institute of real estate management november 15, 2013 austin, texas texas demographic...

37
Institute of Real Estate Management November 15, 2013 Austin, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends, Texas and Greater Austin

Upload: jonathan-carter

Post on 13-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

PowerPoint Presentation

Institute of Real Estate Management November 15, 2013Austin, TexasTexas Demographic Characteristics and Trends, Texas and Greater Austin1Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio. Growing States, 2000-201022000Population*2010Population*NumericalChange2000-2010PercentChange2000-2010United States 281,421,906308,745,53827,323,6329.7%Texas20,851,82025,145,5614,293,74120.6%California33,871,64837,253,9563,382,30810.0%Florida15,982,37818,801,3102,818,93217.6%Georgia8,186,4539,687,6531,501,20018.3%North Carolina 8,049,313 9,535,483 1,486,170 18.5%Arizona 5,130,632 6,392,017 1,261,385 24.6%Population values are decennial census counts for April 1 for 2000 and 2010.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 2000 and 2010 Census Count. 65% (2.8 million) of this change can be attributed to growth of the Hispanic populationTexas is the second largest state in terms of population (2nd to CA) and area (2nd to AK). In terms of number of people, Texas growth exceeds that of all other states between 2000 and 2010.2 Percent Change Due toYear*PopulationNumericalChangePercentChangeNaturalIncreaseNetMigration19507,711,194--------19609,579,6771,868,48324.293.916.09197011,196,7301,617,05316.986.7413.26198014,229,1913,032,46127.141.5858.42199016,986,5102,757,31919.965.8534.15200020,851,8203,865,31022.849.6550.35201025,145,5614,293,74120.654.9445.06201226,059,203 913,6423.652.0547.95* All values for the decennial dates are for April 1st of the indicated census year. Values for 2011 are for July 1 as estimated by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Source: Derived from U.S. Census Bureau Estimates for dates indicated by the Texas State Data Center, University of Texas at San Antonio.Note: Residual values are not presented in this table. Total Population and Components of Population Change in Texas, 1950-20123The components of change include natural increase (births-deaths) and net migration (in-out migration). In recent years, natural increase and net migration have contributed almost equally to Texas growth. Natural increase is much more predictable and stable than net migration. Net migration tends to fluctuate with economic factors. Between 2010 and 2012, Texas growth continues, but appears to have slowed some between 2011 and 2012. 3Total Estimated Population by County, 20124Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2012 Population EstimatesAlong and east of I-35: 40% of land 86% of population 92% of population growth (2011-2012)

The counties of Harris, Bexar, Dallas, Tarrant, and Travis are the most populated in the State. Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, Hidalgo, and El Paso counties also have significant population concentrations. Many counties west of Interstate 35 are more sparsely populated.4Change of the Total Population by County, 2000 to 20105Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 Census Counts

79 counties lost population over the decade175 counties gained population while 79 lost population over the decade.

5

Change of the Total Population by County, 2010 to 20126Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates, 2012 Vintage. 96 counties lost population over the two year period

Of counties that lost population90% had net out migration47% had natural declinePopulation change over the decade has been greatest in the urban and suburban population triangle counties. Counties in the lower Rio Grande Valley also had significant growth as did El Paso county. Overall, 175 counties gained population while 79 lost population over the decade.

6The 10 Fastest Growing Metro AreasIncrease from July 1, 2011, to July 1, 20127Percent Increase1.Midland, Texas4.62.Clarksville, Tenn.-Ky. 3.73.Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, Fla.3.64.The Villages, Fla.3.45.Odessa, Texas3.46.Jacksonville, N.C.3.37.Austin-Round Rock, Texas3.08.Casper, Wyo.3.09.Columbus, Ga.-Ala. 2.910.Manhattan, Kan.2.8Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012Eight Texas counties were among the top largest growth counties in the country. Harris country grew more than any other county in the country.

7The 10 Counties with the Largest Numeric Increase from July 1, 2011, to July 1, 20128NumericIncrease1.Harris, Texas80,0052.Los Angeles, Calif.73,7643.Maricopa, Ariz.73,6444.Dallas, Texas45,8275.San Diego, Calif.38,8806.King, Wash.35,8387.Travis, Texas34,3818.Orange, Calif.34,0179.Tarrant, Texas32,99710.Clark, Nev.32,833Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013Eight Texas counties were among the top largest growth counties in the country. Harris country grew more than any other county in the country.

8

Job Growth9Estimated domestic migration by county, 2000-201010Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, 2012. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center

This map demonstrates DOMESTIC, or internal, migration made up largely of persons who are citizens or legal residents of the United States. International migrants are not included on this map. Generally, western counties had U.S. residents and citizens moving out and the areas around urban cores had U.S. residents and citizens moving in. Note that Dallas and Harris county have net out domestic migration indicating that persons from these counties may be moving to more suburban adjacent counties.

10Estimated international migration by county, 2000-2010Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, March 19, 2009. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center11

This map demonstrates in migration of international migrants. Domestic migrants are not included on this map. It is estimated that international migrants made significant contributions to population growth in large urban counties and along the border. Note that Dallas and Harris counties experienced substantial international migration resulting in a positive net in-migration to those counties.

11

12http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2011/migration.htmlThis map from Forbes.com (www.forbes.com/special-report/2011/migration.html) illustrates migration flows for the selected county.12

13http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2011/migration.htmlThis map from Forbes.com (www.forbes.com/special-report/2011/migration.html) illustrates migration flows for the selected county.13Texas Racial and Ethnic Composition, 2000 and 2010Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 2000 and 2010 Census count As of the 2000 Census, about 53% of Texas population was non-Hispanic Anglo, about 32% where of Hispanic descent, about 11% where non-Hispanic African American, and about 4% were non-Hispanic Other. In 2010, it is estimated that about 45% of the Texas population was non-Hispanic Anglo, 38% of Hispanic descent, 11% were non-Hispanic African American, and about 6% were non-Hispanic Other (largely of Asian descent). 14Texas White (non-Hispanic) and Hispanic Populations by Age, 201015Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Decennial Census, SF1The age distribution of the non-Hispanic white population in Texas is weighted heavily with the baby boom generation. Largely the result of lower fertility and less net in-migration, the non-Hispanic white population has relatively fewer young persons relative to those in the middle-age years. In 2010, at ages 37 and younger, the Hispanic population exceeds the non-Hispanic white population.15Texas Population Pyramid by Race/Ethnicity, 201016Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Decennial Census, SF1This population pyramid represents the age, sex, race and ethnic composition of the Texas population. Blue represents males, red females, rows are single years of age, and shades represent specified race/ethnic groups as indicated in the legend. Note the inverted pyramid for the non-Hispanic White population and the presence of the baby boom while the Hispanic and African American population pyramids are characterized with wider bases (the young) relative to the peak (the old).16 17Median Housing Unit Value, Austin Area, Census Tracts, 2007-11 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007-11 5-year sample.

Median Household Income by County, 2005-2009Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample 2005-2009Median Household Income, Austin Area Census Tracts, 2007-201119Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

1920Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

Percent of Households with Annual Income Less than $10,000, Austin Area Census Tracts, 2007-2001120Percent of Households with Annual Income Greater than $200,000, Austin Area Census Tracts, 2007-2001121Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

21 Percent of population aged 25 years and older with Bachelors degree or higher. 2005-2009

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample 2005-2009Educational Attainment in Texas, 2011Level of Educational AttainmentPercent of persons aged 25 years and olderState RankingHigh school diploma or equivalency or greater81.1%48/49/50 (tied with CA and MS)Bachelors or greater26.4%2923Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, One-year Sample, 2011.Race/Ethnic Composition by Education Level in the Labor Force (aged 25 years and more), Texas, 200924Source: Derived from 2009 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates by the Office of the State Demographer.

Less Than High SchoolCollege and GreaterMean travel time (minutes) to work, Austin area Census Tracts, 2007-201125Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

Percent of the CLF employed in management, business, science, and arts, Census Tracts, 2007-201126Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

`26Percent of the CLF employed in natural resources, construction, and maintenance, Austin area Census Tracts, 2007-201127Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample, 2007-2011

Projected Population Growth in Texas, 2010-205028Source: Texas State Data Center 2012 Population Projections Projected Racial and Ethnic Percent, Texas, 2010-205029Source: Texas State Data Center 2012 Population Projections , 2000-2010 Migration ScenarioProjected Population Change, Texas Counties, 2010-205030Source: Texas State Data Center 2012 Population Projections . 2000-2010 Migration Scenario

Projected Percent Population Change, Texas Counties, 2010-205031

Source: Texas State Data Center 2012 Population Projections . 2000-2010 Migration Scenario

32

33

34

Source: New York Times 2011/05/01 Week in ReviewTeen Birth Rate by State, 201035Source: National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and PreventionRank State Birth rate per 1,000 women ages 15-191Mississippi552New Mexico52.93Arkansas52.54Texas52.25Oklahoma50.46Louisiana47.77Kentucky46.28District of Columbia45.49West Virginia44.810Alabama43.6Texas had the 3rd highest teen birth rate in 2006.

35

Demographics and Destiny36

Texas is growing with more people being added than in any other state we added 4 additional seats to our representation in the U.S. Congress.

Texas is becoming more urban. Many rural counties are losing population. Urbanized metropolitan areas have been growing dramatically over the decade.

Texas is becoming more diverse much of our growth is attributable to growth of the Hispanic population.

36Contact Office: (512) 463-8390 or (210) 458-6530Email: [email protected]: http://osd.state.tx.us

37Lloyd Potter, Ph.D.The Office of the State Demographer and the Texas State Data Center are committed to supporting your work through providing you with the best, most accurate, and objective information we can identify about our greatest asset, the people of Texas.

37