information, monitoring & mrv for redd+ in indonesia: the un-redd approach
DESCRIPTION
Information, Monitoring & MRV for REDD+ in Indonesia: The UN-REDD Approach. Joel Scriven REDD+ After Cancun: Moving from Negotiation to Implementation. 10 May 2011, Douala. Outline. The UN-REDD Programme Information, monitoring & MRV Approach in Indonesia (and generally in Asia Pacific) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Information, Monitoring & MRV for REDD+ in Indonesia: The UN-REDD Approach
Joel Scriven
REDD+ After Cancun: Moving from Negotiation to Implementation
10 May 2011, Douala
• The UN-REDD Programme
• Information, monitoring & MRV
• Approach in Indonesia (and generally in Asia Pacific)
• Challenges to date
Outline
• Established in 2008 by UNDP, UNEP and FAO– UNFCCC Bali Action Plan
• Offers UN Joint Program: Delivering as One UN
• Agreed delivery platform with FCPF and FIP
• Supports countries to benefit from REDD+– Facilitate international cooperation;– Support countries through the development of the three REDD+ phases;– Capacity building and strengthening;
• FAO: Focus on technical monitoring and MRV aspects
The UN-REDD Programme
The UN-REDD Programme
MRV and Monitoring
Stakeholder Engagement
Multiple Benefits of forests/REDD+
Transparent Equitable Accountable Management of REDD+ Payments
REDD+ Governance
REDD+ as Catalyst of Green Economy
The UN-REDD Programme
• Two UNFCCC Decision texts:– Decision 4/CP.15 on methodological guidance for REDD+;– Decision 1/CP.16 Section II Chap. C on policy approaches for REDD+.
• Key points:– Use of International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidance and
Guidelines;– System for providing information on REDD+ safeguards (Information);– Set-up of robust and transparent national forest monitoring systems
(Monitoring and MRV);– Phased approach (1. Readiness; 2. Demonstration activities; 3. Fully
MRV’ed national activities).
Following (& Translating) UNFCCC Decisions
• Parties must develop a system for providing information on how REDD+ safeguards are being addressed and respected throughout the implementation of REDD+ activities:
a) Consistent with the objectives of NFPs and international agreements;b) Transparent and effective national forest governance structures;c) Respect for the knowledge and rights of indigenous peoples and local
communities; d) The full and effective participation of relevant stakeholders;e) Consistent with the conservation of natural forests and biological diversity;f) Actions to address the risks of reversals (permanence);g) Actions to reduce displacement of emissions (leakage).
• Need to make this information accessible to all stakeholders during all implementation activities (Phases 2 and 3).
REDD+ Safeguards Information System
• In Phase 2 of REDD+:1. Demonstration Activities Monitoring System: Ensure that subnational
demonstration activities are results-based (i.e., result in measureable positive outcomes);
2. Provides basic national coverage data, e.g., forest cover changes and the location of fires (feeds into REDD+ Safeguards Information System);
» E.g. Brazil’s PRODES TERRA-AMAZON
1. In Phase 3 of REDD+:1. National Performance Monitoring System: Ensures that the
implementation of national policies and measures on all the national territory are results-based (for the country to check how successful their policies and measures are and international transparency).
Monitoring Systems
Measurement, Reporting & Verification
EMISSION FACTOR National Forest Inventory
ACTIVITY DATA Satellite land monitoring
system
2005
x
M
V UNFCCC Secretariat Roster of Experts
REDD+ GHG Inventory
LULUCF InventoryLULUCF
Inventory
Inventory compilation
QA/QC
Inventory compilation
QA/QC
Emission Inventory Database
Emission Inventory Database
UNFCCCUNFCCC
=
R
Phases & Elements: Bringing it all together...
Year 7Year 7Year 6Year 6Year 5Year 5Year 4Year 4Year 3Year 3
Capacity building & development
Capacity building & development
Year 2Year 2Year 1Year 1
Phase IReadiness
Phase IReadiness
Phase IIResults-based demonstration activities
Phase IIResults-based demonstration activities
Phase IIIPayments for verified performance
Phase IIIPayments for verified performance
RED
D+
PHAS
ESIN
FO, M
ON
& M
RV P
HAS
ES
National Performance Monitoring System
MRV System
SLMS:AD
NFI: EF
GHG-I:CO2e
REDD+ Safeguards Information SystemREDD+ Safeguards Information System
REDD+ Safeguards Information SystemREDD+ Safeguards Information System
SLMS
Demonstration Activities Monitoring System
• 3rd largest tropical forest area, peatlands; high deforestation rates
Hansen et al., South Dakota State University
Global Significance of Indonesia’s Forests
• Follow phases
• Phase 1: Readiness– Partnerships (e.g. Norway)– Extensive technical consultations– Develop Action Plan, including institutional arrangements: Build on existing
capacities and expertise– Presidential Decree to enact Action Plan – including creation of new
institutions and steering committees– Hire and train technical staff
Approach to Implementation in
Indonesia
• Phase 2: Transition, implementation & capacity building
• Implementation:– National policies and measures (e.g., logging moratorium)– Demonstration Activities Monitoring System for subnational pilot activities
(e.g., Central Kalimantan) – REDD+ Safeguards Information System
• Capacity building:– SLMS (data and image collection, processing and analysis)– NFI (training of field teams, data management, processing and storage)– REDD+ GHG inventory (standardization of all official data, reporting
requirements)
Approach to Implementation in
Indonesia
• Phase 3: Payments for verified performance
• Integration of REDD+ with other mitigation actions– Fully operational MRV System to report REDD+ mitigation performance in
CO2e: Payment linked to performance
– REDD+ reporting requirements consistent with NAMAs (paragraphs 60 & 61, 1/CP.16):• National Communications every four years• Update reports every two years
– REDD+ Safeguards Information System (ongoing)– Demonstration Activities Monitoring System National Performance
Monitoring System
Approach to Implementation in
Indonesia
• International context– Limited knowledge of negotiation outcomes
• Institutional– Gaining national consensus
• Coordination– Of international support– Distribution of tasks
• Technical– Communicating and building lasting technical knowledge
• Logistical– Extending training across Provinces
Challenges
Thank you for your attention
Contact: [email protected]