inl’s cellular data stipend jonathan homer nlit 2009

33
INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Upload: geoffrey-david-hubbard

Post on 16-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

INL’s Cellular Data StipendINL’s Cellular Data Stipend

Jonathan Homer

NLIT 2009

Page 2: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

DOE IG-0669

“Contractor organizations to consider eliminating all use of

Government-owned or managed cellular phones, where

not critical to emergency response and continuity of

operations, and adopting a flat rate reimbursement

program for employees using personal cellular phones for

official business.”- Recommendations, Section 2

Page 3: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

User Experience

Except:Except:-Changes in Travel PlansChanges in Travel Plans-Unexpected Child Care ChangesUnexpected Child Care Changes

Page 4: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Manager Experience

Page 5: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Cellular Department

Page 6: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

User Experience

Page 7: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Manager Experience

Page 8: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Cellular Department

Page 9: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

What Is A Stipend?

• Prepaid Compensation

• Covers business-use costs associated with cellular phone and/or data

• Pre-Tax Dollars

Page 10: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Result Of Stipend Implementation – Users

• Nearly eliminated “audit fear factor” (3% reportable vs. 60% previous program)

• Increased exposure to new technology through new devices and networks

• Reduced environmental impact by elimination of redundant equipment and services

Page 11: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Result Of Stipend Implementation - Management

• Reduced Labor Costs

• Reduced Audits and Assessments

• Eliminated Equipment

– No INL hardware life cycle costs

• Prevents Legacy Accounts

– Integrated into termination process

Page 12: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

History

• 2005 INL Internal Audit led to a Business Council initiative to examine cell phone functionality and efficiency, reduce audit/compliance exposure, and avoid potential unallowable costs

• Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report DOE/IG-0669, Use and Management of Mobile Communications Services – recommended that the Department reimburse federal and contractor employees for the use of personal cell phones for official business

• INL implemented Cellular Stipend Program for voice service in 2006

• Piloted data service in 2008

2005 INL Internal Audit said about Cell Phones & Voice/Data Devices

► Wireless Tracking Database is not accurate

– Vendor billing data and database do not agree

– Database does not include T-Mobile Information

► Management oversight is inadequate but difficult to improve

– High personal use carries audit and unallowable cost risks

– Many cell phones have inappropriate service plans

– Policies need improvement/updating (incidental use, emerging technologies, etc.)

– INL continued to pay monthly service charges for lost, damaged and/or unassigned (e.g. terminated employee) cell phones

► Employees vulnerable to equipment abuse issues

Page 13: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

What To Fix / What Not To

• Reduce Costs

• Reduce Audit Exposure

• Maintain Security

• Reduce Customer Exposure to Audits (misuse)

• Improve Customer Relations

• Decrease per-line costs

• Expand Data Connections (iPhone, etc)

• Increase Customers Paycheck

Page 14: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

3 Step Process

• Setup the System

• Run The Pilot

• Get Customer Buy-in

Page 15: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Setting Up The System

• Have a Plan

– Establish what you are trying to accomplish

– Integrate management goals with operations path forward

• Build a System– Stipends don’t work unless fully

automated (Significant ROI)

– K.I.S.S.

Page 16: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Stipend Program Screenshot

Page 17: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Stipend Risks and Mitigation• Personal Email & 3rd Party Software – bleed-over

– No difference between government owned and personal

– MSC is applied to both devices equally

• Employee termination – device may not be able to be physically destroyed– No current government requirement

– Device is wiped upon termination

– No greater risk than a lost/stolen device

Page 18: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Stipend Risks And Mitigation (cont)

• Security investigations – potentially more difficult– Judge’s order may be needed

– Not expected to be a common issue

• Sensitive foreign travel – security risks

– Best practice calls for employee to use a pooled phone, regardless of government owned vs. personal

Page 19: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Setting Up The Pilot

• Define the scope

– At the INL:• 2006: Voice Pilot

• 2008: Data Pilot

• Define The Timeframe:– INL: Learned all our lessons in the first 90 days

• Define the Audience:– Cross cut organizations

– Audience can be relatively small (50 individuals)

Page 20: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Leveraging Pilot For Continual Success

• When setting up pilot, select individuals from across the organization

• Involve pilot participants in regular discussions, get them talking and spreading the word for you

• Actively resolve pilot participant concerns – you want all the good rumors you can get

• Publish your pilot’s success as part of your full deployment

Page 21: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Getting The Lab Onboard

• Again - K.I.S.S.

• Focus on the customer benefits

• Have a defined communications program

– all team members should share the same story

• Spend 10 minutes explaining the system

• One-On-One experience works best

Page 22: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Key Selling Points

• One device

• Choice of device

• Choice of providers

• No audits for misuse

• No additional cost

Page 23: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Stipend Population

Page 24: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Conclusion

• No significant security risks introduced by the data stipend

• No breach of financial rules

• An automated tracking process was essential

• Keys to success: Effective organizational responsibilities, policy/procedures, and defined processes

Page 25: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Questions Or Comments?

Page 26: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Contact Information

Jonathan Homer

(208) 526-9660

[email protected]

Page 27: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Customer Surveys

300 Employees Using Stipend

50 Managers Over Stipend’d Employees

300 Employees Not Using Stipend

Page 28: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Business Needs

Page 29: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Costs

Page 30: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Costs (cont)

Page 31: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Security

Page 32: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Abuse

Page 33: INL’s Cellular Data Stipend Jonathan Homer NLIT 2009

Other Statistics

• 91% of managers feel that the stipend program reduces the lab’s exposure to risk (audits, abuse, etc).

• 87% of all survey participants who were not a part of the stipend program had already heard of the program by word of mouth.

• 66% of non-program participants wanted more information about the stipend