increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 i per dialysis run) than...

5
ORIGINAL ARTI CLE Increased risk of bacteremi a in patients hemodialyzed through central catheters GEOFFREY TAYLOR, MD, T ERESA KIRKLAND, BSCN, PETER HAMILTON, MBBCH ABSTRACT: As part of an ongoing prospective survey of nosocomial bacterem ias. patients develop ing bac- teremia while undergoing in -ce ntre hemodialysis were observed over a 23 month period. Thirty -six ep isodes of bacteremia occurred in 30 patients: every episode was dircclly a t tributab le to hemodia l ys i s. In 28 of the 36 episodes (78%). there was evidence ofinn ammation with or without drainage of pus at the hemodialysis access site. Staphy lcx:occus aur eus accou nted for 76% of the I NFECTION IS NOW THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF MOR- bidity and th e seco nd lead in g cause of death in pa ti ents under going hemodial ys i s. with vascular access the principal so urce of th ese inf ec ti ons (1.2). As part of a hospital-wide program of mon - itoring blood c ulture i solates for nosocomial bac- teremias. the a uthors have been prospectively following patients acquiring bacteremia as a res ult of in-centre hemodial ys is. The res ults of two yea rs of s u ch s u rveill ance are presented . and eviden ce provided that hemodialysis throu gh a per- cutaneous central venous access cath ete r grea tl y adds to the ri sk of dialysis-related b acteremia. Uni versity of Al berta Hospitals. Edmonton. Alberta Correspondence and reprints: Dr CD Taylor. 2£3. 1 1 WMC. University of Alberta Hospitals. Edmonton. Alberta T6G 287 Received for publication January 25. 1990. Accepted April 3. 1990 CAN J INFECT DIS VOL 1 No 1 MAY 1990 bacterem ic iso lates. Patients hemodialyzing through ce ntral ve n ous catheters had a far higher incid ence of bacteremia (0.0 I per dial ys is run) than patients hemo- dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can J Infect Dis 1990;1(1):11-14 Key Words: Bacteremia. Ilemod ialys is . Staphyl ococcus au reu s PATIENTS AND METHODS As part of an ongoing inf ection co ntrol su n,e il - la nce proj ec t id en tif yi ng no soco mial bacte r em ia . hemodi al ys is-re lated bacteremic epi so des occur- r-in g within th e in -ce ntre hemodial ys is un it were prospective ly eva lu ated over a 23 month period from August 1, 1 986 lo June 30, 1 988. One of the a uth ors (TK) reviewed a ll positive blood cultures re ported by the h ospita l microbiology l abo ratory. Bacteremic cases were reviewed by a physician (GT) pri or to inclusion. All b acte remi as occurr-in g in patients undergo in g h emod ial ysis in the 16- bed . in-ce ntre h emod ia l ysis unit were docu- mented. Patients undergoi ng dial ys is for acute renal fa ilure in th e intensive care units were nol included. A bacteremia was defined as a bacter-ial in fection of L he bloodstream where one or more blood cu ltures contained pathogenic organisms. If culture yielded a typ i ca l skin com mensal. two 11

Upload: others

Post on 06-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed through

central catheters

GEOFFREY TAYLOR, MD, TERESA KIRKLAND, BSCN, PETER HAMILTON, MBBCH

ABSTRACT: As part of an ongoing prospective survey of nosocomial bacteremias. patients developing bac­teremia while undergoing in-centre hemodialysis were observed over a 23 month period. Thirty-six episodes of bacteremia occurred in 30 patients: every episode was dircclly a ttributable to hemodialysis. In 28 of the 36 episodes (78%). there was evidence ofinnammation with or without drainage of pus at the hemodialysis access site. Staphylcx:occus aureus accounted for 76% of the

INFECTION IS NOW THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF MOR­

bidity and the second leading cause of death in patients undergoing hemodialysis. with vascular access the principal source of these infections (1.2) . As part of a hospita l-wide program of mon­itoring blood culture isolates for nosocomial bac­teremias. the a uthors have been prospectively following patients acquiring bacteremia as a result of in-centre hemodialysis. The results of two years of s uch s u rveillance are presented. and evidence provided that hemodialys is through a per­cutaneous central venous access catheter greatly adds to the risk of d ialysis-related bacteremia.

University of Alberta Hospitals. Edmonton. Alberta Correspondence and reprints: Dr CD Taylor. 2£3. 1 1 WMC.

University of Alberta Hospitals. Edmonton. Alberta T6G 287 Received for publication January 25. 1990. Accepted April

3. 1990

CAN J INFECT DIS VOL 1 No 1 MAY 1990

bacteremic isolates. Patients hemodialyzing through central venous catheters had a far higher incidence of bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo­dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can J Infect Dis 1990;1(1):11-14

Key Words: Bacteremia. Ilemodialys is . Staphylococcus au reus

PATIENTS AND METHODS As part of a n ongoing infection control sun,eil­

lance project identify ing nosocomia l bacteremia . hemodia lysis-related bacteremic episodes occur­r-ing within the in-centre hemodia lysis un it were prospectively evalua ted over a 23 month period from August 1, 1986 lo June 30, 1988. One of the authors (TK) reviewed a ll positive blood cultures reported by the hospital microbiology labora tory. Bacteremic cases were reviewed by a physician (GT) prior to inclusion. All bacteremias occurr-ing in patients undergoing hemodialysis in the 16-bed. in -centre hemodia lysis unit were docu­mented. Patients undergoing dia lysis for acute renal failure in the intensive care units were nol included. A bacteremia was defined as a bacter-ial infection of Lhe bloodstream where one or more blood cultures contained pathogenic organisms. If culture yielded a typical skin commensal. two

11

Page 2: Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can

TAYLOR et Of

blood cultures taken at different sites or at dif­ferent limes positive for the same species of bac­teria were considered to represent bacteremia. One blood culture with a typical skin commensal was documented as a bacteremia if the attending physician diagnosed bacteremia and prescribed a course of antibiotic therapy directed against the bactercmic organism. Organisms considered to be skin commensals were: Corynebacterium species. Bacillus species. viridans group streptococci. micrococcus. coagulase-negative staphylococci or Propionibacterium species. A single positive cu l­ture due to Staphylococcus aureuswas considered significant. The primary organ system caus ing the bacteremia . if present. was noted. and the mode of hemodialysis at the lime of bacteremia was deter­mined (ie. via a vascular access graft or through central venous cannula). Evidence of access s ite infection was determined by direct inspection. In­fection rates were calculated per dialysis run and per dia lysis year (one patient undergoing 156 hemodialysis nms was equivalent to one dialysis year) .

The University of Alberta Hospitals (UAJI) di­alysis centre is a 16-bed unit providing in-centre hemodialysis services to an average of 100 patients , up to 283 runs/week. Patients arc pre­ferentially dialyzed through an arteriovenous fis­tula. Dialysis U1rough a central venous catheter is undertaken if no fistula is in place or if the fis tula is actively infected or clotted. The right subclavian site is preferentially used: insertion is performed in the unit by house staff using the Scldingcr

TABLE 1 Causative organisms in 36 episodes of hemodialysis-re­lated bacteremia

Organism

Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumonlae Enterococcus fecalis Candido species Coagulase-negative staphylococcus

Escherichia coli Total

TABLE 2 Bacteremia by method of dialysis

Dialysis Episodes of method bacteremia Dial sis runs Central 24 2399 venous line Vascular graft 12 23.089 Tolal 36 25.488

Episodes (%)

27 (75%) 3 (8%)

3 (8%)

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

36 (100%)

Episodes of bacteremia per

dial sis run 001 '

0.0005 0.0001

• P=O.CXJI by/ test. Oddsrolio 19.4. 95%confidenceinlervoi9.J to41 .2

12

technique. as described by Schwarzheek et al (3). Prophylactic antibiotics are not administered prior to line insertion. but may be given if a concurrent infection is present elsewhere. eg. fis­tula infection. The line is used exclusively for dialysis and is flushed with 2000 to 3000 units of heparin at the time of insertion and after each dialysis run. Transparent semiocclus ive dressings are applied and changed after each run and when the site is inspected. Povidone-iodine ointment is applied to central line insertion s ites at the lime or dressing change. The catheter is removed when no longer required for hemodialysis or if there is catheter malfunction. thrombosis or evidence of local (pus or erythema) or systemic infection. Routine changing of the subclavian line. e ither by reinsertion or by passing over a guidewire to the same site, is not undertaken.

RESULTS Thirty-six episodes of bacteremia were detected

in 30 patients. No source of infection apart from the dialysis access site was found in any patient: in 28 episodes (78%) there were clinical signs of infection (inflammation with or without drainage of pus) al the access site. Staph aureus was by far lhe most common isolate. accounting for 27 episodes (75%) (Table 1). There was one death in the bacteremia popula tion which was clinically direc tly attributed to infection with KLebsiella pneumoniae (bacteremia mortality rate 2. 7%). Dialysis via a central venous catheter was as­sociated with 24 (67%) of a ll episodes of bac­teremia. despite the fact that only 9% of all dia lysis in the unit is conducted through this type of access. Table 2 calculates bacteremia rate by mode of dialys is and a risk of bacteremia per dia lysis run. The bacteremia rate was 0.22 per patient dialysis year overall (0.08 for vascular graft dialysis patients and 1.56 for central venous catheter patients).

Of the 24 patients developing bacteremia while being dialyzed through a centra l line, the access site was in the subclavian position in 23 and the femoral site in one. Patients were undergoing central line dialysis because: no graft had yet been established (14 patients); a graft was established but not mature (nine patients): and presence of superficial graft site infection (one patient).

There was apparent clustering of infection sug­gestive of epidemic spread in the months of May and June 1988 (Figure 1). with 10 (27%) of the bacteremic episodes occurring during these last two months of the study. However, a case control study of staff members failed to reveal any staff member as having a significant association with dialysis on/off procedures in bacteremic cases.

CAN J INFECT DIS VOL l NO 1 MAY 1990

Page 3: Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can

I I I \

I I \

I

Bacteremia in hemodialysis

Bacteremia - Staph Aureus tzZZZZJ

Bacteremia - Other 1· ..'.·'.·'.·'1

#of Cases 6

5 .. p v v

4 .. v II v v v

v v

~ v 3

..... ,/

..... :,/

M ..... P"

il il

il ..... ..... v il . . ..... v . ..... I v

il il ,/ v v P" il ..... p . v il P" v ,..

..... v ..... v il v v ,/ v v v v v v il ..... v ..... v v v il v il v v v il il il . il il :.... v v il v il il il ..... il il v il / v v v il v . il il il il v II il

2

1

0 AUG

1986 OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC FEB APR JUN

1987 Months

1988

Figure 1) Bacteremias in hemodialysis patienLs (rom August 1986 to .June 1988 at the Urtil'ersity of Alberta Hospitals dialysis centre

Likc,visc. phage typing of the 10 isolat<:>s in this two month period failed to reveal a common iso­late.

DISCUSSION This study is similar to others documenting the

extent of risk of bacteremia in hemodialysis patients (1.4). It is also similar in documenting the type of microorganisms caus ing these infections (1.4-6). Staph aureus accounted for 75% of all of lh<:> bacteremias seen in the 23 months of the study. Fortunately. the mortality rate related to these was quite low - only one death related to infection was seen. This is quite likely related to the close supervision patients undergoing in­centre hemodialysis receive. probably resulting in prompt diagnosis and treatment of infection.

The major finding of this study was documen­tation of the great ly increased risk of uactcrcmia in patients undergoing hemodialysis via a central venous catheter. Since this was not a controlled study. it is possible that other factors associated with these patients are more important than the mode of dialysis itself. It seems unlikely that these

C AN j INFECT D IS V OL 1 No 1 M AY 1990

possible other factors cou ld completely account for this greatly increased risk. It is left to be concluded that central venous access dialysis should be avoided if at all possible. eg. by close following of patients with moderate degrees of renal Impairment and creation of vascular grafts well in advance of possible commencement of hemodia lysis. The vast majority of the central­line-related bacteremias (23 of 24) occurred in patients who either did not have a vascular graft in place or who had a graft not sufficiently mature to be used. Further steps should be taken to reduc<:> the risk of dialysis via central catheters. As the access cannula is left in place for weeks in some cases. it is not difficult to conceptualize the process by which microorganisms might traverse the ·catheter wound' to enter the bloodstream. Other studies have demonstrated that coloniza­tion or skin at the insertion site of central venous catheters is a major source of organisms causing bacteremia (7). Staph aureus carriage on the skin has been demonstrated in 6 to 42% of the hemodialysis patient population (8.9). Staph aureus remained on the skin after skin prepara-

13

Page 4: Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can

TAYLOR et Of

lion a nd has been found to be present in si~­nifica nlly heavier growth in persons with poor hygiene. Elimina ting chronic Staph aureus car­riage. either wilh intern1iltent cycles of ora l rifam­pin and intranasal bacitracin (8) or more reccnlly with intermittent or continuous intra nasal mupirocin (10. L 1). has been s uggested to be use­fu l in rcducin~ the incidence of bacteremia due to this organism.

Body site selected for venous access has been shown to be an imporiant variable. Femora l a c­cess sites should be avoided. The authors avoid femoral access if possible. a nd as a consequence

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors thank the staff of the in-centre hemodialysis unit. University of Alberta llospitals for their coope;·aUon and for allo~ving obser­vation of their patients.

REFERENCES I . Dobkin JF. Miller MH. Steigbi~e l NH. Septicemia in

patients on chronic hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 1978:88:28-33.

2. Degoulet P. Legrain M. Reach I. eta!. Mortality risk factors in patients treated by chronic hemodialysis. Nephron 1982:3 1: I 03- 10.

3. SchwarLheek A. Brittin~er WD. !Ienning GE. Slrauch M. Cannulat ion of subclavian vein for hemodialysis using Scldinger 's technique. Trans Am Soe Artif Intern Organs 1978: 14:27 9.

4. Foissac-Gegoux P. Dumant A. Septic&mics au cours du traitcment par hemodialysc p('riodique. Nouv Presse Med 1974:3:15 1. (Lett)

5. Quarles LD. Rutsky EA. Rostand SG. Staphy lo coccus bacteremia in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1985:6:4 12-9.

6. Meyrier A. Chevet D. Marsac J. Leroux -Rober C'. Sraer J. Scetbon V. Slaphylococcemies chez les rnalades hemocl ialysccs. Nouv Presse Mcd 1973:2:2379-83. .

7. Maki DG. Sources of in fection wi th cent ral venous catheters in an ICU: A prospective study. Program and Abstracts of the 28th lntersciencc Conference

14

saw only one bacteremia in a patient dialyzing throu~h this s ite. Increased frequency of manipula tion of the catheter junction sites - for example , when the catheter is used for the ad­ministration of drugs , Ouids or blood products- is a lso felt to be a risk factor and s hould likewise be avoided (12). Finally. the type of dressing a pplied to the cannula has rcccnlly been shown to be an important factor in increasing the risk or infection. Transparent semiocclusive dressings have been s hown to increase the multiplication of bacteria under the dressing and lead to an increased ris k of catheter infection ( 13) .

on Anlimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Los An~cles . Califomia. October 1988: 157.

8. Yu VL. Goelz A. Wagener ryi. et al. SLaphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on hemodialysis. N Eng! J Med 1986:315:9 1-6.

9. Haplowitz L. Com stook J. Landwehr D. Dalton II. Mayhall C. Prospective study of microbial coloniza­tion of the nose and skin and infection of l he vas­cular access site in hemodialysis patients. J Clin Microbiol 1989 :26:1257-62.

10. Boelaert JR. DcBaere Y. Godard C. Van Landuyt I rw. Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in dialysis by n asal mupirocin. Program and Abstracts of the 29th lnterscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents a:1d Chemotherapy. Houston. Texas. September 1989:315.

I I . Holton D. Nic-o lle LE. Diley D. Bernstein K. Efficacy of mupirocin nasal ointment in eradica t­ing Stapltylococcus aureus in chronic hemodialysis patients. Pro~ram and Abstracts of the 29th Inter­science Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Houston. Texas. September 1989:3 15.

t 2. Maki DG. Sepsis arising from extrinsic contamina­tion of the infusion and measu res for control: In : Philips I. ed. Microbiological llazards of Infusion Therapy. Lancaster : MTP Press. 1977:99- 14 1.

13. Conly J. Grieve I<. Peters B. A prospective ran­domized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J lnfC'cl Dis 1989: 159:3 10-9.

CAN j INFECT DIS VOL l No l MAY 1990

Page 5: Increased risk of bacteremia in patients hemodialyzed ......bacteremia (0.0 I per dialysis run) than patients hemo dialyzing through vascular grafts (0.0005 per dialysis run). Can

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com