial and technical

• Every solution has consequences that can be made visible because research results are available

Page 29: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Technical solution: building a dam in the Planalto

Page 30: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Consequences of a dam (the research results)

• Positive:– Reduce peak flooding in the Pantanal– Reduce sediment transport to the Pantanal

• Negative:– Probably further decline of fish en less income

for fisherman and tourism– No final solution to erosion problem – High costs

Page 31: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Spatial and organisational solution: replanting forest on the Planalto

• Positive:– Less flow of water due to evapotranspiration (15%)– Less erosion if planted along rivers– It is a cheap solution– It can enhance solidarity within the river basin

• Negative:– It requires (only) 10% of the area on the Planalto– The farmers on the Planalto need devices for water supply– It requires planning and supervision

• General: it requires organisation of water management

Page 32: Integrating Knowledge for Decision-making in the Pantanal

Conclusion:

• Joint problem statement by stakeholders and researchers is important

• Interaction between stakeholders and research in the analysis of problem is needed

• Research taking into account the problem analysis of the stakeholder has an added value, because it links research conclusions, solutions and its consequences