inspiring packaging recycling - conai · pay-as-you-throw (payt) system on residual household waste...

INSPIRINGPACKAGINGRECYCLING

FOREWORDS

“The foundations of EXPRA rest on the belief of delivering quality waste management services to all citizens, which are embedded in a sustainable and global waste management vision.

FOREWORDS

Today, within Europe and globally, the linear “take-make-waste” patterns

of production and consumption are considered to have had detrimental

effects in relation to climate change, resource efficiency and

environmental protection. The solution to these challenges is a circular

economy where resources are used in an efficient and sustainable way.

The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an essential part of this

approach which the European Commissioni has recognised in the

recently published Circular Economy Package.

The Extended Producer Responsibility Alliance (EXPRA) currently

embraces 25 members from 23 countries. These include 17 EU Member

States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland,

Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania,

Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden), Bosnia and Herzegovina,

Canada, Israel, Macedonia, Norway and Turkey. Every year, our members,

on behalf of the obliged industry, recover and recycle over 19 million tons

of packaging, and provide over 200 million inhabitants with packaging

collection, sorting and recycling infrastructure.

EXPRA’s members, owned and run by the obliged companies, offer

waste management solutions based on the EPR principle. In so doing,

they operate on a not-for-profit model since their activities are driven by

the industry’s public service mission of acting in a socially-responsible

manner. This allows EXPRA to deliver services of general economic

interest that are both cost and resource-efficient.

Over the past four years, EXPRA has become THE voice of EPR

schemes in Europe. Our organisation has been recognised as a key

stakeholder by the EU institutions, the obliged industry, business

associations and NGOs alike. Since 2013, EXPRA has developed studies

and position papers aimed at sharing expert knowledge with European

audiences, including policy-makers, in the field of both EPR and

packaging waste management.

This brochure explains EXPRA’s principles and values, its structure and

activities. It also provides key facts and figures relating to members’

activities as well as EPR best practice.

We would like to thank everyone involved in the production of this

publication, which, we hope, you will find of interest.

William VermeirPresident of EXPRA

Dr Joachim QuodenManaging Director EXPRA

EXPRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of EXPRA is made up of 8 representatives of the members and is responsible for the overall strategic direction of EXPRA and overseeing its operations to ensure they fulfill the obligations of the Mission of EXPRA:

‘To be the umbrella organisation of not-for-profit producer

responsibility organisations dealing with used, mainly

household, packaging which is owned by the obliged industry. It

aims to act as the authoritative voice and common policy

platform representing the interests of its member

organizations, and to run a network for the exchange of best

practices within its members. Finally, it is the promoter of the

EPR golden rules and works on the implementation of these

rules into European and national legislation.’

The members of the Board are elected for a 2 year period and

are led by a President and supported by the work of the

Managing Director, who is also member of the Board. The Board

receives updates from each of the work stream committees on

a regular basis to maintain full oversight of the developments

relating to the environments the members operate in.

“

PRESENTATION OF THE BOARD OF EXPRA

William VermeirFost Plus

Dr JoachimQuodenManaging DirectorEXPRA

Oscar MartinEcoEmbes

Valter FacciottoCONAI

Jaana RøineGrønt Punkt Norge

Zbynek KozelEKO-KOM

Bogdan UrecheEco-Rom Amblaje

Cees de Mol van OtterlooNedvang

Mario SchembriGreenpak

BEST PRACTICES FOR PACKAGING EPR

The of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is based on the

principle that so-called ‘obliged companies’ take responsibility

for the end-of-life management of the products they put on the

market. For (household) packaging, EPR ensures that the entire

packaging chain is optimized and that packaging is developed

in a more sustainable manner.

“Below you will find an outline for how EPR organisations can achieve the best environmental and economic results.

To achieve the best results – both economically and

environmentally — the EPR organisation should be owned by the

obliged companies and run on a not-for-profit basis. The table

below outlines what EXPRA considers as ten key principles for

EPR.

The essence of EPR is the producer’s responsibility for a product throughout its life cycle

PROs should be owned, run and steered by the obliged companies

1.

2.PROs should be not-for-profit / profit-not-for-distribution

Collectors, sorters or recyclers of waste should not be active as not be active as PROs but deliver good services

3.

4.There should be a strong EPR legal framework enforced by public authorities

Successful EPR must be based on a partnership between public authorities and PROs

5.

6.There should be a level playing field for the provision of EPR services in a given territory

Obliged companies should receive equal treatment and fees should be publicly available

7.

8.The industry-owned PROs arepursuing a public service mission

PROs should support obliged companies to improve the environmental performance of their products and packaging

9.

10.


1. 2.THE ESSENCE OF EXTENDED PRODUCER

RESPONSIBILITY (EPR)

According to the Organisation for Economic

Co-operation and Development (OECD ), EPR is “an

environmental policy approach in which a producer’s

responsibility for a product is extended to the

postconsumer stage of a product’s life cycle”.

It means that companies who put products on the

market are obliged to collect and recycle these products

and their packaging once they have reached their

end-of-life stage. In this sense, it can be seen as a

practical way of implementing the ‘producer pays

principle’.

In order to ensure that the products and their packaging

are appropriately dealt with once they become waste,

the obliged companies set up an EPR organisation to

finance, organise, and co-ordinate the collection and

recycling of the waste, using the services of licensed

waste management companies.

The obliged companies receive a mandate from the

authorities to shift their individual responsibility to the

EPR organisation, which then becomes responsible and

organizes the practical implementation.

THE EPR ORGANISATION SHOULD BE RUN AND CONTROLLED BY THE OBLIGED COMPANIES

The EPR organisation should be founded, run, financed

and controlled by the obliged companies themselves. It

is the best guarantee to ensure the lowest cost to

society and that the scheme will be both sustainable

and compliant with environmental and legal objectives.

When obliged companies financing the EPR

organisation are sitting in the boards and committees of

this organisation they have the control about the

expenses for all operations of the EPR organisation and

will keep them in their own interest to the necessary

minimum.

Moreover, they can agree to dedicate funding to

necessary long term projects like education campaigns

to increase the long term performance of the system

which would not be run in case of multiple systems

competing just on price.

To achieve this, the obliged companies should not only

pay a contribution to the EPR organisation, but they

should also be actively represented in the EPR

organisation.


3. 4.NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANISATION

The EPR organisation should be a not-for-profit

or profit-not-for-distribution body. There are several

reasons why this is the preferred structure:

• It ensures non-discrimination among all of the obliged

companies. A distribution of profit to the founding

members/shareholders would constitute discrimination

against non-shareholders.

• It also ensures that small and medium size

participants receive full and equal service and that

the EPR organisation does not just focus on big clients.

• It ensure that every obliged company has a right to join

the system and is not been refused.

• It ensures that the interests of the

consumers/inhabitants are served and that general

interest objectives such as education, prevention, and

communication will be pursued. This is especially

important in the case of household packaging. Any

for-profit company will make all possible efforts to avoid

these costs which are – on a short term scale – not

necessary to fulfill the minimum targets of the

respective legislation.

WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES AND/OR INVESTORS

CANNOT BE EPR ORGANISATIONS AND VICE VERSA

The natural inclination of investors and waste management

companies in an open market is to maximise profit and grow

market share – a method that strives for the highest price per

tonne of collected and recycled material. Moreover, investors

and waste management companies have an interest in

increasing the amount of packaging put on the market. This, of

course, is contrary to the legal objectives of the waste hierarchy

and thereby creates a conflict with serving the public interest.

The focus of the EPR organisation on the other hand is to fulfil

the obliged company’s obligations in the most efficient and

effective way possible. In other words, at the lowest possible

cost for the obliged companies and society in general. The

EPR organisation should work in close collaboration with the

local authorities and negotiate and tender in an open market

for collection, sorting, and recycling services.

The legal framework should be set up in such a way that the

role of waste management companies is focused on and

restricted to the supply of the highest quality services. On the

one hand, waste management companies should not

interfere in the execution of the EPR. On the other, the EPR

organisation should not enter into the collection, sorting, and

recycling process itself. Both parties have a distinct and

separate role to play in the fulfilment of the EPR – preferably

based on a close partnership.


5. 6.STRONG GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT AND MONITORING

Public authorities have a key role to play in the

enforcement of the EPR.

The national legislator should not only create an effective

and efficient legal framework for the implementation of

the EPR, it should also dedicate the necessary resources

to fulfill its objectives. In this respect, special and exclusive

rights can be granted to a single PROs. In any case the

national legislator should set out clear and high criteria for

the accreditation of PROs..

In their auditing role, public authorities should enforce

this legal framework so that it ensures a qualitative

implementation of the EPR, i.e. by using meaningful

enforcement procedures to close loopholes and trace

free riders. The public authorities should also develop

a sound supporting policy. A compulsory

Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) system on residual household

waste can for example work as an incentive for the

inhabitants to sort their household packaging waste.

They should also refrain from establishing any

counter-productive regulations or measures such as

packaging taxes and deposit schemes which could

impede the execution of the EPR.

ROLE OF MUNICIPALITIES/LOCAL AUTHORITIES

A close partnership between the local authorities and

the PROs., based on mutual trust, is a condition sine qua

non for the success and the environmental

sustainability of the EPR.

Municipalities have several roles to play. Many of these

roles depend upon the product/waste flow itself.

For example, when the flow concerns household

packaging for high-volume, fast moving consumer

goods, municipalities play an important role in the

set-up and management of door-to-door collections

and/or bring or collection point centers.

In this respect, local authorities and the EPR organisation

have to agree on the most appropriate collection

system, taking into account both local particularities and

conformity with national and European requirements.

The local authorities and the PROs. should also actively

cooperate in local public communication and

awareness programmes, data gathering and

monitoring, the control of the waste management

operators, and the tendering for collection services.


7. SINGLE OR MULTIPLE PROs?

Having a single PRO responsible for a national territory –

organising the collection and recycling of a product

category for all obliged companies within national

boundaries – has many advantages.

A single PRO ensures that:

• The government can execute effective

andefficient control.

• Obliged companies are treated in anon- discriminatory manner.

• An efficient functioning of the market is created, enabling the lowest societal cost for collection,

sorting and recycling.

• Effective national and local awareness and communication campaigns are run.

• Reliable data on the collection, sorting, and recycling of packaging waste can be obtained.

When multiple PROs are in simultaneous operation, it

should be noted that the principle of competition

regarding the collection of household packaging

seldom functions ideally.


This is because those who receive the service

(inhabitants) do not choose the PROs (which is selected by the obliged companies).

In countries with multiple PROs – in some cases up to 40

in the same country – it has been observed that the

organisations tend to cherry-pick. That is, they

concentrate on the easiest material to collect and recycle.

Moreover, public authorities have greater difficulty monitoring the EPR organisations and the obliged companies and to avoid and penalize free riding.

Also, for each authorized PROs it becomes more or less

impossible to monitor the reports of those obliged

companies participating in their system as they might

participate with remaining packaging in another EPR

organisation. Therefore, usually the number of free riders

in countries with multiple PROs is higher than in a

country with a single organisation.

Competition must however be assured at the level of the waste management activities, meaning on the level of collection, sorting and recycling, which represent over 80% of a successful PRO’s total cost.

In any case, EPR should never be reduced to a shopping list of a large number of so-called PROs owned by waste

operators and investors, making profits at the expense of

and to the detriment of the obliged companies, the

environment, and society in general.

8. 9.SUSTAINABLE FINANCING BASED ON JOINT

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

The PRO must be set up in such a waythat all

necessary finances are provided for an effective

implementation in compliance with the legal

framework. The financial contribution of the obliged

companies should also be significant enough

compared to the total cost. This gives them a strong

position in discussions with local authorities regarding

the most appropriate collection system to be employed.

The financial contribution of each obliged company

must be calculated based upon the amount and type

of packaging they put on the market and the real cost

of operations – including awareness campaigns and

potential revenues from the secondary raw material

market. This ensures that all obliged companies receive

equal treatment and share a fair allocation of the costs.

PUBLIC SERVICE MISSION ANDPROCUREMENT PROCEDURES

The PRO should pursue – as part of itsstatutory

purpose – a public service mission regardingthe

collection, recovery, and recycling of household

packaging waste. This means the organisation should

serve a higher purpose – realising an environmentally

and economically sustainable recycling society, which

benefits the inhabitants of the country.

In this respect, the PRO should engage itself in raising

awareness about sorting and recycling among the

inhabitants and provide support for educational

programmes. It should also develop adequate

programmes and actions for ‘away from home’

consumption of household packaging waste.

The PRO should implement transparent and efficient

procurement procedures for contracting waste

treatment operators such as collectors, sorters, and

recyclers. It should observe the principles of equality and

neutrality at all times.


10.


PACKAGING OPTIMISATION AND PREVENTION

The PRO should help the obliged companies to improve

the environmental performance of their products and

their packaging by providing advice and information on

packaging optimisation.

Packaging optimisation efforts include improved

design of the combined product/packaging,

guaranteeing the greatest functionality and longest life,

while using safe materials and a minimum of raw

materials and resources.

Through its co-ordination efforts, the PRO functions as a

‘bridge’ between the obliged companies and the

recyclers. This ensures that theobliged companies gain

insight into the recyclability of their packaging and

enables them to take the end-of-life treatment into

account during the design of the packaging.

EXPRA WORKING GROUPS

EXPRA has a Regulatory Affairs Committee, three specialised Working Groups anda Communication Platform.These are presented below.

“

The regulatory Affairs Committee (RAC) stimulates uniform, high standard yet practical legislation in the

field of packaging and packaging waste in Europe. The RAC analyses all legislation in Europe that has an

effect on packaging and packaging waste management, and draws and executes strategic plans on the

positioning EXPRA should take.

The RAC also exchanges information with producers and importers of packed products.

Johan GoosensFost PlusCommittee Chair

REGULATORY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE


Sandra AnguianoEcovidrio

Paul ChristiaensNedvang

Eric MonamiFost Plus

Amanda Fuso NeriniConai

Beáta Gönci Öko Pannon

Alphan Eröztürk CEVKO

Eirik OlandGreen Dot Norway

Esther Colino CaroEco Embes

Evripidis DimouHerrco

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP

The Technical working group (TWG) stimulates the optimal functioning of collection, sorting and recycling of

packaging waste on an operational and cost basis. The TWG gathers, pools and shares information on the

collection, sorting and recycling of packaging waste. The information is shared with both members of

EXPRA (best practices) and other stakeholders (demonstrated expertise), particularly the producers and

importers of packed products.

Vassilis MakridisHerrco

Rosa Trigo FernandezEco Embes(Chair)


Daniel Tabone Greenpak

Roman VandakEnvipak

Filip IvanovskiPakomak

Mik Van GaeverFost Plus

Rani AidlerTAMIR

Rumen ShurlievECOPACK

Laura Garcia CampoEcovidrio

Petr Balner EKO KOM

The Eco Design working group (EDWG) stimulates the activities of producers and importers of packed

products towards the eco-design of their packaging. The EDWG gathers, pools and exchanges information

on the activities regarding packaging prevention. The information is shared with both members of EXPRA

(best practices) and other stakeholders (demonstrated expertise), particularly with producers and importers

of packed products. The Eco Design working group looks to communicate information to stakeholders on

eco-design innovations and examples of packaging prevention best practices.

Jorge Serrano PachecoEcoembesWG Chair

ECO DESIGN WORKING GROUP


Beata GönciÖko Pannon

Philippe GendebienFost Plus

Eirik OlandGreen Dot Norway

Karen van der StadtNedvang/Kennis

DATA, REPORTING ANDBENCHMARKING WORKING GROUP

The Data and Reporting Working Group (DRWG) aims to support the development of a level playing

field in data, information and statistics on packaging and packaging waste. The DRWG gathers, pools,

and analyses information about performance, operations and costs of extended producer

responsibility for packaging. The information is shared with both members of EXPRA (best practices)

and other stakeholders (demonstrated expertise), particularly producers and importers of packed

products.

Tassos ArvanitisHerrco

Paul ChristiaensNedvang(Chair)

Alphan ERÖZTÜRK CEVKO

Marie DembskiValorlux

Nadia Puttemans Fost Plus

Katrien MentenFost Plus

Petr Šikýř EKO KOM

Sjur Kvifte NesheimGreen Dot

Kobi DarTAMIR

Daniel Moradiellos ZapicoEco Embes

The EPR Implementation Working Group gathers, pools and shares information on best practices in

running of a non for profit EPR scheme, especially but of course not only in a competitive environment. The

EPR Implementation WG also exchanges information with both members of EXPRA (best practices) and

other EU and National stakeholders (demonstrated expertise).

EPR IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP

Alphan ErozturkCEVKO(Chair)

Srečko BukovecSlopak

Steve Claus Fost Plus

Hana NovakovaEnvipak

Iko Brdaroski PAKOMAK

Kobi DarTMIR

Mihail MitevECOPACK

Esther Colino CaroEco Embes

COMMUNICATION PLATFORM

The communication platform supports the mission of EXPRA by showing the organization’s and its

members’ commitment to sound packaging waste management. The CN gathers and exchanges

information on communication regarding the collection of packaging waste. The information is shared with

both members of EXPRA (best practices) and other stakeholders (demonstrated expertise).

Beáta Gönci Öko Pannon


Dilek Özcanli CEVKO

Sandy TROMMER Valorlux

Lorita ConstantinescuEco Rom

Adriaan LowetFost Plus

Luckas GrolmusEco Embes

Bijou BoomNedvang

Luca Brivio CONAI

KEY FACTS ABOUT EXPRA MEMBERS

Fact and Figures about EXPRA members“

EXPRA MEMBERS BELGIUM

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business

Number of authorized Household systems

Financial share of producer responsibility

Operational responsibility for collection

Operational responsibility for sorting

Operational responsibility for marketing

Number contributing companies

Income from obliged companies

Coverage of the country (territory)

Number of inhabitants

- with access to infrastructure

Costs per included inhabitant

Cost average per recovered ton

BELGIUM

Fost Plus

1994

Household packaging

1

full costs

Local Authorities (usually via call for tender)

Fost Plus

5054

61,03 million €

100 %

11,2

11,2

5,45 €

32,3 €

asbl Fost Plus vzw

Avenue des Olympiades 2

BE-1140 Brussel

T: +32 2 775 03 50

E: [email protected]

www.fostplus.be

BELGIUMTOTAL AMOUNT OF PACKAGING PUT ON THE MARKET 851,3 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 92 % TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF

RECOVERY WITH INCINERATIONn/a

TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY (RECYCLING + RECOVERY

WITH INCINERATION)n/a

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Collected via banks*

Collected together with newspapers

Mostly by curbside collection with transparent bags

Mostly by curbside collection with transparent bags

*separated by color

*mostly via curbside collection, but also collection stations

*(Blue PMD bag) and also in some cases bycontainer stations

*(Blue PMD bag) and also in some cases bycontainer stations. From MSW, recycling from bottomashes from incineration plants (all MSW is incinerated).

TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

699,7 4 kt = 09,2 %

334,3 kt = 110,4 %

170,5 kt = 101,5 %

77,6 kt = 37,2 %

39,9 kt = 96%

76,2 kt = 102,8 %

included in tinplate

TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF RECYCLING

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

682, 4 kt = 86,8%

335,1 kt = 109,5 %

174,3 kt = 99,6 %

79,9 kt = 38,3 %

16,8 kt = 91 %

76,2 kt = 102,5 %


*mechanical recycling

(including PMD residue from the blue bags)

EXPRA MEMBERS BELGIUM

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business

Number of authorized Industrial systems












BELGIUM

VAL-I-PAC

1997

Promote & coordinate the recyclingof industrial packaging waste

1

mixed

Private waste collectors

Unpackers

VAL-I-PAC

7.200

13.5 mio €

100 %

-

irrelevant

n/a

19 € / ton

VAL-I-PAC

Avenue Reine Astrid 59 bte 11

1780 Wemmel

T: +32 (0)2 456 83 10

F: +32 (0)2 456 83 20


www.valipac.be

BELGIUM

TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY WITH INCINERATION

n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

TOTAL AMOUNT OF PACKAGING PUT ON THE MARKET

put on the market by the 7.200 members

800.000 tons

700.000 tons

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM n/a


Paper

Plastics

Metals

Wood

Other

655 000 t = 93 %

405 000 t = 100 %

64 000 t = 70 %

30 000 t = 80 %

156 000 t = 95 %

500 t = 6 %


Paper

Plastics

Metals

Wood

600 000 t = 85 %

398 000 t = 99 %

52 000 t = 56 %

30 000 t = 80 %

120 000 t = 73 %


EXPRA MEMBERS BULGARIA

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business










- with access to ECOPACK infrastructure



BULGARIA

ECOPACK *

2004

All Packaging

4

Full costs

ECOPACK

ECOPACK

ECOPACK

1.230

5,88 million €

38%

7,2 million

2,77 million

2,3 €

73 €

С ГРИЖА ЗА ОБЩЕСТВОТО И ПРИРОДАТА

ECOPACK Bulgaria Jsc

60 Tzarigradsko Shousse Blvd.

1750 Sofia, Bulgaria

T: +359 2 401 91 00, +359 2 975 19 25

F: +359 2 401 91 01, +359 2 975 19 26


www.ecopack.bg

EXPRA MEMBERS BULGARIA

TOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING PUT ON THE MARKET

(by ECOPACK clients)

330 kt

143 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 9 kt


0,01 Kt = 1%


WITH INCINERATION)87,14 kt = 61 %


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

87,14 kt = 60%

20,5 kt = 60%

44,7 kt = 60 %

13 kt = 22,5 %

Included in paper

4 kt = 50 %

Included in tinplate

5 kt = 15%

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Green containers, no color separation

Blue containers

Yellow container

Included in blue containers

Included in yellow containers

EXPRA MEMBERS BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business










- with access to Ekopak infrastructure



BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA

Ekopak

2011 (Operational from May 2012)

PWM

2

Full costs

Local Authorities

Local Authorities

Ekopak

510

0,7 million €

51 %

3,8 million

50 k

3,74 €

24,42 €

EKOPAK d.o.o.

1Zmaja od Bosne 7-7a, Objekat 03/6 Importanne center

71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

T: 033 921 934

F: 033 921 935


www.ekopak.ba

First licensed packaging recovery organisation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINAEXPRA MEMBERS


(by Ekopack clients)

280 kt

49 kt



0,22 kt


WITH INCINERATION)10,16 kt = 20 %


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

9,95 kt

0,53 kt = 5 %

8,09 kt = 20 %

1,04 kt = 8 %

0,12 kt = 4 %


0,17 kt = 5 %

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Green containers, no color separation

Blue containers

Yellow container



EXPRA MEMBERS CANADA

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













CANADA

Éco Entreprises Québec*

2003

All Packaging

1

Total net costs

Municipalities

Municipalities

Sorting centers

3000

73.357.725 €

99%

8,1 million

~ 8,1 million

9,04 €

197 €

Éco Entreprises Québec

1600, René-Lévesque Blvd. West Suite 600

Montréal (Québec) H3H 1P9

Phone : 514 987-1491


www.ecoentreprises.qc.ca (for containers and packaging only)


(thereof household packaging)

683 kt

595 kt



n/a




Glass*

Paper packaging

Plastics*

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum*

Steel containers

377 kt = 55 %

119 kt = 77 %

154 kt = 61%

66 kt = 34%

17 kt = 49%

included in aluminium

5 kt = 29%

15 kt = 51%

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Curbside recycling collection

Curbside recycling collection*


Included in paper


CANADA

*together with newspapers


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum*

377 kt = 55 %

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a*In Quebec, beer and soft drinks, either in glass, plastic or aluminum containers, are subjectto a deposit system, thus excluded from curbside recycling compensation plan.

EXPRA MEMBERS CYPRUS

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













CYPRUS

Green Dot Cyprus

2004

All Packaging

1

80% - 100% of total costs

Green Dot Cyprus

Green Dot Cyprus

Green Dot Cyprus

923

3,9 million €

85%

0,84 million

0,7 million

8 €

154 €

Green Dot (Cyprus) Public Co Ltd

229 Tseriou Avenue, 2047 Strovolos, Nicosia

P.O.Box 25463 1310 Nicosia Cyprus

T: +357 22 586020

F: +357 22 586001


www.greendot.com.cy


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Iglu stations, 1 bin/600 cap

Brown bags door to door*

Transparent bag door to door



CYPRUS

*together with newspapers magazines & office paper



103 kt

77 kt



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

42 kt = 67%

5,7 kt = 37%

25 kt = 126%

4,3 kt = 32%

-n/a

4 kt = 130%

0,2 kt = 10%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

39 kt = 63%

5.7 kt = 37%

25 kt = 126%

4,3 kt = 32%

n/a

4 kt = 130%

0,3 kt = 10%


COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Czech Republic

EKO KOM

1997

All Packaging

1

Full costs for packaging waste

Local authorities

Local authorities

Local authorities

20.277

59,18 million €

99%

10,53 million

10,48 million

5,61 €

85,7 €

EXPRA MEMBERS CZECH REPUBLIC

(standardized costs)

EKO-KOM, a.s.

Na Pankráci 1685/17140 21 Prague 4

Czech Republic

T: +420 729 848 111

F: +420 729 848 119


www.ekokom.cz

CZECH REPUBLIC


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Container stations*

Collected together with newspapers*

Container stations

Container stations*

Collected via recycling stations*



(est.) 2.980 kt (2014)

n/a

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 1.067i kt


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

690 kt = 75%

129kt = 73%

330 kt = 89%

135 kt = 67%

included in paper (BC)& plastics

29 kt = 61%



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

690 kt = 75%

129 kt = 73%

317 kt = 87%

135 kt = 67%

included in paper (BC)& plastics

29 kt = 61%


*color separation

*container stations

included in paper

*collection usually via recycling stations run by localauthorities, partly collected via container stations

EXPRA MEMBERS ESTONIA

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













ESTONIA

EestiTaaskasutusorganisatsioonMTÜ (ETO)MTÜ (ETO)

2004

All Packaging

3

32%

Waste management companies via tenders

ETO system

1000

3 569 606 €

99%

1 313 271

1 300 138

2,75€

148,73 €

Eesti Taaskasutusorganisatsioon MTÜ

Mustamäe tee 24 10621 Tallinn Estonia

T: +372 640 32 40

F: + 372 640 32 48


www.eto.ee


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics Bottles

Flasks, Beverage

Metal packaging

Green containers

Blue containers

Yellow container

Yellow container

Yellow containers

ESTONIATOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING

PUT ON THE MARKET


40 163,5 t

60%

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 99%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

24 949 t = 62,1%

6 031 t = 71,7%

8 732 t = 71,7%

4 818 t = 55,6%

not collected separately

1 098 t = 61,1%


4 269 t = 46,8%



Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

20 250 t = 50,4%

6 031 t = 71,7%

8 732 t = 71,7%

2 474 t = 8,6%

not collected separately

1 098 t = 61,1%


1 915 t = 21%

EXPRA MEMBERS FINLAND

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













FINLAND

Finnish PackagingRecycling RINKI Ltd

1997

Consumer packagingcollection

1

100 %

RINKI, local authorities,private wastemanagement companies

Waste producers

PROs

4,200

10 million € (2014)

100 % (excluding Aland)

5,5 million

5,5 million

2 €

15 €

The Environmental Register of Packaging PYR Ltd

Mikonkatu 15 B

FI-00100 HELSINKI, Finland

T: +3589 616 230

F: +3589 6162 3100

E: [email protected]@pyr.fiV

http://info.pyr.fi/aiheet/in-english/


n/a



FINLAND

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics Bottles

Flasks, Beverage

Curbside collection & recycling stations




TOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING PUT ON THE MARKET 716,686 t

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM not reported


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Metals

667 706 t = 93 %

63 122 t = 77 %

292 399 t = 113 %

63 751 t = 54 %

Included in paper

Included in metals

Included in metals

42 135 t = 82 %



Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Metals

Tinplate

Aluminum

415 436 t = 58 %

63 122 t = 77 %

252 399 t = 98 %

26 751 t = 23 %

Included in paper

42 135 t = 82 %

Included in metals

Included in metals

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













GREECE

Herrco

1991

All Packaging

3

Additional costs

Local Authority

Herrco

Herrco

1,817

20,6 million €

87%

10,8 million

9,4 million

1,91 €

53,12 €

EXPRA MEMBERS GREECE

HERRCO (Hellenic Recovery & Recycling Corporation)

Himaras 5

Maroussi 15125,Greece

T: 00 30 210 8010962/ 963

F: 00 30 210 8012272


www.herrco.gr


n/a



TOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING PUT ON THE MARKET 706 kt



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

389 kt

20 kt

251 kt

59 kt

Included in paper

44 kt

7 kt

8 kt


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

389 kt

20 kt

251 kt

59 kt

Included in paper

44 kt

7 kt

8 kt

GREECE

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Co-mingled collection - blue container*

Co-mingled collection - blue container




*separate bin

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













HUNGARY

Öko Pannon

1996

Lobbying for EPR solution from2012 (formerly all packaging)0 (State owned& run organization)

Packaging Tax

Local Authority

Local Authority

National WasteManagement Authority

23 000

113 million € Packaging Tax

90%

10 million

9 million

12,26 €

not published

EXPRA MEMBERS HUNGARY

ÖKO-Pannon Nonprofit Kft.

1146 Budapest

Hungária krt. 179-187,Hungary

T: +36-1-383-9305

F: +36-1-383-9306


www.okopannon.hu

HUNGARY


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastic

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

not published

not published

not published

not published

not published



1 064 kt

585,2 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 585,2 kt


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Metal

633,9 kt = 59,45 %

32, kt = 32,29 %

349 kt = 96,09 %

156,3 kt = 56,4 %

8,5 kt = 33,4 %

59 kt = 83,7 %


Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Metal

487,8 kt = 48,2%

36,4 kt = 34,2 %

323,4 kt = 88,86 %

88,86 kt = 31,86 %

4,6 kt=18,41%

59 kt = 83,7 %


COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













ISRAEL

TAMIR

2011

2

100%

TAMIR

TAMIR

TAMIR

860

11 million €

7.7 million

n/a

2 €

46 €

EXPRA MEMBERS ISRAEL

(operation started in 2012)

TAMIR – Packaging Recovery Organization of

Israel Ltd (cc).Shenkar 18 st.

Herzliya. P.O.B 2078, Israel.

T: 972-9-8800046

F: 972-9-8866053


www.tmir.org.il

All packaging exceptbeverage containersunder deposit

165 local municipalitiesout of 255. 5.5M inhabitantsout of 7.7M.

EXPRA MEMBERS

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Container stations

Container stations for paper cardboard*

Container stations

Orange bins DTD collection

Orange bins DTD collection


(by TAMIR clients)

est. 755K



n/a




Glass

Paper

Plastics

Wood

Tinplate

240 kt = 68 %

1 kt = 6.5 %

190 kt = 124 %

36 kt = 33 %

3.4kt = 50%

10 kt = 41 %

ISRAEL

*collected together with newspapers

via orange bins DTD collection

no color separation

EXPRA MEMBERS

* Data for 2014

ITALY

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













ITALY

CONAI

1997

All Packaging

1

Additional fee

Local Authority

Local Authority

CONAI

1.069.227

377 million €

71% - 96%

60.8 million

57.3 million

6.6 €

41.0 €

CONAI, Consorzio Nazionale Imballaggi

Via Pompeo Litta, 5

20122 Milano, ITALY

T: +39 (0) 2 54044 1

F: +39 (0) 2 54122648


www.conai.org


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage cartons

Metal packaging

Stationary - mobile waste container

Stationary - mobile waste container*

Stationary - mobile waste container

Included in paper or plastic

Included in plastic

ITALY




11.851 kt

5.551 kt



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

9.203 kt = 77.7%

1.615 kt = 70.3%

3.859 kt = 88.2%

1.717 kt = 82.5%

Included in paper

336 kt = 74.63%

50.2 kt = 79.2%

1.626 kt = 63.1%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

7.808 kt = 6.9 %

1.615 kt = 70.3%

3.482 kt = 79.5%

790 kt = 37.9%

Included in paper

336 kt = 74.3%

47.1 kt = 74.3%

1539 kt= 59.7%

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Luxembourg

Valorlux

1995

Household packaging + commercial packaging from retailers

1

Total costs for household packaging + financial support for commercial pack.PMC: VALOLUX; other packaging: local authoritiesPMC: VALOLUX; other packaging: local authoritiesPMC: VALOLUX; other packaging: local authorities

1.100

4,9 million €

100%

0,52 million

0,52 million

9,4 €

104 €

EXPRA MEMBERS LUXEMBOURG

* Data for 2012

VALORLUX A.S.B.L.

9, rue Nicolas Brosius, L-3372 Leudelange

B.P. 26, L-3205 Leudelange , Luxemburg / Luxembourg

T: + 352/37 00 06-1

F: + 352/37 11 37


www.valorlux.lu



n/a

67 kt



n/a




Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

47 kt = 73%

21 kt = 78%

15 kt = 82%

5 kt = 43%

1 kt = 97%

2 kt = 79%

1 kt = 71%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

46 kt = 72%

21 kt = 78%

15 kt = 82%

5 kt = 43%

1 kt = 97%

2 kt = 79%

1 kt = 71%

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper/cardboard

Plastics Bottles &Plastics Bottles &Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Other plastics

Collected via iglu stations, curbside and recycling stations mixed colorsTogether with newspapers in bundle collection door to door;cardboard only collected in recycling stations

Collection via blue bag door to door and recycling stations

n/a

Collection usually via recycling stations run by local authorities

(beverage cartons only)

(beverage cartons only)

LUXEMBOURG

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Macedonia

Pakomak

2010

All Packaging

4

35%

Pakomak

Public/private companies

Public/private companies

830

0,8 million €

70%

2.1 million

1.47 million

0,5 €

26 €

EXPRA MEMBERS MACEDONIA

Pakomak - Asset packaging and packaging waste

blv, Partizanski odredi, Porta Vlae blok 4,

1000 Skopje,

R. Macedonia

T: 389 2 20 44 567




100 kt total (Pakomak 42 kt)

100 kt



n/a




Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

11,5 kt

770 tons = 8,4 %

6.15 tons= 55,9 %

4,015 tons = 36,5 %

33 tons = 0,3%44 kt

n/a

n/a


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

11,5 kt

770 tons = 8,4 %

6.15 tons= 55,9 %

4,015 tons = 36,5 %

33 tons = 0,3%44 kt

n/a

n/a

MACEDONIA

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

HoReCa

collected in containers*

collected in containers*

included in paper

collected via container stations



*blue in public areas

*yellow in public places

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













MALTA

GreenPak

2005

All Packaging

2

Total costs

GreenPak

GreenPak

GreenPak

1228

1,65 million €

70%

0,445 million

0,305 million

6,62 €

181 €

EXPRA MEMBERS MALTA

GreenPak Cooperative Society Ltd

St. John Street

Fgura FGR1447, Malta

T: (00356) 21 660233

F: (00356) 21 803434


www.greenpak.com.mt



90 kt

67,5 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 13,18 kt TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF





Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate & Aluminum

11,12 kt = 62%

1,58 kt = 34%

5,08 kt = 71%

2,55 kt = 69%

Included in paper

0,65 kt = 59%

MALTA

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastic

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Green containers

Container stations

Container stations

Included in paper

Container stations




Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate & Aluminum

9,84 kt = 55%

1,58 kt = 34%

5,06 kt = 70%

2,54 kt = 69%

Included in paper

0.66 kt = 58%

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Norway

Green Dot Norway

1991 - 1997

All Packaging*

1**

Local Authority

Green Dot Norway+ material companies

9.500

31,5 million €

100 %

5 million

5 million

6,3 €

62 €

EXPRA MEMBERS NORWAY

Additional costs for separate collection and sorting

Grønt Punkt Norge

Visiting address: Karenslyst alle 9 A

Postal address: Postbok 91Skøyen,

0212 Oslo, Norway

T: +47 22121500


www.grontpunkt.no*except beverage containers under deposit**no authorization required, also two deposit systems - one for reusable glass and PET and one for recyclablePET and PE bottles and aluminum cans

NORWAY


n/a



COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Collected via bring stations*

Collected together with newspapers at homeCollected viakerbside collection and bring stations

Included in paper

Collected via bring stations together with glass



542 kt

265 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 225 = 85%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

542 kt = 93,7 %

70 kt = 90 %

302 kt = 97 %

157 kt = 92 %

14 kt = 58 %



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

520 kt = 69,5 %

70 kt = 90 %

302 kt = 81 %

157 kt = 38,5 %

14 kt = 58 %


*together with metals (more kerbside collection on the way)

included in paper& plastics

included in paper& plastics

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Romania

Eco Rom Ambalaje

2003

All Packaging

9

Additional costs

Local Authority

Local Authority

Eco Rom Ambalaje

3,056

9,81 million €

48 %

20,1 million

9 million

0,56 €

33 €

EXPRA MEMBERS ROMANIA

Data for 2015

ECO-ROM AMBALAJE

51-55, 1 Mai Blvd.

Bucharest, 061629, Romania

T: +4021 413 08 44

F: +4021 413 08 57


www.ecoromambalaje.ro


n/a



ROMANIA

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Green container stations

Blue container stations

Yellow container stations

Blue container stations

Yellow container stations



624 kt

no split on IC and HH

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 56 %


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

387kt = 62 %

66 kt = 69 %

114 kt = 61 %

129 kt = 94 %*

Included in paper

14 kt = 73 %

3,2 kt = 23 %

61 kt = 50 %


Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

Wood

376 kt = 60 %

66 kt = 69 %

114 kt = 61 %

124 kt = 90,3 %*

Included in paper

14kt = 72,6 %

3,2 kt = 23,5 %

55 kt = 45 %

*mechanical recycling *plastic+PET

*plastic+PET

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













SLOVAKIA

ENVI-PAK

2003

All Packaging

1

Additional costs

Local Authority

Local Authority

ENVI-PAK

1 239

2,4 million €

48,76%

5,4 million

5,4 million

0,85 €

16,424 €

EXPRA MEMBERS SLOVAKIA

ENVI-PAK, a. s.

Galvaniho 7/B

821 04 Bratislava 2, Slovensko

T: +421 2 333 227 10

F: +421 2 335 200 10

E: www.envipak.sk

[email protected]



463 613 t

n/a

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 95 882 t


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Metal

Wood

130 244,570 = 68,50%

28 586,829 = 72,68%

57 665,336 = 76,53%

29 107,305 = 62,66%

896,082 = 57,77%

6 357,360 = 58,65%

7 531,681 = 45,72%


Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Metal

Wood

124 440,670 = 65,45%

28 586,829 = 72,68%

57 281,506 = 76,03%

25 678,524 = 55,28%

888,520 = 57,28%

6 357,360 = 58,65%

5 647,931 = 34,29%



n/a



SLOVAKIA

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastic

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Bring system

Bring and kerbside collection

Bring and kerbside collection

Bring and kerbside collection*

Bring and kerbside collection*


*mostly together with plastic

*mostly together with plastic

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













SLOVENIA

SLOPAK d.o.o.

2002

All Packaging

6

Shared

Local authorities

PRO’s

PRO’s

819

2.7 Million €

100%

2.061.952

2.061.952

-

-

EXPRA MEMBERS SLOVENIA

Slopak d.o.o.

Vodovodna cesta 100

1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

T: +386 1 5600 250

F: +386 1 5600 260

E: www.slopak.si

[email protected]


n/a



SLOVENIA

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Container stations

Container stations

Container stations

Together with plastic & metal pack.

Together with plastic pack. & bevarage



46,341 t

no split on IC and HH



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

36,062 t = 92%

7,923 t = 100%

8,569 t = 100%

17,497 t = 100%

Included in plastics

Included in metals

Included in metals


Glass

Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Metals

Tinplate

Aluminum

28,789 t = 73%

7,923 t = 100%

8,142 Tt = 95%

9,735 t = 56%

Included in plastics

2,073 t = 100%

Included in metals

Included in metals


EXPRA MEMBERS SPAIN

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













SPAIN

Ecoembes

1996Household Packaging excluding glass; commercial & industrial packaging onlyif collected by Municipalities

1 for plastic/paper/metals + 1 for glass

Additional costs for separate collection and sorting

Local Authority

Local Authority

Eco Embes (via call for tender)

11947

435,5 million €

99,97%

47,117 million

46,738 (paper/cardboard)46,573 (lightweight packaging)

9,24 €

324 €

Ecoembalajes España

Paseo de la Castellana, 83-85 (Planta 11)

28046 Madrid, Spain

T: 00 34 / 91 567 24 03

F: 00 34 / 91 598 06 24


www.ecoembes.com

SPAINTOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING PUT ON THE MARKET

(thereof household packaging Ecoembes)

6695,84 kt

1707,265 kt

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM n/a TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF





Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

1344,0 Kt = 78,7%

587,9 Kt=85,0%

472,7 Kt=70,6%

included in paper

276,5 Kt= 83,6%


COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastic

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Included in Ecovidrio section

Collected via container stations*

Container stations

Collected together with metalsand plastic

Collected via container stations




Paper

Plastics*

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

1258,6 Kt= 73,7%

564,7 Kt=81,7%

410,8 Kt=61,4%

included in paper

276,5 Kt= 83,6%


EXPRA MEMBERS SPAIN

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













SPAIN

Ecovidrio

1997

Glass packaging

Additional costs

Local Entities

n/a

Ecovidrio

2,655

41,675 million €

99,3% (7,976 Local Entities)

47 million

46,8 million

1,41 €

96,9 €/ton (glass only)

1 for plastic/paper/metals (Ecoembes) + 1 for glass (Ecovidrio)

Ecovidrio

General Oraa, 3 – 2. 28006 Madrid (Spain)

T: 00 34 91 411 83 44


www.ecovidrio.es

EXPRA MEMBERS SPAIN

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Curbside containers*

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a



n/a

n/a

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM

Horeca represents48% of collection

TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY 694.325 tons (+1%)

*no colour separation

Additional tons recycled (via other sources monitored by Ecovidrio, collaboration plans to collect and recycle glass from non-municipal channels): 162.045 tons (19%)


n/a



COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













SWEDEN

FTI

1994

All Packaging

2

100%

FTI

FTI

FTI

Local authorities

9,000

100%

10 million €

10 million €

6, 60 €

n/a

EXPRA MEMBERS SWEDEN

Förpacknings- och Tidningsinsamlingen (FTI)

Box 17033, S-104 62 Stockholm Sweden

(visiting address: Magnus Ladulåsgatan 63A, Stockholm)

T: (+46) 8 566 144 00

F: (+46) 8 566 144 44

E: mailto:[email protected]

www.ftiab.se/english



938 kt

not reported

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM not reported TOTAL AMOUNT AND PERCENTAGE OF





Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate & Aluminum

not reported

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a


Glass

Pape cartons

Plastics*

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

683 kt = 73%

180 kt = 93%

403 kt = 78%*

72 kt = 38%*

n/a

28 kt = 73%*


SWEDEN

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Metal

Collected from householdsvia bring stations


(excluding alu cans and PET bottles that are covered by deposit scheme)

*paper packaing including used beverage

*plastic packaging excluding PET bottles

*metal packaging excluding alu cans

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













The Netherlands

Afvalfonds Verpakkingen& Nedvang

2012 & 2006

All Packaging

1

Total costs

Municipalities

Municipalities

Municipalities

2,800

155 million €

100%

17.0 million

17,0 million

9,11€

49 €

EXPRA MEMBERS THE NETHERLANDS

Data for 2012

Nedvang

Schorpioenstraat 290, 4th floor

3067 KW Rotterdam, The Netherlands

T: +31 10 420 61 61


www.nedvang.nl


n/a



THE NETHERLANDS

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Container stations

Collected together*

Collection with transparent bags

Separate, with plastics & metals or with paper

Collection via MSW

*with newspapers

TOTAL AMOUNT OF PACK AGING PUT ON THE MARKET n/a



Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Metals

Aluminum

Wood

2,053 kt = 74%

414 kt = 79%

955 kt = 82%

269 kt = 57%

Included in paper

208 kt = 94%

Included in metals

208 kt = 54%


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Metals

Aluminum

Wood

1,909 kt = 69%

414 kt = 79%

955 kt = 82%

236 kt = 50%

Included in paper

208 kt = 94%

Included in metals

97 kt = 25%

COUNTRY

Name of the system

Founded

Scope of business













Turkey

CEVKO

1991

All Packaging

3

Shared

Local authorities

Local authorities

CEVKO

1.759

8,5 million €

31%

75 million

21.4 million

0,65 €

22 €

EXPRA MEMBERS TURKEY

ÇEVKO Foundation

Cenap Sahabettin Sk. No: 94 Kosuyolu

Kadiköy - Istanbul / Türkiye

T: +90 (216) 428 78 90 - 94

F: +90 (216) 428 78 95


www.cevko.org.tr


n/a



TURKEY

COLLECTION

Glass

Paper

Plastics

Beverage Cartons

Metal packaging

Container stations*

Container stations

Container stations

Container stations

Container stations



1.000.000 t (est.)

n/a

HH PACKAGING PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM 980.000 t


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

545,6 kt

98,5 kt

223 kt

17,497 t

25,3 kt

25,5 kt

11 kt


Glass

Paper

Plastics

Composites

Tinplate

Aluminum

545,6 kt

98,5 kt

223 kt

153 kt

25,3 kt

25,5 kt

11 kt

*no color separation, bin

Expra

Avenue Olympiades 2, 1140 Brussels (Evere) / BELGIUM

Tel: +49 171 201 70 55

[email protected]

www.expra.eu

inspiring packaging recycling - conai · pay-as-you-throw (payt) system on residual household waste...

Documents